Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.03629

Discriminating Lindbladian Dynamics

Robert Salzmann, Ludovico Lami, Martin B. Plenio, Susana F. Huelga

quant-phmath-phSubmitted Oct 2, 2026• Announced Oct 5, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The fundamental task of quantum hypothesis testing, which consists in discriminating quantum objects, has been extensively studied for quantum states and channels. Here, we investigate the fundamental limits of discriminating an arbitrary pair of quantum Markovian dynamics generated by Lindbladians, focusing on the roles of total exposure time and temporal resolution. We allow adaptive choices of evolution durations and arbitrary instantaneous controls between them. We characterise the optimal type-II error exponent (Stein exponent) as the largest instantaneous increase of quantum relative entropy, and give an algebraic criterion for its finiteness in terms of the Lindbladians. Remarkably, an infinite exponent is equivalent to a vanishing type-II error probability at sufficiently large finite total time, for every positive type-I tolerance. While some dynamics admit a finite protocol with zero type-II error, others require increasingly fine temporal control. For the latter, the error vanishes as the minimum allowed evolution duration, or resolution time, tends to zero at fixed sufficiently large total time, but remains bounded away from zero at every fixed positive resolution time. We achieve this using quantum Zeno protocols, establishing temporal resolution as a resource for discrimination. When the null hypothesis is the identity semigroup, an infinite asymptotic error exponent has a stronger consequence: at a fixed finite total exposure time, the type-II error can be made arbitrarily small while keeping the type-I error exactly zero. This is impossible in the corresponding classical setting. Discriminating the identity semigroup from generalised amplitude damping on a qubit provides examples of all three regimes: a finite asymptotic error exponent, zero type-II error attainable at positive resolution time, and vanishing type-II error requiring the resolution time to tend to zero.

Related papers

Quantum Channel Stein Theorem beyond Definite Causal Order

Chengkai Zhu, Xin Wang

Distinguishability is a central concept in information theory and extends naturally to quantum systems. This work shows that, for any two finite-dimensional memoryless quantum channels, parallel, adaptive and general testing strategies achieve the same Stein exponent at every fixed type-I error tolerance $ε\in(0,1)$, namely the regularized channel relative entropy. When this rate is finite, any larger type-II exponent forces the probability of correctly accepting the null hypothesis to decay exponentially. Thus, adaptivity provides no asymptotic advantage. The key step is proving the continuity of the regularized sandwiched Rényi channel divergence at order one. We also derive the exact strong-converse exponent for general testers.

quant-pharXiv:2609.30268•Sep 25, 2026•0 citations

Strong Converse Exponents for a Quantum Channel Discrimination Problem and Quantum-Feedback-Assisted Communication

Cooney, Tom, Milán Mosonyi, Mark M. Wilde

This paper studies the difficulty of discriminating between an arbitrary quantum channel and a “replacer" channel that discards its input and replaces it with a fixed state. The results obtained here generalize those known in the theory of quantum hypothesis testing for binary state discrimination. We show that, in this particular setting, the most general adaptive discrimination strategies provide no asymptotic advantage over non-adaptive tensor-power strategies. This conclusion follows by proving a quantum Stein’s lemma for this channel discrimination setting, showing that a constant bound on the Type I error leads to the Type II error decreasing to zero exponentially quickly at a rate determined by the maximum relative entropy registered between the channels. The strong converse part of the lemma states that any attempt to make the Type II error decay to zero at a rate faster than the channel relative entropy implies that the Type I error necessarily converges to one. We then refine this latter result by identifying the optimal strong converse exponent for this task. As a consequence of these results, we can establish a strong converse theorem for the quantum-feedback-assisted capacity of a channel, sharpening a result due to Bowen. Furthermore, our channel discrimination result demonstrates the asymptotic optimality of a non-adaptive tensor-power strategy in the setting of quantum illumination, as was used in prior work on the topic. The sandwiched Rényi relative entropy is a key tool in our analysis. Finally, by combining our results with recent results of Hayashi and Tomamichel, we find a novel operational interpretation of the mutual information of a quantum channel N as the optimal Type II error exponent when discriminating between a large number of independent instances of N and an arbitrary “worst-case” replacer channel chosen from the set of all replacer channels.

