Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.11901

EFI Pairs Without One-Way Puzzles: Oracle Separations from Communication Complexity

Atul Mantri

quant-phcs.CRSubmitted Sep 10, 2026• Announced Sep 11, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

EFI pairs (Brakerski, Canetti, and Qian, ITCS 2023) and one-way puzzles (Khurana and Tomer, STOC 2024) are the leading candidates for the minimal assumption of quantum cryptography. The first are efficiently preparable quantum states, statistically far yet computationally indistinguishable; the second are classical puzzles, easy to sample and hard to solve. One-way puzzles imply EFI pairs, and whether the converse holds is open. We construct a single classical oracle relative to which one-way puzzles do not exist, even with an unbounded verifier, while an EFI pair survives every distinguisher that queries the oracle classically throughout and holds advice about it, making its one superposition query at the end. The oracle answers every question about the output probabilities of quantum samplers, which removes the puzzles, and hides a Haar-random half-dimensional subspace. To prove security we reduce it to communication complexity. An adversary whose knowledge of the subspace arrives as classical query answers can be simulated inside a two-party protocol against the party holding it, so it does no better than the best classical protocol for Vector-in-Subspace (Klartag and Regev, STOC 2011), whatever the oracle computes. That argument does not cover the superposition query, which we bound instead using tools from random matrix theory. The same attack gives a classical simulation of any quantum party in a classical-message protocol with no entanglement shared in advance, so relative to the oracle there is no proof of quantumness either. Quantum polynomial time therefore offers no advantage on any task with classical inputs and outputs, while the two quantum states stay indistinguishable. We state conjectures on removing the restriction on superposition queries.

Related papers

Quantum Cryptography and Hardness of Non-Collapsing Measurements

Tomoyuki Morimae, Shirakawa, Yuki, Takashi Yamakawa

One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) introduced by Khurana and Tomer [STOC 2024] are a natural quantum analogue of one-way functions (OWFs), and one of the most fundamental primitives in ''Microcrypt'' where OWFs do not exist but quantum cryptography is possible. OWPuzzs are implied by almost all quantum cryptographic primitives, and imply several important applications such as non-interactive commitments and multi-party computations. A significant goal in the field of quantum cryptography is to base OWPuzzs on plausible assumptions that will not imply OWFs. In this paper, we base OWPuzzs on hardness of non-collapsing measurements. To that end, we introduce a new complexity class, $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$, which is a sampling version of the decision class $\mathbf{PDQP}$ introduced in [Aaronson, Bouland, Fitzsimons, and Lee, ITCS 2016]. We show that if $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$ is hard on average for quantum polynomial time, then OWPuzzs exist. $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$ is the class of sampling problems that can be solved by a classical polynomial-time algorithm that can make a single query to a non-collapsing measurement oracle, which is a ''magical'' oracle that can sample measurement results on quantum states without collapsing the states. Such non-collapsing measurements are highly unphysical operations that should be hard to realize in quantum polynomial-time. We also study upperbounds of the hardness of $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$. We introduce a new primitive, distributional collision-resistant puzzles (dCRPuzzs), which are a natural quantum analogue of distributional collision-resistant hashing [Dubrov and Ishai, STOC 2006]. We show that dCRPuzzs imply average-case hardness of $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$ (and therefore OWPuzzs as well). We also show that two-message honest-statistically-hiding commitments with classical communication and one-shot signatures [Amos, Georgiou, Kiayias, Zhandry, STOC 2020] imply dCRPuzzs.

