Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2607.28369

Performance Benchmarking: Software for the Density Matrix Renormalization Group

Per Sehlstedt, Paolo Bientinesi, Lars Karlsson

physics.comp-phcs.CEcs.MSphysics.chem-phquant-phSubmitted Jul 30, 2026• Announced Jul 31, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The performance of scientific software often determines the scale of problems that can be solved in practice. As multiple implementations of the same algorithm emerge, systematic evaluation is needed to compare their strengths and limitations. The density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) algorithm, widely used to study quantum systems, has over 50 software implementations. These implementations vary in multiple aspects that can strongly affect performance. However, despite the need, performance evaluations of these implementations are scarce and lack a consistent standard; many existing evaluations are either too incomplete to enable meaningful comparisons or focus on objectives other than direct performance comparisons, thereby limiting understanding of how the implementations compare. Here, we present a performance-oriented benchmarking framework to facilitate meaningful comparisons of DMRG implementations, and we apply it to quantify the performance of eight implementations, highlighting similarities and differences among them. Furthermore, we examine multiple parameter settings, optimization strategies, and implementation-specific features to demonstrate how parameter configuration can affect performance and how systematic evaluation can reveal non-obvious trade-offs. The results show significant performance differences, up to two orders of magnitude in some cases, not only between different implementations when aligning parameters, but also within the same implementation when comparing different parameter configurations. Hence, our results demonstrate the significant value and insight that can be gained from conducting rigorous performance evaluations. Using our results and framework as a starting point, more rigorous benchmarking will ultimately help users and developers make informed decisions and support future development efforts to build better, more efficient software.

Related papers

The software landscape for the density matrix renormalization group

Per Sehlstedt, Jan Brandejs, Paolo Bientinesi +1 more

The density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) algorithm is a cornerstone computational method for studying quantum many-body systems, renowned for its accuracy and adaptability. Because DMRG provides a general framework applicable across various fields such as materials science, quantum chemistry, and quantum computing, one might expect a shared, flexible library to serve most users. Nevertheless, numerous independent implementations continue to appear, resulting in significant duplication of effort. To identify collaboration opportunities that can promote a more unified approach, we map the rapidly expanding DMRG software landscape and provide a comprehensive comparison of features across 37 existing packages. When comparing key features, such as parallelism strategies for high-performance computing and symmetry-adapted formulations that enhance efficiency, we found significant overlap among the packages. This overlap suggests opportunities for collaboration to modularize common functionality—e.g., tensor operations, symmetry representations, and eigensolvers—as the packages are mostly independent and share few third-party library dependencies. More collaboration on modularization could reduce duplication of effort, improve interoperability, and enable prioritization and quicker spread of new advances. We believe the current lack of modularity is more socially driven than a technical issue; hence, we see raising awareness about the existing implementations as a first step in the right direction. Ultimately, this work emphasizes the value of greater cohesion through modularity, which would benefit DMRG software and related tensor-network-centered software, enabling the solution of more complex and ambitious problems.

arXiv:2506.12629•Computer Physics Communications•Mar 20, 2026•1 citation

The ab-initio density matrix renormalization group in practice

Roberto Olivares‐Amaya, Weifeng Hu, Naoki Nakatani +3 more

The ab-initio density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) is a tool that can be applied to a wide variety of interesting problems in quantum chemistry. Here, we examine the density matrix renormalization group from the vantage point of the quantum chemistry user. What kinds of problems is the DMRG well-suited to? What are the largest systems that can be treated at practical cost? What sort of accuracies can be obtained, and how do we reason about the computational difficulty in different molecules? By examining a diverse benchmark set of molecules: π-electron systems, benchmark main-group and transition metal dimers, and the Mn-oxo-salen and Fe-porphine organometallic compounds, we provide some answers to these questions, and show how the density matrix renormalization group is used in practice.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 15, 2015•364 citations

Systematic benchmarking of quantum computers: status and recommendations

Jeanette Miriam Lorenz, Thomas Monz, Jens Eisert +11 more

Architectures for quantum computing can only be scaled up when they are accompanied by suitable benchmarking techniques. The document provides a comprehensive overview of the state and recommendations for systematic benchmarking of quantum computers. Benchmarking is crucial for assessing the performance of quantum computers, including the hardware, software, as well as algorithms and applications. The document highlights key aspects such as component-level, system-level, software-level, HPC-level, and application-level benchmarks. Component-level benchmarks focus on the performance of individual qubits and gates, while system-level benchmarks evaluate the entire quantum processor. Software-level benchmarks consider the compiler's efficiency and error mitigation techniques. HPC-level and cloud benchmarks address integration with classical systems and cloud platforms, respectively. Application-level benchmarks measure performance in real-world use cases. The document also discusses the importance of standardization to ensure reproducibility and comparability of benchmarks, and highlights ongoing efforts in the quantum computing community towards establishing these benchmarks. Recommendations for future steps emphasize the need for developing standardized evaluation routines and integrating benchmarks with broader quantum technology activities.

