Mixed-precision quantization requires discrete allocation of weight and activation bit-widths, followed by recovery of the selected network. We develop a task-aware quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) surrogate with separate weight and activation profiles, a bit-operation (BOP) cost, and selected structural priors. QUBO provides a network-wide allocation that can be refined through direct validation-based PROTES search. On a compact NAFBlock-based denoiser, the refined route achieves 37.192 dB after LSQ+ at 4.035\% routed-layer BOPs, versus 37.092 dB at 4.101\% for a HAWQ-style baseline. The repeated-search primary experiment shows that LSQ+ largely closes the quality gap between QUBO allocation and expensive direct refinement. An additional restoration architecture retains a larger recovered gain, indicating that refinement's value depends on architecture and recovery. We evaluate quality, achieved cost, routing stability and optimization expense together. Deployment measurements characterize a fake-quantized floating-point implementation; BOP reductions describe analytical allocation savings.
Mixed-precision quantization requires discrete allocation of weight and activation bit-widths, followed by recovery of the selected network. We develop a task-aware quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) surrogate with separate weight and activation profiles, a bit-operation (BOP) cost, and selected structural priors. QUBO provides a network-wide allocation that can be refined through direct validation-based PROTES search. On a compact NAFBlock-based denoiser, the refined route achieves 37.192 dB after LSQ+ at 4.035% routed-layer BOPs, versus 37.092 dB at 4.101% for a HAWQ-style baseline. The repeated-search primary experiment shows that LSQ+ largely closes the quality gap between QUBO allocation and expensive direct refinement. An additional restoration architecture retains a larger recovered gain, indicating that refinement's value depends on architecture and recovery. We evaluate quality, achieved cost, routing stability and optimization expense together. Deployment measurements characterize a fake-quantized floating-point implementation; BOP reductions describe analytical allocation savings.
Mixed-precision quantization (MPQ) aims to assign different bit-widths to different neural network layers, balancing accuracy and efficiency. Prior studies have formulated the MPQ search problem as an integer linear programming (ILP) prob-lem, relying on layer-wise importance indicators derived from quantization-aware training. This work proposes an alternative approach that reformulates the MPQ as a Quadratic Uncon-strained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem, which can be solved effectively using the quantum-inspired annealers. This method leverages learned importance indicators while enabling flexible incorporation of additional constraints via soft penalty terms. Experimental results on the Imagenette dataset demon-strate that our QUBO-based approach achieves quantization policies with comparable performance to the ILP-based method, validating its effectiveness.
The evolution of multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) systems requires the efficient detection algorithms to overcome the exponential computational complexity of optimal maximum likelihood detection. Reformulating MIMO detection as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem enables the use of highly parallel, physics-inspired, hardware-accelerated solvers and non-von Neumann architectures. However, embedding continuous-valued QUBO coefficients into hardware introduces quantization noise due to finite precision, which can severely degrade detection accuracy. This paper presents a rigorous analysis of the performance impact of finite-precision, hardware-accelerated QUBO solvers in MIMO detection. We analytically derive the probability distribution functions of the QUBO matrix entries and introduce novel homogeneous and heterogeneous quantization schemes based on either instantaneous channel state information or its statistical features. We further derive a sufficient condition on the precision required to maintain the optimal solution after quantization. Extensive numerical experiments, across various MIMO system sizes and modulation orders (up to 256-QAM), show that heterogeneous quantization matches the full-precision baseline bit error rate using significantly fewer bits than homogeneous approaches. We provide hardware-aware guidelines for selecting the optimal quantization strategy.
Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO)-based quantum computed tomography (CT) casts reconstruction as a binary quadratic problem for quantum annealing and hybrid quantum--classical solvers. For grayscale CT, however, image encoding is constrained by the binary-variable budget: fixed global bit-plane encodings increase QUBO size and coupling complexity as gray-level precision improves, whereas low-bit encodings introduce quantization error. We propose a QUBO-based grayscale CT reconstruction framework that combines dynamic interval encoding with prior-balanced optimization. Each refinement round encodes active pixels only within local gray-level intervals around the current estimate, and a boundary-hit-guided update rule adaptively switches between search expansion and local refinement. To improve optimization stability, the method balances projection-domain data consistency and an edge-preserving quadratic prior before forming the final QUBO. Sparse-view and limited-angle fan-beam CT experiments show that the proposed method recovers structures and gray-level distributions more faithfully than the evaluated analytic, iterative, variational, and representation-based baselines. Expressivity analysis and ablation studies further indicate that the improvement mainly arises from effective gray-level representation through dynamic local encoding and more stable data-fidelity--prior coupling. Experiments on the D-Wave hybrid binary quadratic model (BQM) solver further demonstrate that the formulation is executable on a hardware-backed hybrid quantum--classical backend.