Civil War Book Review•Jan 1, 2014•122 citations

Fundamental limits to quantum channel discrimination

Stefano Pirandola, Riccardo Laurenza, Cosmo Lupo +1 more

Abstract What is the ultimate performance for discriminating two arbitrary quantum channels acting on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space? Here we address this basic question by deriving a general and fundamental lower bound. More precisely, we investigate the symmetric discrimination of two arbitrary qudit channels by means of the most general protocols based on adaptive (feedback-assisted) quantum operations. In this general scenario, we first show how port-based teleportation can be used to simplify these adaptive protocols into a much simpler non-adaptive form, designing a new type of teleportation stretching. Then, we prove that the minimum error probability affecting the channel discrimination cannot beat a bound determined by the Choi matrices of the channels, establishing a general, yet computable formula for quantum hypothesis testing. As a consequence of this bound, we derive ultimate limits and no-go theorems for adaptive quantum illumination and single-photon quantum optical resolution. Finally, we show how the methodology can also be applied to other tasks, such as quantum metrology, quantum communication and secret key generation.

arXiv:1803.02834•npj Quantum Information•Jun 5, 2019•140 citations

Quantum Channel Stein's Lemma with an Exponential Strong Converse

Minbo Gao, Zhengfeng Ji, Chenghua Liu

We establish the quantum channel Stein lemma at every fixed type-I error tolerance in $(0,1)$ and prove an exponential strong converse under arbitrary adaptive strategies. For any finite-dimensional channel pair, the optimal type-II exponent equals the regularized channel relative entropy and is attained by parallel strategies. When this divergence is finite, every strictly larger type-II rate forces the probability of accepting the null hypothesis to decay exponentially, uniformly over strategies and quantum memories. The proof rests on a uniform Stinespring approximation: tensor powers of the null dilation are approximated by tensor powers of the alternative dilation after applying an auxiliary linear map to the environment. The operator-norm error is exponentially small under a squared-norm bound at any rate above the regularized relative entropy. We construct the approximation from a weak testing bound by iterative rate reduction and a fixed-block tensor expansion with an exact residual. It implies right continuity at order one of the regularized sandwiched Rényi channel divergence, which yields the adaptive converse through the channel chain rule. We also obtain a sharp hockey-stick threshold and a subchannel smoothing asymptotic equipartition property for fixed and subexponentially vanishing diamond-norm errors.

quant-pharXiv:2609.27196•Sep 24, 2026•0 citations

Error Exponents of Quantum State Discrimination With Composite Correlated Hypotheses

Kun Fang, Masahito Hayashi

We study the error exponents in quantum hypothesis testing between two sets of quantum states, extending the analysis beyond the independent and identically distributed case to encompass composite correlated hypotheses. In particular, we introduce and compare two natural extensions of the quantum Hoeffding divergence and anti-divergence to sets of quantum states, establishing their equivalence or quantitative relations. In the error exponent regime, we generalize the quantum Hoeffding bound to stable sequences of convex, compact sets of quantum states, demonstrating that the optimal Type-I error exponent, under an exponential constraint on the Type-II error, is precisely characterized by the regularized quantum Hoeffding divergence between the sets. In the strong converse exponent regime, we establish a general lower bound on the exponent in terms of the regularized quantum Hoeffding anti-divergence, and we prove a matching upper bound when the null hypothesis is a singleton, under additional assumptions. The generality of these results enables applications in various contexts, including (i) refining the generalized quantum Stein’s lemma by [Fang, Fawzi & Fawzi, 2024]; (ii) exhibiting counterexamples to the continuity of the regularized Petz R´enyi divergence and Hoeffding divergence; (iii) obtaining error exponents for adversarial channel discrimination and resource detection problems.

arXiv:2508.12901•IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Apr 16, 2026•1 citation

Beyond Hoeffding and Chernoff: Trading conclusiveness for advantages in quantum hypothesis testing

