Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.38775

Experimentally Testable Quantum Advantage in Shallow Circuits

Kishor Bharti, Adán Cabello

quant-phcs.CCSubmitted Sep 30, 2026• Announced Oct 1, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Experimental tests of shallow-circuit quantum advantage require explicit classical bounds at finite circuit sizes. We refine the finite-size classical soundness bound of Aasnaess's graph-distributed construction to depend linearly on the number of players. Combined with standard disjoint-player repetition, this gives a two-round test on a single processor for any finite nonlocal game with a finite-dimensional perfect quantum strategy and classical winning probability $γ<1$, with arbitrarily small classical success. The method is based on playing $m$ copies with disjoint players and teleporting each player's register to a uniformly random one of $N$ sites before the questions are revealed. Each answer bit of a depth-$D$, fan-in-$K$ classical response with fixed wiring depends on at most $K^D$ question wires, making cross-player dependencies unlikely when $N$ is large. The quantum implementation has constant depth per round and wins with certainty. A classical device wins with probability at most $γ^m+O(mK^D/N)$, which vanishes as $O(\log N/N)$ for $m=\lceil\log_{1/γ}N\rceil$ at fixed $D$ and $K$. We present an explicit proposal for an experimentally testable quantum advantage with 99 qubits.

Comments
31 pages, 2 figures

Related papers

Worst-case depth hierarchy for shallow quantum circuits

Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Michael de Oliveira, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian +1 more

Circuit depth is a central resource in complexity theory. While bounded-depth classical circuits admit well-understood hierarchy theorems, the internal structure of constant-depth quantum computation remains comparatively unexplored. We prove an explicit depth hierarchy theorem for $\mathsf{QNC}^0$. For each $d\ge 12$, we construct a family of two-round interactive problems on which no depth-$(d-1)$ quantum circuit can achieve near-perfect success, regardless of gate set, circuit size, or ancillary qubits. In contrast, we prove that our construction admits realizations by simple bounded fan-in quantum circuits of depth larger than $d$ by a small constant factor. Moreover, all bounded fan-in classical circuits of sublogarithmic depth (in the input size) fail to achieve perfect success on these tasks for every $d$, yielding a hierarchy of problems that show unconditional quantum advantage of $\mathsf{QNC}^0$ over $\mathsf{NC}^0$. A key obstacle is the scarcity of lower bound techniques for quantum circuits. To address this, we develop methods to analyze how depth affects a circuit's ability to realize nonlocal correlations amongst its output qubits in a fine-grained manner. Our approach exploits the correspondence between constraint systems and nonlocal games, translating group-theoretic constructions into rigid operator-valued constraint systems and then into non-local games. In particular, we construct constraint systems whose unique faithful operator-valued solutions require every perfect strategy, and every near-perfect strategy to a fixed precision, to implement multi-controlled phase operations. This reduces to a nonlocal unitary-synthesis problem, yielding depth lower bounds for both shallow quantum and classical circuits. These results show that increasing depth strictly increases computational power within $\mathsf{QNC}^0$, establishing a genuinely quantum hierarchy.

quant-pharXiv:2606.16425•Jun 16, 2026•0 citations

Unconditional quantum advantage from a two-round CHSH problem in one dimension

Yonghae Lee, Jeonghyeon Shin, Soojoon Lee

We introduce a relation problem constructed from the Clauser--Horne--Shimony--Holt (CHSH) game, which we call the two-round one-dimensional CHSH problem. Its two-round structure ensures that the CHSH questions are supplied only after the relevant Pauli-frame data have been fixed, thereby ruling out a simple classical strategy that solves the corresponding problem perfectly when all inputs are supplied simultaneously. We construct a quantum circuit on $2N$ qubits that uses only adjacent two-qubit gates, has operational depth at most eight, and achieves the optimal quantum success probability of CHSH, which is strictly smaller than one. We prove that, for every fixed $0\leqδ<(\sqrt{2}-1)/4$, any randomized classical circuit with fixed wiring and bounded gate fan-in that achieves an average success probability of at least $(2+\sqrt{2})/4-δ$ requires depth $Ω(\log N)$ after the questions of the second round are supplied. This yields an unconditional separation even though the quantum circuit is restricted to a one-dimensional geometry, whereas the classical circuit has no geometric locality restriction. The result shows that perfect quantum success is not necessary for unconditional quantum advantage with shallow circuits.

quant-pharXiv:2609.21237•Sep 21, 2026•0 citations

Parallel classical simulation of noisy shallow circuits: no quantum advantage in 1D