arXiv:2510.04448•Oct 6, 2025•0 citations

On the Computational Hardness Needed for Quantum Cryptography

Zvika Brakerski, Ran Canetti, Luowen Qian

In the classical model of computation, it is well established that one-way functions (OWF) are minimal for computational cryptography: They are essential for almost any cryptographic application that cannot be realized with respect to computationally unbounded adversaries. In the quantum setting, however, OWFs appear not to be essential (Kretschmer 2021; Ananth et al., Morimae and Yamakawa 2022), and the question of whether such a minimal primitive exists remains open. We consider EFI pairs - efficiently samplable, statistically far but computationally indistinguishable pairs of (mixed) quantum states. Building on the work of Yan (2022), which shows equivalence between EFI pairs and statistical commitment schemes, we show that EFI pairs are necessary for a large class of quantum-cryptographic applications. Specifically, we construct EFI pairs from minimalistic versions of commitments schemes, oblivious transfer, and general secure multiparty computation, as well as from QCZK proofs from essentially any non-trivial language. We also construct quantum computational zero knowledge (QCZK) proofs for all of QIP from any EFI pair. This suggests that, for much of quantum cryptography, EFI pairs play a similar role to that played by OWFs in the classical setting: they are simple to describe, essential, and also serve as a linchpin for demonstrating equivalence between primitives.

arXiv:2209.04101•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Sep 9, 2022•23 citations

Quantum Pessiland

Boyang Chen, Tomoyuki Morimae, Takashi Yamakawa

Pessiland is a world where NP is hard on average but one-way functions (OWFs) do not exist [Impagliazzo 1995]. Because almost all classical cryptographic primitives imply OWFs [Impagliazzo and Luby 1989], there is almost no classical cryptography in Pessiland. On the other hand, quantum cryptography can exist even when OWFs do not [Kretschmer 2021; Morimae and Yamakawa 2022; Ananth, Qian and Yuen 2022]. Is there a quantum analogue of Pessiland where NP is hard on average but even quantum cryptography does not exist? In this paper, we show that such a miserable world, Quantum Pessiland, exists: there is a quantum oracle relative to which $UP\cap coUP$ is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet auxiliary-input EFI pairs do not exist. We also show that there is a classical oracle relative to which $UP\cap coUP$ is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet classically-secure auxiliary-input one-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) do not exist. Almost all quantum cryptographic primitives imply EFI pairs or OWPuzzs, and therefore these results mean that there is almost no quantum cryptography relative to these oracles. We further show that relative to the classical oracle, SampBQP = SampBPP, and therefore there is no sampling-based quantum advantage in Quantum Pessiland. Finally, because our average-case hardness of $UP\cap coUP$ implies $P^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpoly$, our result also implies that a non-relativizing proof technique is necessary to construct OWPuzzs solely from $P^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpoly$, which gives a partial negative answer to the open problem of [Khurana and Tomer 2025].

quant-pharXiv:2608.29493•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

The Breakdown of Classical Minicrypt Equivalences in the Quantum-Computation Classical-Communication Model

Boyang Chen, Yiming Wang, Ziyi Xie

Classically, it is well-known that several fundamental cryptographic primitives, including one-way functions, pseudorandom number generators, commitments, and signatures, characterize the same cryptographic world, which is known as "Minicrypt". In this paper, we investigate to what extent this picture persists in the quantum-computation classical-communication (QCCC) setting, where parties may perform quantum local computation, but communicate through only classical messages. We demonstrate that the classical Minicrypt landscape breaks down in the QCCC model by oracle separations. We construct two oracle worlds where efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles (EV-OWPuzz) exist. By a known equivalence, QCCC one-time signatures also exist in both worlds. In the first, one-way functions do not exist, even if we allow quantum pseudodeterministic evaluation. In the second, QCCC bit commitments do not exist. Thus, the classical Minicrypt reductions from signatures to one-way functions and bit commitments have no fully black-box counterparts in the QCCC setting. Our proofs develop techniques for analyzing the random phase states, including a concentration theorem and an LOCC decoupling theorem. As a separate result, we establish quantum sum-binding for the NOVY protocol, settling the question of its post-quantum security. We also generalize it to a fully black-box construction of a QCCC commitment from EV-OWPuzz with nearly uniform puzzle distribution, complementing our oracle separation results.

