A pure multipartite quantum state is called absolutely maximally entangled if all reductions of no more than half of the parties are maximally mixed. However, an
n-qubit absolutely maximally entangled state exists only when
n equals 2, 3, 5, and 6. A natural question arises when it does not exist: Which
n-qubit pure state has the largest number of maximally mixed $\ensuremath{\lfloor}n/2\ensuremath{\rfloor}$-party reductions? We denote this number by
Qex(n). It was shown that
Qex(4)=4 by Higuchi and Sudbery [Phys. Lett. A 273, 213 (2000)] and
Qex(7)=32 by Huber et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 200502 (2017)]. In this paper, we give a general upper bound of
Qex(n) by linking the well-known Tur\'an problem in graph theory and provide lower bounds using constructive and probabilistic methods. In particular, we show that
Qex(8)=56, which is the third known value for this problem.
Absolutely maximally entangled (AME) states represent an extreme form of multipartite entanglement: every reduced system containing at most half of the parties is maximally mixed. These states provide perfect tensors and optimal quantum error-correcting codes, yet their existence is known only in restricted parameter regimes. For every odd prime power
q=pe≥3, we construct a stabilizer
AME(2q,q) state whose normalized one-party projection yields a stabilizer
AME(2q−1,q) state. A closed-form
q×q bordered-circulant matrix
Aq over
Fq2 generates a Hermitian self-dual maximum distance separable (MDS) code
[2q,q,q+1]q2, which lies outside the extended Reed-Solomon classes. In suitable bases, the amplitude tensors define normalized
q-unitary complex Hadamard matrices of order
qq with
pth-root phases. Additional constructions yield
AME(q+3,q) states and families at intermediate particle numbers through explicit rescalings of selected submatrices. We also provide nine explicit parent matrices and the corresponding one-party projections.
Pure multiparticle quantum states are called absolutely maximally entangled if all reduced states obtained by tracing out at least half of the particles are maximally mixed. We provide a method to characterize these states for a general multiparticle system. With that, we prove that a seven-qubit state whose three-body marginals are all maximally mixed, or equivalently, a pure ((7,1,4))_{2} quantum error correcting code, does not exist. Furthermore, we obtain an upper limit on the possible number of maximally mixed three-body marginals and identify the state saturating the bound. This solves the seven-particle problem as the last open case concerning maximally entangled states of qubits.
Absolutely maximally entangled (AME) states are pure multi-partite generalizations of the bipartite maximally entangled states with the property that all reduced states of at most half the system size are in the maximally mixed state. AME states are of interest for multipartite teleportation and quantum secret sharing and have recently found new applications in the context of high-energy physics in toy models realizing the AdS/CFT-correspondence. We work out in detail the connection between AME states of minimal support and classical maximum distance separable (MDS) error correcting codes and, in particular, provide explicit closed form expressions for AME states of
n parties with local dimension
q a power of a prime for all
q≥n−1. Building on this, we construct a generalization of the Bell-basis consisting of AME states and develop a stabilizer formalism for AME states. For every
q≥n−1 prime we show how to construct QECCs that encode a logical qudit into a subspace spanned by AME states. Under a conjecture for which we provide numerical evidence, this construction produces a family of quantum error correcting codes
[[n,1,n/2]]q for
n even, saturating the quantum Singleton bound. We show that our conjecture is equivalent to the existence of an operator whose support cannot be decreased by multiplying it with stabilizer products and explicitly construct the codes up to
n=8.
Absolutely maximally entangled (AME) states and, more generally,
k-uniform states in $(\C^q)^{\otimes n}$ are central objects in multipartite entanglement theory, with applications to quantum secret sharing, quantum masking, and quantum error correction. In the extremal case
k=⌊n/2⌋, Scott (2004) proved a sharp nonexistence bound showing that AME states cannot exist once the number of parties
n exceeds a threshold of order
2q2 (with a parity dependence on
n), where
q is the local dimension. Recently, Ning et al.\ studied \emph{defective} AME states (i.e.,
k=⌊n/2⌋−l with
l>0), gave explicit Scott-type bounds for defects
l=1,2 and conjectured a general
(2l+2)q2+o(q2) behavior. In this paper, we solve this conjecture and establish a fully explicit Scott-type upper bound for AME states with arbitrary defect
l≥0, yielding Scott's bound for
l=0 and Ning et al.'s bounds for
l=1,2 as special cases. Equivalently, this gives nonexistence bounds for one-dimensional pure quantum error-correcting codes near the quantum Singleton regime. The proof uses a truncated MacWilliams linear-programming system and an explicit infeasibility certificate. As a direct application, we derive explicit asymptotic upper bounds on
k/n for fixed local dimension
q, improving the implicit upper bounds given by Ning et al.
We propose a straightforward method to determine the maximal entanglement of pure states using the criterion of maximal I-concurrence, a measure of entanglement. The square of concurrence for a bipartition
X∣X′ of a pure state is defined as
EX∣X′2=2[1−tr(ρX2)]. From this, we can infer that the concurrence
EX∣X′ reaches its maximum when
tr(ρX2) is minimized. Using this approach, we identify numerous Absolutely Maximally Entangled (AME) pure states that exhibit maximal entanglement across all possible bipartitions. Conditions are derived for pure states to achieve maximal mixedness in all bipartitions, revealing that any pure state with an odd number of subsystem coefficients does not meet the AME criterion. Furthermore, we obtain equal maximal multipartite entangled pure states across all bipartitions using our maximal concurrence criterion.