Strategic Plan for Neutral Atom Quantum Computation
Adrian J. Menssen, Tout Wang, Michael Gullans, Tom Manovitz, Jacob M. Taylor, Jason Cong, Josiah Sinclair, Ziv Aqua, Daniel J. Blumenthal, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Johannes Borregaard, Antoine Browaeys, Paola Cappellaro, Soonwon Choi, Alexandre Cooper, Robin Côté, Jacob P. Covey, Alexandre Dauphin, Ivana Dimitrova, Matt Eichenfield, Dirk Englund, Jacob Freedman, Akihisa Goban, Brandon Grinkemeyer, Andi Gu, Ruonan Han, Dominik Hangleiter, Aram W. Harrow, Liang Jiang, Eun-ah Kim, Felix W. Knollmann, Aleksander Kubica, Thierry Lahaye, Lucas Lassabliere, Joonho Lee, Bingzhao Li, Mo Li, Wan-Hsuan Lin, Mikhail D. Lukin, Varun Menon, Thomas Propson, Akbar Safari, Mark Saffman, Pascal Scholl, Alexander Schuckert, Giulia Semeghini, Jonathan Simon, David Spierings, Daniel Bochen Tan, Shai Tsesses, Vladan Vuletic, Hanrui Wang, Hanyu Wang, Susanne Yelin, Johannes Zeiher, Hengyun Zhou
quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.opticsSubmitted Jul 23, 2026• Announced Jul 24, 2026• 0 citations
We present a strategic plan for neutral atom quantum computation, bringing together hardware development and theory advancements to achieve the goal of practical quantum advantage. The concept of practical quantum advantage is defined, along with how to verify claims of advantage, and approaches to designing quantum algorithms that deliver practical advantage. Future directions for neutral atom quantum processor hardware are described: scaling-up system size, Qubit encodings and atomic platforms, going further below threshold with neutral-atom logical-qubit performance, continuous reloading of qubits, and fast readout. We also explore opportunities for scalable integrated photonic control technologies. Alongside hardware advancements, new developments in quantum error correction and compilation of quantum circuits are proposed. Finally, we examine the opportunity of networking multiple neutral atom quantum processors together to perform distributed quantum computing and overcome possible limitations of a single system.
We present a strategic plan for neutral atom quantum computation, bringing together hardware development and theory advancements to achieve the goal of practical quantum advantage. The concept of practical quantum advantage is defined, along with how to verify claims of advantage, and approaches to designing quantum algorithms that deliver practical advantage. Future directions for neutral atom quantum processor hardware are described: scaling-up system size, Qubit encodings and atomic platforms, going further below threshold with neutral-atom logical-qubit performance, continuous reloading of qubits, and fast readout. We also explore opportunities for scalable integrated photonic control technologies. Alongside hardware advancements, new developments in quantum error correction and compilation of quantum circuits are proposed. Finally, we examine the opportunity of networking multiple neutral atom quantum processors together to perform distributed quantum computing and overcome possible limitations of a single system.
The power of quantum computation derives from algorithmic methods that exploit the availability of quantum superposition and entanglement to perform computations that are intractable with classical devices. The race is on to develop hardware that will unleash the promise of quantum algorithms. A handful of different types of hardware are currently being developed with the greatest efforts directed at superconducting, quantum-dot, trapped-ion, photonic, and neutral-atom approaches [1]. While all approaches have strengths and weaknesses, and are at different stages of development, the challenge of creating a practical design that can be scaled to a million or more qubits has not yet been met with any of the existing platforms. One may wonder if we really need a million qubits for a useful quantum computer. The answer depends on our ambition level. On the one hand it is widely believed that a quantum computer with less than 100 reliable qubits will be able to demonstrate a quantum advantage for a well defined computational problem [2]. Demonstration of a quantum computational advantage will generate great excitement in the halls of academia, but will have little broader import. A problem of great practical interest such as ab initio design of chemicals for increasing the yield of fertilizers for crop production, to name but one example, may also require just a few hundred qubits, provided computational sequences with circuit depth of 1010 or more operations can be reliably performed [3]. However, given the current performance of qubit hardware, which has demonstrated error rates not less than ∼10−3, computations with depth 1010 will only produce random outcomes of negligible value. The solution lies in the construction of error-correction circuitry operating on logical qubits, each composed of many physical qubits, which will enable logical error rates many orders of magnitude smaller than physical error rates. Although error correction is remarkably efficient for classical computing devices—Hamming codes detect and correct errors while only requiring roughly 10% overhead in the number of physical bits—quantum error correction is notoriously expensive. New approaches to error correction are the subject of intensive research with one promising direction being the development of codes that are optimized to suppress the dominant error mechanism in a particular physical platform [4,5]. Nevertheless, with physical error rates of 10−4, a plausible target for current qubit systems, the overhead required to reach logical error rates of 10−10 may be measured in thousands of physical qubits for each logical qubit. Thus a quantum computer able to perform deep calculations on a few hundred logical qubits could require a million physical qubits. A consequence of the cost of quantum error correction is that any viable approach to large-scale quantum computing