quant-pharXiv:2609.33098•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

One-Wayness in Quantum Cryptography

Tomoyuki Morimae, Takashi Yamakawa

The existence of one-way functions is one of the most fundamental assumptions in classical cryptography. In the quantum world, on the other hand, there are evidences that some cryptographic primitives can exist even if one-way functions do not exist. We therefore have the following important open problem in quantum cryptography: What is the most fundamental element in quantum cryptography? In this direction, Brakerski, Canetti, and Qian recently defined a notion called EFI pairs, which are pairs of efficiently generatable states that are statistically distinguishable but computationally indistinguishable, and showed its equivalence with some cryptographic primitives including commitments, oblivious transfer, and general multi-party computations. However, their work focuses on decision-type primitives and does not cover search-type primitives like quantum money and digital signatures. In this paper, we study properties of one-way state generators (OWSGs), which are a quantum analogue of one-way functions. We first revisit the definition of OWSGs and generalize it by allowing mixed output states. Then we show the following results. (1) We define a weaker version of OWSGs, weak OWSGs, and show that they are equivalent to OWSGs. (2) Quantum digital signatures are equivalent to OWSGs. (3) Private-key quantum money schemes (with pure money states) imply OWSGs. (4) Quantum pseudo one-time pad schemes imply both OWSGs and EFI pairs. (5) We introduce an incomparable variant of OWSGs, which we call secretly-verifiable and statistically-invertible OWSGs, and show that they are equivalent to EFI pairs.

arXiv:2210.03394•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Oct 7, 2022•13 citations

How to Build Pseudorandom Unitaries in Microcrypt

Aditya Gulati, Dakshita Khurana, Kabir Tomer

We provide the first evidence relative to a classical oracle that pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can exist without quantum-computable one-way functions. To obtain this result, we first prove that five independent random diagonal phase layers interleaved with Hadamard transforms \[ U=F_5HF_4HF_3HF_2HF_1 \] form a strong PRU with security under adaptive, controlled access to the unitary, its inverse, transpose, and complex conjugate. Our main result is that, when the phase layers are implemented using a classical random oracle O, the construction remains secure against uniform BQP adversaries with coherent access to suitable Boolean completions of classical-input $QMA^{PH}^{O}}$ decision problems. Such an adversary can invert (even quantum-computable) one-way functions and solve efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles defined relative to O. Our result therefore provides classical-oracle evidence that PRUs do not imply quantum-computable one-way functions, in the form of a black-box separation. We substantially strengthen the classical-oracle result of Kretschmer, Qian, and Tal (STOC 2025) by obtaining PRUs secure against these QMA-aided adversaries. Our construction also consists of a simple, efficient circuit that queries a random function, suggesting a route to concrete implementation via the random-oracle heuristic.

