Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.27231

A hardware-safety-gated system for LLM-written native ARTIQ control code on a trapped-ion platform

Duanyang Wang, Lu Qi, Yuanheng Xie, Norbert M. Linke, Kenneth R. Brown

quant-phphysics.ins-detSubmitted Jun 25, 2026• Announced Jun 26, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Large-language-model (LLM) agents can write and run experimental control code. This allows laboratory work to be conducted autonomously. However, this autonomy raises a safety problem that prior work has not addressed. Unchecked code can damage the apparatus, and there is no formal, per-operation boundary between human authorization/supervision, and agent decisions. We present a control system that places an LLM agent in the loop of a trapped-ion experiment while enforcing such a boundary. The agent controls the existing Advanced Real-Time Infrastructure for Quantum physics (ARTIQ) stack through tools provided by a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. No tool call reaches the hardware unless it carries an authorization token bound to its exact contents. Tokens are issued in one of two ways: automatically, by running the agent's proposed script in an isolated hardware simulation (dax.sim) and checking every operation against preset per-device bounds, or manually by a human operator for sensitive actions. Within this boundary the agent develops its own experiments, rather than only calling pre-built routines. We deploy the system on a co-trapped $^{40}$Ca$^{+}$/$^{40}$CaOH$^{+}$ crystal, where the agent autonomously builds a full calibration stack and, with targeted operator guidance, closes a cross-instrument magnetic-field-stabilization loop. On a separate, independent $^{171}$Yb$^{+}$ platform, we confirm interface-level portability. We systematically test token-authorization mechanism with adversarial scripts that attempt to bypass it, mapping the precise boundary of its protection and prioritizing where to strengthen it next. Analyzing where the agent still requires human guidance, we find that its limits lie in metacognitive control, namely recognizing when a problem must be re-framed, rather than in domain knowledge.

Comments
15 pages, 5 figures

Related papers

A Model Context Protocol Server for Quantum Execution in Hybrid Quantum-HPC Environments

Masaki Shiraishi, Ikko Hamamura, Tatsuya Ishigaki +1 more

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into scientific research is accelerating the realization of autonomous ``AI Scientists.'' While recent advancements have empowered AI to formulate hypotheses and design experiments, a critical gap remains in the execution of these tasks, particularly in the domain of quantum computing (QC). Executing quantum algorithms requires not only generating code but also managing complex computational resources such as QPUs and high-performance computing (HPC) clusters. In this paper, we propose an AI-driven framework specifically designed to bridge this execution gap through the implementation of a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Our system enables an LLM agent to process natural language prompts submitted as part of a job, autonomously executing quantum computing workflows by invoking our tools via the MCP. We demonstrate the framework's capability by performing essential quantum algorithmic primitives, including sampling and computation of expectation values. Key technical contributions include the development of an MCP server for quantum execution, a pipeline for interpreting OpenQASM code, an automated workflow with CUDA-Q for the ABCI-Q hybrid platform, and an asynchronous execution pipeline for remote quantum hardware using the Quantinuum emulator via CUDA-Q. This work validates that AI agents can effectively abstract the complexities of hardware interaction through an MCP-based architecture, thereby facilitating the automation of practical quantum research.

quant-pharXiv:2604.08318•International Conference on Quantum Communications, Networking, and Computing (QCNC)•Apr 10, 2026•1 citation