needs to combine high-fidelity quantum logic operations with a capability for integrating large numbers of physical qubits. From this perspective neutral-atom qubits appear particularly promising [6] as they have already demonstrated control of more qubits than any other platform with recent experiments in 1D [7], 2D [8,9], and 3D [10] geometries showing control of up to 50 atomic qubits. Large qubit arrays can potentially be prepared in 1D, 2D, or 3D geometries. The number of proximal qubits increases with the dimensionality, which is advantageous for implementation of error correction code words, and points towards a preference for 2D or 3D arrays. On the other hand, the added overhead of compensating crosstalk incurred when targeting atoms inside a 3D volume makes parallel operations on multiple qubits challenging. A 2D geometry, as shown schematically in Fig. 1, may be an optimal choice since qubit control and measurement can be performed with lasers propagating normal to the plane of the array so that individual qubit sites can be addressed independently. With demonstrated array periods of a few micrometers we require a footprint of less than 1 mm2 for 104 qubits. Conceptual picture of a 2D neutral-atom qubit array. a) High-numerical-aperture lenses project several different wavelengths of light for control and measurement of the qubits. Specific choices of optical wavelengths depend on the atomic species. Not shown are optics for initial laser cooling, transport to the array, beam scanning, and imaging for qubit measurement. b) Averaged fluorescence image of 49 atomic qubits on a 2D grid with |3.8μm| spacing [8]. From a fundamental perspective the prospects for scaling neutral-atom systems are particularly promising due to the exceptionally large ratio between coherent and incoherent coupling rates. Neutral-atom qubits are encoded in hyperfine ground states for which coherence times of the order of 10 s have been demonstrated [10]. This implies a dephasing rate |γ∼0.1s−1|. The coherent coupling that enables quantum logic operations is switched on by exciting atoms to high-lying Rydberg states with principal quantum number close to 100 [11,12]. Rydberg excited atoms at spacings of a few micrometers in an optical lattice interact coherently with rates |g>109s−1|. The ratio between desired coherent coupling and residual incoherent dephasing of g/γ ∼ 1010 establishes a figure of merit that is enabling for scalability. To our knowledge only trapped ions can claim a similar g/γ ratio [13], but without a correspondingly direct path towards controlling thousands of qubits in a single processing unit. Although the g/γ ratio is exceptionally favorable for neutral-atom qubits a complete set of universal gate operations has not yet been demonstrated with high fidelity. Single-qubit gates in large 2D and 3D arrays have reached fidelity |F∼0.999| [8,10]. However, the highest demonstrated fidelity for two-qubit entanglement mediated by Rydberg-state interactions is |F<0.8| [6,14,15], a value that is well short of the theoretical limit of |F>0.9999| [16,17]. There is healthy optimism within the research community working with neutral-atom qubits that combining improved laser sources with reduced noise, better cooling to reduce motional dephasing, and control of stray electric fields that perturb Rydberg atoms will lead to substantially improved gate fidelity in the near future. Recent results with better filtering of laser phase noise have already demonstrated remarkable improvement in ground–Rydberg entanglement [18]. The outlook for the next few years appears very promising. We anticipate that with advances in lasers, optical lattices for atom trapping, deterministic rearrangement and loading of atoms in multi-dimensional arrays [19,20], and optics for fast beam scanning it will be possible to increase the number of physical qubits in a single neutral-atom module to at least 104. A challenging yet plausible path to a million-qubit processor can then be contemplated by connecting 100 such modules with atom–photon entanglement channels [21]. Beyond the potential for advancing the state of the art in computation, development of techniques for single-atom control inside large multi-atom arrays will enable other applications of quantum science including metrology and time-keeping. Rydberg interactions that are at the heart of a neutral-atom quantum computer may lead to multi-atom entanglement and Heisenberg scaling of atomic-clock precision [22]. This work was supported by the NSF and ARL CDQI.
Quantum computers open new scientific avenues, from exploring complex quantum mechanical systems to new computational paradigms, but face the fundamental challenge of decoherence. Remarkably, decoherence can be prevented by creating highly entangled states of physical qubits that encode an error-corrected “logical” qubit. This thesis will describe the development of quantum computing with reconfigurable arrays of neutral atoms and their use for quantum processing with logical qubits. Quantum processing in this approach is based on the coherent transport of atoms shuttled by optical tweezers, enabling any-to-any connectivity, high-fidelity programmable logic, and mid-circuit processing within a zoned architecture. Logical qubit processing is greatly facilitated by parallel control and transversal operations, and is used for experiments ranging from entangling logical qubits to their use for precise simulation of quantum scrambling. Core physical mechanisms for achieving deep-circuit, universal algorithms with logical qubits are identified, and these are leveraged into new techniques that greatly reduce overheads for large-scale computation. Finally, applications of quantum processors will be explored via analog and gate-based quantum simulations. These results, alongside other recent advances, herald a transition to error-corrected quantum processing, establishing foundations that can enable future large-scale quantum computers and their useful applications.
