Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2608.29734

The quantum supremum of the $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality is not attained in finite dimension

Jef Pauwels

quant-phSubmitted Aug 30, 2026• Announced Sep 1, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In 2010, Pál and Vértesi found a family of finite-dimensional strategies for the $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality whose optimized values appeared to converge as the local Hilbert-space dimension grew. They conjectured that this limit is the supremum over all finite-dimensional quantum strategies, but that no finite-dimensional strategy attains it. We prove both claims. The proof uses the symmetry of the Bell functional to associate every strategy with a finite matrix of probabilities, one for each pair of spectral subspaces of Alice and Bob. This matrix gives an upper bound on the Bell value, and finite-dimensional strategies built from the repeating structure found by Pál and Vértesi approach it as the dimension grows. If the bound were attained exactly in finite dimension, the optimality conditions would then require a state that cannot be normalized. Consequently, the set of finite-dimensional quantum correlations is not closed in the $(3,3,2,2)$ scenario, the smallest Bell scenario where this can happen. Moreover, approaching the supremum requires unbounded local dimension. The core of the proof was formalized in Lean~4.

AI Summary

The paper addresses the Pál–Vértesi conjecture that the quantum supremum of $I_{3322}$ is approached by their increasing-dimensional family but attained by no finite-dimensional strategy. It proves both statements: the supremum over arbitrary finite-dimensional states and binary measurements equals the supremum of the finite Pál–Vértesi family, numerically estimated near $0.25087538$, and every finite-dimensional strategy has strictly smaller value. It also proves the exact two-qubit maximum $1/4$. The upper-bound argument uses a party-swap/outcome-flip symmetry, optimizes the third measurements through a trace norm, and applies Jordan decomposition to the first two measurements. This associates each strategy with a finite joint distribution over spectral labels and an explicit upper-bound functional. A combinatorial construction approximates that functional by weighted averages of finite Pál–Vértesi chains. For nonattainment, equality conditions for a finite distribution produce a square-summable auxiliary chain; stationarity then forces geometric growth, yielding a contradiction. The core results are formalized in Lean 4, excluding the reduction from mixed states and POVMs. Consequently, finite-dimensional quantum correlations are not closed in $(3,3,2,2)$, the smallest binary-outcome scenario permitting nonclosure. Approaching the supremum requires unbounded local dimension: every fixed dimension cutoff has a strict gap. The paper does not determine whether an infinite-dimensional tensor-product strategy attains the supremum, whether the commuting-operator value is larger, or a closed-form value. Exact dimension-restricted thresholds beyond qubits, convergence rates, and rigidity of near-optimal strategies remain open.

Almost certainly largely AI-generatedAI use disclosed
Much of the work since---with Anthropic's Claude also serving as translator and hostile referee---has been to turn that first draft into the argument above.

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Comments
10 + 4 pages, 3 figures

Related papers

The I3322 quantum value is attained spatially but not in finite dimension

Seth Douglas

Let $S$ be the common tensor-product and commuting-operator supremum of the $I_{3322}$ Bell functional in the Collins-Gisin normalization. Starting from a certified value window and Bellman/path equivalence, we prove that no finite-dimensional quantum strategy attains $S$, whereas a spatial strategy on $\ell^2(\mathbb{Z})\otimes\ell^2(\mathbb{Z})$ does. The finite-dimensional statement includes mixed states and binary POVMs. Consequently $C_q(3,3;2,2)$ is not closed and $C_{qs}(3,3;2,2)\setminus C_q(3,3;2,2)$ is nonempty. We also establish the dimension complexity $D(ε)=Θ(\log(1/ε))$: approaching $S$ requires and suffices local dimension logarithmic in inverse error. The constructive upper bound is $D(ε)\le 23.9010650\log(1/ε)$ for all sufficiently small $ε$, with natural logarithms; the lower constants are existential. The proofs use critical Bellman storage, spectral transport and normalizable orbit measures. A finite weighted-flow argument supplies the unrestricted quantitative lower bound without identifying distinct joint spectral components. This revision replaces an unsupported step in the earlier lower argument and records additional proof corrections. Prior numerical certification and independent concurrent attainment results are credited. Exact arithmetic and Lean 4 check specified numerical, scalar and finite accounting facts; the complete analytic proof is not formalized.

quant-pharXiv:2609.05555•Sep 4, 2026•0 citations

The $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality requires infinite dimensions

Andrea Coladangelo

The $I_{3322}$ inequality is one of the simplest bipartite Bell inequalities, with three possible questions and two possible answers per party. Yet, despite its simplicity, it has long been conjectured by Pál and Vértesi (Physical Review A, 2010) to possess the following quirk: no finite-dimensional quantum strategy can attain its maximal violation, but an infinite-dimensional strategy can. A Bell correlation, with five questions and three answers per party, that provably possesses the same property has since been discovered by Coladangelo and Stark (Nature Communications, 2020). However, proving that the same property holds for $I_{3322}$, which lives in the simplest Bell scenario in which such a phenomenon could occur, has remained elusive. Here, we provide a proof of this conjecture. An approximate proof, containing all the main ideas, was produced by GPT 5.5 Pro after various rounds of interaction. The presentation of this proof was revised substantially by the author for completeness, correctness, and clarity.

quant-pharXiv:2609.06038•Sep 8, 2026•0 citations

Quantum value for a family of I3322 -like Bell functionals

N. Gigena, Jędrzej Kaniewski

We introduce a three-parameter family of Bell functionals that extends those studied previously [Kaniewski, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033420 (2020)] by including a marginal contribution. An analysis of their largest value achievable by quantum realizations naturally splits the family into two branches, and for the first of them we show that this value is given by a simple function of the parameters defining the functionals. In this case we completely characterize the realizations attaining the optimal value and show that these functionals can be used to self-test any partially entangled state of two qubits. The optimal measurements, however, are not unique and form a one-parameter family of qubit measurements. The second branch, which includes the well-known ${I}_{3322}$ functional, is studied numerically. We identify the region in the parameter space where the optimal value can be attained with two-dimensional quantum systems and characterize the state and measurements attaining this value. Finally, we show that the set of realizations introduced by P\'al and V\'ertesi [Phys. Rev. A 82, 022116 (2010)] to obtain the maximal violation of the ${I}_{3322}$ inequality succeeds in approaching the optimal value for a large subset of the functionals in this branch. In these cases we analyze and discuss the main features of the optimal realizations.

arXiv:2203.01837•Physical Review A•Jul 1, 2022•3 citations

Trading symmetry for Hilbert-space dimension in Bell-inequality violation

Hsin-Yu Hsu, Gelo Noel M. Tabia, Kai-Siang Chen +4 more

In quantum information, asymmetry, i.e., the lack of symmetry, is a resource allowing one to accomplish certain tasks that are otherwise impossible. Similarly, in a Bell test using any given Bell inequality, the maximum violation achievable using quantum strategies respecting or disregarding a certain symmetry can be different. In this work, we focus on the symmetry involved in the exchange of parties and explore when we have to trade this symmetry for a lower-dimensional quantum strategy in achieving the maximal violation of given Bell inequalities. For the family of symmetric Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu inequalities, we provide evidence showing that there is no such trade-off. However, for several other Bell inequalities with a small number of dichotomic measurement settings, we show that symmetric quantum strategies in the minimal Hilbert space dimension can only lead to a suboptimal Bell violation. In other words, there exist symmetric Bell inequalities that can only be maximally violated by asymmetric quantum strategies of minimal dimension. In contrast, one can also find examples of asymmetric Bell inequalities that are maximally violated by symmetric correlations. The implications of these findings on the geometry of the set of quantum correlations and the possibility of performing self-testing therefrom are briefly discussed.

quant-pharXiv:2601.02893•Quantum Science and Technology•Jan 7, 2026•0 citations

Upper Bounding Hilbert Space Dimensions which can Realize all the Quantum Correlations

