In classical fine-grained complexity, the 3SUM Conjecture is used to prove a variety of conditional lower bounds on data structure and graph problems via an initial reduction to the SetDisjointness problem. However, there is an $\tilde{O}(n)$-time quantum algorithm for 3SUM and a direct application of Grover's algorithm to SetDisjointness queries beats the state-of-the-art classical conditional bound by Kopelowitz, Pettie, and Porat (SODA 2016); this shows that these classical bounds do not apply in the quantum setting. Thus establishing analogous conditional lower bounds in the quantum setting requires applying the quantum 3SUM Conjecture to a \emph{quantum} fine-grained reduction from 3SUM to SetDisjointness.
We give the first sub-linear time quantum reductions from 3SUM to online SetDisjointness. Via our reduction, the quantum 3SUM conjecture implies a $p + 2q \geqslant 1$ tradeoff bound for quantum SetDisjointness algorithms with $O(N^p)$ preprocessing time and $O(N^q)$ query time. We also give an analogous reduction from 3XOR. These results are derived from a general framework for fine-grained reductions to SetDisjointness which applies to any Abelian 3-Orthogonal Array (3OA) problem with suitable almost-linear hash functions.
In classical fine-grained complexity, the 3SUM Conjecture is used to prove a variety of conditional lower bounds on data structure and graph problems via an initial reduction to the SetDisjointness problem. However, there is an O~(n)-time quantum algorithm for 3SUM and a direct application of Grover's algorithm to SetDisjointness queries beats the state-of-the-art classical conditional bound by Kopelowitz, Pettie, and Porat (SODA 2016); this shows that these classical bounds do not apply in the quantum setting. Thus establishing analogous conditional lower bounds in the quantum setting requires applying the quantum 3SUM Conjecture to a \emph{quantum} fine-grained reduction from 3SUM to SetDisjointness.
We give the first sub-linear time quantum reductions from 3SUM to online SetDisjointness. Via our reduction, the quantum 3SUM conjecture implies a p+2q⩾1 tradeoff bound for quantum SetDisjointness algorithms with O(Np) preprocessing time and O(Nq) query time. We also give an analogous reduction from 3XOR. These results are derived from a general framework for fine-grained reductions to SetDisjointness which applies to any Abelian 3-Orthogonal Array (3OA) problem with suitable almost-linear hash functions.
Many computational problems are subject to a quantum speed-up: one might find that a problem having an O(n^3)-time or O(n^2)-time classic algorithm can be solved by a known O(n^1.5)-time or O(n)-time quantum algorithm. The question naturally arises: how much quantum speed-up is possible? The area of fine-grained complexity allows us to prove optimal lower-bounds on the complexity of various computational problems, based on the conjectured hardness of certain natural, well-studied problems. This theory has recently been extended to the quantum setting, in two independent papers by Buhrman, Patro, and Speelman (arXiv:1911.05686), and by Aaronson, Chia, Lin, Wang, and Zhang (arXiv:1911.01973). In this paper, we further extend the theory of fine-grained complexity to the quantum setting. A fundamental conjecture in the classical setting states that the 3SUM problem cannot be solved by (classical) algorithms in time O(n^{2-a}), for any a>0. We formulate an analogous conjecture, the Quantum-3SUM-Conjecture, which states that there exist no sublinear O(n^{1-b})-time quantum algorithms for the 3SUM problem. Based on the Quantum-3SUM-Conjecture, we show new lower-bounds on the time complexity of quantum algorithms for several computational problems. Most of our lower-bounds are optimal, in that they match known upper-bounds, and hence they imply tight limits on the quantum speedup that is possible for these problems.
Classically, for many computational problems one can conclude time lower bounds conditioned on the hardness of one or more of key problems: k-SAT, 3SUM and APSP. More recently, similar results have been derived in the quantum setting conditioned on the hardness of k-SAT and 3SUM. This is done using fine-grained reductions, where the approach is to (1) select a key problem X that, for some function T, is conjectured to not be solvable by any O(T(n)1−ε) time algorithm for any constant ε>0 (in a fixed model of computation), and (2) reduce X in a fine-grained way to these computational problems, thus giving (mostly) tight conditional time lower bounds for them. Interestingly, for Delta-Matching Triangles and Triangle Collection, classical hardness results have been derived conditioned on hardness of all three mentioned key problems. More precisely, it is proven that an n3−ε time classical algorithm for either of these two graph problems would imply faster classical algorithms for k-SAT, 3SUM and APSP, which makes Delta-Matching Triangles and Triangle Collection worthwhile to study. In this paper, we show that an n1.5−ε time quantum algorithm for either of these two graph problems would imply faster quantum algorithms for k-SAT, 3SUM, and APSP. We first formulate a quantum hardness conjecture for APSP and then present quantum reductions from k-SAT, 3SUM, and APSP to Delta-Matching Triangles and Triangle Collection. Additionally, based on the quantum APSP conjecture, we are also able to prove quantum lower bounds for a matrix problem and many graph problems. The matching upper bounds follow trivially for most of them, except for Delta-Matching Triangles and Triangle Collection for which we present quantum algorithms that require careful use of data structures and Ambainis' variable time search.
The local Hamiltonian (LH) problem is the canonical QMA-complete problem introduced by Kitaev. In this paper, we show its hardness in a very strong sense: we show that the 3-local Hamiltonian problem on n qubits cannot be solved classically in time O(2(1−ε)n) for any ε>0 under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), and cannot be solved quantumly in time O(2(1−ε)n/2) for any ε>0 under the Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (QSETH). These lower bounds give evidence that the currently known classical and quantum algorithms for LH cannot be significantly improved.
