arXiv:2606.28892 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Reply to “Comment on ‘Scaling and universality at noisy quench dynamical quantum phase transitions’ ”
S. Ansari, Rouhollah Jafari, A. Akbari, M. Abdi
Abstract
The Comment by Sirker [] raises an important issue concerning dynamical quantum phase transitions (DQPTs) in noisy and mixed-state dynamics, namely that the extension of the Loschmidt echo from pure to mixed states is not unique and different extensions preserve different physical properties. The Comment examines a noise-averaged mixed-state fidelity and shows that, DQPTs cannot occur for any nonzero noise when the return rate is defined through the Uhlmann-Bures fidelity of the noise-averaged density matrix. This conclusion is valid for the mixed-state fidelity observable discussed in the Comment and is consistent with prior studies [Jafari, Langari, Eggert, and Johannesson, ; Jafari, Akbari, Biderang, and Sirker, ]. Our article [Ansari, Jafari, Akbari, and Abdi, ] investigated a different operationally defined quantity: the logarithm of the Loschmidt echo obtained by first determining the noise-averaged excitation probabilities generated during the noisy ramp and then performing a coherent postramp evolution of a pure state constructed from these noise-averaged transition probabilities. As emphasized explicitly in our original publication, this observable is defined through an operational assumption and is not the same quantity as the mixed-state fidelity. The nonanalyticities reported in [Ansari, Jafari, Akbari, and Abdi, ], therefore, concern this two-stage operational protocol and should not be identified with zeros of the Uhlmann-Bures fidelity. There is, therefore, no direct contradiction between the theorem established for the Uhlmann-Bures return rate and the conclusions obtained for the different operational protocol studied in [Ansari, Jafari, Akbari, and Abdi, ].