We show how to compile an arbitrary classical circuit into a fault-tolerant circuit, which performs the desired computation even when an almost-linear number of bits are adversarially chosen and corrupted in each timestep. Using a variant of this fault-tolerance scheme that only detects (rather than corrects) corruptions, we give a new construction of probabilistically checkable proofs (PCPs) for NP with polylogarithmic query complexity. This PCP construction from fault-tolerance presents a promising candidate for quantization by the work of Anshu, Breuckmann, and Nguyen (STOC'24), who provided a roadmap for constructing quantum PCPs via fault-tolerance.
We show how to compile an arbitrary classical circuit into a fault-tolerant circuit, which performs the desired computation even when an almost-linear number of bits are adversarially chosen and corrupted in each timestep. Using a variant of this fault-tolerance scheme that only detects (rather than corrects) corruptions, we give a new construction of probabilistically checkable proofs (PCPs) for NP with polylogarithmic query complexity. This PCP construction from fault-tolerance presents a promising candidate for quantization by the work of Anshu, Breuckmann, and Nguyen (STOC'24), who provided a roadmap for constructing quantum PCPs via fault-tolerance.
We prove a fault-tolerance theorem for quantum computation against adversarial noise. For every quantum circuit on Nˉ logical qudits of depth Tˉ, we construct a fault-tolerant circuit on N=poly(Nˉ) physical qudits of depth Tˉ⋅Nˉo(1), which is robust against an adversary who may arbitrarily choose and corrupt an almost-linear number N1−o(1) of physical qudits at each time step. This robustness significantly improves upon prior fault-tolerance theorems, which assumed corruptions were either local and stochastic, or else only act on a polynomially vanishing fraction of qudits.
Our fault-tolerance scheme addresses a key bottleneck towards constructing quantum PCPs via the circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping of Anshu, Breuckmann, and Nguyen (STOC'24). More fundamentally, our result demonstrates that fault-tolerant quantum computation remains possible under noise models that are global, worst-case, and non-Markovian over the full duration of the computation, directly countering concerns that correlated noise could fundamentally undermine quantum fault tolerance.
Our construction is based on a new family of subsystem product codes we develop, which have large dimension and distance along with low-weight parity-checks, and which support transversal non-Clifford gates. We show how to perform single-shot fault-tolerant error correction on these codes using a Floquet-like procedure based on the local testability of classical tensor codes. We then obtain a universal fault-tolerance scheme using repeated code switching in a hypercubic qudit architecture. Finally, we recursively compose our scheme with itself to reduce an initially exponential qudit dimension down to a constant.
The quantum PCP conjecture is one of the major open problems in quantum complexity theory. It has resisted attack in part because many primitives used in the proof of the classical PCP theorem, such as locality-preserving gap amplification and alphabet reduction, have no obvious quantum analogues due to quantum no-cloning. Locality-preserving gap amplification is a procedure that takes as input a local Hamiltonian problem instance and produces a new instance with a larger promise gap, without increasing the locality of the Hamiltonian, and instead moderately increasing its local qudit dimension. Obtaining this kind of control over the locality during gap amplification is critical to the success of many known strategies for proving the classical PCP theorem. In this work, we put forth the first known viable template for quantum locality-preserving gap amplification, and we prove that our procedure amplifies the combinatorial gap of local Hamiltonians. Our work introduces a new framework for reasoning about quantum gap amplification in terms of fault-tolerant computation, and illuminates a route toward importing one of the central ingredients in classical PCPs into the quantum setting. In particular, we build upon ideas from the recent classical PCP of Bafna--Minzer--Vyas based on high-dimensional expanders, and the circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction of Anshu--Breuckmann--Nguyen, in addition to several recent advances in quantum coding theory.