quant-pharXiv:2610.03711•Oct 5, 2026•0 citations
EFI pairs (Brakerski, Canetti, and Qian, ITCS 2023) and one-way puzzles (Khurana and Tomer, STOC 2024) are the leading candidates for the minimal assumption of quantum cryptography. The first are efficiently preparable quantum states, statistically far yet computationally indistinguishable; the second are classical puzzles, easy to sample and hard to solve. One-way puzzles imply EFI pairs, and whether the converse holds is open.
We construct a single classical oracle relative to which one-way puzzles do not exist, even with an unbounded verifier, while an EFI pair survives every distinguisher that queries the oracle classically throughout and holds advice about it, making its one superposition query at the end. The oracle answers every question about the output probabilities of quantum samplers, which removes the puzzles, and hides a Haar-random half-dimensional subspace.
To prove security we reduce it to communication complexity. An adversary whose knowledge of the subspace arrives as classical query answers can be simulated inside a two-party protocol against the party holding it, so it does no better than the best classical protocol for Vector-in-Subspace (Klartag and Regev, STOC 2011), whatever the oracle computes. That argument does not cover the superposition query, which we bound instead using tools from random matrix theory.
The same attack gives a classical simulation of any quantum party in a classical-message protocol with no entanglement shared in advance, so relative to the oracle there is no proof of quantumness either. Quantum polynomial time therefore offers no advantage on any task with classical inputs and outputs, while the two quantum states stay indistinguishable. We state conjectures on removing the restriction on superposition queries.
One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) introduced by Khurana and Tomer [STOC 2024] are a natural quantum analogue of one-way functions (OWFs), and one of the most fundamental primitives in ''Microcrypt'' where OWFs do not exist but quantum cryptography is possible. OWPuzzs are implied by almost all quantum cryptographic primitives, and imply several important applications such as non-interactive commitments and multi-party computations. A significant goal in the field of quantum cryptography is to base OWPuzzs on plausible assumptions that will not imply OWFs. In this paper, we base OWPuzzs on hardness of non-collapsing measurements. To that end, we introduce a new complexity class, SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP, which is a sampling version of the decision class PDQP\mathbf{PDQP}PDQP introduced in [Aaronson, Bouland, Fitzsimons, and Lee, ITCS 2016]. We show that if SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP is hard on average for quantum polynomial time, then OWPuzzs exist. SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP is the class of sampling problems that can be solved by a classical polynomial-time algorithm that can make a single query to a non-collapsing measurement oracle, which is a ''magical'' oracle that can sample measurement results on quantum states without collapsing the states. Such non-collapsing measurements are highly unphysical operations that should be hard to realize in quantum polynomial-time. We also study upperbounds of the hardness of SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP. We introduce a new primitive, distributional collision-resistant puzzles (dCRPuzzs), which are a natural quantum analogue of distributional collision-resistant hashing [Dubrov and Ishai, STOC 2006]. We show that dCRPuzzs imply average-case hardness of SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP (and therefore OWPuzzs as well). We also show that two-message honest-statistically-hiding commitments with classical communication and one-shot signatures [Amos, Georgiou, Kiayias, Zhandry, STOC 2020] imply dCRPuzzs.
In the classical model of computation, it is well established that one-way functions (OWF) are minimal for computational cryptography: They are essential for almost any cryptographic application that cannot be realized with respect to computationally unbounded adversaries. In the quantum setting, however, OWFs appear not to be essential (Kretschmer 2021; Ananth et al., Morimae and Yamakawa 2022), and the question of whether such a minimal primitive exists remains open. We consider EFI pairs - efficiently samplable, statistically far but computationally indistinguishable pairs of (mixed) quantum states. Building on the work of Yan (2022), which shows equivalence between EFI pairs and statistical commitment schemes, we show that EFI pairs are necessary for a large class of quantum-cryptographic applications. Specifically, we construct EFI pairs from minimalistic versions of commitments schemes, oblivious transfer, and general secure multiparty computation, as well as from QCZK proofs from essentially any non-trivial language. We also construct quantum computational zero knowledge (QCZK) proofs for all of QIP from any EFI pair. This suggests that, for much of quantum cryptography, EFI pairs play a similar role to that played by OWFs in the classical setting: they are simple to describe, essential, and also serve as a linchpin for demonstrating equivalence between primitives.
