Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.36401

From Two-Level Hamiltonians to Quantum Superposition and Measurement: A Traceable Classroom Module

Boris Kiefer

Published Sep 28, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present a traceable instructional module that maps documented learner difficulties in quantum superposition and measurement to explicit learning goals, classroom activities, and assessment evidence. Using the general two-level Hamiltonian as the organizing physics framework, the module implements this mapping through a five-activity classroom sequence and grading rubric targeting four recurrent difficulties: interpreting superposition as physical splitting, confusing a quantum state with its representation or measurement context, mixing theoretical probabilities with finite-sample frequencies, and using inconsistent notation across states, amplitudes, probabilities, and measurement outcomes. The instructional design is organized through a reversible mapping from documented barriers to learning goals, activity responses, and assessment evidence, allowing each assessment item to be traced back to the specific difficulty it is intended to address. The module uses the standard general two-level Hermitian Hamiltonian, represented by a \(2\times2\) matrix, as the physical framework connecting its eigenstates, computational-basis amplitudes, Born probabilities, and sampled outcomes. The contribution is a challenge-targeted instructional design that organizes standard quantum mechanics into a traceable classroom sequence linking documented learner difficulties to learning goals, activities, assessment criteria, and implementation guidance. The mathematical structure uses standard Hamiltonian and measurement conventions, supporting direct incorporation into an undergraduate quantum-mechanics course.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2609.36401

Related papers

A Research-Informed Module on Quantum Superposition for Rapid Classroom Adoption

Boris Kiefer

We present an adoption-ready instructional module for introducing quantum superposition in a two-state system. The package combines a five-activity classroom sequence with grading-ready assessment materials organized around six conceptual barriers documented in the physics education research literature: interpreting superposition as physical splitting, confusing coherent superposition with classical mixture, making basis-change errors, misreading finite-sample fluctuations as changes in the underlying state, using inconsistent notation, and, in an optional extension, reasoning about ordered operations. The main claim is that the bottleneck for introductory quantum instruction is rarely the absence of a usable simulator, but rather the absence of a coherent activity sequence, barrier-targeted prompts, and aligned assessment tools that an instructor can deploy without additional development work. We make the instructional rationale explicit through backward mapping from documented barriers to activity prompts and rubric-based evidence. The resulting module is designed for a single 50-minute class meeting and can be implemented with the included notebook or adapted to comparable two-state quantum simulators.

physics.ed-phCross-listedarXiv:2605.23976•May 14, 2026

Design and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess learners’ understanding of quantum measurement in different two-state contexts: The context matters

Philipp Bitzenbauer, Sergej Faletič, Marisa Michelini +2 more

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection in Investigating and Improving Quantum Education through Research.] The teaching and learning of quantum physics has recently become a topic of increasing interest in physics education research. In particular, the study of two-state systems is gaining importance as a means of teaching quantum physics at various educational levels. Meanwhile, a number of approaches have been developed that are also suitable for high school students. It can be assumed that the different approaches have different degrees of effectiveness in teaching central quantum concepts. However, suitable evaluation instruments to test this are still lacking. Therefore, as a first step, a short questionnaire on quantum measurement, suitable for both research and classroom use, was developed in several steps. First, a questionnaire with open and closed items was created and piloted with a total of N = 120 learners. The responses were evaluated qualitatively using a comprehensive coding manual, which provided insights into learners’ conceptions. These results led to the development of an eight-item questionnaire that could be adapted to different teaching approaches. This questionnaire was subjected to expert review and, finally, successfully tested for its psychometric properties with a sample of N = 201 learners. Overall, our results provide initial empirical evidence that context (i.e., which two-state approach is used) does matter for student learning, but in general, two-state approaches appear to be particularly conducive to learning quantum concepts (specified in this article for quantum measurement) compared to traditional instruction. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical Review Physics Education Research•Oct 29, 2024•14 citations

A double well on-line simulation and activities for active learning of introductory quantum mechanics

