arXiv:2609.28491
Hybrid Variational Quantum-Classical Framework with Adaptive Weighting and Efficiency Assessment
Dilli Hang Rai
Abstract
Hybrid quantum-classical neural networks have emerged as a promising approach for leveraging quantum computing in machine learning while mitigating current hardware limitations. This paper presents Sim-HVQC, a hybrid Deep Quantum Neural Network that couples an adaptive, parameter-free SimAM weighting module with classical feature extraction to preserve class-discriminative information prior to encoding into a Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC). Previous studies are restricted to binary classification [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. In contrast, the proposed framework is trained and evaluated on various multi-class datasets(MNIST, KMNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and EMNIST). The framework further demonstrates reproducibility, parameter efficiency, and interpretability through multi-seed evaluation, parameter analysis, and latent/quantum feature inspection. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Dilli822/ SimAM-HVQC
AI Summary
The paper examines whether parameter-free attention before classical feature compression improves hybrid variational quantum–classical image classification across multiple multiclass datasets. Its SimAM-HVQC architecture applies the existing SimAM weighting module to images, then uses a fully connected encoder $784\rightarrow256\rightarrow128\rightarrow8$. The eight latent features are mapped to rotation angles using $\theta=\pi\tanh(F)$ and processed by an eight-qubit variational circuit with six strongly entangling layers and 144 trainable quantum parameters. Pauli-$Z$ expectations feed a classical classifier. Experiments use PennyLane’s state-vector simulator on a CPU, with 25 training epochs, a 70:15:15 train–validation–test split, and five random seeds. Reported classification accuracies are $97.57\pm0.05\%$ on MNIST, $87.98\pm0.08\%$ on Fashion-MNIST, $88.20\pm0.61\%$ on KMNIST, and $80.16\pm0.17\%$ on 47-class EMNIST Balanced. Removing SimAM gives respective accuracies of 97.48%, 87.51%, 88.23%, and 78.99%. Additional analyses vary training-data availability and inspect representations using PCA, saliency, occlusion sensitivity, and quantum-measurement responses. A CPU inference benchmark reports 236,258 total parameters and 0.8124 milliseconds per sample over 2,000 samples. The evaluation is restricted to simulated circuits and standard grayscale image benchmarks. The reported ablation isolates attention rather than the contribution of the quantum circuit; no matched fully classical baseline or hardware/noise evaluation is presented. The paper does not provide an explicit limitations discussion.
Error found: The abstract's blanket characterization of previous studies as binary-only conflicts with the paper's own acknowledgment and tabulation of prior multiclass work. The EMNIST data-utilization table reports 83.66–87.55% accuracy, versus 80.16 ± 0.17% in the principal results, without explaining the discrepancy. The reported parameter counts do not establish comparative parameter efficiency because the paper supplies no matched-performance baseline. The conclusion that the quantum component introduces limited computational overhead is unsupported by total simulator latency and parameter counts without an appropriate timing baseline.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- 5 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables