Quantum illumination exploits entanglement between a transmitted signal and a retained idler to improve the error-probability exponent of target detection by roughly a factor of four (6 dB) over that with a coherent state of the same transmitted energy. This advantage presumes a known return phase. In practice, the phase is set by the range to the target and the condition of its surface, and is difficult to know in advance. Whether the advantage survives when this phase is unknown is not obvious. Here, we cast target detection as a composite hypothesis test in which the return phase is an unknown constant common to all trials, and we restrict the receiver to independent and identical measurements on each copy. We bound the worst-case error exponent at low reflectivity for every such measurement and every input state of a single signal mode and an idler of any dimension. We then show that unentangled coherent light with heterodyne detection already saturates this bound, for every value of the phase. Entanglement therefore confers no advantage in this setting. The class of independent and identical measurements contains many implementable quantum-illumination receivers, including the optical parametric amplifier and phase-conjugate receivers. Our result shows that none of them can offer a quantum advantage in the worst case over the phase, to leading order in the reflectivity.
Quantum illumination exploits entanglement between a transmitted signal and a retained idler to improve the error-probability exponent of target detection by roughly a factor of four (6 dB) over that with a coherent state of the same transmitted energy. This advantage presumes a known return phase. In practice, the phase is set by the range to the target and the condition of its surface, and is difficult to know in advance. Whether the advantage survives when this phase is unknown is not obvious. Here, we cast target detection as a composite hypothesis test in which the return phase is an unknown constant common to all trials, and we restrict the receiver to independent and identical measurements on each copy. We bound the worst-case error exponent at low reflectivity for every such measurement and every input state of a single signal mode and an idler of any dimension. We then show that unentangled coherent light with heterodyne detection already saturates this bound, for every value of the phase. Entanglement therefore confers no advantage in this setting. The class of independent and identical measurements contains many implementable quantum-illumination receivers, including the optical parametric amplifier and phase-conjugate receivers. Our result shows that none of them can offer a quantum advantage in the worst case over the phase, to leading order in the reflectivity.
Quantum illumination (QI) is an entanglement-enhanced sensing system whose performance advantage over a comparable classical system survives its usage in an entanglement-breaking scenario plagued by loss and noise. In particular, QI's error-probability exponent for discriminating between equally likely hypotheses of target absence or presence is 6 dB higher than that of the optimum classical system using the same transmitted power. This performance advantage, however, presumes that the target return, when present, has known amplitude and phase, a situation that seldom occurs in light detection and ranging (lidar) applications. At lidar wavelengths, most target surfaces are sufficiently rough that their returns are speckled, i.e., they have Rayleigh-distributed amplitudes and uniformly distributed phases. QI's optical parametric amplifier receiver---which affords a 3 dB better-than-classical error-probability exponent for a return with known amplitude and phase---fails to offer any performance gain for Rayleigh-fading targets. We show that the sum-frequency generation receiver [Zhuang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040801 (2017)]---whose error-probability exponent for a nonfading target achieves QI's full 6 dB advantage over optimum classical operation---outperforms the classical system for Rayleigh-fading targets. In this case, QI's advantage is subexponential: its error probability is lower than the classical system's by a factor of $1/ln(M\overline{\ensuremath{\kappa}}{N}_{S}/{N}_{B})$, when $M\overline{\ensuremath{\kappa}}{N}_{S}/{N}_{B}\ensuremath{\gg}1$, with $M\ensuremath{\gg}1$ being the QI transmitter's time-bandwidth product, ${N}_{S}\ensuremath{\ll}1$ its brightness, $\overline{\ensuremath{\kappa}}$ the target return's average intensity, and NB the background light's brightness.