Agentic AI for Scientific Reasoning in Autonomous Quantum Sensing Experiments

Takuya Isogawa, Ryotaro Okabe, Nutdech Phadetsuwannukun +2 more

We implement an agentic AI workflow built around a large language model (LLM) agent for autonomous experiments with nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. NV centers are a widely used platform for quantum sensing, and the ability to control many measurements from a computer makes NV experiments a natural setting for autonomous workflows. We make two main contributions. First, we demonstrate an autonomous NV experiment workflow that combines persistent project records, quantitative calculation and data analysis tools, and deterministic experiment control. In one autonomous experiment, the agent selected a single NV center, calibrated its resonant frequency, measured \(T_2^\ast\) with Ramsey measurements, and added a Carr--Purcell--Meiboom--Gill (CPMG) measurement to check a weak feature that could be related to nearby \(^{13}\mathrm{C}\). Second, we introduce two offline benchmarks that evaluate the agent's reasoning separately from laboratory execution. We evaluated both benchmarks with GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. In the Ramsey checkpoint benchmark, greater reasoning effort generally improved recognition of a residual resonance calibration offset. By contrast, in the pulsed optically detected magnetic resonance (pODMR) data evaluation benchmark, pulse sequence information alone produced more false positive resonance judgments at higher reasoning effort. Requiring an expected signal calculation kept false positive rates low across all three models and reasoning settings. The results suggest a clear division of labor for autonomous experiments. The agent forms scientific hypotheses and uses quantitative tools to evaluate data, while deterministic code controls the hardware and enforces safety constraints.

quant-pharXiv:2607.25145•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations

Vibe Calibration: Autonomous Bring-up of a 112-Qubit Superconducting Quantum Processor by a Skill-Orchestrating Language Agent

Huikai Xu, Jiaxiu Han, Shigang Ou +11 more

Superconducting quantum computing is one of the most mature solid-state platforms for quantum computation, with processors exceeding one hundred qubits. Yet further scaling toward fault-tolerant quantum computing is increasingly constrained by calibration complexity. Conventional scripts are brittle to anomalous signals, and expert judgment is bounded by cognitive bandwidth and serial operation time, failing to keep pace with system scale. Here we report Vibe Calibration, an autonomous calibration system orchestrated by large language model agents, which distills expert tacit knowledge into reusable Skills. Each Skill is organized as a decision tree that packages parameterized measurement commands, quantitative acceptance criteria, and audit records, enabling autonomous execution and self-healing. We capture this knowledge through a three-phase human-in-the-loop distillation process and fine-tune a large language model on validated trajectories. On a 112-qubit processor with frequency-tunable transmons, the system autonomously completes calibration of 108 out of 112 qubits in 4.7 hours, achieving a 4--5$\times$ speedup over manual calibration of the full 112 qubits. A cross-validated comparison with expert manual calibration on a 16-qubit subset shows agreement on 14 out of 16 qubits. More importantly, the model demonstrates transferable calibration workflows across devices. While low-level control scripts require minor interface adaptation for different hardware platforms, the core decision logic and task orchestration generalize to new processors, demonstrating a reusable laboratory interface rather than a memorized script.This work demonstrates, for the first time, fully autonomous calibration of a hundred-qubit superconducting processor through reusable and auditable Skills, removing a critical barrier to scalable quantum hardware operation.

quant-pharXiv:2606.22376•Jun 23, 2026•0 citations

Evaluating Verified Autonomy in Quantum Engineering

Naixu Guo, Changhao Li, Siyu Cheng +6 more

Reliable quantum engineering is essential for turning quantum phenomena into practical technologies. As quantum platforms grow in scale and complexity, their characterization and operation require increasing human effort and coordination. Scientific artificial intelligence agents, which can plan experiments, operate instruments, and analyze observations, offer a promising route towards autonomous quantum engineering. Yet whether current agents can perform reliably in this setting has not been systematically established. To fill this gap, we developed Quantum-Harbor, a virtual laboratory that provides a controlled execution environment for agents to interact with quantum systems. This design enables direct verification of both the actions taken and the conclusions drawn. Building on this framework, we introduce QIQCBench, a benchmark of $49$ expert-authored tasks spanning multiple layers including calibration and control, error correction and compilation, sensing and networking. Across $17$ frontier agentic systems, QIQCBench reveals wide variation in verified performance. These results expose a substantial gap between demonstrating capability and achieving reliable operation, and establish Quantum-Harbor as a foundation for measuring progress towards verified autonomy in quantum engineering.

