High-fidelity quantum control relies on accurate models of driven dynamics. We examine this re- quirement for single-qubit gates in superconducting transmons by comparing control pulses derived from the standard Duffing approximation and from a Hamiltonian constructed by diagonalizing the transmon eigenbasis. Using the same correction-pulse construction for both models, we show that correction fields derived from the Duffing approximation can substantially reduce the gate error pre- dicted by that model while remaining less effective when combined with an independently calibrated baseline pulse in the diagonalized-transmon model. In the fast-gate regime, such transferred correc- tions can even fail to improve over the uncorrected diagonalized-transmon baseline. We show that small model-dependent differences in both the energy spectrum and the representation of the drive operator can compound during driven evolution, resulting in different predicted error generators and correction pulses. A mismatch in the accumulated AC Stark phase provides one illustrative di- agnostic of this dynamical model dependence. We further demonstrate that the model Hamiltonian informs the choice of control framework: Omitting relevant leakage pathways or higher-order error channels can lead to an overly restricted correction strategy. Including these channels motivates an extended correction framework that improves the gate performance using the same physical control resources.
High-fidelity quantum control relies on accurate models of driven dynamics. We examine this re- quirement for single-qubit gates in superconducting transmons by comparing control pulses derived from the standard Duffing approximation and from a Hamiltonian constructed by diagonalizing the transmon eigenbasis. Using the same correction-pulse construction for both models, we show that correction fields derived from the Duffing approximation can substantially reduce the gate error pre- dicted by that model while remaining less effective when combined with an independently calibrated baseline pulse in the diagonalized-transmon model. In the fast-gate regime, such transferred correc- tions can even fail to improve over the uncorrected diagonalized-transmon baseline. We show that small model-dependent differences in both the energy spectrum and the representation of the drive operator can compound during driven evolution, resulting in different predicted error generators and correction pulses. A mismatch in the accumulated AC Stark phase provides one illustrative di- agnostic of this dynamical model dependence. We further demonstrate that the model Hamiltonian informs the choice of control framework: Omitting relevant leakage pathways or higher-order error channels can lead to an overly restricted correction strategy. Including these channels motivates an extended correction framework that improves the gate performance using the same physical control resources.
Pulse-level simulators are the lowest-level, most widely used abstraction layer for studying how quantum hardware responds to control signals, but they can be built on Hamiltonian models with very different fidelity and cost. This raises the question: which level of physical abstraction is sufficient for a given simulation objective? We study this question for a flux-tunable two-qubit superconducting device with a fixed bus coupler by comparing three Hamiltonian descriptions of the same hardware: an effective two-level model, a three-mode Duffing model, and a circuit-based transmon model in the charge basis. Using a realistic parameter set, we evaluate these models on a common benchmark suite spanning flux-dependent spectra, extracted two-qubit interaction terms, driven single-qubit dynamics, CZ gate dynamics, leakage outside the computational subspace, and runtime. Across the tested flux range, the Duffing model follows the circuit-based reference more closely than the effective model for static spectra and reduced two-qubit quantities, while in driven benchmarks, the multilevel models reveal effects absent in the effective description. Overall, the results support a layered use of abstraction in pulse-level simulation: effective models for reduced analyses, Duffing models as a practical multilevel default, and circuit-based models for high-fidelity reference simulation or detailed leakage analysis.
Pulse-level simulators are the lowest-level, most widely used abstraction layer for studying how quantum hardware responds to control signals, but they can be built on Hamiltonian models with very different fidelity and cost. This raises the question: which level of physical abstraction is sufficient for a given simulation objective? We study this question for a flux-tunable two-qubit superconducting device with a fixed bus coupler by comparing three Hamiltonian descriptions of the same hardware: an effective two-level model, a three-mode Duffing model, and a circuit-based transmon model in the charge basis. Using a realistic parameter set, we evaluate these models on a common benchmark suite spanning flux-dependent spectra, extracted two-qubit interaction terms, driven single-qubit dynamics, CZ gate dynamics, leakage outside the computational subspace, and runtime. Across the tested flux range, the Duffing model follows the circuit-based reference more closely than the effective model for static spectra and reduced two-qubit quantities, while in driven benchmarks, the multilevel models reveal effects absent in the effective description. Overall, the results support a layered use of abstraction in pulse-level simulation: effective models for reduced analyses, Duffing models as a practical multilevel default, and circuit-based models for high-fidelity reference simulation or detailed leakage analysis.
Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires quantum gates that combine short duration, high fidelity, and robustness to noise. As quantum processors scale, robustness becomes increasingly important because exhaustive characterization and frequent recalibration of individual gates become impractical. We present a comprehensive optimal-control framework for controlled-Z (CZ) gates between directly coupled, frequency-tunable transmons that systematically accounts for intrinsic Hamiltonian errors and realistic decoherence mechanisms, including energy relaxation and dephasing. Using smooth, single-shot flux pulses, we obtain 12-ns CZ gates---close to the theoretical speed limit of 11.6 ns---with intrinsic errors suppressed to the 2×10−5 level. We construct dephasing noise models, calibrated against published experimental measurements, that capture fast dephasing from room-temperature control electronics and slow dephasing from 1/f flux noise. Using these models, we identify dephasing sweet spots that suppress sensitivity to dephasing noise. We further exploit transmon asymmetry as a design parameter to access distinct noise-resilient operating regimes. These results establish an experimentally applicable framework for balancing gate speed, fidelity, and noise robustness while reducing characterization and recalibration overhead.
In the companion paper (Part I), we developed an optimal-control framework to suppress intrinsic and decoherence-induced errors in controlled-Z (CZ) gates between directly coupled, frequency-tunable transmons. Here, we extend this framework to incorporate uncertainties in coupling strength, anharmonicities, and zero-flux qubit frequencies, enabling the design of high-fidelity gates robust against noise and parameter uncertainties. We classify these uncertainties by whether they perturb the off-diagonal coupling strengths or the diagonal detunings of the Hamiltonian, and we identify distinct suppression mechanisms for each class. Coupling errors are mitigated through dynamical decoupling induced by strong detuning modulation. For a 30-ns gate, this strategy reduces the coupling error to 6.21×10−7 and tolerates coupling-strength uncertainties up to 2π×4 MHz while keeping total gate infidelity below 10−3. Detuning errors are minimized near a symmetric-detuning operating point that balances the two dominant leakage-mediated interactions. A 24-ns gate operated near this point tolerates individual uncertainties of up to 2π×5 MHz in each relevant diagonal parameter under the same infidelity threshold. We further optimize gate performance under realistic conditions where intrinsic errors, decoherence, and parameter uncertainties coexist across six representative stages of progressively improving hardware performance. The resulting stage-specific controls achieve lower infidelity and greater robustness. Together with the companion study (Part I), this framework offers a practical approach to balance speed, fidelity, and robustness while reducing the need for exhaustive characterization and frequent recalibration in large-scale superconducting quantum processors.
Improving the speed and fidelity of quantum logic gates is essential to reach quantum advantage with future quantum computers. However, fast logic gates lead to increased leakage errors in superconducting quantum processors based on qubits with low anharmonicity, such as transmons. To reduce leakage errors, we propose and experimentally demonstrate two new analytical methods, Fourier ansatz spectrum tuning derivative removal by adiabatic gate (FAST DRAG) and higher-derivative (HD) DRAG, both of which enable shaping single-qubit control pulses in the frequency domain to achieve stronger suppression of leakage transitions compared to previously demonstrated pulse shapes. Using the new methods to suppress the e f transition of a transmon qubit with an anharmonicity of − 212 MHz, we implement R X ( π / 2 ) gates achieving a leakage error below 3.0 × 10 − 5 down to a gate duration of 6.25 ns without the need for iterative closed-loop optimization. The obtained leakage error represents a 20-fold reduction in leakage compared to a conventional cosine DRAG pulse. Employing the FAST DRAG method, we further achieve an error per gate of ( 1.56 ± 0.07 ) × 10 − 4 at a 7.9-ns gate duration, outperforming conventional pulse shapes both in terms of error and gate speed. Furthermore, we study error-amplifying measurements for the characterization of temporal microwave control-pulse distortions, and demonstrate that non-Markovian coherent errors caused by such distortions may be a significant source of error for sub-10-ns single-qubit gates unless corrected using predistortion. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Achieving very fast gates that undercut the natural limits set by decoherence requires going into the strong driving limit. Realizing single-qubit control predicted beyond semi-classical, time-dependent modeling has yet to be experimentally realized on superconducting and most other computing platforms. In this regime, the common model of dynamics within a three-level manifold breaks down, and instead, we see new quantum error channels growing abruptly with decreasing time. To identify these error processes we systematically calculate the effect of multi-photon transitions that occur out of the computational space. We then derive analytical formulas to suppress these effects, as well as amplitude and phase errors on the qubit space; we term these R1D for suppressing the ∣0⟩−∣2⟩ transition and R2D when also suppressing ∣1⟩−∣3⟩ leakage. We also answer long-standing questions about the optimal values of the DRAG prefactor as well as constant detuning, when accounting for time-ordering, and also show how to calibrate other prefactors for further performance improvement. Upon correcting these varied sources of error, we numerically demonstrate gate infidelities below 10−5 for a 7ns π-rotation when incorporating existing decoherence rates.