Furthermore, we are able to demonstrate fine-grained complexity lower bounds for approximating the quantum partition function (QPF) with an arbitrary constant relative error. Approximating QPF with relative error is known to be equivalent to approximately counting the dimension of the solution subspace of QMA problems. We show the SETH and QSETH hardness to estimate QPF with constant relative error. We then provide a quantum algorithm that runs in O(2n) time for an arbitrary 1/poly(n) relative error, matching our lower bounds and improving the state-of-the-art algorithm by Bravyi, Chowdhury, Gosset, and Wocjan (Nature Physics 2022) in the low-temperature regime.
To prove our fine-grained lower bounds, we introduce the first size-preserving circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction that encodes the computation of a T-time quantum circuit acting on N qubits into a (d+1)-local Hamiltonian acting on N+O(T1/d) qubits. This improves the standard construction based on the unary clock, which uses N+O(T) qubits.
This paper points at a connection between certain (classical) fine-grained reductions and the question: Do quantum algorithms offer an advantage for problems whose (classical) best solution is via dynamic programming? A remarkable recent result of Ambainis et al. [SODA 2019] indicates that the answer is positive for some fundamental problems such as Set-Cover and Travelling Salesman. They design a quantum O^*(1.728^n) time algorithm whereas the dynamic programming O^*(2^n) time algorithms are conjectured to be classically optimal. In this paper, fine-grained reductions are extracted from their algorithms giving the first lower bounds for problems in P that are based on the intriguing Set-Cover Conjecture (SeCoCo) of Cygan et al. [CCC 2010]. In particular, the SeCoCo implies: - a super-linear Omega(n^{1.08}) lower bound for 3-SUM on n integers, - an Omega(n^{k/(c_k)-epsilon}) lower bound for k-SUM on n integers and k-Clique on n-node graphs, for any integer k >= 3, where c_k <= log_2{k}+1.4427. While far from being tight, these lower bounds are significantly stronger than what is known to follow from the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH); the well-known n^{Omega(k)} ETH-based lower bounds for k-Clique and k-SUM are vacuous when k is constant. Going in the opposite direction, this paper observes that some "sequential" problems with previously known fine-grained reductions to a "parallelizable" core also enjoy quantum speedups over their classical dynamic programming solutions. Examples include RNA Folding and Least-Weight Subsequence.
Time and space (memory) are two of the most important measures of cost in computation, even more so for quantum computation. Yet, our tools for proving unconditional quantum tradeoffs between time and space are surprisingly limited.
The first quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds were proven for sorting by Klauck, Špalek and de Wolf. Unfortunately, their method is limited to proving output-oblivious lower bounds (i.e. the lower bounds only apply to algorithms with a non-adaptive output schedule) and other methods have yielded nothing beyond output-oblivious lower bounds for sorting. Here, we prove the first fully general quantum time-space tradeoff lower bound for sorting.
We do so by introducing a novel method based on the noise operator to add to the analysis toolkit for proving quantum query and time-space tradeoff lower bounds. By combining our resulting quantum noise stability bound with quantum recording query methods, we prove an Ω(n4/3(loglogn)/(S1/3logn)) lower bound on the number of queries that a fully general quantum algorithm with at most S qubits of memory requires to sort n numbers from [n2]. Applying our noise operator argument involves purely classical reasoning, which makes it particularly simple to use.
We also use it to prove that, for any strongly universal (pairwise independent) hash function family H from n bits to m bits, almost all hash functions in H require any algorithm with at most S qubits of memory to make Ω(nm/S) quantum queries to input x in order to compute h(x), even with very small success probability. Previously, Mansour, Nisan, and Tiwari had shown a matching classical lower bound for computing h(x) with both h and x as inputs using their hash mixing lemma. Our noise operator method allows us to use a related property of hash functions to prove our quantum lower bounds.
The classical 3SUM conjecture states that the class of 3SUM-hard problems does not admit a truly subquadratic O(n2−δ)-time algorithm, where δ>0, in classical computing. The geometric 3SUM-hard problems have widely been studied in computational geometry and recently, these problems have been examined under the quantum computing model. For example, Ambainis and Larka [TQC'20] designed a quantum algorithm that can solve many geometric 3SUM-hard problems in O(n1+o(1))-time, whereas Buhrman [ITCS'22] investigated lower bounds under quantum 3SUM conjecture that claims there does not exist any sublinear O(n1−δ)-time quantum algorithm for the 3SUM problem. The main idea of Ambainis and Larka is to formulate a 3SUM-hard problem as a search problem, where one needs to find a point with a certain property over a set of regions determined by a line arrangement in the plane. The quantum speed-up then comes from the application of the well-known quantum search technique called Grover search over all regions. This paper further generalizes the technique of Ambainis and Larka for some 3SUM-hard problems when a solution may not necessarily correspond to a single point or the search regions do not immediately correspond to the subdivision determined by a line arrangement. Given a set of n points and a positive number q, we design O(n1+o(1))-time quantum algorithms to determine whether there exists a triangle among these points with an area at most q or a unit disk that contains at least q points. We also give an O(n1+o(1))-time quantum algorithm to determine whether a given set of intervals can be translated so that it becomes contained in another set of given intervals and discuss further generalizations.