A resource theory of quantum measurement can be addressed in terms of quantum coherence and measurement sharpness, respectively. The former analyzes the off-diagonal structure of POVM elements in a predetermined basis while the latter analyzes the deviation from trivial, state-independent, measurements. We establish a direct connection between the two resource theories by identifying measurement sharpness as the maximal coherence that is achievable under all possible unitary changes of the reference basis. For a broad class of POVMs whose elements share a common eigenbasis, we show that the maximal distance-based coherence of measurement coincides exactly with the corresponding distance-based sharpness monotone. We further extend this equivalence, with element-additive distances, to POVMs whose elements admit a common mutually unbiased basis structure. These results provide a measurement-theoretic analogue of the maximal-coherence \& purity correspondence for quantum states. We also show that the maximal coherence of measurement is faithful with respect to trivial measurements and is monotonic under fuzzifying operations for dichotomic measurements, as well as under mixed-unitary and unitarily covariant preprocessing channels. Finally, we illustrate the operational meaning and limitations of the equivalence through qubit POVMs, single-photon phase sensing, and noisy photon-number resolving detection. In particular, the maximal Fisher information in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is shown to be determined by the squared maximal coherence of the measurement, while in an imperfect photon-number resolving detector the maximal coherence behaves as a proper sharpness monotone, unlike conventional PVM-based unsharpness measures.
A resource theory of quantum measurement can be addressed in terms of quantum coherence and measurement sharpness, respectively. The former analyzes the off-diagonal structure of POVM elements in a predetermined basis while the latter analyzes the deviation from trivial, state-independent, measurements. We establish a direct connection between the two resource theories by identifying measurement sharpness as the maximal coherence that is achievable under all possible unitary changes of the reference basis. For a broad class of POVMs whose elements share a common eigenbasis, we show that the maximal distance-based coherence of measurement coincides exactly with the corresponding distance-based sharpness monotone. We further extend this equivalence, with element-additive distances, to POVMs whose elements admit a common mutually unbiased basis structure. These results provide a measurement-theoretic analogue of the maximal-coherence & purity correspondence for quantum states. We also show that the maximal coherence of measurement is faithful with respect to trivial measurements and is monotonic under fuzzifying operations for dichotomic measurements, as well as under mixed-unitary and unitarily covariant preprocessing channels. Finally, we illustrate the operational meaning and limitations of the equivalence through qubit POVMs, single-photon phase sensing, and noisy photon-number resolving detection. In particular, the maximal Fisher information in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer is shown to be determined by the squared maximal coherence of the measurement, while in an imperfect photon-number resolving detector the maximal coherence behaves as a proper sharpness monotone, unlike conventional PVM-based unsharpness measures.
We construct a resource theory of sharpness for finite-dimensional positive operator-valued measures (POVMs), where the sharpness−non−increasing operations are given by quantum preprocessing channels and convex mixtures with POVMs whose elements are all proportional to the identity operator. As required for a sound resource theory of sharpness, we show that our theory has maximal (i.e., sharp) elements, which are all equivalent, and coincide with the set of POVMs that admit a repeatable measurement. Among the maximal elements, conventional non-degenerate observables are characterized as the canonical ones. More generally, we quantify sharpness in terms of a class of monotones, expressed as the EPR–Ozawa correlations between the given POVM and an arbitrary reference POVM. We show that one POVM can be transformed into another by means of a sharpness-non-increasing operation if and only if the former is sharper than the latter with respect to all monotones. Thus, our resource theory of sharpness is complete , in the sense that the comparison of all monotones provides a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a sharpness-non-increasing operation between two POVMs, and operational , in the sense that all monotones are in principle experimentally accessible.
The resource theory of quantum coherence studies the off-diagonal elements of a density matrix in a distinguished basis, whereas the resource theory of purity studies all deviations from the maximally mixed state. We establish a direct connection between the two resource theories, by identifying purity as the maximal coherence which is achievable by unitary operations. The states that saturate this maximum identify a universal family of maximally coherent mixed states. These states are optimal resources under maximally incoherent operations, and thus independent of the way coherence is quantified. For all distance-based coherence quantifiers the maximal coherence can be evaluated exactly, and is shown to coincide with the corresponding distance-based purity quantifier. We further show that purity bounds the maximal amount of entanglement and discord that can be generated by unitary operations, thus demonstrating that purity is the most elementary resource for quantum information processing.
