Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.27082

Finding Stationary Points by Comparisons

Helin Wang, Chenyi Zhang, Xiwen Tao, Yexin Zhang, Tongyang Li

cs.LGcs.DSmath.OCquant-phSubmitted Jun 25, 2026• Announced Jun 26, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the problem of finding stationary points of non-convex functions when access to the objective is provided only through a comparison oracle that, given two points, outputs which has the larger function value. For a twice differentiable $f\colon\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R$ with Lipschitz gradient and Hessian, we develop an algorithm that visits an $ε$-stationary point using $\widetilde O(n^2/ε^{1.5})$ queries. Our approach uses a subroutine that estimates the normalized Hessian to accuracy $δ$ using $\widetilde O(n^2\log(1/δ))$ queries. We further study this problem with a quantum comparison oracle model where queries can be made in superpositions, and develop the first quantum algorithm that finds an $ε$-stationary point, which takes $\widetilde O(n/ε^{1.5})$ queries.

Comments
41 pages, 4 figures. To appear in the Forty-Third International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2026)

Related papers

Gradient Testing and Estimation by Comparisons

Tao, Xiwen, Chenyi Zhang, Wang, Helin +2 more

We study gradient testing and gradient estimation of smooth functions using only a comparison oracle that, given two points, indicates which one has the larger function value. For any smooth $f\colon\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R$, $\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb R^n$, and $\varepsilon>0$, we design a gradient testing algorithm that determines whether the normalized gradient $\nabla f(\mathbf{x})/\|\nabla f(\mathbf{x})\|$ is $\varepsilon$-close or $2\varepsilon$-far from a given unit vector $\mathbf{v}$ using $O(1)$ queries, as well as a gradient estimation algorithm that outputs an $\varepsilon$-estimate of $\nabla f(\mathbf{x})/\|\nabla f(\mathbf{x})\|$ using $O(n\log(1/\varepsilon))$ queries which we prove to be optimal. Furthermore, we study gradient estimation in the quantum comparison oracle model where queries can be made in superpositions, and develop a quantum algorithm using $O(\log (n/\varepsilon))$ queries.

arXiv:2405.11454•May 19, 2024•1 citation

Robustness of Quantum Algorithms for Nonconvex Optimization

Weiyuan Gong, Zhang, Chenyi, Tongyang Li

Recent results suggest that quantum computers possess the potential to speed up nonconvex optimization problems. However, a crucial factor for the implementation of quantum optimization algorithms is their robustness against experimental and statistical noises. In this paper, we systematically study quantum algorithms for finding an $ε$-approximate second-order stationary point ($ε$-SOSP) of a $d$-dimensional nonconvex function, a fundamental problem in nonconvex optimization, with noisy zeroth- or first-order oracles as inputs. We first prove that, up to noise of $O(ε^{10}/d^5)$, accelerated perturbed gradient descent with quantum gradient estimation takes $O(\log d/ε^{1.75})$ quantum queries to find an $ε$-SOSP. We then prove that perturbed gradient descent is robust to the noise of $O(ε^6/d^4)$ and $O(ε/d^{0.5+ζ})$ for $ζ>0$ on the zeroth- and first-order oracles, respectively, which provides a quantum algorithm with poly-logarithmic query complexity. We then propose a stochastic gradient descent algorithm using quantum mean estimation on the Gaussian smoothing of noisy oracles, which is robust to $O(ε^{1.5}/d)$ and $O(ε/\sqrt{d})$ noise on the zeroth- and first-order oracles, respectively. The quantum algorithm takes $O(d^{2.5}/ε^{3.5})$ and $O(d^2/ε^3)$ queries to the two oracles, giving a polynomial speedup over the classical counterparts. Moreover, we characterize the domains where quantum algorithms can find an $ε$-SOSP with poly-logarithmic, polynomial, or exponential number of queries in $d$, or the problem is information-theoretically unsolvable even by an infinite number of queries. In addition, we prove an $Ω(ε^{-12/7})$ lower bound in $ε$ for any randomized classical and quantum algorithm to find an $ε$-SOSP using either noisy zeroth- or first-order oracles.

arXiv:2212.02548•Dec 5, 2022•0 citations

Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Minimizing the Maximal Loss

Hao Wang, Zhang, Chenyi, Tongyang Li

The problem of minimizing the maximum of $N$ convex, Lipschitz functions plays significant roles in optimization and machine learning. It has a series of results, with the most recent one requiring $O(Nε^{-2/3} + ε^{-8/3})$ queries to a first-order oracle to compute an $ε$-suboptimal point. On the other hand, quantum algorithms for optimization are rapidly advancing with speedups shown on many important optimization problems. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study for quantum algorithms and lower bounds for minimizing the maximum of $N$ convex, Lipschitz functions. On one hand, we develop quantum algorithms with an improved complexity bound of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}ε^{-5/3} + ε^{-8/3})$. On the other hand, we prove that quantum algorithms must take $\tildeΩ(\sqrt{N}ε^{-2/3})$ queries to a first order quantum oracle, showing that our dependence on $N$ is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors.

