Noise is a major challenge for current quantum computers. It can be broadly categorized into bit-flip and phase-flip errors. These two types do not necessarily affect the executed algorithm, thus also the application, in the same way. We illustrate this general effect for the example of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) applied to a small instance of the flight-gate assignment (FGA) problem. We compare bit-flip and phase-flip Pauli noise under both layer-level and gate-level noise models, using two circuit decompositions of the same ideal QAOA unitary: a CNOT-based decomposition and a native-$R_{ZZ}$ decomposition. In the simulations, bit-flip noise produces the larger degradation in the performance of the quantum optimization. The asymmetry is most visible in the layer-level and native-$R_{ZZ}$ simulations. We explain this by how the errors affect mixing, final measurements, and how they propagate inside the circuit. We then exploit these insights to tackle noise particularly efficiently using asymmetric error-correcting codes. As an illustration, we use the quantum parity code (QPC), a generalization of the 9-qubit Shor code, and show that a smaller asymmetric code can achieve nearly the same improvement as a larger symmetric choice. This demonstrates that error-correction resources should be assigned not only according to physical error rates, but also according to how strongly each error channel affects the application. As a result, asymmetric quantum error correction proves useful even in cases where the noise model is symmetric. Finally, we discuss how information about the noise obtained through calibration can be exploited in our approach.
Noise is a major challenge for current quantum computers. It can be broadly categorized into bit-flip and phase-flip errors. These two types do not necessarily affect the executed algorithm, thus also the application, in the same way. We illustrate this general effect for the example of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) applied to a small instance of the flight-gate assignment (FGA) problem. We compare bit-flip and phase-flip Pauli noise under both layer-level and gate-level noise models, using two circuit decompositions of the same ideal QAOA unitary: a CNOT-based decomposition and a native-RZZ decomposition. In the simulations, bit-flip noise produces the larger degradation in the performance of the quantum optimization. The asymmetry is most visible in the layer-level and native-RZZ simulations. We explain this by how the errors affect mixing, final measurements, and how they propagate inside the circuit. We then exploit these insights to tackle noise particularly efficiently using asymmetric error-correcting codes. As an illustration, we use the quantum parity code (QPC), a generalization of the 9-qubit Shor code, and show that a smaller asymmetric code can achieve nearly the same improvement as a larger symmetric choice. This demonstrates that error-correction resources should be assigned not only according to physical error rates, but also according to how strongly each error channel affects the application. As a result, asymmetric quantum error correction proves useful even in cases where the noise model is symmetric. Finally, we discuss how information about the noise obtained through calibration can be exploited in our approach.
Quantum computing holds immense promise for revolutionizing various fields, but its inherent susceptibility to noise poses a significant challenge to achieving reliable computations. This work investigates the degradation of quantum information due to noise and proposes an optimized approach to error-correcting codes specifically tailored for quantum systems. We establish a precise noise degradation model, incorporating various noise types and their statistical properties, represented as (σi). This model allows for a more realistic simulation of quantum noise compared to traditional approaches. Subsequently, we employ an optimization algorithm, based on the principle of minimizing bit-flip error rates, to design error-correcting codes. The core of our design strategy leverages information theory concepts, particularly channel capacity and mutual information, represented as (Cch, Imn), to determine the optimal code parameters. The optimization process aims to find the most efficient code that can effectively protect quantum information from noise, ultimately enhancing the reliability of quantum computations. The final optimized code is characterized by its encoding rate (R), decoding rate (D), and the minimum distance (dmin) of the code, represented as (R, D, dmin). The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in mitigating noise degradation and improving the performance of quantum error correction.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.
Qubits with strongly biased noise, in which phase-flip errors are orders of magnitude more frequent than bit-flips, arise both naturally, as in electron and nuclear spins, and by engineering, as in stabilized cat qubits. This noise structure holds the promise of reducing the daunting hardware overhead of fault-tolerant quantum computing, but exploiting it requires physical operations that do not convert frequent phase-flips into rare bit-flips. In this review, we analyze the most prominent fault-tolerant protocols for biased-noise qubits, organized according to the available set of such bias-preserving operations. When this set is restricted to the CZ gate together with preparation and measurement in the X basis, we show that the complexity of the required syndrome extraction gadgets essentially cancels the benefit of the noise bias: at experimentally relevant error rates, one may as well ignore the bias and rely on standard error correction designed for depolarizing noise. The situation changes drastically when a bias-preserving CX gate is available: the hierarchy of errors can then be reflected in the structure of the code, with frequent phase-flips corrected by a dedicated high-threshold code and rare bit-flips by concatenation with a high-rate code. The same hierarchy also enables hardware-efficient preparation of magic states. Finally, as a bias-preserving CX is forbidden in naturally biased platforms and challenging in engineered ones, we present a measurement-based architecture in which a high-fidelity quantum non-demolition readout of multi-qubit Pauli Z operators takes its place, extending these overhead reductions to a much broader range of physical platforms.
Fault-tolerant quantum computation requires quantum error correction (QEC), and while the performance of various QEC codes has been well characterized under idealized noise conditions, it has not been sufficiently characterized by simulation under realistic noise conditions.In this paper, the performance of three basic QEC codes (3-qubit Bit-Flip, 3-qubit Phase-Flip and Shor's 9-qubit [[9,1,3]]) under simulated depolarizing noise, by using Qiskit Aer, is analyzed systematically in three stages.Stage 1 is a validation of all three implementations under ideal circumstances.Stage 2 tests for 6 different error rates of 0% to 5%, and runs 2048 shots per error rate.Stage 3 brings the analysis from stage 2 to 0% to 10%, but with an uncorrected baseline for comparison.Results verify that Shor's > Bit-Flip > Phase-Flip is consistent over practically relevant error rates.At 1% noise, within current IBM Quantum hardware range, all three codes achieve a logical fidelity of over 98.7%.An error rate of 7-8% is used to identify a cross-over threshold above which the simpler Bit-Flip code can match Shor's code in fidelity with only one-third the number of qubits.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.