Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2607.10659

Security of passive entanglement-based key distribution protocols

Shun Kawakami, Koichi Takasugi, Koji Azuma

quant-phSubmitted Jul 12, 2026• Announced Jul 14, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Entanglement-based key distribution protocols, such as the Bennett-Brassard-Mermin 1992 (BBM92) protocol and quantum conference key agreement (QCKA), are promising applications of quantum networks. In practical implementations, passive measurement setups are widely adopted because of their simplicity. However, the security analysis of passive protocols with biased basis choice is highly nontrivial, since standard proof techniques for threshold detectors are generally not applicable in this setting. In this work, we establish the security of passive entanglement-based key distribution protocols in the asymptotic regime. Specifically, we prove the security of passive BBM92 with biased basis choice and extend the proof to passive QCKA with an arbitrary number of parties. In addition, we numerically show that the key generation rate of passive BBM92 is almost identical to that of the corresponding active protocol. Our results provide a theoretical foundation for practical passive implementations of entanglement-based key distribution protocols.

AI Summary

Passive, biased basis selection with threshold detectors complicates entanglement-based QKD security because standard qubit reductions and uncertainty-based arguments do not directly apply. This paper derives asymptotic security bounds for passive BBM92 and extends the analysis to GHZ-based quantum conference key agreement with an arbitrary number of parties and an untrusted source. The proof moves basis-dependent optical loss into an effective splitting probability, introduces virtual photon-number measurements, and constructs a virtual qubit for complementarity-based phase-error estimation. Single-photon events reproduce active qubit measurements after filtering and a depolarizing channel; cross-click statistics bound the multiphoton contribution. Operator relations and Azuma’s inequality connect these bounds to observed frequencies without an independent-and-identically-distributed assumption. For BBM92, define $q_L=Q_Z-\alpha(Q_{\bot_A,Z_B}+Q_{Z_A,\bot_B})$, where $\alpha=\gamma\bar p_Z^2/(2\bar p_Z\bar p_X)$. The resulting bound is $R\ge q_L[1-h(\gamma(\bar p_Z/\bar p_X)^2E_X/q_L)]-Q_Zf_{\rm EC}$, with $E_X$ the error frequency per emitted round. It requires key-basis bias, positive $q_L$, and an entropy argument at most $1/2$. The multipartite expression replaces the cross-click sum by a sum over parties and the exponent by the party count. Optimized PDC-source simulations find nearly identical passive and active BBM92 rates for equal basis-line efficiencies, using detector efficiency $0.7$, dark-count probability $10^{-7}$, and misalignment error $0.03$. The treatment is asymptotic; finite-key security is left open. The detector model assumes matched efficiencies within each basis and identical dark-count probabilities.

Little sign of AI-generated textPossible error

Error found: The passive-QCKA theorem prints a basis-bias exponent of 2 in its hypothesis where its entropy argument requires N+1, leaving the rate bound unjustified on part of its stated domain. The numerical error model incorrectly treats some dark-count-induced within-basis double clicks as ordinary correct detections, predicting zero error for an ideal detected single-photon pair when the protocol actually produces positive error.

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Comments
22 pages, 5 figures

Related papers

Security of the BB84 protocol with passive biased basis choice by the receiver

Shun Kawakami, Atsushi Taniguchi, Yoshihide Tonomura +2 more

The Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol is one of the simplest protocols for implementing quantum key distribution (QKD). In the protocol, the sender and the receiver iteratively choose one of two complementary measurement bases. Regarding the basis choice by the receiver, a passive setup has been adopted in a number of its implementations, including satellite QKD and time-bin encoding. However, conventional theoretical techniques to prove the security of the BB84 protocol are not applicable if the receiver chooses their measurement basis passively, rather than actively, with a biased probability, followed by measurement with threshold detectors. Here we present a fully analytical security proof against coherent attacks for such a decoy-state BB84 protocol with the receiver’s passive basis choice and measurement with threshold detectors. Numerical simulations under practical situations show that the difference in secure key rate between the active and passive implementations of the protocol is negligible except for long communication distances.

