Quantum computing is a promising way to study problems that are difficult for classical methods, but current quantum hardware still faces limits in scale, noise, and fidelity. Running quantum algorithms on physical machines can also be costly. Quantum circuit simulators therefore remain important because they let researchers design and test algorithms on classical computers before using quantum hardware. Most high-performance simulators provide GPU backends, while few offer native support for NPUs. This gap limits the computing platforms available for quantum-algorithm research. We developed Aicir to provide a full-stack quantum circuit simulator with a native Huawei Ascend NPU backend. Aicir connects circuit construction, several state representations, measurement, differentiation, variational algorithms, quantum machine learning, and quantum architecture search through one programming model. It also supports noise simulation, tensor-network and matrix-product-state engines, and distributed state simulation. On the NPU, paired real tensors, fixed-rank gate views, and hardware-specific formulas keep the tested simulation paths on the device. The same representation lets Aicir partition a state across $2^{p}$ NPUs while retaining reverse-mode differentiation. We validated native execution with CPU fallback disabled and checked distributed communication and gradients on 2, 4, and 8 NPUs. For the tested fused layered circuits, Aicir's CPU runtime is within $0.97$--$1.28\times$ that of Qiskit Aer and $0.76$--$1.10\times$ that of Cirq. These results place its CPU execution in the same range as established simulators for this workload, while the NPU tests establish correct native execution rather than CPU-to-NPU speedup.
Quantum computing is a promising way to study problems that are difficult for classical methods, but current quantum hardware still faces limits in scale, noise, and fidelity. Running quantum algorithms on physical machines can also be costly. Quantum circuit simulators therefore remain important because they let researchers design and test algorithms on classical computers before using quantum hardware. Most high-performance simulators provide GPU backends, while few offer native support for NPUs. This gap limits the computing platforms available for quantum-algorithm research. We developed Aicir to provide a full-stack quantum circuit simulator with a native Huawei Ascend NPU backend. Aicir connects circuit construction, several state representations, measurement, differentiation, variational algorithms, quantum machine learning, and quantum architecture search through one programming model. It also supports noise simulation, tensor-network and matrix-product-state engines, and distributed state simulation. On the NPU, paired real tensors, fixed-rank gate views, and hardware-specific formulas keep the tested simulation paths on the device. The same representation lets Aicir partition a state across 2p NPUs while retaining reverse-mode differentiation. We validated native execution with CPU fallback disabled and checked distributed communication and gradients on 2, 4, and 8 NPUs. For the tested fused layered circuits, Aicir's CPU runtime is within 0.97--1.28× that of Qiskit Aer and 0.76--1.10× that of Cirq. These results place its CPU execution in the same range as established simulators for this workload, while the NPU tests establish correct native execution rather than CPU-to-NPU speedup.
Classical simulation of quantum circuits remains indispensable for algorithm development, hardware validation, and error analysis in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. However, state-vector simulation faces exponential memory scaling, with an n-qubit system requiring O(2^n) complex amplitudes, and existing simulators often lack the flexibility to exploit heterogeneous computing resources at runtime. This paper presents a GPU-accelerated quantum circuit simulation framework that introduces three contributions: (1) an empirical backend selection algorithm that benchmarks CuPy, PyTorch-CUDA, and NumPy-CPU backends at runtime and selects the optimal execution path based on measured throughput; (2) a directed acyclic graph (DAG) based gate fusion engine that reduces circuit depth through automated identification of fusible gate sequences, coupled with adaptive precision switching between complex64 and complex128 representations; and (3) a memory-aware fallback mechanism that monitors GPU memory consumption and gracefully degrades to CPU execution when resources are exhausted. The framework integrates with Qiskit, Cirq, PennyLane, and Amazon Braket through a unified adapter layer. Benchmarks on an NVIDIA A100-SXM4 (40 GiB) GPU demonstrate speedups of 64x to 146x over NumPy CPU execution for state-vector simulation of circuits with 20 to 28 qubits, with speedups exceeding 5x from 16 qubits onward. Hardware validation on an IBM quantum processing unit (QPU) confirms Bell state fidelity of 0.939, a five-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state fidelity of 0.853, and circuit depth reduction from 42 to 14 gates through the fusion pipeline. The system is designed for portability across NVIDIA consumer and data-center GPUs, requiring no vendor-specific compilation steps.
This work presents QiliSim, the native C++ simulation backend of QiliSDK, an open-source Python framework for digital and analog quantum computing. QiliSim supports quantum circuits, Hamiltonian time evolution, and analog-digital quantum reservoirs through a common interface, allowing users to test quantum algorithms before executing them on quantum hardware. The simulator provides statevector and density-matrix methods for digital workloads, alongside fixed-step and adaptive Runge–Kutta integrators, Krylov-subspace methods, and direct matrix exponentiation for analog evolution. Monte Carlo trajectories, mid-circuit measurements, and Kraus and Lindbladian noise models support the simulation of noisy quantum systems. Numerical methods and execution settings are selected through structured configuration objects, allowing the same quantum program to run with different simulation strategies without modifying its definition. The poster includes a circuit simulation example and performance comparisons for digital circuit sampling and quantum annealing. The reported benchmarks show competitive CPU performance against Qiskit Aer and Cirq for small to medium circuits, and faster execution than QuTiP and CUDA-Q dynamics for the tested annealing task at a target fidelity of 99%.
