arXiv:2609.27456
Precision and resource scaling of real-time flux distortion compensation for superconducting quantum control
Qi Zhou, Zi-Hao Mei, Peng Duan, Peng Wang, Liang-Liang Guo, Hao-Ran Tao, Wei-Cheng Kong, Hui Yang, Guo-Ping Guo, Zhao-Yun Chen
Abstract
Real-time waveform generation supports dynamic quantum circuits without pre-storing complete waveforms for every execution path. However, long-lived distortions in flux-control lines degrade gate fidelity, requiring compensation to account for the actual pulse history. A frequency-domain inversion and time-domain fitting method is proposed for resource-efficient real-time flux distortion compensation. The method fits the reconstructed compensation impulse response with a compact hybrid infinite impulse response (IIR) and finite impulse response (FIR) filter. Look-ahead parallelization enables this filter to process synthesized waveforms at 1.2GSa/s on a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). Two-qubit cross-entropy benchmarking shows that real-time IIR filtering achieves a median controlled-Z Pauli fidelity close to the software-reference value of 99.57%. Numerical analysis and FPGA synthesis indicate approximately logarithmic growth in hardware resource use with compensation timescale. Extending compensation from microsecond to hundred-microsecond timescales increases look-up table (LUT) and digital signal processing (DSP) resource use by only about 14% and 4%, respectively, while maintaining a relative arithmetic error below $10^{-4}$. This work provides a scalable hardware foundation for high-fidelity flux control in dynamic superconducting quantum circuits.
AI Summary
Long-lived flux-line distortions make compensation depend on pulse history, complicating instruction-driven control with conditional execution. This paper studies real-time inverse filtering after waveform synthesis, including how arithmetic precision and FPGA cost scale with the compensation timescale. The method reconstructs an inverse impulse response through frequency-domain inversion with Gaussian high-frequency weighting, then fits a compact parallel IIR/FIR model. Look-ahead IIR processing and sliding-window FIR convolution produce six samples per 200 MHz clock, sustaining 1.2 GSa/s. Validation combines room-temperature oscilloscope measurements, cryogenic qubit-based step-response measurements, and two-qubit XEB. A fourth-order, 44-bit IIR filter with a 44-tap FIR branch gives a median estimated CZ Pauli fidelity of 99.53%, versus 99.57% for offline double-precision compensation. Cryogenic compensated-response fluctuations are approximately $10^{-4}$. Fixed-point simulations using compensation models from 147 measured flux channels, together with FPGA synthesis, relate precision to timescale coverage for a three-SOS architecture. At 44 bits, channel-averaged peak arithmetic error stays below one 16-bit DAC LSB up to 35 microseconds; the channel-averaged relative-error criterion of $10^{-4}$ permits over 100 microseconds. Extending coverage from approximately 1 to 138 microseconds increases IIR LUT and DSP use by about 14% and 4%, respectively. The analysis assumes linear time-invariant responses; extended-timescale results use radially shifted model poles rather than measurements across those timescales. Gate fidelity does not improve monotonically with filter precision or order, and the benchmarking suggests incoherent errors dominate. Integration with measurement-dependent feedforward remains future work.
Central claim may not hold: The reported relative arithmetic error below 10^-4 is a channel-averaged peak error for step-input tests, not a per-channel guarantee for arbitrary synthesized waveforms. The resource counts and nine-channel capacity estimate cover the IIR engine without budgeting the FIR branch or other controller functions, so they do not establish complete compensation-system capacity. The approximately logarithmic timescale scaling is demonstrated for a fixed-order, synthetically pole-shifted model family, not generally for physical flux responses whose complexity may change with timescale.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- 17 pages, 9 figures