We develop a resource-theoretic framework for quantum coherence directly in continuous basis, with emphasis on the position representation. Since position eigenstates are non-normalizable generalized eigenstates, the standard finite-dimensional dephasing map cannot be transferred directly to normal states. We therefore introduce a physically motivated dephasing channel based on random momentum kicks, equivalently described as the unconditional back-action of a finite-resolution position measurement. This yields a fixed-point notion of incoherence and a natural class of dephasing-covariant free operations. For physically relevant kernels, however, the fixed-point set contains no normal states, showing that continuous-basis coherence is tied to dephasing disturbance rather than to distance from a nonempty set of diagonal states. We study two quantifiers built from the channel action: a relative-entropy dephasing loss and a Hilbert-Schmidt dephasing loss. The former satisfies the main resource-theoretic properties under the free operations considered, while the latter is convex and experimentally transparent but fails monotonicity and strong monotonicity. We also formulate threshold witnesses for certifying coherence above a finite value and connect them, in a two-path setting, with interference visibility. Finally, we illustrate the framework with a Gaussian wavepacket evolving in a gravitational potential. The resulting theory provides a mathematically consistent and physically motivated treatment of coherence in continuous-variable systems.
Quantum measurements lie at the core of quantum information processing, enabling tasks ranging from state reconstruction and parameter estimation to sensing and computation. As quantum technologies scale and become increasingly precise, a central question emerges: what does it mean for a quantum measurement to be good? This thesis addresses this question by developing quantitative, operational, and physically grounded frameworks for assessing the quality and informational power of quantum measurements.The first part of the thesis focuses on the intrinsic quality of quantum measurements independent of any particular input state. Adopting the formalism of quantum resource theories, measurements are treated as resources ordered under classical post-processing, which cannot increase informational content. Restricting attention to informationally complete measurements, we employ frame theory to introduce a novel resource monotone termed completeness stability, defined as the minimum eigenvalue of a suitably scaled frame operator. We establish its operational significance by showing that the average error in quantum state tomography and the average variance in shadow tomography are tightly bounded by the inverse of the completeness stability. Maximizing this monotone identifies weighted complex projective 2-designs, including symmetric informationally complete POVMs and mutually unbiased bases, as optimal measurement configurations.The second part of the thesis extends these ideas to quantum parameter estimation, where measurement performance necessarily depends on correlations between the measurement and the encoded quantum state. By introducing a state-dependent inner product on operator space, we develop an operator-theoretic formulation in which both the classical and quantum Fisher information arise naturally from a single frame operator associated with the measurement and the reference state. Within this framework, the spectral properties of the frame operator provide a complete characterization of estimation performance. The maximum and minimum eigenvalues identify the best- and worst-case parameter-encoding directions, respectively, yielding sharp bounds on the achievable ratio of classical and quantum Fisher information. This establishes a direct connection between informational completeness, estimation robustness, and resource-theoretic monotonicity.The final part of the thesis returns to foundational questions concerning quantum measurement and arrival time. Using Bohmian mechanics, we develop a microscopic, first-principles account of the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect, a paradigmatic two-particle interference phenomenon. By analyzing particle trajectories guided by the wave function, we show how bosonic bunching and fermionic anti-bunching emerge dynamically from the guiding equation without invoking wave-function collapse. Beyond reproducing the Hong–Ou–Mandel dip, we demonstrate how experimental parameters such as barrier strength, phase velocity, and path asymmetry influence both coincidence probabilities and temporal correlations.Taken together, this thesis provides a unified treatment of quantum measurement quality across operational, metrological, and dynamical regimes. By bridging resource theory, frame theory, Fisher information, and trajectory-based quantum dynamics, it offers new insights into the structure, limitations, and physical interpretation of quantum measurements in both applied and foundational contexts.
We introduce the witness robustness of quantum measurements, a resource quantifier whose admissible noise consists of tuples of free-state witnesses rather than physical measurements. We establish its operational interpretation: it quantifies the maximal advantage that a measurement can provide over free measurements in discriminating an ensemble composed entirely of free states. Unlike the standard and generalized robustnesses, the witness robustness is not faithful in general, reflecting the fact that a resourceful measurement need not be useful when only free states can be prepared. We identify conditions under which faithfulness is recovered and show that, in resource theories admitting a resource-destroying map, the witness robustness vanishes for every measurement. We also establish fundamental properties, including convexity and monotonicity. Finally, we derive analytical results for projective measurements in single-qubit magic and for binary pure-state projective measurements in the two-qubit PPT entanglement theory.
The advantage that quantum systems provide for certain quantum information processing tasks over their classical counterparts can be quantified within the general framework of resource theories. Certain distance functions between quantum states have successfully been used to quantify resources like entanglement and coherence. Perhaps surprisingly, such a distance-based approach has not been adopted to study resources of quantum measurements, where other geometric quantifiers are used instead. Here, we define distance functions between sets of quantum measurements and show that they naturally induce resource monotones for convex resource theories of measurements. By focusing on a distance based on the diamond norm, we establish a hierarchy of measurement resources and derive analytical bounds on the incompatibility of any set of measurements. We show that these bounds are tight for certain projective measurements based on mutually unbiased bases and identify scenarios where different measurement resources attain the same value when quantified by our resource monotone. Our results provide a general framework to compare distance-based resources for sets of measurements and allow us to obtain limitations on Bell-type experiments.