Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2608.12427

Is the Aharonov-Casher phase geometrical or dynamical?

Igor Kuzmenko, Y. B. Band, Yshai Avishai

cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasquant-phSubmitted Aug 12, 2026• Announced Aug 13, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider two two-dimensional (2D) electronic systems in the presence of a perpendicular homogeneous electric field that generates a Rashba spin-orbit interaction (RSOI): a system of non-interacting electrons in a 2D conductor, modeled using the 2D Schrödinger equation (SE), and a single-layer graphene system, modeled using a 2D Dirac equation (DE) for massless fermions. In both cases the RSOI is expressed via an $SU(2)$ Rashba vector potential ${\bf A}_{R}$. We demonstrate that ${\bf A}_{R}$ cannot be eliminated from either the 2D SE or the 2D DE via a gauge transformation. Nevertheless, for a plane wave solution, an $SU(2)$ matrix exists that eliminates ${\bf A}_{R}$ from the resulting 1D SE. This unitary matrix is an Aharonov-Casher (AC) phase factor, and facilitates the calculation of the AC phase in the Schrödinger scheme. The plane wave solution for the DE contains two components of ${\bf A}_{R}$: $A_{R, k}$ in the direction of the wave vector ${\bf k}$, and $A_{R, n}$ normal to ${\bf k}$. The latter generates an effective electron mass that cannot be eliminated from the DE. The former generates an AC phase that can be eliminated by a time-dependent unitary transformation. Thus, the Dirac AC phase is time-dependent, i.e., it is a dynamical phase. This is in contradistinction to the Schrödinger AC phase which is geometrical.

Comments
5 pages, 2 eps figures

Related papers

The Aharonov-Casher Phase: Considerations Regarding Force, Time-Dependence, and Berry Phase

Igor Kuzmenko, Y. B. Band, Y. Avishai

The relation of the Aharonov-Casher (AC) effect and the force on a particle having a magnetic moment is explored. The general form of the AC Hamiltonian is derived using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation to the Dirac equation. Geometries in which an analytic expression for the phase can be obtained are examined, as well as the relation of the AC phase to the Berry phase. The AC phase is determined for an arbitrary homogeneous electric field; it is quadratic (linear) in the field strength for small (large) electric field strengths.

arXiv:2506.11149•Jun 11, 2025•0 citations

Aharonov-Casher phase: Considerations regarding force, time dependence, and Berry phase

Igor Kuzmenko, Y. B. Band, Y. Avishai

The relation of the Aharonov-Casher (AC) effect and the force on a particle having a magnetic moment is explored. The general form of the AC Hamiltonian is derived using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation to the Dirac equation. Geometries in which an analytic expression for the phase can be obtained are examined, as well as the relation of the AC phase to the Berry phase. The AC phase is determined for an arbitrary homogeneous electric field; it is quadratic (linear) in the field strength for small (large) electric field strengths.

Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Nov 19, 2025•1 citation

Relativistic Aharonov-Casher phase in spin 1

J.A. Swansson, Bruce H. J. McKellar

The Aharonov-Casher (AC) phase is calculated in relativistic wave equations of spin 1. The AC phase has previously been calculated from the Dirac-Pauli equation using a gauge-like technique. In the spin-1 case, we use Kemmer theory (a Dirac-like particle theory) to calculate the phase in a similar manner. However, the vector formalism, the Proca theory, is more widely known and used. In the presence of an electromagnetic field, the two theories are `equivalent' and may be transformed into one another. We adapt these transformations to show that the Kemmer theory results apply to the Proca theory. Then we calculate the Aharonov-Casher phase for spin-1 particles directly in the Proca formalism.

arXiv:quant-ph/0007118•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 25, 2001•15 citations

The Aharonov-Casher phase is geometrical and not topological

Igor Kuzmenko, Y. B. Band, Y. Avishai

It is demonstrated that the Aharonov-Casher (AC) phase is a geometric phase that, in general, depends on the details of the closed path taken by a particle with a magnetic moment that is subject to an electric field. Consequently, it is not a topological phase. The proof of this statement is obtained by developing a counterexample that elucidates the dependence of the AC phase on the details of the path. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, in the particular example considered here, paths having an Abelian AC phase factor, also have an AC phase that is path-independent, whereas paths having a non-Abelian AC phase factor may have an AC phase that is path-dependent (i.e., not topological).