Sergej Faletič

Abstract Teaching introductory quantum mechanics is challenging, especially to students who have limited knowledge of mathematics. The challenges and approaches are evidenced in a wide range of literature. Our goal is to develop an active engagement module for introductory quantum mechanics that would cover the most important concepts: indeterminism, incompatibility, the difference between superposition and statistical mixture and the role of measurement. To accomplish this, we developed a free on-line simulation of a double well—a (pseudo) two-state system—which is able to evidence all of the above concepts. Students perform simulated experiments and build their knowledge from their observations. We present the simulation and the proposed experiments to address the above concepts. We provide a description of the activities and their outcomes as tested with high-school students in different settings. Qualitative analysis of learning outcomes offers evidence that between 60% and 100% of students can reach the following conclusions on their own. (i) The particle is only ever detected in one of the possible states. (ii) The outcome of one experiment cannot be predicted, only its probability can be predicted. (iii) For some pairs of quantities, knowing the value of one quantity exactly precludes the possibility of knowing the value of the other quantity exactly. (iv) A statistical mixture (of eigenstates) is not the same as a superposition state. (v) The measurement affects the time evolution of the system. The most difficult conclusion for students to reach is how exactly the measurement affects the system. The success rates presented here lead us to conclude that the simulated experiments can be very useful when designing an active engagement course on the concepts of quantum mechanics. While the development is done in high-school, we believe the results are also relevant for introductory university level, especially for non-physics students.

European Journal of Physics•May 6, 2020•22 citations

Promoting the transition to quantum thinking: development of a secondary school course for addressing knowledge revision, organization, and epistemological challenges

Giacomo Zuccarini, Marisa Michelini

We describe the development of a course of quantum mechanics for secondary school designed to address the challenges related to the revision of classical knowledge, to the building of a well-organized knowledge structure on the discipline, and to the development of a plausible picture of the quantum world. The course is based on a systemic approach to conceptual change, which relies on its analysis in the transition from classical to quantum mechanics, and coordinates cognitive and epistemological aspects. We show how our approach drives the derivation of design principles, how these principles guide the development of the instructional sequence and of its strategies, how their implementation requires the blending of different research perspectives and learning systems. The first challenge is addressed through a path of revision of classical concepts and constructs which leverages prior knowledge according to the dynamics of each notion in theory change. The second by adopting a framework that promotes the construction of a unifying picture of quantum measurement across contexts. The third by designing the course around a modelling process that engages students in epistemic practices of the theoretical physicist, such as generating and/or running thought experiments, and mathematical modelling in a purely theoretical setting. All is aimed to help students accept the quantum description of the world as a plausible product of their own inquiry. This process is assisted by the discussion of the facets of the foundational debate that are triggered by each of the suggested interpretive choices, with the goal to promote an awareness of its cultural significance, of the limits the chosen stance, of the open issues. Data on the cycles of refinement illustrate how a set of activities have been made effective in addressing the challenges at a local level.

arXiv:2301.00239•Dec 31, 2022•2 citations

Teaching quantum mechanics in secondary schools: A qubit-first learning path to Bell's inequalities

Alberto Carlini, Andrea Lanza, Dalida Monti +5 more

Teaching quantum mechanics at the secondary school level remains a major educational challenge. Traditional historical approaches often present the theory as a sequence of disconnected phenomena, requiring extensive prior knowledge of classical physics before students can appreciate the conceptual structure of quantum physics. In this work, we present the design, implementation, and evaluation of a curriculum based on the two state (qubit first) approach, in which the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics are introduced through mathematically accessible two level systems and realized with light polarization. The curriculum integrates theoretical instruction, laboratory activities, a coherent progression grounded in the interactive simulations, and inquiry based learning into a coherent pathway that progresses from quantum states and superposition to entanglement and the experimental violation of Bell's inequalities. A distinctive feature of the project is the experimental realization of the violation of Bell's inequalities obtained in a newly established quantum optics laboratory in an Italian high school, where students performed, for the first time in Italy, an authentic Bell test using polarization-entangled photons. The same educational framework was adopted for in service teacher professional development courses. Learning outcomes were evaluated through mixed methods. Preliminary analysis indicates significant improvements in conceptual understanding, confidence in using mathematical formalism, and appreciation of the relationship between theory, experimentation, and the foundations of quantum mechanics. The proposed curriculum shows that two-state formalism and supported by real laboratory experiences enables secondary-school students to engage more meaningfully with both the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics and their experimental verification.