arXiv:2402.12745•Feb 20, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Algorithms for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization

Chengchang Liu, Chaowen Guan, Jianhao He +1 more

This paper considers the problem for finding the $(δ,ε)$-Goldstein stationary point of Lipschitz continuous objective, which is a rich function class to cover a great number of important applications. We construct a zeroth-order quantum estimator for the gradient of the smoothed surrogate. Based on such estimator, we propose a novel quantum algorithm that achieves a query complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}δ^{-1}ε^{-3})$ on the stochastic function value oracle, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem. We also enhance the query complexity to $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}δ^{-1}ε^{-7/3})$ by introducing a variance reduction variant. Our findings demonstrate the clear advantages of utilizing quantum techniques for non-convex non-smooth optimization, as they outperform the optimal classical methods on the dependency of $ε$ by a factor of $ε^{-2/3}$.

arXiv:2410.16189•neural information processing systems•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Convex optimization using quantum oracles

Joran van Apeldoorn, András Gilyén, Sander Gribling +1 more

We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using O~(1) quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exponential quantum speed-up over the Ω(n) membership queries that are needed classically. We show that a quantum computer can very efficiently compute an approximate subgradient of a convex Lipschitz function. Combining this with a simplification of recent classical work of Lee, Sidford, and Vempala gives our efficient separation oracle. This in turn implies, via a known algorithm, that O~(n) quantum queries to a membership oracle suffice to implement an optimization oracle (the best known classical upper bound on the number of membership queries is quadratic). We also prove several lower bounds: Ω(n) quantum separation (or membership) queries are needed for optimization if the algorithm knows an interior point of the convex set, and Ω(n) quantum separation queries are needed if it does not.

arXiv:1809.00643•Quantum•Jan 13, 2020•35 citations

Near-Optimal Quantum Lower Bounds for Convex Optimization via Fourier Rank

Brandon Augustino, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Enrico Fontana +4 more

We establish a linear quantum query lower bound for high-accuracy convex optimization over an explicit family of $n$-dimensional ellipsoids. We focus on linear optimization with an explicitly given objective, where the feasible set is accessed through a membership oracle. We show that any algorithm that, for every unit linear objective, returns an exactly feasible point with additive objective error $Θ(n^{-1/2})$ requires $Ω(n)$ membership queries, where the ellipsoids are contained in the unit ball. The same lower bound can be shown to hold if the returned point is only required to be approximately feasible, within $Θ(n^{-3/2})$ distance from the feasible set. This resolves an open question posed by Chakrabarti, Childs, Li, and Wu~(\textit{Quantum}, 2020) and by van Apeldoorn, Gilyén, Gribling, and de Wolf~(\textit{Quantum}, 2020). Coupled with the upper bounds in these papers, the query complexity of high-accuracy convex optimization is characterized tightly up to logarithmic factors. The proof is built around a lower bound for determinant computation that is derived via a novel polynomial method based on Fourier-rank. In the continuous matrix phase-query model, computing the determinant of a real $n\times n$ matrix requires at least $n/2$ matrix-vector product queries. The construction also yields an $Ω(n)$ phase-query lower bound for estimating the minimum eigenvalue of a real symmetric $n\times n$ matrix to additive accuracy $Θ(n^{-2})$. These results extend the determinant and minimum-eigenvalue lower bounds of Childs, Hung, and Li~(ICALP 2021) from finite fields to the real-valued setting. Based on the same constructions, we also prove an $Ω(\min\{\sqrtκ,n\})$ gradient-query lower bound for constant-accuracy optimization of $1$-strongly convex and $κ$-smooth functions, which is optimal up to a logarithmic factor.

