Quantum advantage is widely expected to require sufficiently deep circuits, where correlations and global computational structure can grow beyond the reach of efficient classical simulation. This expectation is especially stark for constant-depth circuits with local readout: the expectation value of any fixed local observable lies within a bounded backward lightcone and is therefore classically tractable. Here we show that measurement feedback changes this picture. We establish a strict hierarchy of computational power: at fixed coherent depth, increasing the number of feedback outcomes strictly enlarges the class of functions accessible through a local expectation value. The two ends of this hierarchy exhibit distinct computational regimes. With logarithmic feedback, local expectation values for product-state inputs are efficiently classically simulable. Polynomial feedback, by contrast, enables an explicit family of adaptive shallow circuits to encode prime-field discrete logarithm problem~(DLP) into a fixed single-qubit expectation. Assuming the standard worst-case classical hardness of DLP, estimating this expectation value is classically hard. These results reveal a feedback-driven complexity transition, with further implications for resource lower bounds on DLP and the complexity of local-observable estimation under area-law entanglement. Our results open a new route to quantum advantage with shallow quantum circuits.
Quantum advantage is widely expected to require sufficiently deep circuits, where correlations and global computational structure can grow beyond the reach of efficient classical simulation. This expectation is especially stark for constant-depth circuits with local readout: the expectation value of any fixed local observable lies within a bounded backward lightcone and is therefore classically tractable. Here we show that measurement feedback changes this picture. We establish a strict hierarchy of computational power: at fixed coherent depth, increasing the number of feedback outcomes strictly enlarges the class of functions accessible through a local expectation value. The two ends of this hierarchy exhibit distinct computational regimes. With logarithmic feedback, local expectation values for product-state inputs are efficiently classically simulable. Polynomial feedback, by contrast, enables an explicit family of adaptive shallow circuits to encode prime-field discrete logarithm problem~(DLP) into a fixed single-qubit expectation. Assuming the standard worst-case classical hardness of DLP, estimating this expectation value is classically hard. These results reveal a feedback-driven complexity transition, with further implications for resource lower bounds on DLP and the complexity of local-observable estimation under area-law entanglement. Our results open a new route to quantum advantage with shallow quantum circuits.
Circuit depth is a central resource in complexity theory. While bounded-depth classical circuits admit well-understood hierarchy theorems, the internal structure of constant-depth quantum computation remains comparatively unexplored.
We prove an explicit depth hierarchy theorem for QNC0. For each d≥12, we construct a family of two-round interactive problems on which no depth-(d−1) quantum circuit can achieve near-perfect success, regardless of gate set, circuit size, or ancillary qubits. In contrast, we prove that our construction admits realizations by simple bounded fan-in quantum circuits of depth larger than d by a small constant factor. Moreover, all bounded fan-in classical circuits of sublogarithmic depth (in the input size) fail to achieve perfect success on these tasks for every d, yielding a hierarchy of problems that show unconditional quantum advantage of QNC0 over NC0.
A key obstacle is the scarcity of lower bound techniques for quantum circuits. To address this, we develop methods to analyze how depth affects a circuit's ability to realize nonlocal correlations amongst its output qubits in a fine-grained manner. Our approach exploits the correspondence between constraint systems and nonlocal games, translating group-theoretic constructions into rigid operator-valued constraint systems and then into non-local games. In particular, we construct constraint systems whose unique faithful operator-valued solutions require every perfect strategy, and every near-perfect strategy to a fixed precision, to implement multi-controlled phase operations. This reduces to a nonlocal unitary-synthesis problem, yielding depth lower bounds for both shallow quantum and classical circuits.
These results show that increasing depth strictly increases computational power within QNC0, establishing a genuinely quantum hierarchy.
Recent works by Bravyi, Gosset and Konig (Science 2018), Bene Watts et al. (STOC 2019), Coudron, Stark and Vidick (QIP 2019) and Le Gall (CCC 2019) have shown unconditional separations between the computational powers of shallow (i.e., small-depth) quantum and classical circuits: quantum circuits can solve in constant depth computational problems that require logarithmic depth to solve with classical circuits. Using quantum error correction, Bravyi, Gosset, Konig and Tomamichel (Nature Physics 2020) further proved that a similar separation still persists even if quantum circuits are subject to local stochastic noise.
We prove that this quantum advantage persists even if the quantum circuits can be subject to arbitrary corruption: in this paper we assume that any constant fraction of the qubits (for instance, huge blocks of qubits) may be arbitrarily corrupted at the end of the computation. We show that even in this model, quantum circuits can still solve in constant depth computational problems that require logarithmic depth to solve with bounded fan-in classical circuits. This gives another compelling evidence of the computational power of quantum shallow circuits.
In order to show our result, we consider the Graph State Sampling problem (which was also used in prior works) on expander graphs. We exploit the robustness of expander graphs against vertex corruption to show that a subproblem hard for small-depth classical circuits can still be extracted from the output of the corrupted quantum circuit.