Robert Koenig, Marco Tomamichel

We consider quantum circuits consisting of $d$ layers of nearest-neighbor two-qubit gates acting on $n$ qubits arranged on a line, where every qubit is independently depolarized with a constant probability before each layer. We describe a randomized parallel algorithm which samples from the output distribution of any such circuit to within total variation error $δ$, with parallel runtime $2^{O(d)}\log\log(n/δ)$ and $n 2^{O(d)}$ elementary real-arithmetic operations. Without noise, the same approach gives an exact sampler with parallel runtime $O(\log n)$. For constant depth, we further show that the input/output behavior of the noisy quantum circuit is reproduced up to a constant error by a randomized $\mathsf{AC}^0$-circuit, that is, a Boolean circuit of polynomial size and constant depth with unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates and NOT gates. Consequently, every relation problem solved by a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit in one dimension is also solved, with essentially the same success probability, by a randomized $\mathsf{AC}^0$-circuit. This rules out, for noisy circuits in one dimension, the unconditional quantum advantage established for noisy shallow circuits in two and three dimensions, where polynomial-size classical circuits over the same gate set require depth $Ω(\log n/\log\log n)$. Our algorithm exploits the fact that depolarizing noise cuts a one-dimensional circuit into independent pieces of logarithmic width, each of which can be sampled exactly in parallel.

quant-pharXiv:2609.39448•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Verifiable quantum advantage in extremely low depth

Alexandru Gheorghiu

We give a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer. The quantum sampler admits two implementations: one uses log-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QNC}^0[\log\log]$ circuits, while the other uses constant-depth quantum circuits with unbounded fan-in gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits. Our construction can be seen as compiling the Learning with Errors (LWE)-based single-round proof of quantumness of Arabadjieva et al. (2025) to very low depth. The price paid for this compilation is the reliance on less standard, though well-motivated, assumptions: in addition to the lattice knowledge assumption used by Arabadjieva et al. (2025), we require a strengthened variant of the adaptive-hardcore-bit property of LWE, for which we provide supporting evidence. Unlike previous low-depth proofs of quantumness, the quantum computation here requires no mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward: it consists only of running a shallow circuit and sampling from its output distribution. This shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.

quant-pharXiv:2609.01448•Sep 2, 2026•0 citations

A colossal advantage: 3D-local noisy shallow quantum circuits defeat unbounded fan-in classical circuits

Libor Caha, Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Robert König

We present a computational problem with the following properties: (i) Every instance can be solved with near-certainty by a constant-depth quantum circuit using only nearest-neighbor gates in 3D even when its implementation is corrupted by noise. (ii) Any constant-depth classical circuit composed of unbounded fan-in AND, OR, as well as NOT gates, i.e., an AC0-circuit, of size smaller than a certain subexponential, fails to solve a uniformly random instance with probability greater than a certain constant. Such an advantage against unbounded fan-in classical circuits was previously only known in the noise-free case or without locality constraints. We overcome these limitations, proposing a quantum advantage demonstration amenable to experimental realizations. Subexponential circuit-complexity lower bounds have traditionally been referred to as exponential. We use the term colossal since our fault-tolerant 3D architecture resembles a certain Roman monument.

arXiv:2312.09209•Dec 14, 2023•1 citation

Unconditional Quantum Advantage for Sampling with Shallow Circuits

Adam Bene Watts, Natalie Parham

Recent work by Bravyi, Gosset, and Koenig showed that there exists a search problem that a constant-depth quantum circuit can solve, but that any constant-depth classical circuit with bounded fan-in cannot. They also pose the question: Can we achieve a similar proof of separation for an input-independent sampling task? In this paper, we show that the answer to this question is yes when the number of random input bits given to the classical circuit is bounded.We introduce a distribution D n over { 0 , 1 } n and construct a constant-depth uniform quantum circuit family { C n } n such that C n samples from a distribution close to D n in total variation distance. For any δ < 1 we also prove, unconditionally, that any classical circuit with bounded fan-in gates that takes as input k n + n δ i.i.d. Bernouli random variables with entropy 1 / k and produces output close to D n in total variation distance has depth Ω ( log ⁡ log ⁡ n ) . This gives an unconditional proof that constant-depth quantum circuits can sample from distributions that can't be reproduced by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits, even up to additive error. We also show a similar separation between constant-depth quantum circuits with advice and classical circuits with bounded fan-in and fan-out, but access to an unbounded number of i.i.d random inputs.The distribution D n and classical circuit lower bounds are inspired by work of Viola, in which he shows a different (but related) distribution cannot be sampled from approximately by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits.

