Whether the principles of general relativity extend to a quantum regime remains one of the open questions in modern physics. In classical general relativity, Einstein's equivalence principle underpins the interpretation of gravity as spacetime geometry. However, it is not known whether the principle remains valid when the source of gravity could be quantum. Here we show that gravity-induced entanglement (GIE) of quantum clocks provides a framework to characterize local position invariance (LPI) in such a regime, which constitutes one of the subprinciples of the equivalence principle. By adapting the existing formulation of quantum LPI to the context of GIE, we analyze two schemes that address complementary aspects of LPI and differ only in the choice of the initial clock state: one in which entanglement will be generated if and only if there is a genuinely quantum violation of LPI, and the other where classical-like LPI violation manifests in the frequency of entanglement oscillation. Our results suggest that GIE of quantum clocks offers an approach to investigating fundamental principles of general relativity in the quantum regime, shedding new light on the interplay between quantum mechanics and the theory of gravity.
Whether the principles of general relativity extend to a quantum regime remains one of the open questions in modern physics. In classical general relativity, Einstein's equivalence principle underpins the interpretation of gravity as spacetime geometry. However, it is not known whether the principle remains valid when the source of gravity could be quantum. Here we show that gravity-induced entanglement (GIE) of quantum clocks provides a framework to characterize local position invariance (LPI) in such a regime, which constitutes one of the subprinciples of the equivalence principle. By adapting the existing formulation of quantum LPI to the context of GIE, we analyze two schemes that address complementary aspects of LPI and differ only in the choice of the initial clock state: one in which entanglement will be generated if and only if there is a genuinely quantum violation of LPI, and the other where classical-like LPI violation manifests in the frequency of entanglement oscillation. Our results suggest that GIE of quantum clocks offers an approach to investigating fundamental principles of general relativity in the quantum regime, shedding new light on the interplay between quantum mechanics and the theory of gravity.
Gravity-induced entanglement (GIE) experiments have been proposed as a theory-independent test of the quantum nature of gravity, on the strength of several no-go theorems concluding that GIE detection implies the gravitational interaction is either nonlocal or nonclassical. This is in apparent tension with a growing number of papers claiming that theories with a classical gravitational field do predict GIE. This article resolves the tension by reviewing the assumptions of the no-go theorems and highlighting the information-theoretic, rather than spatiotemporal, nature of the locality assumption. This makes violating locality not particularly problematic. Indeed, quantum electrodynamics and perturbative quantum gravity are nonlocal in the sense of the theorems. Thus, simple detection GIE is not sufficient to rule out a classical gravitational field and we will need quantitative comparison of theoretical predictions in the low-energy quantum gravity regime to test whether the gravitational field is quantum or classical.
Can propagating gravitational waves serve as operational probes of the quantum nature of gravity? We address this question by developing a unified theoretical framework that combines spacetime geometry, quantum information, and gravitational-wave physics. Starting from the geodesic deviation equation in linearized General Relativity, we derive the effective detector Hamiltonian directly from spacetime geometry and construct the complete quantum dynamics for detector subsystems interacting with both classical and quantized propagating gravitational-wave fields. This unified formulation enables a direct comparison between classical and quantum descriptions of gravitational radiation within the same physical framework. We demonstrate that classical gravitational-wave backgrounds can induce mixedness in the detector state but cannot generate genuine quantum correlations between the detector subsystems. In contrast, quantized gravitational waves coherently mediate gravity-induced entanglement, quantum coherence, quantum memory, and nonclassical correlations, providing clear operational signatures of the quantum nature of propagating gravitational radiation. We further discuss how mesoscopic quantum mechanical oscillators offer a promising route towards experimentally probing these effects. Our results establish a geometric and quantum-information-based framework for exploring quantum gravity through propagating gravitational waves.