quant-pharXiv:2609.17439•Sep 16, 2026•0 citations

LLM-Driven Cross-Paradigm Design for Quantum Optimal Control

Yu-Qin Chen, Shi-Xin Zhang

Quantum optimal control (QOC) underpins adiabatic quantum computation, quantum annealing, and quantum state engineering, yet practical deployment is fundamentally bottlenecked by strict hardware constraints and substantial expert effort required to design protocols for each problem instance. To overcome this, we introduce QOC-Workbench, an auditable, large language model (LLM)-driven workflow that acts as an automated quantum co-scientist for cross-paradigm protocol design. Going beyond traditional numerical optimizers that merely tune parameters within a fixed formula, the LLM autonomously parses physics literature, proposes structural hypotheses, and writes code to validate them by direct simulation. This workflow supports cross-paradigm design by accumulating control motifs across tasks. We demonstrate this approach across three distinct settings: Case 1, Rydberg-atom maximum-independent-set arrays; Case 2, interacting XXZ spin chains; and Case 3, random transverse-field Ising models. In Cases 1 and 2, the workflow autonomously discovers hardware-compliant auxiliary controls, target catalysts, and schedule deformations that outperform literature baselines. In Case 3, it addresses the computational bottleneck of variational counterdiabatic driving by escalating from per-instance optimization to an amortized graph-neural-network generator, successfully transferring learned coefficient paths to larger unseen systems. By actively bridging the gap between theoretical algorithms and experimental restrictions across distinct control paradigms and Hamiltonian families, QOC-Workbench establishes a continuously evolving, cross-paradigm methodology for autonomous quantum control.

quant-pharXiv:2607.17498•Jul 21, 2026•0 citations

Large Language Model Steering of Acousto-Optic Tweezer Arrays

Cheng Sheng, Kai-xuan Xiao, Yin Zhang +5 more

Controlling quantum hardware requires choosing and revising experimental strategies as nonlinear response, coupling, and drift limit calibration. We experimentally investigate a general-purpose large language model (LLM) as a human-in-the-loop strategy layer for a neutral-atom tweezer platform. Through step-by-step interaction with experimental feedback, the LLM guides a transition from multiplicative row--column correction to a drift-corrected local response-matrix method when separable feedback stalls. Deterministic software performs image analysis and numerical updates, while an experimentalist verifies and authorizes each waveform. For a $10\times10$ crossed-acousto-optic-deflector array, this workflow reduces the Gaussian-peak coefficient of variation from $20.30\%$ to $1.57\%$ in 30 candidate-update rounds. The experiment demonstrates feedback-informed strategy selection on a physical quantum-control subsystem, rather than direct generation of control parameters alone. These results highlight the potential of LLMs to guide control optimization across diverse quantum platforms by adaptively formulating and refining experimental strategies.