The signal half of an entangled twin beam, generated using spontaneous parametric downconversion, interrogates a region of space that is suspected of containing a target and has high loss and high (entanglement-breaking) background noise. A joint measurement is performed on the returned light and the idler beam that was retained at the transmitter. An optimal quantum receiver, whose implementation is not yet known, was shown to achieve 6 dB gain in the error-probability exponent relative to that achieved with a single coherent-state (classical) laser transmitter and the optimum receiver. We present two structured optical receivers that achieve up to 3 dB gain in the error exponent over that attained with the classical sensor. These are designs of quantum-optical sensors for target detection, which can be readily implemented in a proof-of-concept experiment, that appreciably outperform the best classical sensor in the low-signal-brightness, high-loss, and high-noise operating regime.
In quantum illumination (QI), a signal beam initially entangled with an idler beam held at the receiver interrogates a target region bathed in thermal background light. The returned beam is measured jointly with the idler in order to determine whether a weakly reflecting target is present. Using tools from quantum information theory, we derive lower bounds on the average error probability of detecting both specular and fading targets and on the mean squared error of estimating the reflectance of a detected target, which are obeyed by any QI transmitter satisfying a signal energy constraint. For bright thermal backgrounds, we show that the QI system using multiple copies of low-brightness two-mode squeezed vacuum states is nearly optimal. More generally, our results place limits on the best possible performance achievable using QI systems at all wavelengths, and at all signal and background noise levels.
Quantum illumination (QI) is the task of querying a scene using a transmitter probe whose quantum state is entangled with a reference beam retained in ideal storage, followed by optimally detecting the target-returned light together with the stored reference, to make decisions on characteristics of targets at stand-off range, at precision that exceeds what is achievable with a classical transmitter of the same brightness and otherwise identical conditions. Using tools from perturbation theory, we show that in the limit of low transmitter brightness, high loss, and high thermal background, there is a factor of four improvement in the Chernoff exponent of the error probability in discriminating any number of apriori-known reflective targets when using a Gaussian-state entangled QI probe, over using classical coherent-state illumination (CI). While this advantage was known for detecting the presence or absence of a target, it had not been proven for the generalized task of discriminating between arbitrary target libraries. In proving our result, we derive simple general analytic expressions for the lowest-order asymptotic expansions of the quantum Chernoff exponents for QI and CI in terms of the signal brightness, loss, thermal noise, and the modal expansion coefficients of the target-reflected light's radiant exitance profiles when separated by a spatial mode sorter after entering the entrance pupil of the receiver's aperture.
Quantum illumination (QI) promises unprecedented performances in target detection, but there are various problems surrounding its implementation. Where target ranging is a concern, signal and idler recombination forms a crucial barrier to the protocol's success. This could potentially be mitigated if performing a measurement on the idler mode could still yield a quantum advantage. In this article, we investigate the QI protocol for a generically correlated Gaussian source and study the phase-conjugating (PC) receiver, deriving the associated SNR in terms of the signal and idler energies, and their cross-correlations, which may be readily adapted to incorporate added noise due to Gaussian measurements. We confirm that a heterodyne measurement performed on the idler mode leads to a performance, which asymptotically approaches that of a coherent state with homodyne detection. However, if the signal mode is affected by heterodyne but the idler mode is maintained clean, the performance asymptotically approaches that of the PC receiver without any added noise.
Abstract Quantum target detection aims to utilise quantum technologies to achieve performances in target detection not possible through purely classical means. Quantum illumination is an example of this, based on signal–idler entanglement, promising a potential 6 dB advantage in error exponent over its optimal classical counterpart. So far, receiver designs achieving this optimal reception remain elusive with many proposals based on Gaussian processes appearing unable to utilise quantum information contained within Gaussian state sources. This paper considers the employment of a noiseless linear amplifier at the detection stage of a quantum illumination-based quantum target detection protocol. Such a non-Gaussian amplifier offers a means of probabilistically amplifying an incoming signal without the addition of noise. Considering symmetric hypothesis testing, the quantum Chernoff bound is derived and limits on detection error probability is analysed for both the two-mode squeezed vacuum state and the coherent state classical benchmark. Our findings show that in such a scheme the potential quantum advantage is amplified even in regimes where quantum illumination alone offers no advantage, thereby extending its potential use. The same cannot be said for coherent states, whose performances are generally bounded by that without amplification.