Pessiland is a world where NP is hard on average but one-way functions (OWFs) do not exist [Impagliazzo 1995]. Because almost all classical cryptographic primitives imply OWFs [Impagliazzo and Luby 1989], there is almost no classical cryptography in Pessiland. On the other hand, quantum cryptography can exist even when OWFs do not [Kretschmer 2021; Morimae and Yamakawa 2022; Ananth, Qian and Yuen 2022]. Is there a quantum analogue of Pessiland where NP is hard on average but even quantum cryptography does not exist? In this paper, we show that such a miserable world, Quantum Pessiland, exists: there is a quantum oracle relative to which UP∩coUPUP\cap coUPUP∩coUP is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet auxiliary-input EFI pairs do not exist. We also show that there is a classical oracle relative to which UP∩coUPUP\cap coUPUP∩coUP is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet classically-secure auxiliary-input one-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) do not exist. Almost all quantum cryptographic primitives imply EFI pairs or OWPuzzs, and therefore these results mean that there is almost no quantum cryptography relative to these oracles. We further show that relative to the classical oracle, SampBQP = SampBPP, and therefore there is no sampling-based quantum advantage in Quantum Pessiland. Finally, because our average-case hardness of UP∩coUPUP\cap coUPUP∩coUP implies P#P⊈i.o.BQP/qpolyP^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpolyP#P⊆i.o.BQP/qpoly, our result also implies that a non-relativizing proof technique is necessary to construct OWPuzzs solely from P#P⊈i.o.BQP/qpolyP^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpolyP#P⊆i.o.BQP/qpoly, which gives a partial negative answer to the open problem of [Khurana and Tomer 2025].
Classically, it is well-known that several fundamental cryptographic primitives, including one-way functions, pseudorandom number generators, commitments, and signatures, characterize the same cryptographic world, which is known as "Minicrypt". In this paper, we investigate to what extent this picture persists in the quantum-computation classical-communication (QCCC) setting, where parties may perform quantum local computation, but communicate through only classical messages. We demonstrate that the classical Minicrypt landscape breaks down in the QCCC model by oracle separations. We construct two oracle worlds where efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles (EV-OWPuzz) exist. By a known equivalence, QCCC one-time signatures also exist in both worlds. In the first, one-way functions do not exist, even if we allow quantum pseudodeterministic evaluation. In the second, QCCC bit commitments do not exist. Thus, the classical Minicrypt reductions from signatures to one-way functions and bit commitments have no fully black-box counterparts in the QCCC setting. Our proofs develop techniques for analyzing the random phase states, including a concentration theorem and an LOCC decoupling theorem. As a separate result, we establish quantum sum-binding for the NOVY protocol, settling the question of its post-quantum security. We also generalize it to a fully black-box construction of a QCCC commitment from EV-OWPuzz with nearly uniform puzzle distribution, complementing our oracle separation results.
The existence of one-way functions is one of the most fundamental assumptions in classical cryptography. In the quantum world, on the other hand, there are evidences that some cryptographic primitives can exist even if one-way functions do not exist. We therefore have the following important open problem in quantum cryptography: What is the most fundamental element in quantum cryptography? In this direction, Brakerski, Canetti, and Qian recently defined a notion called EFI pairs, which are pairs of efficiently generatable states that are statistically distinguishable but computationally indistinguishable, and showed its equivalence with some cryptographic primitives including commitments, oblivious transfer, and general multi-party computations. However, their work focuses on decision-type primitives and does not cover search-type primitives like quantum money and digital signatures. In this paper, we study properties of one-way state generators (OWSGs), which are a quantum analogue of one-way functions. We first revisit the definition of OWSGs and generalize it by allowing mixed output states. Then we show the following results. (1) We define a weaker version of OWSGs, weak OWSGs, and show that they are equivalent to OWSGs. (2) Quantum digital signatures are equivalent to OWSGs. (3) Private-key quantum money schemes (with pure money states) imply OWSGs. (4) Quantum pseudo one-time pad schemes imply both OWSGs and EFI pairs. (5) We introduce an incomparable variant of OWSGs, which we call secretly-verifiable and statistically-invertible OWSGs, and show that they are equivalent to EFI pairs.
We provide the first evidence relative to a classical oracle that pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can exist without quantum-computable one-way functions. To obtain this result, we first prove that five independent random diagonal phase layers interleaved with Hadamard transforms U=F5HF4HF3HF2HF1 U=F_5HF_4HF_3HF_2HF_1 U=F5​HF4​HF3​HF2​HF1​ form a strong PRU with security under adaptive, controlled access to the unitary, its inverse, transpose, and complex conjugate. Our main result is that, when the phase layers are implemented using a classical random oracle O, the construction remains secure against uniform BQP adversaries with coherent access to suitable Boolean completions of classical-input $QMA^{PH}^{O}}$ decision problems. Such an adversary can invert (even quantum-computable) one-way functions and solve efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles defined relative to O. Our result therefore provides classical-oracle evidence that PRUs do not imply quantum-computable one-way functions, in the form of a black-box separation. We substantially strengthen the classical-oracle result of Kretschmer, Qian, and Tal (STOC 2025) by obtaining PRUs secure against these QMA-aided adversaries. Our construction also consists of a simple, efficient circuit that queries a random function, suggesting a route to concrete implementation via the random-oracle heuristic.