arXiv:2503.04905•Mar 6, 2025•2 citations

Measuring what matters: A scalable framework for application-level quantum benchmarking

Willie Aboumrad, Claudio Girotto, Joshua Goings +16 more

As quantum computing systems continue to mature, there is an increasing need for benchmarking methodologies that capture performance in terms of meaningful, application-level metrics. In this work, we present a scalable framework for application-level quantum benchmarking that is designed to support internal system evaluation and cross-platform comparison across technology providers. Our framework is guided by a set of core principles, including measurability, simplicity, scalability, and extensibility. We present 13 benchmark families that reflect realistic workloads across multiple domains. This enables the systematic evaluation of the quality of solutions, the total execution time, total used energy, as well as Time-to-Solution. The benchmarks are designed to be reproducible, interpretable across stakeholder groups, and adaptable to evolving system capabilities. The framework aims to bridge the gap between low-level performance metrics and real-world value, providing a unified approach to assessing quantum systems. The resulting benchmarks support development and validation and contribute to the foundation of industry-wide benchmarking standards.

quant-pharXiv:2604.11781•Apr 14, 2026•0 citations

The density matrix renormalization group in chemistry and molecular physics: Recent developments and new challenges

Alberto Baiardi, Markus Reiher

In the past two decades, the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) has emerged as an innovative new method in quantum chemistry relying on a theoretical framework very different from that of traditional electronic structure approaches. The development of the quantum chemical DMRG has been remarkably fast: it has already become one of the reference approaches for large-scale multiconfigurational calculations. This perspective discusses the major features of DMRG, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses also in comparison with other novel approaches. The method is presented following its historical development, starting from its original formulation up to its most recent applications. Possible routes to recover dynamical correlation are discussed in detail. Emerging new fields of applications of DMRG are explored, such as its time-dependent formulation and the application to vibrational spectroscopy.

arXiv:1910.00137•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 23, 2020•305 citations

Benchmarking quantum computer simulation software packages: State vector simulators

Amit Jamadagni, Andreas Martin Läuchli, Cornelius Hempel

Rapid advances in quantum computing technology lead to an increasing need for software simulators that enable both algorithm design and the validation of results obtained from quantum hardware. This includes calculations that aim at probing regimes of quantum advantage, where a quantum computer outperforms a classical computer in the same task. High performance computing (HPC) platforms play a crucial role as today’s quantum devices already reach beyond the limits of what powerful workstations can model, but a systematic evaluation of the individual performance of the many offered simulation packages is lacking so far. In this Technical Review, we benchmark several software packages capable of simulating quantum dynamics with a special focus on HPC capabilities. We develop a containerized toolchain for benchmarking a large set of simulation packages on a local HPC cluster using different parallelisation capabilities, and compare the performance and system size-scaling for three paradigmatic quantum computing tasks. Our results can help finding the right package for a given simulation task and lay the foundation for a systematic community effort to benchmark and validate upcoming versions of existing and also newly developed simulation packages.

