In Hamiltonian systems, the only basis-independent quantity is the spectrum. Given a spectrum, quantum mereology seeks preferred tensor-product decompositions into local subsystems, leading to the emergence of locality. Causal order, however, remains fixed by the Hamiltonian time evolution. In contrast, higher-order quantum theory permits more general processes that need not possess a definite global causal order. In the process-matrix framework, specifying a process requires a choice of subsystems corresponding to the input and output Hilbert spaces of each agent. A change of basis redefines both the agents and the corresponding decompositions into subsystems, while leaving the spectrum of the process matrix invariant. Here, we study how causality arises from this spectrum. First, we derive spectral constraints on processes compatible with definite causal order. Second, we show that, in the thermodynamic limit, generic quantum processes admit a preferred decomposition with a definite causal order. This suggests a mechanism for the emergence of classical causality only from algebraic ingredients.
In Hamiltonian systems, the only basis-independent quantity is the spectrum. Given a spectrum, quantum mereology seeks preferred tensor-product decompositions into local subsystems, leading to the emergence of locality. Causal order, however, remains fixed by the Hamiltonian time evolution. In contrast, higher-order quantum theory permits more general processes that need not possess a definite global causal order. In the process-matrix framework, specifying a process requires a choice of subsystems corresponding to the input and output Hilbert spaces of each agent. A change of basis redefines both the agents and the corresponding decompositions into subsystems, while leaving the spectrum of the process matrix invariant. Here, we study how causality arises from this spectrum. First, we derive spectral constraints on processes compatible with definite causal order. Second, we show that, in the thermodynamic limit, generic quantum processes admit a preferred decomposition with a definite causal order. This suggests a mechanism for the emergence of classical causality only from algebraic ingredients.
The idea that events are equipped with a partial causal order is central to our understanding of physics in the tested regimes: given two pointlike events A and B , either A is in the causal past of B , B is in the causal past of A , or A and B are space-like separated. Operationally, the meaning of these order relations corresponds to constraints on the possible correlations between experiments performed in the vicinities of the respective events: if A is in the causal past of B , an experimenter at A could signal to an experimenter at B but not the other way around, while if A and B are space-like separated, no signaling is possible in either direction. In the context of a concrete physical theory, the correlations compatible with a given causal configuration may obey further constraints. For instance, space-like correlations in quantum mechanics arise from local measurements on joint quantum states, while time-like correlations are established via quantum channels. Similarly to other variables, however, the causal order of a set of events could be random, and little is understood about the constraints that causality implies in this case. A main difficulty concerns the fact that the order of events can now generally depend on the operations performed at the locations of these events, since, for instance, an operation at A could influence the order in which B and C occur in A ’s future. So far, no formal theory of causality compatible with such dynamical causal order has been developed. Apart from being of fundamental interest in the context of inferring causal relations, such a theory is imperative for understanding recent suggestions that the causal order of events in quantum mechanics can be indefinite. Here, we develop such a theory in the general multipartite case. Starting from a background-independent definition of causality, we derive an iteratively formulated canonical decomposition of multipartite causal correlations. For a fixed number of settings and outcomes for each party, these correlations form a polytope whose facets define causal inequalities. The case of quantum correlations in this paradigm is captured by the process matrix formalism. We investigate the link between causality and the closely related notion of causal separability of quantum processes, which we here define rigorously in analogy with the link between Bell locality and separability of quantum states. We show that causality and causal separability are not equivalent in general by giving an example of a physically admissible tripartite quantum process that is causal but not causally separable. We also show that there are causally separable quantum processes that become non-causal if extended by supplying the parties with entangled ancillas. This motivates the concepts of extensibly causal and extensibly causally separable (ECS) processes, for which the respective property remains invariant under extension. We characterize the class of ECS quantum processes in the tripartite case via simple conditions on the form of the process matrix. We show that the processes realizable by classically controlled quantum circuits are ECS and conjecture that the reverse also holds.
The recently developed framework for quantum theory with no global causal order allows for quantum processes in which operations in local laboratories are neither causally ordered nor in a probabilistic mixture of definite causal orders. The causal relation between the laboratories is described by the process matrix. We show that, if the inputs of the laboratories are measured in a fixed basis, one can introduce an effective process matrix which is operationally indistinguishable from the original one. This effective process matrix can be obtained by applying the von Neumann--L\"uders update rule for nonselective measurements to the original process matrix and, in the bipartite case, it is compatible with a definite causal order. The latter extends the original Oreshkov et al. proof where one considers that both the measurement of the input and the re-preparation of the output are performed in a fixed basis.