physics.atom-phCross-listedarXiv:2610.25014•Oct 20, 2026•0 citations
Large-language-model (LLM) agents can write and run experimental control code. This allows laboratory work to be conducted autonomously. However, this autonomy raises a safety problem that prior work has not addressed. Unchecked code can damage the apparatus, and there is no formal, per-operation boundary between human authorization/supervision, and agent decisions. We present a control system that places an LLM agent in the loop of a trapped-ion experiment while enforcing such a boundary. The agent controls the existing Advanced Real-Time Infrastructure for Quantum physics (ARTIQ) stack through tools provided by a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. No tool call reaches the hardware unless it carries an authorization token bound to its exact contents. Tokens are issued in one of two ways: automatically, by running the agent's proposed script in an isolated hardware simulation (dax.sim) and checking every operation against preset per-device bounds, or manually by a human operator for sensitive actions. Within this boundary the agent develops its own experiments, rather than only calling pre-built routines. We deploy the system on a co-trapped 40^{40}40Ca+^{+}+/40^{40}40CaOH+^{+}+ crystal, where the agent autonomously builds a full calibration stack and, with targeted operator guidance, closes a cross-instrument magnetic-field-stabilization loop. On a separate, independent 171^{171}171Yb+^{+}+ platform, we confirm interface-level portability. We systematically test token-authorization mechanism with adversarial scripts that attempt to bypass it, mapping the precise boundary of its protection and prioritizing where to strengthen it next. Analyzing where the agent still requires human guidance, we find that its limits lie in metacognitive control, namely recognizing when a problem must be re-framed, rather than in domain knowledge.
The integration of large language models (LLMs) into scientific research is accelerating the realization of autonomous ``AI Scientists.'' While recent advancements have empowered AI to formulate hypotheses and design experiments, a critical gap remains in the execution of these tasks, particularly in the domain of quantum computing (QC). Executing quantum algorithms requires not only generating code but also managing complex computational resources such as QPUs and high-performance computing (HPC) clusters. In this paper, we propose an AI-driven framework specifically designed to bridge this execution gap through the implementation of a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Our system enables an LLM agent to process natural language prompts submitted as part of a job, autonomously executing quantum computing workflows by invoking our tools via the MCP. We demonstrate the framework's capability by performing essential quantum algorithmic primitives, including sampling and computation of expectation values. Key technical contributions include the development of an MCP server for quantum execution, a pipeline for interpreting OpenQASM code, an automated workflow with CUDA-Q for the ABCI-Q hybrid platform, and an asynchronous execution pipeline for remote quantum hardware using the Quantinuum emulator via CUDA-Q. This work validates that AI agents can effectively abstract the complexities of hardware interaction through an MCP-based architecture, thereby facilitating the automation of practical quantum research.
We implement an agentic AI workflow built around a large language model (LLM) agent for autonomous experiments with nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. NV centers are a widely used platform for quantum sensing, and the ability to control many measurements from a computer makes NV experiments a natural setting for autonomous workflows. We make two main contributions. First, we demonstrate an autonomous NV experiment workflow that combines persistent project records, quantitative calculation and data analysis tools, and deterministic experiment control. In one autonomous experiment, the agent selected a single NV center, calibrated its resonant frequency, measured T2∗T_2^\astT2∗​ with Ramsey measurements, and added a Carr--Purcell--Meiboom--Gill (CPMG) measurement to check a weak feature that could be related to nearby 13C^{13}\mathrm{C}13C. Second, we introduce two offline benchmarks that evaluate the agent's reasoning separately from laboratory execution. We evaluated both benchmarks with GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. In the Ramsey checkpoint benchmark, greater reasoning effort generally improved recognition of a residual resonance calibration offset. By contrast, in the pulsed optically detected magnetic resonance (pODMR) data evaluation benchmark, pulse sequence information alone produced more false positive resonance judgments at higher reasoning effort. Requiring an expected signal calculation kept false positive rates low across all three models and reasoning settings. The results suggest a clear division of labor for autonomous experiments. The agent forms scientific hypotheses and uses quantitative tools to evaluate data, while deterministic code controls the hardware and enforces safety constraints.