Heterogeneous HPC workflow scheduling under multiple hard constraints poses a challenging combinatorial optimization problem. Classical exact solvers provide optimal solutions but often face scalability limitations, motivating interest in quantum-inspired Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations as alternative optimization paradigms. This work presents a systematic and reproducible empirical evaluation of QUBO-based scheduling methods against established classical baselines, including MILP, CP-SAT, GA, and HEFT. We evaluate three QUBO variants, single-run simulated annealing, multi-attempt annealing, and a layered QAOA-inspired schedule, together with hybrid enhancement strategies on both ground-truth validation workflows (3–4 tasks) and synthetic scaling instances (5–20 tasks). All solvers are assessed through a unified evaluation pipeline that explicitly tracks feasibility, makespan, and resource utilization under progressive constraint activation and controlled penalty sweeps. Results show that all approaches recover the expected optimal makespan on validation instances, confirming formulation correctness. However, feasibility degradation emerges for specific QUBO variants as constraint interactions intensify, particularly when communication costs are introduced. Penalty sensitivity analysis reveals a sharp feasibility threshold for QUBO-SA, where insufficient penalties consistently fail and moderate-to-strong penalties restore feasibility. Scaling experiments delineate the regimes in which classical solvers and heuristics remain robust across all tested sizes, while QUBO-SA loses feasibility beyond 15 tasks and the QAOA-inspired variant beyond 10 tasks. Overall, the study provides a clear empirical characterization of the reliability boundaries of quantum-inspired QUBO formulations for heterogeneous HPC scheduling and identifies the regimes where classical approaches remain preferable under current formulations and solver capabilities.
Drone-delivery planning combines routing decisions with operational constraints such as payload capacity and limited onboard energy, resulting in combinatorial optimization problems that can become costly to encode directly in binary form. This work investigates a hybrid quantum--classical approach in which candidate drone missions are generated and evaluated classically before constructing a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model for mission selection. Payload- and energy-infeasible missions are removed during preprocessing, while the reduced QUBO is solved using exact enumeration, simulated annealing (SA), and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), with mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) used as a classical reference. Experiments on controlled synthetic delivery instances evaluate solution quality, the effect of preprocessing, and computational scaling. Exact QUBO optimization reproduces the MILP optimum on the evaluated small instances, while SA achieves 100% feasibility with a median optimality gap of 0%. Combined payload-and-energy preprocessing reduces the mean number of QUBO variables by 29.60% and quadratic interactions by 49.20%, while reducing mean SA runtime by 31.26%. In contrast, the evaluated shallow statevector-based QAOA configuration achieves lower feasibility and is restricted to small QUBO instances. These results indicate that, in the considered setting, the main practical benefit of the hybrid architecture comes from classical feasibility preprocessing that reduces the binary search space before QUBO-based optimization.
Heterogeneous HPC workflow scheduling under multiple hard constraints poses a challenging combinatorial optimization problem. Classical exact solvers guarantee optimality but face scalability limits, motivating interest in quantum-inspired Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) as an alternative optimization paradigm. This work presents a systematic empirical evaluation of QUBO-based scheduling methods against classical baselines including MILP, CP-SAT, GA, and HEFT. We evaluate three QUBO variants, single-run simulated annealing, multi-attempt annealing, and a layered QAOA-inspired schedule, with hybrid enhancement strategies on validation workflows (3-4 tasks) and synthetic scaling instances (5-20 tasks). All solvers are assessed through a unified pipeline tracking feasibility, makespan, and resource utilization under progressive constraint activation and controlled penalty sweeps. All approaches recover the expected optimal makespan on validation instances, confirming formulation correctness. However, feasibility degradation emerges for specific QUBO variants as constraint interactions intensify, particularly when communication costs are introduced. Penalty analysis reveals a sharp feasibility threshold for QUBO-SA, where insufficient penalties consistently fail and moderate-to-strong penalties restore feasibility. Scaling experiments show that classical solvers remain robust across all tested sizes, while QUBO-SA loses feasibility beyond 15 tasks and the QAOA-inspired variant beyond 10 tasks. The study provides a clear empirical characterization of the reliability boundaries of quantum-inspired QUBO formulations for HPC scheduling and identifies regimes where classical approaches remain preferable under current solver capabilities.