A channel capacity quantifies the communication capability of a noisy physical process. In contrast to communication channels in the classical world, quantum theory makes this capability contextual. We show that two Pauli two-qubit channels, each with zero private classical capacity, can be used to transmit private information when used together. One is a two-qubit Pauli channel whose environment can reconstruct the receiver output up to matrix transposition; the other is an antidegradable channel. We obtain a similar result when the second channel is the 50% qubit erasure channel. A simple binary code built from rank-three mixtures of Bell states activates private communication. The main ingredient in our construction is a transpose-antidegradable channel that is not antidegradable.
A channel capacity quantifies the communication capability of a noisy physical process. In contrast to communication channels in the classical world, quantum theory makes this capability contextual. We show that two Pauli two-qubit channels, each with zero private classical capacity, can be used to transmit private information when used together. One is a two-qubit Pauli channel whose environment can reconstruct the receiver output up to matrix transposition; the other is an antidegradable channel. We obtain a similar result when the second channel is the 50% qubit erasure channel. A simple binary code built from rank-three mixtures of Bell states activates private communication. The main ingredient in our construction is a transpose-antidegradable channel that is not antidegradable.
Private communication over a noisy quantum channel requires reliable transmission to the receiver and secrecy from the environment. Whether two channels with zero private capacity can jointly enable private communication is a longstanding open problem in quantum information theory. Here we resolve this problem by exhibiting a four-level channel and a qubit erasure channel with half erasure probability, each with zero private capacity, whose joint use achieves more than 0.0001903 private bits per product use. The encoding gives the receiver a linear information gain with at most quadratic environmental leakage, enabling privacy through a fixed joint measurement and classical coding. This superactivation, impossible for independent classical memoryless wiretap channels, shows that a channel's private capacity alone does not determine its value for secure communication. The initial activation example was identified through interactions with large language models, and the result has been formalized in Lean 4.
We construct new polar coding schemes for the transmission of quantum or private classical information over arbitrary quantum channels. In the former case, our coding scheme achieves the symmetric coherent information, and in the latter, the symmetric private information. Both schemes are built from a polar coding construction capable of transmitting classical information over a quantum channel. Appropriately merging two such classical-quantum schemes, one for transmitting amplitude information and the other for transmitting phase, leads to the new private and quantum coding schemes, similar to the construction for Pauli and erasure channels of Renes et al. The encoding is entirely similar to the classical case, and thus efficient. The decoding can also be performed by successive cancellation, as in the classical case, but no efficient successive cancellation scheme is yet known for arbitrary quantum channels. An efficient code construction is unfortunately still unknown. Generally, our two coding schemes require entanglement or secret-key assistance, respectively, but we extend two known conditions under which the needed assistance rate vanishes. Finally, although our results are formulated for qubit channels, we show how the scheme can be extended to multiple qubits. This then demonstrates a near-explicit coding method for realizing one of the most striking phenomena in quantum information theory: the superactivation effect, whereby two quantum channels, which individually have zero quantum capacity can have a nonzero quantum capacity when used together.
Recent examples have shown that zero private capacity need not imply antidegradability and that two channels with zero private capacity can nevertheless transmit private information together. Existing entropic channel orders compare what a receiver and its environment can learn and thereby bound capacities. We connect these orders to the recent constructions through binary estimation, whose minimum mean-square error is governed by measured χ2 divergence. A new integral representation shows how measured χ2 on a qubit extension recovers quantum χ2. It lets us pass from complete measured-χ2 ordering to complete quantum-χ2, relative-entropy, and less-noisy ordering. Zhu and Wang used a signed lift to show that their qutrit channel has zero private capacity. We show that Hermitian-smoothed measured-χ2 ordering characterizes when such lifts exist, even with a quantum reference. Environmental dominance in binary estimation at every blocklength yields a finite-code reliability--secrecy bound. These results explain why complete comparison prevents activation with antidegradable helpers whereas regularized comparison alone does not. Building on that qutrit example, we establish this stability for a range of noisy Werner--Holevo channels, determine sharp private-capacity and antidegradability thresholds, and compute exact complementary capacities in a nondegradable range. By contrast, we extend Pauli half-erasure activation to all 1/2≤p<1 and establish the same range for a new four-level family. Reference-assisted measured-χ2 witnesses show why these activating constructions lack complete comparison.
Quantum information theory establishes the ultimate limits on communication and cryptography in terms of channel capacities for various types of information. The private capacity is particularly important because it quantifies achievable rates of quantum key distribution. We study the power of quantum channels with limited private capacity, focusing on channels that dephase in random bases. These display extensive nonadditivity of private capacity: a channel with 2logd input qubits that has a private capacity less than 2, but when used together with a second channel with zero private capacity, the joint capacity jumps to (1/2)logd. In contrast to earlier work which found nonadditivity vanishing as a fraction of input size or conditional on unproven mathematical assumptions, this provides a natural setting manifesting nonadditivity of privacy of the strongest possible sort.
We have now seen in Chapters 20–22 how Alice can communicate classical or quantum information to Bob, perhaps even with the help of shared entanglement. One might argue that these communication tasks are the most fundamental tasks in quantum Shannon theory, given that they have furthered our understanding of the nature of information transmission over quantum channels. However, when discussing the communication of classical information, we made no stipulation as to whether this classical information should be public, so that any third party might have partial or full access to it, or private, so that no third party has access. This chapter establishes the private classical capacity theorem, which gives the maximum rate at which Alice can communicate classical information privately to Bob without anyone else in the universe knowing what she sent to him. A variation of the information-processing task corresponding to this theorem was one of the earliest studied in quantum information theory, with the Bennett– Brassard-84 quantum key distribution protocol being the first proposed protocol for exploiting quantum mechanics to establish a shared secret key between two parties. The private classical capacity theorem is important for quantum key distribution because it establishes the maximum rate at which two parties can generate a shared secret key. Another equally important, but less obvious utility of private classical communication is in establishing a protocol for quantum communication at the coherent information rate. Section 22.2 demonstrated a somewhat roundabout way of arriving at the conclusion that it is possible to communicate quantum information reliably at the coherent information rate—recall that we “coherified” the entanglement-assisted classical capacity theorem and then exploited the coherent communication identity and catalytic use of entanglement. Establishing achievability of the coherent information rate via private classical coding is another way of arriving at the same result, with the added benefit that the resulting protocol does not require the catalytic use of entanglement. The intuition for quantum communication via privacy arises from the nocloning theorem. Suppose that Alice is able to communicate private classical messages to Bob, so that the channel's environment (Eve) is not able to distinguish which message Alice is transmitting to Bob.
In quantum information theory, in order for two (or more) parties to communicate, there must be a communication channel. The two central quantities that must be considered are quantum channel capacity and the quantum coherent information. The first describes the capability for a given channel to communicate the required quantum information and the latter describes the amount of information that has been successfully transmitted through the corresponding quantum channel. The capacity of a quantum channel is actually a function of the coherent information, and so the basic step for getting the channel capacity is to calculate its coherent information which serves as a lower bound on the capacity. Generally speaking, it is hard to find the capacity of a given quantum channel, this is because of regularization which is to introduce additional process to solve an ill-conditioned problem. Comparing to general quantum channels, the capacity is easily achieved for the two fundamental classes of quantum channels, degradable and antidegradable, in such a way that degradable channels have capacity given exactly by the coherent information and antidegradable channels have zero coherent information. However, this is not true for general quantum channels, by all means that, under certain restrictions, it is possible to find a non-Pauli quantum channel such that its coherent information is zero but its capacity is non-zero.