arXiv:2411.04589•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jun 17, 2025•5 citations

Spin-orbit interaction and Aharonov-Anandan phase in mesoscopic rings

Tiezheng Qian, Zhao-Bin Su

We show the existence of a nonadiabatic geometric phase, i.e., an Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase, in the Aharonov-Casher (AC) topological interference effect in one-dimensional mesoscopic rings. We find the AC phase is the phase accumulated by the spin wave function during a cyclic evolution, and show it is the sum of a geometric AA phase and a dynamical phase. In the adiabatic limit, the AA phase becomes the spin-orbit Berry phase introduced by Aronov and Lyanda-Geller. By solving exactly the model of a quasi-one-dimensional ring formed by the 2DEG on a semiconductor heterostructure, we discuss the observability of the AA phase in the AC effect.

Physical Review Letters•Apr 11, 1994•125 citations

THE AHARONOV–CASHER SCATTERING: THE EFFECT OF THE ∇ · E TERM

E. AL-QAQ, M. S. Shikakhwa

In the Aharonov–Casher (AC) scattering, a neutral particle interacts with an infinitesimally thin, long charge filament resulting in a phase shift. In the original AC treatment, a ∇ · E term proportional to the charge density at the filament's position is dropped from the Hamiltonian on the basis that the particle is banned from the filament, thus, the resulting Hamiltonian compares with the Aharonov–Bohm Hamiltonian of a scalar particle. Here, we consider AC scattering with this term included. Starting from the three-dimensional nonrelativistic Aharonov–Casher (AC) Schrödinger equation with the ∇ · E term included, we find the wave functions — in particular their singular component — the phase shifts and thus compute the scattering amplitudes and cross-sections. We show that singular solutions in the AC case appear only when the delta function interaction introduced is attractive regardless of the spin orientation of the particle. We find that the inclusion of this term does not introduce a structural difference in the general form of the cross-section even for polarized particles. Its mere effect, is in shifting the parameter N (the greatest integer in α) that appears in the cross-section, in the attractive case, by one. Interesting situation appears when N = 0, thus α=δ, in the case α≻0, and N = -1, so α = 1-δ in the case α≺0: At these values of the parameter N, where αis just any fraction, the cross-section for a particle polarized in the scattering plane to scatter in a state with the same polarization, is isotropic. It also vanishes, at these values of N, for transitions between same-helicity eigenstates. For these values of the parameter N and at the special values α = ±1/2, the cross-sections for both signs of α coincide. The main differences between this model and the "mathematically equivalent" spin-1/2 AB theory are outlined.