Yasamin Panahi, Maria Ciudad Alañón, Daniel Centeno +4 more

We introduce novel upper bounds on the Hilbert space dimensions required to realize quantum correlations in Bell scenarios. We start by considering bipartite cases wherein one of the two parties has two settings and two outcomes. Regardless of the number of measurements and outcomes of the other party, the Hilbert space dimension of the first party can be limited to two while still achieving all convexly extremal quantum correlations. We then leverage Schmidt decomposition to show that the remaining party can losslessly also be restricted to a qubit Hilbert space. We then extend this idea to multipartite scenarios. We also adapt our results to provide upper bounds of local Hilbert space dimensions to achieve any quantum correlation, including convexly non-extremal correlations, by utilizing Caratheodory's theorem. Finally, we generalize our results to nonstandard Bell scenarios with communication. Taken together, our results fill in several previously unresolved aspects of the problem of determining sufficient Hilbert space dimensionality, expanding the collection of scenarios for which finite-dimensional quantum systems are known to be sufficient to reproduce any quantum correlation.

arXiv:2505.20519•May 26, 2025•0 citations

Unconditional separation of finite and infinite-dimensional quantum correlations

Andrea Coladangelo, Jalex Stark

Determining the relationship between quantum correlation sets is a long-standing open problem. The most well-studied part of the hierarchy is captured by the chain of inclusions $\mathcal C_q \subseteq \mathcal C_{qs} \subsetneq \mathcal C_{qa} \subseteq \mathcal C_{qc}$. The separation $\mathcal C_{qs} \neq \mathcal C_{qa}$, showing that the set of quantum spatial correlations is not closed, was proven in breakthrough work by Slofstra [arXiv:1606.03140 (2016), arXiv:1703.08618 (2017)]. Resolving the question of $\mathcal C_{qa} = \mathcal C_{qc}$ would resolve the Connes Embedding Conjecture and would represent major progress in the mathematical field of operator algebras. In this work, we resolve the ambiguity in the first inclusion, showing that $\mathcal{C}_q \neq \mathcal{C}_{qs}$. We provide an explicit construction of a correlation that can be attained on a tensor product of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces but not finite-dimensional ones. This property is also conjectured to be possessed by any correlation which maximally violates the $I_{3322}$ inequality.