arXiv:2301.00995•Quantum•Aug 12, 2026•2 citations
Experimental tests of shallow-circuit quantum advantage require explicit classical bounds at finite circuit sizes. We refine the finite-size classical soundness bound of Aasnaess's graph-distributed construction to depend linearly on the number of players. Combined with standard disjoint-player repetition, this gives a two-round test on a single processor for any finite nonlocal game with a finite-dimensional perfect quantum strategy and classical winning probability γ<1γ<1γ<1, with arbitrarily small classical success. The method is based on playing mmm copies with disjoint players and teleporting each player's register to a uniformly random one of NNN sites before the questions are revealed. Each answer bit of a depth-DDD, fan-in-KKK classical response with fixed wiring depends on at most KDK^DKD question wires, making cross-player dependencies unlikely when NNN is large. The quantum implementation has constant depth per round and wins with certainty. A classical device wins with probability at most γm+O(mKD/N)γ^m+O(mK^D/N)γm+O(mKD/N), which vanishes as O(log⁡N/N)O(\log N/N)O(logN/N) for m=⌈log⁡1/γN⌉m=\lceil\log_{1/γ}N\rceilm=⌈log1/γ​N⌉ at fixed DDD and KKK. We present an explicit proposal for an experimentally testable quantum advantage with 99 qubits.
Circuit depth is a central resource in complexity theory. While bounded-depth classical circuits admit well-understood hierarchy theorems, the internal structure of constant-depth quantum computation remains comparatively unexplored. We prove an explicit depth hierarchy theorem for QNC0\mathsf{QNC}^0QNC0. For each d≥12d\ge 12d≥12, we construct a family of two-round interactive problems on which no depth-(d−1)(d-1)(d−1) quantum circuit can achieve near-perfect success, regardless of gate set, circuit size, or ancillary qubits. In contrast, we prove that our construction admits realizations by simple bounded fan-in quantum circuits of depth larger than ddd by a small constant factor. Moreover, all bounded fan-in classical circuits of sublogarithmic depth (in the input size) fail to achieve perfect success on these tasks for every ddd, yielding a hierarchy of problems that show unconditional quantum advantage of QNC0\mathsf{QNC}^0QNC0 over NC0\mathsf{NC}^0NC0. A key obstacle is the scarcity of lower bound techniques for quantum circuits. To address this, we develop methods to analyze how depth affects a circuit's ability to realize nonlocal correlations amongst its output qubits in a fine-grained manner. Our approach exploits the correspondence between constraint systems and nonlocal games, translating group-theoretic constructions into rigid operator-valued constraint systems and then into non-local games. In particular, we construct constraint systems whose unique faithful operator-valued solutions require every perfect strategy, and every near-perfect strategy to a fixed precision, to implement multi-controlled phase operations. This reduces to a nonlocal unitary-synthesis problem, yielding depth lower bounds for both shallow quantum and classical circuits. These results show that increasing depth strictly increases computational power within QNC0\mathsf{QNC}^0QNC0, establishing a genuinely quantum hierarchy.
We introduce a relation problem constructed from the Clauser--Horne--Shimony--Holt (CHSH) game, which we call the two-round one-dimensional CHSH problem. Its two-round structure ensures that the CHSH questions are supplied only after the relevant Pauli-frame data have been fixed, thereby ruling out a simple classical strategy that solves the corresponding problem perfectly when all inputs are supplied simultaneously. We construct a quantum circuit on 2N2N2N qubits that uses only adjacent two-qubit gates, has operational depth at most eight, and achieves the optimal quantum success probability of CHSH, which is strictly smaller than one. We prove that, for every fixed 0≤δ<(2−1)/40\leqδ<(\sqrt{2}-1)/40≤δ<(2​−1)/4, any randomized classical circuit with fixed wiring and bounded gate fan-in that achieves an average success probability of at least (2+2)/4−δ(2+\sqrt{2})/4-δ(2+2​)/4−δ requires depth Ω(log⁡N)Ω(\log N)Ω(logN) after the questions of the second round are supplied. This yields an unconditional separation even though the quantum circuit is restricted to a one-dimensional geometry, whereas the classical circuit has no geometric locality restriction. The result shows that perfect quantum success is not necessary for unconditional quantum advantage with shallow circuits.