We give a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer. The quantum sampler admits two implementations: one uses log-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates, i.e., QNC0[loglog] circuits, while the other uses constant-depth quantum circuits with unbounded fan-in gates, i.e., QAC0 circuits. Our construction can be seen as compiling the Learning with Errors (LWE)-based single-round proof of quantumness of Arabadjieva et al. (2025) to very low depth. The price paid for this compilation is the reliance on less standard, though well-motivated, assumptions: in addition to the lattice knowledge assumption used by Arabadjieva et al. (2025), we require a strengthened variant of the adaptive-hardcore-bit property of LWE, for which we provide supporting evidence. Unlike previous low-depth proofs of quantumness, the quantum computation here requires no mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward: it consists only of running a shallow circuit and sampling from its output distribution. This shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
Recent works by Bravyi, Gosset and König (Science 2018), Bene Watts et al. (STOC 2019), Coudron, Stark and Vidick (QIP 2019) and Le Gall (CCC 2019) have shown unconditional separations between the computational powers of shallow (i.e., small-depth) quantum and classical circuits: quantum circuits can solve in constant depth computational problems that require logarithmic depth to solve with classical circuits. Using quantum error correction, Bravyi, Gosset, König and Tomamichel (Nature Physics 2020) further proved that a similar separation still persists even if quantum circuits are subject to local stochastic noise. In this paper, we consider the case where any constant fraction of the qubits (for instance, huge blocks of qubits) may be arbitrarily corrupted at the end of the computation. We make a first step forward towards establishing a quantum advantage even in this extremely challenging setting: we show that there exists a computational problem that can be solved in constant depth by a quantum circuit but such that even solving any large subproblem of this problem requires logarithmic depth with bounded fan-in classical circuits. This gives another compelling evidence of the computational power of quantum shallow circuits. In order to show our result, we consider the Graph State Sampling problem (which was also used in prior works) on expander graphs. We exploit the "robustness" of expander graphs against vertex corruption to show that a subproblem hard for small-depth classical circuits can still be extracted from the output of the corrupted quantum circuit.
Reliable and scalable readout strategies are essential for quantum technologies. As quantum processors grow, extracting useful information must remain feasible without measurement circuits becoming a dominant bottleneck. Randomized measurements and classical shadows provide a powerful route, but global estimation is conventionally associated with highly random ensembles that require increasing circuit depth and hence substantial experimental overhead. In this work, we show that substantially less randomness suffices when the readout is meaningfully adapted to the quantities being estimated. We introduce shallow phase shadows, based on a sparse Clifford-IQP ensemble, and prove efficient global estimation of stabilizer-state fidelities despite the ensemble not forming an approximate relative-error design. On all-to-all architectures, the protocol admits a constant-depth implementation using mid-circuit measurements and classical feedforward, or logarithmic depth without auxiliary systems. The protocol requires only controlled-phase entangling gates and offers a tunable trade-off between circuit resources and estimation accuracy, making it particularly amenable to experimentally relevant architectures with long-range connectivity. Our results show that scalable quantum readout need not reproduce generic randomness: task-adapted randomization can enable substantially shallower global characterization protocols.
A central question of quantum computing is determining the source of the advantage of quantum computation over classical computation.Even though simulating quantum dynamics on a classical computer is thought to require exponential overhead in the worst case, efficient simulations are known to exist in several special cases.It was widely assumed that these easy-to-simulate cases as well as any yetundiscovered ones could be avoided by choosing a quantum circuit at random.We prove that this intuition is false by showing that certain families of constant-depth, 2D random circuits can be approximately simulated on a classical computer in time only linear in the number of qubits and gates, even though the same families are capable of universal quantum computation and are hard to exactly simulate in the worst case (under standard hardness assumptions).While our proof applies to specific random circuit families, we demonstrate numerically that typical instances of more general families of sufficiently shallow constantdepth 2D random circuits are also efficiently simulable.We propose two classical simulation algorithms.One is based on first simulating spatially local regions which are then "stitched" together via recovery maps.The other reduces the 2D simulation problem to a problem of simulating a form of 1D dynamics consisting of alternating rounds of random local unitaries and weak measurements.Similar processes have recently been the subject of an intensive research focus, which has observed that the dynamics generally undergo a phase transition from a low-entanglement (and efficient-to-simulate) regime to a highentanglement (and inefficient-to-simulate) regime as measurement strength is varied.Via a mapping from random quantum circuits to classical statistical mechanical models, we give analytical evidence that a similar computational phase transition occurs for both of our algorithms as parameters of the circuit architecture like the local Hilbert space dimension and circuit depth are varied and, additionally, that the effective 1D dynamics corresponding to sufficiently shallow random quantum circuits falls within the efficient-to-simulate regime.Implementing the latter algorithm for the depth-3 "brickwork" architecture, for which exact simulation is hard, we find that a laptop could simulate typical instances on a 409 × 409 grid with a total variation distance error less than 0.01 in approximately one minute per sample, a task intractable for previously known circuit simulation algorithms.Numerical results support our analytic evidence that the algorithm is asymptotically efficient.