physics.ed-phCross-listedarXiv:2610.29834•Oct 22, 2026•0 citations

Analyzing the structure of basic quantum knowledge for instruction

Giacomo Zuccarini

In order to support students in the development of expertise in quantum mechanics, we asked which concepts and structures can act as organizing principles of non-relativistic theory. The research question has been addressed in a multi-step process based on the analysis of categorization studies, on a content analysis of a sample of undergraduate textbooks, and on the results of existing research on learning difficulties. The answer consists of seven concept maps, intended as models of the organizing principles of quantum knowledge needed to account for the results of measurement and time evolution. By means of these instruments, it is possible to visualize and explore the different facets of the interplay between the vector structure of the quantum states and the operator structure of the observables, and to highlight the educational significance of the relations between observables. The maps can be used by instructors as a support for helping students build a well-organized knowledge structure and by researchers as a basis for the design of investigations into student understanding. While this framework may be adapted to different approaches and interpretive stances, it provides indications in favor of a spin-first approach over a waves-first one.

arXiv:1908.04231•American Journal of Physics•Apr 21, 2020•6 citations
We present a traceable instructional module that maps documented learner difficulties in quantum superposition and measurement to explicit learning goals, classroom activities, and assessment evidence. Using the general two-level Hamiltonian as the organizing physics framework, the module implements this mapping through a five-activity classroom sequence and grading rubric targeting four recurrent difficulties: interpreting superposition as physical splitting, confusing a quantum state with its representation or measurement context, mixing theoretical probabilities with finite-sample frequencies, and using inconsistent notation across states, amplitudes, probabilities, and measurement outcomes. The instructional design is organized through a reversible mapping from documented barriers to learning goals, activity responses, and assessment evidence, allowing each assessment item to be traced back to the specific difficulty it is intended to address. The module uses the standard general two-level Hermitian Hamiltonian, represented by a (2\times2) matrix, as the physical framework connecting its eigenstates, computational-basis amplitudes, Born probabilities, and sampled outcomes. The contribution is a challenge-targeted instructional design that organizes standard quantum mechanics into a traceable classroom sequence linking documented learner difficulties to learning goals, activities, assessment criteria, and implementation guidance. The mathematical structure uses standard Hamiltonian and measurement conventions, supporting direct incorporation into an undergraduate quantum-mechanics course.
We present an adoption-ready instructional module for introducing quantum superposition in a two-state system. The package combines a five-activity classroom sequence with grading-ready assessment materials organized around six conceptual barriers documented in the physics education research literature: interpreting superposition as physical splitting, confusing coherent superposition with classical mixture, making basis-change errors, misreading finite-sample fluctuations as changes in the underlying state, using inconsistent notation, and, in an optional extension, reasoning about ordered operations. The main claim is that the bottleneck for introductory quantum instruction is rarely the absence of a usable simulator, but rather the absence of a coherent activity sequence, barrier-targeted prompts, and aligned assessment tools that an instructor can deploy without additional development work. We make the instructional rationale explicit through backward mapping from documented barriers to activity prompts and rubric-based evidence. The resulting module is designed for a single 50-minute class meeting and can be implemented with the included notebook or adapted to comparable two-state quantum simulators.
[This paper is part of the Focused Collection in Investigating and Improving Quantum Education through Research.] The teaching and learning of quantum physics has recently become a topic of increasing interest in physics education research. In particular, the study of two-state systems is gaining importance as a means of teaching quantum physics at various educational levels. Meanwhile, a number of approaches have been developed that are also suitable for high school students. It can be assumed that the different approaches have different degrees of effectiveness in teaching central quantum concepts. However, suitable evaluation instruments to test this are still lacking. Therefore, as a first step, a short questionnaire on quantum measurement, suitable for both research and classroom use, was developed in several steps. First, a questionnaire with open and closed items was created and piloted with a total of N = 120 learners. The responses were evaluated qualitatively using a comprehensive coding manual, which provided insights into learners’ conceptions. These results led to the development of an eight-item questionnaire that could be adapted to different teaching approaches. This questionnaire was subjected to expert review and, finally, successfully tested for its psychometric properties with a sample of N = 201 learners. Overall, our results provide initial empirical evidence that context (i.e., which two-state approach is used) does matter for student learning, but in general, two-state approaches appear to be particularly conducive to learning quantum concepts (specified in this article for quantum measurement) compared to traditional instruction. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Abstract Teaching introductory quantum mechanics is challenging, especially to students who have limited knowledge of mathematics. The challenges and approaches are evidenced in a wide range of literature. Our goal is to develop an active engagement module for introductory quantum mechanics that would cover the most important concepts: indeterminism, incompatibility, the difference between superposition and statistical mixture and the role of measurement. To accomplish this, we developed a free on-line simulation of a double well—a (pseudo) two-state system—which is able to evidence all of the above concepts. Students perform simulated experiments and build their knowledge from their observations. We present the simulation and the proposed experiments to address the above concepts. We provide a description of the activities and their outcomes as tested with high-school students in different settings. Qualitative analysis of learning outcomes offers evidence that between 60% and 100% of students can reach the following conclusions on their own. (i) The particle is only ever detected in one of the possible states. (ii) The outcome of one experiment cannot be predicted, only its probability can be predicted. (iii) For some pairs of quantities, knowing the value of one quantity exactly precludes the possibility of knowing the value of the other quantity exactly. (iv) A statistical mixture (of eigenstates) is not the same as a superposition state. (v) The measurement affects the time evolution of the system. The most difficult conclusion for students to reach is how exactly the measurement affects the system. The success rates presented here lead us to conclude that the simulated experiments can be very useful when designing an active engagement course on the concepts of quantum mechanics. While the development is done in high-school, we believe the results are also relevant for introductory university level, especially for non-physics students.
We describe the development of a course of quantum mechanics for secondary school designed to address the challenges related to the revision of classical knowledge, to the building of a well-organized knowledge structure on the discipline, and to the development of a plausible picture of the quantum world. The course is based on a systemic approach to conceptual change, which relies on its analysis in the transition from classical to quantum mechanics, and coordinates cognitive and epistemological aspects. We show how our approach drives the derivation of design principles, how these principles guide the development of the instructional sequence and of its strategies, how their implementation requires the blending of different research perspectives and learning systems. The first challenge is addressed through a path of revision of classical concepts and constructs which leverages prior knowledge according to the dynamics of each notion in theory change. The second by adopting a framework that promotes the construction of a unifying picture of quantum measurement across contexts. The third by designing the course around a modelling process that engages students in epistemic practices of the theoretical physicist, such as generating and/or running thought experiments, and mathematical modelling in a purely theoretical setting. All is aimed to help students accept the quantum description of the world as a plausible product of their own inquiry. This process is assisted by the discussion of the facets of the foundational debate that are triggered by each of the suggested interpretive choices, with the goal to promote an awareness of its cultural significance, of the limits the chosen stance, of the open issues. Data on the cycles of refinement illustrate how a set of activities have been made effective in addressing the challenges at a local level.
Teaching quantum mechanics at the secondary school level remains a major educational challenge. Traditional historical approaches often present the theory as a sequence of disconnected phenomena, requiring extensive prior knowledge of classical physics before students can appreciate the conceptual structure of quantum physics. In this work, we present the design, implementation, and evaluation of a curriculum based on the two state (qubit first) approach, in which the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics are introduced through mathematically accessible two level systems and realized with light polarization. The curriculum integrates theoretical instruction, laboratory activities, a coherent progression grounded in the interactive simulations, and inquiry based learning into a coherent pathway that progresses from quantum states and superposition to entanglement and the experimental violation of Bell's inequalities. A distinctive feature of the project is the experimental realization of the violation of Bell's inequalities obtained in a newly established quantum optics laboratory in an Italian high school, where students performed, for the first time in Italy, an authentic Bell test using polarization-entangled photons. The same educational framework was adopted for in service teacher professional development courses. Learning outcomes were evaluated through mixed methods. Preliminary analysis indicates significant improvements in conceptual understanding, confidence in using mathematical formalism, and appreciation of the relationship between theory, experimentation, and the foundations of quantum mechanics. The proposed curriculum shows that two-state formalism and supported by real laboratory experiences enables secondary-school students to engage more meaningfully with both the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics and their experimental verification.
In order to support students in the development of expertise in quantum mechanics, we asked which concepts and structures can act as organizing principles of non-relativistic theory. The research question has been addressed in a multi-step process based on the analysis of categorization studies, on a content analysis of a sample of undergraduate textbooks, and on the results of existing research on learning difficulties. The answer consists of seven concept maps, intended as models of the organizing principles of quantum knowledge needed to account for the results of measurement and time evolution. By means of these instruments, it is possible to visualize and explore the different facets of the interplay between the vector structure of the quantum states and the operator structure of the observables, and to highlight the educational significance of the relations between observables. The maps can be used by instructors as a support for helping students build a well-organized knowledge structure and by researchers as a basis for the design of investigations into student understanding. While this framework may be adapted to different approaches and interpretive stances, it provides indications in favor of a spin-first approach over a waves-first one.