Kaiyuan Ji, Bartosz Regula

The ultimate limits of quantum state discrimination are often thought to be captured by asymptotic bounds that restrict the achievable error probabilities, notably the quantum Chernoff and Hoeffding bounds. Here we study hypothesis testing protocols that are permitted a probability of producing an inconclusive discrimination outcome, and investigate their performance when this probability is suitably constrained. We show that even by allowing an arbitrarily small probability of inconclusiveness, the limits imposed by the quantum Hoeffding and Chernoff bounds can be significantly exceeded. This completely circumvents the conventional trade-offs between error exponents in hypothesis testing while incurring only a vanishingly small overhead over conventional approaches. Such improvements over standard state discrimination are robust and can be obtained even when an exponentially vanishing probability of inconclusive outcomes is demanded. Relaxing the constraints on the inconclusive probability can enable even larger advantages, but this comes at a price. We show a 'strong converse' property of this setting: targeting error exponents beyond those achievable with vanishing inconclusiveness necessarily forces the probability of inconclusive outcomes to converge to one. By exactly quantifying the rate of this convergence, we give a complete characterisation of the trade-offs between error exponents and rates of conclusive outcome probabilities. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive asymptotic picture of how the allowance for inconclusive measurement outcomes reshapes optimal quantum hypothesis testing.