Modern Physics Letters A•Jun 4, 2010•1 citation
We consider two two-dimensional (2D) electronic systems in the presence of a perpendicular homogeneous electric field that generates a Rashba spin-orbit interaction (RSOI): a system of non-interacting electrons in a 2D conductor, modeled using the 2D Schrödinger equation (SE), and a single-layer graphene system, modeled using a 2D Dirac equation (DE) for massless fermions. In both cases the RSOI is expressed via an SU(2)SU(2)SU(2) Rashba vector potential AR{\bf A}_{R}AR​. We demonstrate that AR{\bf A}_{R}AR​ cannot be eliminated from either the 2D SE or the 2D DE via a gauge transformation. Nevertheless, for a plane wave solution, an SU(2)SU(2)SU(2) matrix exists that eliminates AR{\bf A}_{R}AR​ from the resulting 1D SE. This unitary matrix is an Aharonov-Casher (AC) phase factor, and facilitates the calculation of the AC phase in the Schrödinger scheme. The plane wave solution for the DE contains two components of AR{\bf A}_{R}AR​: AR,kA_{R, k}AR,k​ in the direction of the wave vector k{\bf k}k, and AR,nA_{R, n}AR,n​ normal to k{\bf k}k. The latter generates an effective electron mass that cannot be eliminated from the DE. The former generates an AC phase that can be eliminated by a time-dependent unitary transformation. Thus, the Dirac AC phase is time-dependent, i.e., it is a dynamical phase. This is in contradistinction to the Schrödinger AC phase which is geometrical.
The relation of the Aharonov-Casher (AC) effect and the force on a particle having a magnetic moment is explored. The general form of the AC Hamiltonian is derived using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation to the Dirac equation. Geometries in which an analytic expression for the phase can be obtained are examined, as well as the relation of the AC phase to the Berry phase. The AC phase is determined for an arbitrary homogeneous electric field; it is quadratic (linear) in the field strength for small (large) electric field strengths.
The relation of the Aharonov-Casher (AC) effect and the force on a particle having a magnetic moment is explored. The general form of the AC Hamiltonian is derived using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation to the Dirac equation. Geometries in which an analytic expression for the phase can be obtained are examined, as well as the relation of the AC phase to the Berry phase. The AC phase is determined for an arbitrary homogeneous electric field; it is quadratic (linear) in the field strength for small (large) electric field strengths.
The Aharonov-Casher (AC) phase is calculated in relativistic wave equations of spin 1. The AC phase has previously been calculated from the Dirac-Pauli equation using a gauge-like technique. In the spin-1 case, we use Kemmer theory (a Dirac-like particle theory) to calculate the phase in a similar manner. However, the vector formalism, the Proca theory, is more widely known and used. In the presence of an electromagnetic field, the two theories are `equivalent' and may be transformed into one another. We adapt these transformations to show that the Kemmer theory results apply to the Proca theory. Then we calculate the Aharonov-Casher phase for spin-1 particles directly in the Proca formalism.
It is demonstrated that the Aharonov-Casher (AC) phase is a geometric phase that, in general, depends on the details of the closed path taken by a particle with a magnetic moment that is subject to an electric field. Consequently, it is not a topological phase. The proof of this statement is obtained by developing a counterexample that elucidates the dependence of the AC phase on the details of the path. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, in the particular example considered here, paths having an Abelian AC phase factor, also have an AC phase that is path-independent, whereas paths having a non-Abelian AC phase factor may have an AC phase that is path-dependent (i.e., not topological).
We show the existence of a nonadiabatic geometric phase, i.e., an Aharonov-Anandan (AA) phase, in the Aharonov-Casher (AC) topological interference effect in one-dimensional mesoscopic rings. We find the AC phase is the phase accumulated by the spin wave function during a cyclic evolution, and show it is the sum of a geometric AA phase and a dynamical phase. In the adiabatic limit, the AA phase becomes the spin-orbit Berry phase introduced by Aronov and Lyanda-Geller. By solving exactly the model of a quasi-one-dimensional ring formed by the 2DEG on a semiconductor heterostructure, we discuss the observability of the AA phase in the AC effect.
In the Aharonov–Casher (AC) scattering, a neutral particle interacts with an infinitesimally thin, long charge filament resulting in a phase shift. In the original AC treatment, a ∇ · E term proportional to the charge density at the filament's position is dropped from the Hamiltonian on the basis that the particle is banned from the filament, thus, the resulting Hamiltonian compares with the Aharonov–Bohm Hamiltonian of a scalar particle. Here, we consider AC scattering with this term included. Starting from the three-dimensional nonrelativistic Aharonov–Casher (AC) Schrödinger equation with the ∇ · E term included, we find the wave functions — in particular their singular component — the phase shifts and thus compute the scattering amplitudes and cross-sections. We show that singular solutions in the AC case appear only when the delta function interaction introduced is attractive regardless of the spin orientation of the particle. We find that the inclusion of this term does not introduce a structural difference in the general form of the cross-section even for polarized particles. Its mere effect, is in shifting the parameter N (the greatest integer in α) that appears in the cross-section, in the attractive case, by one. Interesting situation appears when N = 0, thus α=δ, in the case α≻0, and N = -1, so α = 1-δ in the case α≺0: At these values of the parameter N, where αis just any fraction, the cross-section for a particle polarized in the scattering plane to scatter in a state with the same polarization, is isotropic. It also vanishes, at these values of N, for transitions between same-helicity eigenstates. For these values of the parameter N and at the special values α = ±1/2, the cross-sections for both signs of α coincide. The main differences between this model and the "mathematically equivalent" spin-1/2 AB theory are outlined.