Although the circuit model for quantum computation is well established, it is incapable of representing non-causal higher-order quantum processes such as the quantum switch. If several models of non-causal quantum computation have been considered in the literature, the approaches have so far only been focusing on the physicality of such processes, using matrices and other techniques from linear algebra. If these approaches are expressive, they however only provide a static and monolithic understanding of these processes. In this article, we propose a new formalism for non-causal, higher-order quantum processes. Based on a Curry-Howard interpetation, our proposal offers a computational interpretation that is both compositional and modular. In particular, we present Intuitionistic Unitary Linear Logic (IULL), a logic based on linear logic focusing on conservation of unitarity for higher order terms. We prove the coherence of IULLL, its completeness with regard to unitaries, and the admissibility of its cut rules. We finally discuss the validity of our approach by revisiting known non-causal quantum processes with IULL.
Although the circuit model for quantum computation is well established, it is incapable of representing non-causal higher-order quantum processes such as the quantum switch. If several models of non-causal quantum computation have been considered in the literature, the approaches have so far only been focusing on the physicality of such processes, using matrices and other techniques from linear algebra. If these approaches are expressive, they however only provide a static and monolithic understanding of these processes. In this article, we propose a new formalism for non-causal, higher-order quantum processes. Based on a Curry-Howard interpetation, our proposal offers a computational interpretation that is both compositional and modular. In particular, we present Intuitionistic Unitary Linear Logic (IULL), a logic based on linear logic focusing on conservation of unitarity for higher order terms. We prove the coherence of IULLL, its completeness with regard to unitaries, and the admissibility of its cut rules. We finally discuss the validity of our approach by revisiting known non-causal quantum processes with IULL.
Indefinite causal order is a characteristic phenomenon in quantum computation, with examples including the quantum SWITCH and the OCB process. Not all such processes are believed to be physically realizable: while some implementations of the quantum SWITCH have been proposed, the OCB process is suspected to be unrealizable. This difference in realizability is commonly attributed to constraints imposed by physical causality.
This paper studies such a causality issue in a higher-order setting, proposing a typed lambda calculus with quantum control and its categorical semantics. Our calculus extends pure quantum computation with higher-order functions and quantum conditional branching, and it is equipped with a type system based on intuitionistic BV logic to enforce causality. We also present a novel model that is closely related to the Caus construction, by which we prove that some physically-unrealizable processes are not definable in our language.
Processes with indefinite causal orders (ICOs), such as the quantum switch, are higher-order quantum processes that superpose the order in which quantum operations are performed. Such coherent control yields computational advantages but is not faithfully captured by existing quantum programming languages: either they are restricted to the unitary case, and thus cannot combine ICOs with measurement, or they treat coherent control nonlinearly. In both cases, they do not realize the full computational power of ICOs. We introduce a higher-order quantum functional language that supports general quantum computation, not merely the permutation of channels, and whose linear type system allows quantum control to be well-defined beyond the unitary case, on arbitrary quantum channels. We equip this language with a small-step operational semantics that synchronizes measurement outcomes across superposed branches, using device references and a memory function. We also give a denotational semantics by means of completely positive maps. With linearity as the only constraint, some well-typed terms would denote unphysical maps. We therefore impose a typing discipline that goes beyond linearity, and interpret programs in the causal category Caus[CPM], under which every well-typed program is physically meaningful, a property that can be checked statically and efficiently. We prove soundness, and study the language's expressive power: it can express every quantum channel at first order, and at second order a large subclass of the so-called quantum circuits with quantum control (QC-QCs), containing the quantum switch. Last but not least, we show that this language is well-designed enough to be extended to the nonlinear setting with recursion.
Quantum processes with indefinite causal structure emerge when we wonder which are the most general evolutions, allowed by quantum theory, of a set of local systems which are not assumed to be in any particular causal order. These processes can be described within the framework of higher−order quantum theory which, starting from considering maps from quantum transformations to quantum transformations, recursively constructs a hierarchy of quantum maps of increasingly higher order. In this work, we develop a formalism for quantum computation with indefinite causal structures; namely, we characterize the computational structure of higher order quantum maps. Taking an axiomatic approach, the rules of this computation are identified as the most general compositions of higher order maps which are compatible with the mathematical structure of quantum theory. We provide a mathematical characterization of the admissible composition for arbitrary higher order quantum maps. We prove that these rules, which have a computational and information-theoretic nature, are determined by the more physical notion of the signalling relations between the quantum systems of the higher order quantum maps.
We discuss the design of a typed lambda calculus for quantum computation. After a brief discussion of the role of higher-order functions in quantum information theory, we define the quantum lambda calculus and its operational semantics. Safety invariants, such as the no-cloning property, are enforced by a static type system that is based on intuitionistic linear logic. We also describe a type inference algorithm and a categorical semantics. 4.1 Introduction The lambda calculus, developed in the 1930s by Church and Curry, is a formalism for expressing higher-order functions. In a nutshell, a higher-order function is a function that inputs or outputs a “black box,” which is itself a (possibly higher-order) function. Higher-order functions are a computationally powerful tool. Indeed, the pure untyped lambda calculus has the same computational power as Turing machines (Turing 1937). At the same time, higher-order functions are a useful abstraction for programmers. They form the basis of functional programming languages such as LISP (McCarthy 1960), Scheme (Sussman and Steele 1975), ML (Milner 1978), and Haskell (Hudak et al. 2007). In this chapter, we discuss how to combine higher-order functions with quantum computation. We believe that this is an interesting question for a number of reasons. First, the combination of higher-order functions with quantum phenomena raises the prospect of entangled functions . Certain well-known quantum phenomena can be naturally described in terms of entangled functions, and we give some examples of this in Section 4.2.
We show that the category OS of operator spaces, with complete contractions as morphisms, is locally countably presentable and a model of Intuitionistic Linear Logic in the sense of Lafont. We then describe a model of Classical Linear Logic, based on OS, whose duality is compatible with the Heisenberg-Schrödinger duality of quantum theory. We also show that OS provides a good setting for studying pure state and mixed state quantum information, the interaction between the two, and even higher-order quantum maps such as the quantum switch.
When transforming pairs of independent quantum operations according to the fundamental rules of quantum theory, an intriguing phenomenon emerges: some such higher-order operations may act on the input operations in an indefinite causal order. Recently, the formalism of process matrices has been developed to investigate these noncausal properties of higher-order operations. This formalism predicts, in principle, statistics that ensure indefinite causal order even in a device-independent scenario, where the involved operations are not characterised. Nevertheless, all physical implementations of process matrices proposed so far require full characterisation of the involved operations in order to certify such phenomena. Here we consider a semi-device-independent scenario, which does not require all operations to be characterised. We introduce a framework for certifying noncausal properties of process matrices in this intermediate regime and use it to analyse the quantum switch, a well-known higher-order operation, to show that, although it can only lead to causal statistics in a device-independent scenario, it can exhibit noncausal properties in semi-device-independent scenarios. This proves that the quantum switch generates stronger noncausal correlations than it was previously known.