arXiv:1804.05116•Apr 13, 2018•39 citations
The quantum supremum of the I3322I_{3322}I3322​ Bell inequality is not attained in finite dimension
In 2010, Pál and Vértesi found a family of finite-dimensional strategies for the I3322I_{3322}I3322​ Bell inequality whose optimized values appeared to converge as the local Hilbert-space dimension grew. They conjectured that this limit is the supremum over all finite-dimensional quantum strategies, but that no finite-dimensional strategy attains it. We prove both claims. The proof uses the symmetry of the Bell functional to associate every strategy with a finite matrix of probabilities, one for each pair of spectral subspaces of Alice and Bob. This matrix gives an upper bound on the Bell value, and finite-dimensional strategies built from the repeating structure found by Pál and Vértesi approach it as the dimension grows. If the bound were attained exactly in finite dimension, the optimality conditions would then require a state that cannot be normalized. Consequently, the set of finite-dimensional quantum correlations is not closed in the (3,3,2,2)(3,3,2,2)(3,3,2,2) scenario, the smallest Bell scenario where this can happen. Moreover, approaching the supremum requires unbounded local dimension. The core of the proof was formalized in Lean~4.
The paper addresses the Pál–Vértesi conjecture that the quantum supremum of I3322I_{3322}I3322​ is approached by their increasing-dimensional family but attained by no finite-dimensional strategy. It proves both statements: the supremum over arbitrary finite-dimensional states and binary measurements equals the supremum of the finite Pál–Vértesi family, numerically estimated near 0.250875380.250875380.25087538, and every finite-dimensional strategy has strictly smaller value. It also proves the exact two-qubit maximum 1/41/41/4.
The upper-bound argument uses a party-swap/outcome-flip symmetry, optimizes the third measurements through a trace norm, and applies Jordan decomposition to the first two measurements. This associates each strategy with a finite joint distribution over spectral labels and an explicit upper-bound functional. A combinatorial construction approximates that functional by weighted averages of finite Pál–Vértesi chains. For nonattainment, equality conditions for a finite distribution produce a square-summable auxiliary chain; stationarity then forces geometric growth, yielding a contradiction. The core results are formalized in Lean 4, excluding the reduction from mixed states and POVMs.
Consequently, finite-dimensional quantum correlations are not closed in (3,3,2,2)(3,3,2,2)(3,3,2,2), the smallest binary-outcome scenario permitting nonclosure. Approaching the supremum requires unbounded local dimension: every fixed dimension cutoff has a strict gap. The paper does not determine whether an infinite-dimensional tensor-product strategy attains the supremum, whether the commuting-operator value is larger, or a closed-form value. Exact dimension-restricted thresholds beyond qubits, convergence rates, and rigidity of near-optimal strategies remain open.
Let SSS be the common tensor-product and commuting-operator supremum of the I3322I_{3322}I3322​ Bell functional in the Collins-Gisin normalization. Starting from a certified value window and Bellman/path equivalence, we prove that no finite-dimensional quantum strategy attains SSS, whereas a spatial strategy on ℓ2(Z)⊗ℓ2(Z)\ell^2(\mathbb{Z})\otimes\ell^2(\mathbb{Z})ℓ2(Z)⊗ℓ2(Z) does. The finite-dimensional statement includes mixed states and binary POVMs. Consequently Cq(3,3;2,2)C_q(3,3;2,2)Cq​(3,3;2,2) is not closed and Cqs(3,3;2,2)∖Cq(3,3;2,2)C_{qs}(3,3;2,2)\setminus C_q(3,3;2,2)Cqs​(3,3;2,2)∖Cq​(3,3;2,2) is nonempty. We also establish the dimension complexity D(ε)=Θ(log⁡(1/ε))D(ε)=Θ(\log(1/ε))D(ε)=Θ(log(1/ε)): approaching SSS requires and suffices local dimension logarithmic in inverse error. The constructive upper bound is D(ε)≤23.9010650log⁡(1/ε)D(ε)\le 23.9010650\log(1/ε)D(ε)≤23.9010650log(1/ε) for all sufficiently small εεε, with natural logarithms; the lower constants are existential. The proofs use critical Bellman storage, spectral transport and normalizable orbit measures. A finite weighted-flow argument supplies the unrestricted quantitative lower bound without identifying distinct joint spectral components. This revision replaces an unsupported step in the earlier lower argument and records additional proof corrections. Prior numerical certification and independent concurrent attainment results are credited. Exact arithmetic and Lean 4 check specified numerical, scalar and finite accounting facts; the complete analytic proof is not formalized.
The I3322I_{3322}I3322​ Bell inequality requires infinite dimensions
The I3322I_{3322}I3322​ inequality is one of the simplest bipartite Bell inequalities, with three possible questions and two possible answers per party. Yet, despite its simplicity, it has long been conjectured by Pál and Vértesi (Physical Review A, 2010) to possess the following quirk: no finite-dimensional quantum strategy can attain its maximal violation, but an infinite-dimensional strategy can. A Bell correlation, with five questions and three answers per party, that provably possesses the same property has since been discovered by Coladangelo and Stark (Nature Communications, 2020). However, proving that the same property holds for I3322I_{3322}I3322​, which lives in the simplest Bell scenario in which such a phenomenon could occur, has remained elusive. Here, we provide a proof of this conjecture. An approximate proof, containing all the main ideas, was produced by GPT 5.5 Pro after various rounds of interaction. The presentation of this proof was revised substantially by the author for completeness, correctness, and clarity.
We introduce a three-parameter family of Bell functionals that extends those studied previously [Kaniewski, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033420 (2020)] by including a marginal contribution. An analysis of their largest value achievable by quantum realizations naturally splits the family into two branches, and for the first of them we show that this value is given by a simple function of the parameters defining the functionals. In this case we completely characterize the realizations attaining the optimal value and show that these functionals can be used to self-test any partially entangled state of two qubits. The optimal measurements, however, are not unique and form a one-parameter family of qubit measurements. The second branch, which includes the well-known I3322{I}_{3322}I3322​ functional, is studied numerically. We identify the region in the parameter space where the optimal value can be attained with two-dimensional quantum systems and characterize the state and measurements attaining this value. Finally, we show that the set of realizations introduced by P\'al and V\'ertesi [Phys. Rev. A 82, 022116 (2010)] to obtain the maximal violation of the I3322{I}_{3322}I3322​ inequality succeeds in approaching the optimal value for a large subset of the functionals in this branch. In these cases we analyze and discuss the main features of the optimal realizations.
In quantum information, asymmetry, i.e., the lack of symmetry, is a resource allowing one to accomplish certain tasks that are otherwise impossible. Similarly, in a Bell test using any given Bell inequality, the maximum violation achievable using quantum strategies respecting or disregarding a certain symmetry can be different. In this work, we focus on the symmetry involved in the exchange of parties and explore when we have to trade this symmetry for a lower-dimensional quantum strategy in achieving the maximal violation of given Bell inequalities. For the family of symmetric Collins-Gisin-Linden-Massar-Popescu inequalities, we provide evidence showing that there is no such trade-off. However, for several other Bell inequalities with a small number of dichotomic measurement settings, we show that symmetric quantum strategies in the minimal Hilbert space dimension can only lead to a suboptimal Bell violation. In other words, there exist symmetric Bell inequalities that can only be maximally violated by asymmetric quantum strategies of minimal dimension. In contrast, one can also find examples of asymmetric Bell inequalities that are maximally violated by symmetric correlations. The implications of these findings on the geometry of the set of quantum correlations and the possibility of performing self-testing therefrom are briefly discussed.
We introduce novel upper bounds on the Hilbert space dimensions required to realize quantum correlations in Bell scenarios. We start by considering bipartite cases wherein one of the two parties has two settings and two outcomes. Regardless of the number of measurements and outcomes of the other party, the Hilbert space dimension of the first party can be limited to two while still achieving all convexly extremal quantum correlations. We then leverage Schmidt decomposition to show that the remaining party can losslessly also be restricted to a qubit Hilbert space. We then extend this idea to multipartite scenarios. We also adapt our results to provide upper bounds of local Hilbert space dimensions to achieve any quantum correlation, including convexly non-extremal correlations, by utilizing Caratheodory's theorem. Finally, we generalize our results to nonstandard Bell scenarios with communication. Taken together, our results fill in several previously unresolved aspects of the problem of determining sufficient Hilbert space dimensionality, expanding the collection of scenarios for which finite-dimensional quantum systems are known to be sufficient to reproduce any quantum correlation.
Determining the relationship between quantum correlation sets is a long-standing open problem. The most well-studied part of the hierarchy is captured by the chain of inclusions Cq⊆Cqs⊊Cqa⊆Cqc\mathcal C_q \subseteq \mathcal C_{qs} \subsetneq \mathcal C_{qa} \subseteq \mathcal C_{qc}Cq​⊆Cqs​⊊Cqa​⊆Cqc​. The separation Cqs≠Cqa\mathcal C_{qs} \neq \mathcal C_{qa}Cqs​=Cqa​, showing that the set of quantum spatial correlations is not closed, was proven in breakthrough work by Slofstra [arXiv:1606.03140 (2016), arXiv:1703.08618 (2017)]. Resolving the question of Cqa=Cqc\mathcal C_{qa} = \mathcal C_{qc}Cqa​=Cqc​ would resolve the Connes Embedding Conjecture and would represent major progress in the mathematical field of operator algebras. In this work, we resolve the ambiguity in the first inclusion, showing that Cq≠Cqs\mathcal{C}_q \neq \mathcal{C}_{qs}Cq​=Cqs​. We provide an explicit construction of a correlation that can be attained on a tensor product of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces but not finite-dimensional ones. This property is also conjectured to be possessed by any correlation which maximally violates the I3322I_{3322}I3322​ inequality.