Superconducting quantum computing is one of the most mature solid-state platforms for quantum computation, with processors exceeding one hundred qubits. Yet further scaling toward fault-tolerant quantum computing is increasingly constrained by calibration complexity. Conventional scripts are brittle to anomalous signals, and expert judgment is bounded by cognitive bandwidth and serial operation time, failing to keep pace with system scale. Here we report Vibe Calibration, an autonomous calibration system orchestrated by large language model agents, which distills expert tacit knowledge into reusable Skills. Each Skill is organized as a decision tree that packages parameterized measurement commands, quantitative acceptance criteria, and audit records, enabling autonomous execution and self-healing. We capture this knowledge through a three-phase human-in-the-loop distillation process and fine-tune a large language model on validated trajectories. On a 112-qubit processor with frequency-tunable transmons, the system autonomously completes calibration of 108 out of 112 qubits in 4.7 hours, achieving a 4--5×\times× speedup over manual calibration of the full 112 qubits. A cross-validated comparison with expert manual calibration on a 16-qubit subset shows agreement on 14 out of 16 qubits. More importantly, the model demonstrates transferable calibration workflows across devices. While low-level control scripts require minor interface adaptation for different hardware platforms, the core decision logic and task orchestration generalize to new processors, demonstrating a reusable laboratory interface rather than a memorized script.This work demonstrates, for the first time, fully autonomous calibration of a hundred-qubit superconducting processor through reusable and auditable Skills, removing a critical barrier to scalable quantum hardware operation.
Reliable quantum engineering is essential for turning quantum phenomena into practical technologies. As quantum platforms grow in scale and complexity, their characterization and operation require increasing human effort and coordination. Scientific artificial intelligence agents, which can plan experiments, operate instruments, and analyze observations, offer a promising route towards autonomous quantum engineering. Yet whether current agents can perform reliably in this setting has not been systematically established. To fill this gap, we developed Quantum-Harbor, a virtual laboratory that provides a controlled execution environment for agents to interact with quantum systems. This design enables direct verification of both the actions taken and the conclusions drawn. Building on this framework, we introduce QIQCBench, a benchmark of 494949 expert-authored tasks spanning multiple layers including calibration and control, error correction and compilation, sensing and networking. Across 171717 frontier agentic systems, QIQCBench reveals wide variation in verified performance. These results expose a substantial gap between demonstrating capability and achieving reliable operation, and establish Quantum-Harbor as a foundation for measuring progress towards verified autonomy in quantum engineering.
Quantum optimal control (QOC) underpins adiabatic quantum computation, quantum annealing, and quantum state engineering, yet practical deployment is fundamentally bottlenecked by strict hardware constraints and substantial expert effort required to design protocols for each problem instance. To overcome this, we introduce QOC-Workbench, an auditable, large language model (LLM)-driven workflow that acts as an automated quantum co-scientist for cross-paradigm protocol design. Going beyond traditional numerical optimizers that merely tune parameters within a fixed formula, the LLM autonomously parses physics literature, proposes structural hypotheses, and writes code to validate them by direct simulation. This workflow supports cross-paradigm design by accumulating control motifs across tasks. We demonstrate this approach across three distinct settings: Case 1, Rydberg-atom maximum-independent-set arrays; Case 2, interacting XXZ spin chains; and Case 3, random transverse-field Ising models. In Cases 1 and 2, the workflow autonomously discovers hardware-compliant auxiliary controls, target catalysts, and schedule deformations that outperform literature baselines. In Case 3, it addresses the computational bottleneck of variational counterdiabatic driving by escalating from per-instance optimization to an amortized graph-neural-network generator, successfully transferring learned coefficient paths to larger unseen systems. By actively bridging the gap between theoretical algorithms and experimental restrictions across distinct control paradigms and Hamiltonian families, QOC-Workbench establishes a continuously evolving, cross-paradigm methodology for autonomous quantum control.
Controlling quantum hardware requires choosing and revising experimental strategies as nonlinear response, coupling, and drift limit calibration. We experimentally investigate a general-purpose large language model (LLM) as a human-in-the-loop strategy layer for a neutral-atom tweezer platform. Through step-by-step interaction with experimental feedback, the LLM guides a transition from multiplicative row--column correction to a drift-corrected local response-matrix method when separable feedback stalls. Deterministic software performs image analysis and numerical updates, while an experimentalist verifies and authorizes each waveform. For a 10×1010\times1010×10 crossed-acousto-optic-deflector array, this workflow reduces the Gaussian-peak coefficient of variation from 20.30%20.30\%20.30% to 1.57%1.57\%1.57% in 30 candidate-update rounds. The experiment demonstrates feedback-informed strategy selection on a physical quantum-control subsystem, rather than direct generation of control parameters alone. These results highlight the potential of LLMs to guide control optimization across diverse quantum platforms by adaptively formulating and refining experimental strategies.