arXiv:2507.04248•Physical Review Applied•Nov 24, 2025•1 citation

Finite-key security analysis of the decoy-state BB84 QKD with passive measurement

Akihiro Mizutani, Shun Kawakami, Go Kato

The decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol is widely regarded as the de facto standard for practical implementations. On the receiver side, passive basis choice is attractive because it significantly reduces the need for random number generators and eliminates the need for optical modulators. Despite these advantages, a finite-key analytical security proof for the decoy-state BB84 protocol, where the basis is chosen passively with a biased probability, has been lacking. In this work, we present a simple analytical finite-key security proof for this setting, yielding a closed-form secret-key rate formula that can be directly evaluated using experimentally accessible parameters. Numerical simulations show that the key rates of passiveand active-measurement implementations are nearly identical, indicating that passive measurement does not compromise key-generation efficiency in practical QKD systems.

quant-pharXiv:2511.21253•Quantum Science and Technology•Nov 27, 2025•2 citations

Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices

Daniel Gottesman, Hoi‐Kwong Lo, Norbert Lütkenhaus +1 more

We prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. Our proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. We derive a general lower bound on the asymptotic key generation rate for weakly basis-dependent eavesdropping attacks, and also estimate the rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states with random phases, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.

arXiv:quant-ph/0212066•Dec 11, 2002•11 citations

Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices

Daniel Gottesman, Hoi-Kwong Lo, N. L\"utkenhaus +1 more

We prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. Our proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. We derive a general lower bound on the asymptotic key generation rate for weakly basis-dependent eavesdropping attacks, and also estimate the rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states with random phases, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.

Quantum Information and Computation•Sep 1, 2004•723 citations

Finite-key security of passive quantum key distribution

Víctor Zapatero, Marcos Curty

The passive approach to quantum key distribution (QKD) eliminates all optical modulators and random number generators from QKD systems reaching an enhanced simplicity, immunity to modulator side channels, and potentially higher repetition rates. In this work, we provide finite-key security bounds for a fully passive decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, considering a recently presented passive QKD source. With our analysis, the attainable secret-key rate is comparable to that of the perfect parameter-estimation limit, in fact differing from the key rate of the active approach by less than one order of magnitude. This demonstrates the practicality of fully passive QKD solutions.