The pursuit of a universal, fault-tolerant quantum computer has transformed quantum computing from a predominantly theoretical discipline into a rapidly diversifying hardware ecosystem. This review presents a comprehensive and technically grounded analysis of the principal physical qubit modalities: superconducting circuits, trapped ions, photonic platforms, neutral atoms, semiconductor spin qubits, and topological approaches, focusing on their underlying operating principles, performance characteristics, and system-level constraints. We examine how these qubit technologies are embedded within scalable quantum processor architectures, including control and readout infrastructures, connectivity topologies, and quantum error correction strategies. The review provides a comparative study of key performance metrics, such as coherence times, gate fidelities, error rates, and scalability, reveals fundamental trade-offs between speed, robustness, and operational complexity that shape distinct technological roadmaps and target applications. We further highlight the ongoing transition from noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices toward architectures centred on logical qubits, driven by advances in materials engineering, precision control, and quantum information theory. Together, these developments sketch the emerging routes toward fault-tolerant quantum computing and practical quantum advantage, while offering readers a coherent entry point and reference guide to the current quantum hardware landscape.
Quantum computing promises to revolutionize several scientific and industrial domains by tackling problems that are intractable for classical supercomputers. At the centre of this effort is the quantum processor unit (QPU), implemented today across multiple physical qubit platforms. This review provides a comparative analysis of the state of quantum processors as of late 2024/early 2025, focusing on superconducting qubits, trapped ions, photonic systems, neutral atoms, silicon spin qubits, and emerging topological approaches. We compile and compare recent processor generations such as IBM’s Heron family, Google’s updated Sycamore-class devices, Quantinuum’s H-series, IonQ’s Aria and Forte, neutral-atom platforms with more than 1,000 trapped atoms, and silicon spin prototypes like Tunnel Falls. Key performance metrics, including qubit count, gate and readout fidelity, coherence time, operation speed, and holistic benchmarks such as Quantum Volume (QV) and Algorithmic Qubits (#AQ) are examined with reference to concrete experimental milestones. We discuss algorithmic capabilities demonstrated on current hardware, early realizations of logical qubits and fault-tolerant primitives, and the distinction between feasibility-oriented “quantum advantage” experiments and emerging signs of practical “quantum utility”. Finally, we outline the main technical bottlenecks for each platform on the path from today’s NISQ devices toward universal fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Quantum computers promise to harness the power of quantum entanglement for transformative advances in cryptography, the computational science of materials, and our understanding of fundamental physics. However, major advances in quantum algorithms, hardware, and error-correction techniques are necessary to realize this technology's full potential. In this thesis we show that co-design---the development of all three components in a mutually informed fashion---can result in significant advantages and enable complex quantum computation. We focus on the reconfigurable-atom-array platform, where qubits are encoded in long-lived atomic states and controlled by laser fields. Quantum entanglement at scale is realized by globally exciting the atoms to strongly-interacting Rydberg states, and we experimentally demonstrate quantum gates with fidelity above 99.5%---high-enough to benefit from error-correction (QEC). Leveraging dynamical qubit connectivity enabled by coherent atom transport, we design hardware-efficient protocols for simulating chemistry models and topological quantum matter. With this approach, we experimentally realize the exotic non-Abelian phase of the Kitaev honeycomb model and probe the emergent dynamics of fermionic particles, engineered to experience strong interactions. Similarly, we also show that the overhead introduced by QEC for classically complex computation can be significantly reduced by designing the quantum circuit and QEC codes together. These advances highlight the utility of the co-design principle and pave the way towards useful quantum computation.
Neutral atom quantum computing utilizes laser-trapped neutral atoms as qubits and realizes quantum logic gate operations through Rydberg-state interactions. In recent years, it has become one of the most vibrant directions in quantum computing hardware. This paper systematically reviews the working principles of neutral-atom quantum computers, including qubit encoding, atom trapping and manipulation, Rydberg states and interactions, the Rydberg blockade quantum gate mechanism, and atom rearrangement with reconfigurable architectures. The mainstream technical routes are surveyed, represented by optical tweezer arrays combined with Rydberg interactions, optical lattice schemes, and dipole trap arrays. A panoramic review is provided of domestic and international research progress from theoretical foundations in 2000 to the latest achievements in 2026, including thousand-qubit-scale systems, logical qubits, and quantum error correction experiments. Key breakthroughs are highlighted, such as the 6100-atom qubit array, continuous operation of a 3000-qubit system, quantum simulation of the Kitaev honeycomb model, toric code error correction demonstrations, encoding rates exceeding 1/2, and fault-tolerant architectures. The core bottlenecks are analyzed in depth, including the scalability--fidelity trade-off, engineering implementation of quantum error correction, atom loss and mid-circuit replenishment, laser system industrialization, control electronics scalability, and long-distance quantum interconnection. This paper aims to provide a systematic reference for academic research and technological development in this field.