arXiv:2510.07601•Oct 8, 2025•0 citations
The fundamental task of quantum hypothesis testing, which consists in discriminating quantum objects, has been extensively studied for quantum states and channels. Here, we investigate the fundamental limits of discriminating an arbitrary pair of quantum Markovian dynamics generated by Lindbladians, focusing on the roles of total exposure time and temporal resolution. We allow adaptive choices of evolution durations and arbitrary instantaneous controls between them. We characterise the optimal type-II error exponent (Stein exponent) as the largest instantaneous increase of quantum relative entropy, and give an algebraic criterion for its finiteness in terms of the Lindbladians. Remarkably, an infinite exponent is equivalent to a vanishing type-II error probability at sufficiently large finite total time, for every positive type-I tolerance. While some dynamics admit a finite protocol with zero type-II error, others require increasingly fine temporal control. For the latter, the error vanishes as the minimum allowed evolution duration, or resolution time, tends to zero at fixed sufficiently large total time, but remains bounded away from zero at every fixed positive resolution time. We achieve this using quantum Zeno protocols, establishing temporal resolution as a resource for discrimination. When the null hypothesis is the identity semigroup, an infinite asymptotic error exponent has a stronger consequence: at a fixed finite total exposure time, the type-II error can be made arbitrarily small while keeping the type-I error exactly zero. This is impossible in the corresponding classical setting. Discriminating the identity semigroup from generalised amplitude damping on a qubit provides examples of all three regimes: a finite asymptotic error exponent, zero type-II error attainable at positive resolution time, and vanishing type-II error requiring the resolution time to tend to zero.
Distinguishability is a central concept in information theory and extends naturally to quantum systems. This work shows that, for any two finite-dimensional memoryless quantum channels, parallel, adaptive and general testing strategies achieve the same Stein exponent at every fixed type-I error tolerance ε∈(0,1)ε\in(0,1)ε∈(0,1), namely the regularized channel relative entropy. When this rate is finite, any larger type-II exponent forces the probability of correctly accepting the null hypothesis to decay exponentially. Thus, adaptivity provides no asymptotic advantage. The key step is proving the continuity of the regularized sandwiched Rényi channel divergence at order one. We also derive the exact strong-converse exponent for general testers.
This paper studies the difficulty of discriminating between an arbitrary quantum channel and a “replacer" channel that discards its input and replaces it with a fixed state. The results obtained here generalize those known in the theory of quantum hypothesis testing for binary state discrimination. We show that, in this particular setting, the most general adaptive discrimination strategies provide no asymptotic advantage over non-adaptive tensor-power strategies. This conclusion follows by proving a quantum Stein’s lemma for this channel discrimination setting, showing that a constant bound on the Type I error leads to the Type II error decreasing to zero exponentially quickly at a rate determined by the maximum relative entropy registered between the channels. The strong converse part of the lemma states that any attempt to make the Type II error decay to zero at a rate faster than the channel relative entropy implies that the Type I error necessarily converges to one. We then refine this latter result by identifying the optimal strong converse exponent for this task. As a consequence of these results, we can establish a strong converse theorem for the quantum-feedback-assisted capacity of a channel, sharpening a result due to Bowen. Furthermore, our channel discrimination result demonstrates the asymptotic optimality of a non-adaptive tensor-power strategy in the setting of quantum illumination, as was used in prior work on the topic. The sandwiched Rényi relative entropy is a key tool in our analysis. Finally, by combining our results with recent results of Hayashi and Tomamichel, we find a novel operational interpretation of the mutual information of a quantum channel N as the optimal Type II error exponent when discriminating between a large number of independent instances of N and an arbitrary “worst-case” replacer channel chosen from the set of all replacer channels.
Abstract What is the ultimate performance for discriminating two arbitrary quantum channels acting on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space? Here we address this basic question by deriving a general and fundamental lower bound. More precisely, we investigate the symmetric discrimination of two arbitrary qudit channels by means of the most general protocols based on adaptive (feedback-assisted) quantum operations. In this general scenario, we first show how port-based teleportation can be used to simplify these adaptive protocols into a much simpler non-adaptive form, designing a new type of teleportation stretching. Then, we prove that the minimum error probability affecting the channel discrimination cannot beat a bound determined by the Choi matrices of the channels, establishing a general, yet computable formula for quantum hypothesis testing. As a consequence of this bound, we derive ultimate limits and no-go theorems for adaptive quantum illumination and single-photon quantum optical resolution. Finally, we show how the methodology can also be applied to other tasks, such as quantum metrology, quantum communication and secret key generation.
We establish the quantum channel Stein lemma at every fixed type-I error tolerance in (0,1)(0,1)(0,1) and prove an exponential strong converse under arbitrary adaptive strategies. For any finite-dimensional channel pair, the optimal type-II exponent equals the regularized channel relative entropy and is attained by parallel strategies. When this divergence is finite, every strictly larger type-II rate forces the probability of accepting the null hypothesis to decay exponentially, uniformly over strategies and quantum memories. The proof rests on a uniform Stinespring approximation: tensor powers of the null dilation are approximated by tensor powers of the alternative dilation after applying an auxiliary linear map to the environment. The operator-norm error is exponentially small under a squared-norm bound at any rate above the regularized relative entropy. We construct the approximation from a weak testing bound by iterative rate reduction and a fixed-block tensor expansion with an exact residual. It implies right continuity at order one of the regularized sandwiched Rényi channel divergence, which yields the adaptive converse through the channel chain rule. We also obtain a sharp hockey-stick threshold and a subchannel smoothing asymptotic equipartition property for fixed and subexponentially vanishing diamond-norm errors.
We study the error exponents in quantum hypothesis testing between two sets of quantum states, extending the analysis beyond the independent and identically distributed case to encompass composite correlated hypotheses. In particular, we introduce and compare two natural extensions of the quantum Hoeffding divergence and anti-divergence to sets of quantum states, establishing their equivalence or quantitative relations. In the error exponent regime, we generalize the quantum Hoeffding bound to stable sequences of convex, compact sets of quantum states, demonstrating that the optimal Type-I error exponent, under an exponential constraint on the Type-II error, is precisely characterized by the regularized quantum Hoeffding divergence between the sets. In the strong converse exponent regime, we establish a general lower bound on the exponent in terms of the regularized quantum Hoeffding anti-divergence, and we prove a matching upper bound when the null hypothesis is a singleton, under additional assumptions. The generality of these results enables applications in various contexts, including (i) refining the generalized quantum Stein’s lemma by [Fang, Fawzi & Fawzi, 2024]; (ii) exhibiting counterexamples to the continuity of the regularized Petz R´enyi divergence and Hoeffding divergence; (iii) obtaining error exponents for adversarial channel discrimination and resource detection problems.
The ultimate limits of quantum state discrimination are often thought to be captured by asymptotic bounds that restrict the achievable error probabilities, notably the quantum Chernoff and Hoeffding bounds. Here we study hypothesis testing protocols that are permitted a probability of producing an inconclusive discrimination outcome, and investigate their performance when this probability is suitably constrained. We show that even by allowing an arbitrarily small probability of inconclusiveness, the limits imposed by the quantum Hoeffding and Chernoff bounds can be significantly exceeded. This completely circumvents the conventional trade-offs between error exponents in hypothesis testing while incurring only a vanishingly small overhead over conventional approaches. Such improvements over standard state discrimination are robust and can be obtained even when an exponentially vanishing probability of inconclusive outcomes is demanded. Relaxing the constraints on the inconclusive probability can enable even larger advantages, but this comes at a price. We show a 'strong converse' property of this setting: targeting error exponents beyond those achievable with vanishing inconclusiveness necessarily forces the probability of inconclusive outcomes to converge to one. By exactly quantifying the rate of this convergence, we give a complete characterisation of the trade-offs between error exponents and rates of conclusive outcome probabilities. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive asymptotic picture of how the allowance for inconclusive measurement outcomes reshapes optimal quantum hypothesis testing.