arXiv:2308.02376•Physical Review Applied•Jan 11, 2024•14 citations

Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices

Daniel Gottesman, Hoi‐Kwong Lo, Norbert Lütkenhaus +1 more

This paper prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. This proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. The estimation of the key generation rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Dec 23, 2004•251 citations
Entanglement-based key distribution protocols, such as the Bennett-Brassard-Mermin 1992 (BBM92) protocol and quantum conference key agreement (QCKA), are promising applications of quantum networks. In practical implementations, passive measurement setups are widely adopted because of their simplicity. However, the security analysis of passive protocols with biased basis choice is highly nontrivial, since standard proof techniques for threshold detectors are generally not applicable in this setting. In this work, we establish the security of passive entanglement-based key distribution protocols in the asymptotic regime. Specifically, we prove the security of passive BBM92 with biased basis choice and extend the proof to passive QCKA with an arbitrary number of parties. In addition, we numerically show that the key generation rate of passive BBM92 is almost identical to that of the corresponding active protocol. Our results provide a theoretical foundation for practical passive implementations of entanglement-based key distribution protocols.
Passive, biased basis selection with threshold detectors complicates entanglement-based QKD security because standard qubit reductions and uncertainty-based arguments do not directly apply. This paper derives asymptotic security bounds for passive BBM92 and extends the analysis to GHZ-based quantum conference key agreement with an arbitrary number of parties and an untrusted source.
The proof moves basis-dependent optical loss into an effective splitting probability, introduces virtual photon-number measurements, and constructs a virtual qubit for complementarity-based phase-error estimation. Single-photon events reproduce active qubit measurements after filtering and a depolarizing channel; cross-click statistics bound the multiphoton contribution. Operator relations and Azuma’s inequality connect these bounds to observed frequencies without an independent-and-identically-distributed assumption.
For BBM92, define qL=QZ−α(Q⊥A,ZB+QZA,⊥B)q_L=Q_Z-\alpha(Q_{\bot_A,Z_B}+Q_{Z_A,\bot_B})qL​=QZ​−α(Q⊥A​,ZB​​+QZA​,⊥B​​), where α=γpˉZ2/(2pˉZpˉX)\alpha=\gamma\bar p_Z^2/(2\bar p_Z\bar p_X)α=γpˉ​Z2​/(2pˉ​Z​pˉ​X​). The resulting bound is R≥qL[1−h(γ(pˉZ/pˉX)2EX/qL)]−QZfECR\ge q_L[1-h(\gamma(\bar p_Z/\bar p_X)^2E_X/q_L)]-Q_Zf_{\rm EC}R≥qL​[1−h(γ(pˉ​Z​/pˉ​X​)2EX​/qL​)]−QZ​fEC​, with EXE_XEX​ the error frequency per emitted round. It requires key-basis bias, positive qLq_LqL​, and an entropy argument at most 1/21/21/2. The multipartite expression replaces the cross-click sum by a sum over parties and the exponent by the party count.
Optimized PDC-source simulations find nearly identical passive and active BBM92 rates for equal basis-line efficiencies, using detector efficiency 0.70.70.7, dark-count probability 10−710^{-7}10−7, and misalignment error 0.030.030.03. The treatment is asymptotic; finite-key security is left open. The detector model assumes matched efficiencies within each basis and identical dark-count probabilities.
The Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol is one of the simplest protocols for implementing quantum key distribution (QKD). In the protocol, the sender and the receiver iteratively choose one of two complementary measurement bases. Regarding the basis choice by the receiver, a passive setup has been adopted in a number of its implementations, including satellite QKD and time-bin encoding. However, conventional theoretical techniques to prove the security of the BB84 protocol are not applicable if the receiver chooses their measurement basis passively, rather than actively, with a biased probability, followed by measurement with threshold detectors. Here we present a fully analytical security proof against coherent attacks for such a decoy-state BB84 protocol with the receiver’s passive basis choice and measurement with threshold detectors. Numerical simulations under practical situations show that the difference in secure key rate between the active and passive implementations of the protocol is negligible except for long communication distances.
The decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol is widely regarded as the de facto standard for practical implementations. On the receiver side, passive basis choice is attractive because it significantly reduces the need for random number generators and eliminates the need for optical modulators. Despite these advantages, a finite-key analytical security proof for the decoy-state BB84 protocol, where the basis is chosen passively with a biased probability, has been lacking. In this work, we present a simple analytical finite-key security proof for this setting, yielding a closed-form secret-key rate formula that can be directly evaluated using experimentally accessible parameters. Numerical simulations show that the key rates of passiveand active-measurement implementations are nearly identical, indicating that passive measurement does not compromise key-generation efficiency in practical QKD systems.
We prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. Our proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. We derive a general lower bound on the asymptotic key generation rate for weakly basis-dependent eavesdropping attacks, and also estimate the rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states with random phases, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.
We prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. Our proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. We derive a general lower bound on the asymptotic key generation rate for weakly basis-dependent eavesdropping attacks, and also estimate the rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states with random phases, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.
The passive approach to quantum key distribution (QKD) eliminates all optical modulators and random number generators from QKD systems reaching an enhanced simplicity, immunity to modulator side channels, and potentially higher repetition rates. In this work, we provide finite-key security bounds for a fully passive decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, considering a recently presented passive QKD source. With our analysis, the attainable secret-key rate is comparable to that of the perfect parameter-estimation limit, in fact differing from the key rate of the active approach by less than one order of magnitude. This demonstrates the practicality of fully passive QKD solutions.
This paper prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. This proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. The estimation of the key generation rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.