We consider quantum circuits consisting of ddd layers of nearest-neighbor two-qubit gates acting on nnn qubits arranged on a line, where every qubit is independently depolarized with a constant probability before each layer. We describe a randomized parallel algorithm which samples from the output distribution of any such circuit to within total variation error δδδ, with parallel runtime 2O(d)log⁡log⁡(n/δ)2^{O(d)}\log\log(n/δ)2O(d)loglog(n/δ) and n2O(d)n 2^{O(d)}n2O(d) elementary real-arithmetic operations. Without noise, the same approach gives an exact sampler with parallel runtime O(log⁡n)O(\log n)O(logn). For constant depth, we further show that the input/output behavior of the noisy quantum circuit is reproduced up to a constant error by a randomized AC0\mathsf{AC}^0AC0-circuit, that is, a Boolean circuit of polynomial size and constant depth with unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates and NOT gates. Consequently, every relation problem solved by a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit in one dimension is also solved, with essentially the same success probability, by a randomized AC0\mathsf{AC}^0AC0-circuit. This rules out, for noisy circuits in one dimension, the unconditional quantum advantage established for noisy shallow circuits in two and three dimensions, where polynomial-size classical circuits over the same gate set require depth Ω(log⁡n/log⁡log⁡n)Ω(\log n/\log\log n)Ω(logn/loglogn). Our algorithm exploits the fact that depolarizing noise cuts a one-dimensional circuit into independent pieces of logarithmic width, each of which can be sampled exactly in parallel.
We give a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer. The quantum sampler admits two implementations: one uses log-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates, i.e., QNC0[log⁡log⁡]\mathsf{QNC}^0[\log\log]QNC0[loglog] circuits, while the other uses constant-depth quantum circuits with unbounded fan-in gates, i.e., QAC0\mathsf{QAC}^0QAC0 circuits. Our construction can be seen as compiling the Learning with Errors (LWE)-based single-round proof of quantumness of Arabadjieva et al. (2025) to very low depth. The price paid for this compilation is the reliance on less standard, though well-motivated, assumptions: in addition to the lattice knowledge assumption used by Arabadjieva et al. (2025), we require a strengthened variant of the adaptive-hardcore-bit property of LWE, for which we provide supporting evidence. Unlike previous low-depth proofs of quantumness, the quantum computation here requires no mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward: it consists only of running a shallow circuit and sampling from its output distribution. This shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
We present a computational problem with the following properties: (i) Every instance can be solved with near-certainty by a constant-depth quantum circuit using only nearest-neighbor gates in 3D even when its implementation is corrupted by noise. (ii) Any constant-depth classical circuit composed of unbounded fan-in AND, OR, as well as NOT gates, i.e., an AC0-circuit, of size smaller than a certain subexponential, fails to solve a uniformly random instance with probability greater than a certain constant. Such an advantage against unbounded fan-in classical circuits was previously only known in the noise-free case or without locality constraints. We overcome these limitations, proposing a quantum advantage demonstration amenable to experimental realizations. Subexponential circuit-complexity lower bounds have traditionally been referred to as exponential. We use the term colossal since our fault-tolerant 3D architecture resembles a certain Roman monument.
Recent work by Bravyi, Gosset, and Koenig showed that there exists a search problem that a constant-depth quantum circuit can solve, but that any constant-depth classical circuit with bounded fan-in cannot. They also pose the question: Can we achieve a similar proof of separation for an input-independent sampling task? In this paper, we show that the answer to this question is yes when the number of random input bits given to the classical circuit is bounded.We introduce a distribution D n over { 0 , 1 } n and construct a constant-depth uniform quantum circuit family { C n } n such that C n samples from a distribution close to D n in total variation distance. For any δ < 1 we also prove, unconditionally, that any classical circuit with bounded fan-in gates that takes as input k n + n δ i.i.d. Bernouli random variables with entropy 1 / k and produces output close to D n in total variation distance has depth Ω ( log ⁡ log ⁡ n ) . This gives an unconditional proof that constant-depth quantum circuits can sample from distributions that can't be reproduced by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits, even up to additive error. We also show a similar separation between constant-depth quantum circuits with advice and classical circuits with bounded fan-in and fan-out, but access to an unbounded number of i.i.d random inputs.The distribution D n and classical circuit lower bounds are inspired by work of Viola, in which he shows a different (but related) distribution cannot be sampled from approximately by constant-depth bounded fan-in classical circuits.