We propose a theoretical framework in which time is not a fundamental variable but an emergentproperty arising from the transition between indefinite and definite causal order in quantum processes.Building on the process matrix formalism and the established phenomenon of indefinite causal order,we introduce the concept of Pre-Time, a fully quantum domain where no global temporal directionexists and causal relations remain in coherent superposition. Within this framework, we define acausal-emergence measure λ(W ) that quantifies the distance between a given process matrix W andthe convex set of causally separable processes; λ(W ) > 0 identifies genuinely pre-temporal systems,whereas λ(W ) = 0 corresponds to the emergence of a classical temporal order. We show that, underincreasing decoherence or environmental coupling, any physically realizable process must undergo amonotonic reduction of λ(W ), providing a mathematical mechanism for the conformation of temporalorder. Within this framework, apparent retrocausal paradoxes associated with delayed-choice andquantum eraser experiments do not arise, since the “past” is not a pre-existing entity but a structureformed only upon causal consolidation. The model remains fully consistent with quantum mechanics,relativity, and thermodynamic irreversibility, while offering novel predictions about intermediatepre-temporal phases and the emergence of classical causality. Our results suggest that time ariseswhen the universe selects a definite causal order, and that the pre-temporal quantum regime may playa central role in foundational physics and future quantum-gravity research.
The idea that events obey a definite causal order is deeply rooted in our understanding of the world and at the basis of the very notion of time. But where does causal order come from, and is it a necessary property of nature? Here, we address these questions from the standpoint of quantum mechanics in a new framework for multipartite correlations that does not assume a pre-defined global causal structure but only the validity of quantum mechanics locally. All known situations that respect causal order, including space-like and time-like separated experiments, are captured by this framework in a unified way. Surprisingly, we find correlations that cannot be understood in terms of definite causal order. These correlations violate a 'causal inequality' that is satisfied by all space-like and time-like correlations. We further show that in a classical limit causal order always arises, which suggests that space-time may emerge from a more fundamental structure in a quantum-to-classical transition. Causal order is a concept that is engrained in the standard understanding of time, both in classical and quantum mechanics. Oreshkovet al.generalize the standard formalism of quantum theory to a framework with no pre-existing causal order, and find a new class of correlations that have no analogue in the classical world.
We assess the possibilities offered by Hilbert space fundamentalism, an attitude towards quantum physics according to which all physical structures (e.g. subsystems, locality, spacetime, preferred observables) should emerge from minimal quantum ingredients (typically a Hilbert space, Hamiltonian, and state). As a case study, we first mainly focus on the specific question of whether the Hamiltonian can uniquely determine a tensor product structure, a crucial challenge in the growing field of quantum mereology. The present paper reviews, clarifies, and critically examines two apparently conflicting theorems by Cotler et al. and Stoica. We resolve the tension, show how the former has been widely misinterpreted and why the latter is correct only in some weaker version. We then propose a correct mathematical way to address the general problem of preferred structures in quantum theory, relative to the characterization of emergent objects by unitary-invariant properties. Finally, we apply this formalism in the particular case we started with, and show that a Hamiltonian and a state are enough structure to uniquely select a preferred tensor product structure.
In all our well-established theories, it is assumed that events are embedded in a global causal structure such that, for every pair of events, the causal order between them is always fixed. However, the possible interplay between quantum mechanics and general relativity may require a revision of this paradigm. The process matrix framework keeps the validity of quantum physics locally but does not assume the existence of a global causal order. It allows to describe causal structures corresponding to a quantum superposition of 'A is before B' and 'B is before A'. So far, the framework has been developed only for finite-dimensional systems, and a straightforward generalization to infinite dimensions leads to singularities. Such generalization is necessary for continuous-variable systems and is a prerequisite for quantum fields on indefinite causal structures. Here we develop the process-matrix framework for continuous-variable systems. We encounter and solve the problems of singularities. Moreover, we study an example of a process in infinite dimensions, and we derive correlations exhibiting intereference due to processes in which A is before B and B is before A.