We present TensorCircuit-NG, a next-generation quantum software platform designed to bridge the gap between quantum physics, artificial intelligence, and high-performance computing. Moving beyond the scope of traditional circuit simulators, TensorCircuit-NG establishes a unified, tensor-native programming paradigm where quantum circuits, tensor networks, and neural networks fuse into a single, end-to-end differentiable computational graph. Built upon industry-standard machine learning backends (JAX, TensorFlow, PyTorch), the framework introduces comprehensive capabilities for approximate circuit simulation, analog dynamics, fermion Gaussian states, qudit systems, and scalable noise modeling. To tackle the exponential complexity of deep quantum circuits, TensorCircuit-NG implements advanced distributed computing strategies, including automated data parallelism and model-parallel tensor network slicing. We validate these capabilities on GPU clusters, demonstrating a near-linear speedup in distributed variational quantum algorithms. TensorCircuit-NG enables flagship applications, including end-to-end QML for CIFAR-100 computer vision, efficient pipelines from quantum states to neural networks via classical shadows, and differentiable optimization of tensor network states for many-body physics.
Developing state-of-the-art classical simulators of quantum circuits is of utmost importance to test and evaluate early quantum technology and understand the true potential of full-blown error-corrected quantum computers. In the past few years, multiple theoretical and numerical advances have continuously pushed the boundary of what is classically simulable, hence the development of a plethora of tools which are often limited to a specific purpose or designed for a particular hardware (e.g. CPUs vs. GPUs). Moreover, such tools are typically developed using tailored languages and syntax, which makes it hard to compare results from, and create hybrid approaches using, different simulation techniques. To support unified and optimized use of these techniques across platforms, we developed HybridQ , a highly extensible platform designed to provide a common framework to integrate multiple state-of-the-art techniques to run on a variety of hardware. The philosophy behind its development has been driven by three main pillars: Easy to Use, Easy to Extend, and Use the Best Available Technology. The powerful tools of HybridQ allow users to manipulate, develop, and extend noiseless and noisy circuits for different hardware architectures. HybridQ supports large-scale high-performance computing (HPC) simulations, automatically balancing workload among different processor nodes and enabling the use of multiple backends to maximize parallel efficiency. Everything is then glued together by a simple and expressive language that allows seamless switching from one technique to another as well as from one hardware to the next, without the need to write lengthy translations, thus greatly simplifying the development of new hybrid algorithms and techniques.
Quantum circuit simulation remains essential for developing and validating quantum algorithms, especially as current quantum hardware is limited in scale and quality. However, the growing diversity of simulation methods and software tools creates a high barrier to selecting the most suitable backend for a given circuit. We introduce Maestro, a unified interface for quantum circuit simulation that integrates multiple simulation paradigms - state vector, MPS, tensor network, stabilizer, GPU-accelerated, and p-block methods - under a single API. Maestro includes a predictive runtime model that automatically selects the optimal simulator based on circuit structure and available hardware, and applies backend-specific optimizations such as multiprocessing, GPU execution, and improved sampling. Benchmarks across heterogeneous workloads demonstrate that Maestro outperforms individual simulators in both single-circuit and large batched settings, particularly in high-performance computing environments. Maestro provides a scalable, extensible platform for quantum algorithm research, hybrid quantum-classical workflows, and emerging distributed quantum computing architectures.
Portability in high-performance quantum-circuit simulation need not begin at the kernel. We present QSimAdv, which makes late binding, rather than a common kernel, the basis of vendor independence. Representation, operator lowering, and data placement are bound only when their required inputs become available. Before full-state allocation, circuit, noise, and output inspection can route eligible generic sampled-count requests to a stabiliser tableau; explicitly requested representations remain fixed. For full-state execution, backend constraints shape fusion; an ordered fused operator binds to a native lowering only after its physical targets are known. A first-class logical-to-physical layout map records non-canonical order across local and rank-address bits, so the dispatcher moves nonlocal targets only on demand. GPU, CPU, and Message Passing Interface (MPI) backends share these semantics while retaining native execution paths. We realize this design on NVIDIA GH200 and AMD MI250X/EPYC systems across local and distributed execution. With matched complex 32-bit floating-point state storage, QSimAdv leads both Aer Hopper configurations at N=32 and Aer's HIP backend at four shared MI250X sizes from N=24 to 30. Strong scaling exposes platform dependence: on setonix, QSimAdv leads both GPU and CPU comparisons at every measured rank, achieving 3.4× and 2.8× speedups, respectively, from one to eight ranks; neither the GH200 path nor the CPU path speeds up at eight ranks. Weak scaling reaches 256 ranks with 2 TiB GPU and 1 TiB CPU states. Together, these results support that portability can reside above the kernel boundary while execution remains native and extends across distributed memory.