arXiv:2401.09076•SciPost Physics Core•Nov 26, 2024•25 citations
The performance of scientific software often determines the scale of problems that can be solved in practice. As multiple implementations of the same algorithm emerge, systematic evaluation is needed to compare their strengths and limitations. The density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) algorithm, widely used to study quantum systems, has over 50 software implementations. These implementations vary in multiple aspects that can strongly affect performance. However, despite the need, performance evaluations of these implementations are scarce and lack a consistent standard; many existing evaluations are either too incomplete to enable meaningful comparisons or focus on objectives other than direct performance comparisons, thereby limiting understanding of how the implementations compare. Here, we present a performance-oriented benchmarking framework to facilitate meaningful comparisons of DMRG implementations, and we apply it to quantify the performance of eight implementations, highlighting similarities and differences among them. Furthermore, we examine multiple parameter settings, optimization strategies, and implementation-specific features to demonstrate how parameter configuration can affect performance and how systematic evaluation can reveal non-obvious trade-offs. The results show significant performance differences, up to two orders of magnitude in some cases, not only between different implementations when aligning parameters, but also within the same implementation when comparing different parameter configurations. Hence, our results demonstrate the significant value and insight that can be gained from conducting rigorous performance evaluations. Using our results and framework as a starting point, more rigorous benchmarking will ultimately help users and developers make informed decisions and support future development efforts to build better, more efficient software.
The density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) algorithm is a cornerstone computational method for studying quantum many-body systems, renowned for its accuracy and adaptability. Because DMRG provides a general framework applicable across various fields such as materials science, quantum chemistry, and quantum computing, one might expect a shared, flexible library to serve most users. Nevertheless, numerous independent implementations continue to appear, resulting in significant duplication of effort. To identify collaboration opportunities that can promote a more unified approach, we map the rapidly expanding DMRG software landscape and provide a comprehensive comparison of features across 37 existing packages. When comparing key features, such as parallelism strategies for high-performance computing and symmetry-adapted formulations that enhance efficiency, we found significant overlap among the packages. This overlap suggests opportunities for collaboration to modularize common functionality—e.g., tensor operations, symmetry representations, and eigensolvers—as the packages are mostly independent and share few third-party library dependencies. More collaboration on modularization could reduce duplication of effort, improve interoperability, and enable prioritization and quicker spread of new advances. We believe the current lack of modularity is more socially driven than a technical issue; hence, we see raising awareness about the existing implementations as a first step in the right direction. Ultimately, this work emphasizes the value of greater cohesion through modularity, which would benefit DMRG software and related tensor-network-centered software, enabling the solution of more complex and ambitious problems.
The ab-initio density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) is a tool that can be applied to a wide variety of interesting problems in quantum chemistry. Here, we examine the density matrix renormalization group from the vantage point of the quantum chemistry user. What kinds of problems is the DMRG well-suited to? What are the largest systems that can be treated at practical cost? What sort of accuracies can be obtained, and how do we reason about the computational difficulty in different molecules? By examining a diverse benchmark set of molecules: π-electron systems, benchmark main-group and transition metal dimers, and the Mn-oxo-salen and Fe-porphine organometallic compounds, we provide some answers to these questions, and show how the density matrix renormalization group is used in practice.
Architectures for quantum computing can only be scaled up when they are accompanied by suitable benchmarking techniques. The document provides a comprehensive overview of the state and recommendations for systematic benchmarking of quantum computers. Benchmarking is crucial for assessing the performance of quantum computers, including the hardware, software, as well as algorithms and applications. The document highlights key aspects such as component-level, system-level, software-level, HPC-level, and application-level benchmarks. Component-level benchmarks focus on the performance of individual qubits and gates, while system-level benchmarks evaluate the entire quantum processor. Software-level benchmarks consider the compiler's efficiency and error mitigation techniques. HPC-level and cloud benchmarks address integration with classical systems and cloud platforms, respectively. Application-level benchmarks measure performance in real-world use cases. The document also discusses the importance of standardization to ensure reproducibility and comparability of benchmarks, and highlights ongoing efforts in the quantum computing community towards establishing these benchmarks. Recommendations for future steps emphasize the need for developing standardized evaluation routines and integrating benchmarks with broader quantum technology activities.
As quantum computing systems continue to mature, there is an increasing need for benchmarking methodologies that capture performance in terms of meaningful, application-level metrics. In this work, we present a scalable framework for application-level quantum benchmarking that is designed to support internal system evaluation and cross-platform comparison across technology providers. Our framework is guided by a set of core principles, including measurability, simplicity, scalability, and extensibility. We present 13 benchmark families that reflect realistic workloads across multiple domains. This enables the systematic evaluation of the quality of solutions, the total execution time, total used energy, as well as Time-to-Solution. The benchmarks are designed to be reproducible, interpretable across stakeholder groups, and adaptable to evolving system capabilities. The framework aims to bridge the gap between low-level performance metrics and real-world value, providing a unified approach to assessing quantum systems. The resulting benchmarks support development and validation and contribute to the foundation of industry-wide benchmarking standards.
In the past two decades, the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) has emerged as an innovative new method in quantum chemistry relying on a theoretical framework very different from that of traditional electronic structure approaches. The development of the quantum chemical DMRG has been remarkably fast: it has already become one of the reference approaches for large-scale multiconfigurational calculations. This perspective discusses the major features of DMRG, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses also in comparison with other novel approaches. The method is presented following its historical development, starting from its original formulation up to its most recent applications. Possible routes to recover dynamical correlation are discussed in detail. Emerging new fields of applications of DMRG are explored, such as its time-dependent formulation and the application to vibrational spectroscopy.
Rapid advances in quantum computing technology lead to an increasing need for software simulators that enable both algorithm design and the validation of results obtained from quantum hardware. This includes calculations that aim at probing regimes of quantum advantage, where a quantum computer outperforms a classical computer in the same task. High performance computing (HPC) platforms play a crucial role as today’s quantum devices already reach beyond the limits of what powerful workstations can model, but a systematic evaluation of the individual performance of the many offered simulation packages is lacking so far. In this Technical Review, we benchmark several software packages capable of simulating quantum dynamics with a special focus on HPC capabilities. We develop a containerized toolchain for benchmarking a large set of simulation packages on a local HPC cluster using different parallelisation capabilities, and compare the performance and system size-scaling for three paradigmatic quantum computing tasks. Our results can help finding the right package for a given simulation task and lay the foundation for a systematic community effort to benchmark and validate upcoming versions of existing and also newly developed simulation packages.