The theory of fault tolerance is a cornerstone of computing and many modern technologies. With the development of quantum science and engineering, fault tolerance has become increasingly important, as quantum systems are intrinsically susceptible to noise. This thesis presents several advances in quantum fault tolerance and develops new connections between fault tolerance and quantum complexity theory. In Part I, we construct a fault-tolerant quantum computation scheme with constant space overhead and near-logarithmic time overhead. This is the lowest overhead achieved to date and and provides the first rigorous proof that fault tolerance based on quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes can achieve better asymptotic spacetime overhead than conventional schemes. The construction relies on locally testable qLDPC codes and new quantum state distillation algorithms with improved spacetime overhead. Additionally, a variant of these algorithms yields the first magic state distillation algorithm with constant space overhead. In Part II, we make progress on the quantum probabilistically checkable proofs (PCP) conjecture by using ideas from fault tolerance. We introduce a new circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping that allows Hamiltonians to inherit the fault tolerance properties of quantum circuits. Using this new mapping, we construct the first known template for quantum locality-preserving gap amplification---the quantum analogue of a central ingredient in the classical PCP theorem---and prove that it amplifies the combinatorial gap. The construction develops a new framework for reasoning about gap amplification in terms of fault-tolerant distributed computation, along with new tools in secure multiparty computation and high-dimensional expanders.
We construct the first known fault-tolerant scheme for injecting states into quantum error-correcting codes with constant space and time overhead. That is, we construct a family of constant-rate quantum error-correcting codes for which a set of bare physical qubits can be injected, i.e. fault-tolerantly encoded, into a code block. Similarly, a code state can be ejected, i.e. fault-tolerantly decoded, back into bare physical qubits. We show that these injection and ejection procedures succeed under circuit-level locally stochastic noise, while incurring just a small constant probability of corrupting each qubit, which is unavoidable for bare physical qubits. We also show how to perform fault-tolerant error correction and code-state preparation under locally stochastic noise. All of our gadgets can be implemented with constant quantum circuit depth (i.e. are single-shot), and with a number of physical qubits growing linearly with the number of logical qubits, assuming the ability to run polynomial-sized noiseless classical circuits on the side.
We construct our quantum codes by taking a high-dimensional hypergraph product of classical LDPC codes, which in turn are a simplified version of Spielman's linear-time encodable codes (STOC'95). As our resulting product codes are only resilient to physical errors occurring with non-uniform probabilities across qubits, we then show how to concatenate with inner codes of various sizes to obtain fault-tolerance against uniform noise.
We define a general formulation of quantum PCPs, which captures adaptivity and multiple unentangled provers, and give a detailed construction of the quantum reduction to a local Hamiltonian with a constant promise gap. The reduction turns out to be a versatile subroutine to prove properties of quantum PCPs, allowing us to show: (i) Non-adaptive quantum PCPs can simulate adaptive quantum PCPs when the number of proof queries is constant. In fact, this can even be shown to hold when the non-adaptive quantum PCP picks the proof indices simply uniformly at random from a subset of all possible index combinations, answering an open question by Aharonov, Arad, Landau and Vazirani (STOC '09). (ii) If the q -local Hamiltonian problem with constant promise gap can be solved in QCMA , then QPCP[q]⊆QCMA for any q∈O(1) . (iii) If QMA(k) has a quantum PCP for any k≤poly(n) , then QMA(2)=QMA , connecting two of the longest-standing open problems in quantum complexity theory. Moreover, we also show that there exist (quantum) oracles relative to which certain quantum PCP statements are false. Hence, any attempt to prove the quantum PCP conjecture requires, just as was the case for the classical PCP theorem, (quantumly) non-relativizing techniques.
We generalize quantum-classical PCPs, first introduced by Weggemans, Folkertsma and Cade (TQC 2024), to allow for q quantum queries to a polynomially-sized classical proof (QCPCPQ,c,s[q]). Exploiting a connection with the polynomial method, we prove that for any constant q, promise gap c−s=Ω(1/poly(n)) and δ>0, we have QCPCPQ,c,s[q]⊆QCPCP1−δ,1/2+δ[3]⊆BQ⋅NP, where BQ⋅NP is the class of promise problems with quantum reductions to an NP-complete problem. Surprisingly, this shows that we can amplify the promise gap from inverse polynomial to constant for constant query quantum-classical PCPs, and that any quantum-classical PCP making any constant number of quantum queries can be simulated by one that makes only three classical queries. Nevertheless, even though we can achieve promise gap amplification, our result also gives strong evidence that there exists no constant query quantum-classical PCP for QCMA, as it is unlikely that QCMA⊆BQ⋅NP, which we support by giving oracular evidence. In the (poly-)logarithmic query regime, we show for any positive integer c, there exists an oracle relative to which QCPCP[O(logcn)]⊊QCPCPQ[O(logcn)], contrasting the constant query case where the equivalence of both query models holds relative to any oracle. Finally, we connect our results to more general quantum-classical interactive proof systems.