In general relativity, the picture of space-time assigns an ideal clock to each world line. Being ideal, gravitational effects due to these clocks are ignored and the flow of time according to one clock is not affected by the presence of clocks along nearby world lines. However, if time is defined operationally, as a pointer position of a physical clock that obeys the principles of general relativity and quantum mechanics, such a picture is, at most, a convenient fiction. Specifically, we show that the general relativistic mass-energy equivalence implies gravitational interaction between the clocks, whereas the quantum mechanical superposition of energy eigenstates leads to a nonfixed metric background. Based only on the assumption that both principles hold in this situation, we show that the clocks necessarily get entangled through time dilation effect, which eventually leads to a loss of coherence of a single clock. Hence, the time as measured by a single clock is not well defined. However, the general relativistic notion of time is recovered in the classical limit of clocks.
Recent proposals suggest that detecting entanglement between two spatially superposed masses would establish the quantum nature of gravity. However, these gravitationally induced entanglement (GIE) experiments rely on assumptions about subsystem independence. We sharpen the theoretical underpinnings of such proposals by examining them through the lens of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT), distinguishing distinct operational and algebraic notions of independence. We argue that state and measurement independence of subsystems, essential to the experimental logic, is nontrivial in the presence of gauge constraints and gravitational dressing. Using gravitationally dressed fields, we recall that commutation relations between spacelike separated observables are nontrivial, undermining strict Hilbert space factorization. We further explore the implications for entanglement witnesses, investigating the Tsirelson bound when subsystem algebras fail to commute, and showing that the Tsirelson bound persists for a suitably symmetrized CHSH observable even though the operational status of such "joint" observables becomes delicate when commensurability fails. Our analysis highlights how even within linearized covariant quantum gravity, violations of microcausality may affect both the interpretation, modelling, and design of proposed laboratory tests of quantum gravity, despite remaining negligible for current experimental regimes. Although we consider GIE-style protocols as a concrete case study, the subsystem-independence issues we highlight are generic to low-energy (perturbative) quantum gravity. Finally, we derive estimates for dressing-induced microcausality violations, which suggest a complementary avenue to current proposals: in principle, bounding dressing-induced microcausality violations themselves as a probe of the quantum nature of gravity.
Abstract The Einstein equivalence principle (EEP) is of crucial importance to test the foundations of general relativity. When the particles involved in the test exhibit quantum properties, it is unknown whether this principle still holds. A violation of the EEP would have drastic consequences for physics. A more conservative possibility is that the EEP holds in a generalised form for delocalised quantum particles. Here we formulate such a generalised EEP by extending one of its paradigmatic tests with clocks to quantum clocks that are in a quantum superposition of positions and velocities. We show that the validity of such a generalised version of the EEP is equivalent to the possibility of transforming to the perspective of an arbitrary Quantum Reference Frame (QRF), namely a reference frame associated to the quantum state of the clock. We further show that this generalised EEP can be verified by measuring the proper time of entangled clocks in a quantum superposition of positions in the Earth gravitational field. The violation of the generalised EEP corresponds to the impossibility of defining dynamical evolution in the frame of each clock, and results in a modification to the probabilities of measurements calculated in the laboratory frame. Hence, it can be verified experimentally, for instance in an atom interferometer.
Gravity-induced entanglement has been proposed as a method for testing the non-classical nature of gravity via tabletop experiments. While most existing proposals are restricted to the Newtonian limit, the frame dragging effect offers access to genuinely post-Newtonian features of the gravitational interaction and remains comparatively less explored. Here, we study gravity-induced entanglement generated by frame dragging in an interferometric setting and compute the entanglement phase between the rotational degrees of freedom of a source mass and the paths of a particle in two complementary ways: (i) via Schrödinger evolution with a quantized Lense-Thirring Hamiltonian in the large angular momentum limit, and (ii) via the on-shell action of linearized quantum gravity within the stationary phase approximation. Both approaches yield the same entanglement phase, consistent with the proper time difference between the interferometer arms. The path integral derivation further reveals how gravitational retardation modifies the entanglement phase, thereby making the local, relativistically causal linearized-gravity description explicit. Under the standard locality/mediator assumptions used in existing arguments, the resulting entanglement would witness non-classicality of the gravitational interaction.