quant-pharXiv:2609.09035•Sep 9, 2026•0 citations
We study the problem of finding stationary points of non-convex functions when access to the objective is provided only through a comparison oracle that, given two points, outputs which has the larger function value. For a twice differentiable f ⁣:Rn→Rf\colon\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb Rf:Rn→R with Lipschitz gradient and Hessian, we develop an algorithm that visits an εεε-stationary point using O~(n2/ε1.5)\widetilde O(n^2/ε^{1.5})O(n2/ε1.5) queries. Our approach uses a subroutine that estimates the normalized Hessian to accuracy δδδ using O~(n2log⁡(1/δ))\widetilde O(n^2\log(1/δ))O(n2log(1/δ)) queries. We further study this problem with a quantum comparison oracle model where queries can be made in superpositions, and develop the first quantum algorithm that finds an εεε-stationary point, which takes O~(n/ε1.5)\widetilde O(n/ε^{1.5})O(n/ε1.5) queries.
We study gradient testing and gradient estimation of smooth functions using only a comparison oracle that, given two points, indicates which one has the larger function value. For any smooth f ⁣:Rn→Rf\colon\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb Rf:Rn→R, x∈Rn\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb R^nx∈Rn, and ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0, we design a gradient testing algorithm that determines whether the normalized gradient ∇f(x)/∥∇f(x)∥\nabla f(\mathbf{x})/\|\nabla f(\mathbf{x})\|∇f(x)/∥∇f(x)∥ is ε\varepsilonε-close or 2ε2\varepsilon2ε-far from a given unit vector v\mathbf{v}v using O(1)O(1)O(1) queries, as well as a gradient estimation algorithm that outputs an ε\varepsilonε-estimate of ∇f(x)/∥∇f(x)∥\nabla f(\mathbf{x})/\|\nabla f(\mathbf{x})\|∇f(x)/∥∇f(x)∥ using O(nlog⁡(1/ε))O(n\log(1/\varepsilon))O(nlog(1/ε)) queries which we prove to be optimal. Furthermore, we study gradient estimation in the quantum comparison oracle model where queries can be made in superpositions, and develop a quantum algorithm using O(log⁡(n/ε))O(\log (n/\varepsilon))O(log(n/ε)) queries.
Recent results suggest that quantum computers possess the potential to speed up nonconvex optimization problems. However, a crucial factor for the implementation of quantum optimization algorithms is their robustness against experimental and statistical noises. In this paper, we systematically study quantum algorithms for finding an εεε-approximate second-order stationary point (εεε-SOSP) of a ddd-dimensional nonconvex function, a fundamental problem in nonconvex optimization, with noisy zeroth- or first-order oracles as inputs. We first prove that, up to noise of O(ε10/d5)O(ε^{10}/d^5)O(ε10/d5), accelerated perturbed gradient descent with quantum gradient estimation takes O(log⁡d/ε1.75)O(\log d/ε^{1.75})O(logd/ε1.75) quantum queries to find an εεε-SOSP. We then prove that perturbed gradient descent is robust to the noise of O(ε6/d4)O(ε^6/d^4)O(ε6/d4) and O(ε/d0.5+ζ)O(ε/d^{0.5+ζ})O(ε/d0.5+ζ) for ζ>0ζ>0ζ>0 on the zeroth- and first-order oracles, respectively, which provides a quantum algorithm with poly-logarithmic query complexity. We then propose a stochastic gradient descent algorithm using quantum mean estimation on the Gaussian smoothing of noisy oracles, which is robust to O(ε1.5/d)O(ε^{1.5}/d)O(ε1.5/d) and O(ε/d)O(ε/\sqrt{d})O(ε/d​) noise on the zeroth- and first-order oracles, respectively. The quantum algorithm takes O(d2.5/ε3.5)O(d^{2.5}/ε^{3.5})O(d2.5/ε3.5) and O(d2/ε3)O(d^2/ε^3)O(d2/ε3) queries to the two oracles, giving a polynomial speedup over the classical counterparts. Moreover, we characterize the domains where quantum algorithms can find an εεε-SOSP with poly-logarithmic, polynomial, or exponential number of queries in ddd, or the problem is information-theoretically unsolvable even by an infinite number of queries. In addition, we prove an Ω(ε−12/7)Ω(ε^{-12/7})Ω(ε−12/7) lower bound in εεε for any randomized classical and quantum algorithm to find an εεε-SOSP using either noisy zeroth- or first-order oracles.
The problem of minimizing the maximum of NNN convex, Lipschitz functions plays significant roles in optimization and machine learning. It has a series of results, with the most recent one requiring O(Nε−2/3+ε−8/3)O(Nε^{-2/3} + ε^{-8/3})O(Nε−2/3+ε−8/3) queries to a first-order oracle to compute an εεε-suboptimal point. On the other hand, quantum algorithms for optimization are rapidly advancing with speedups shown on many important optimization problems. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study for quantum algorithms and lower bounds for minimizing the maximum of NNN convex, Lipschitz functions. On one hand, we develop quantum algorithms with an improved complexity bound of O~(Nε−5/3+ε−8/3)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}ε^{-5/3} + ε^{-8/3})O~(N​ε−5/3+ε−8/3). On the other hand, we prove that quantum algorithms must take Ω~(Nε−2/3)\tildeΩ(\sqrt{N}ε^{-2/3})Ω~(N​ε−2/3) queries to a first order quantum oracle, showing that our dependence on NNN is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors.
This paper considers the problem for finding the (δ,ε)(δ,ε)(δ,ε)-Goldstein stationary point of Lipschitz continuous objective, which is a rich function class to cover a great number of important applications. We construct a zeroth-order quantum estimator for the gradient of the smoothed surrogate. Based on such estimator, we propose a novel quantum algorithm that achieves a query complexity of O~(d3/2δ−1ε−3)\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}δ^{-1}ε^{-3})O~(d3/2δ−1ε−3) on the stochastic function value oracle, where ddd is the dimension of the problem. We also enhance the query complexity to O~(d3/2δ−1ε−7/3)\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}δ^{-1}ε^{-7/3})O~(d3/2δ−1ε−7/3) by introducing a variance reduction variant. Our findings demonstrate the clear advantages of utilizing quantum techniques for non-convex non-smooth optimization, as they outperform the optimal classical methods on the dependency of εεε by a factor of ε−2/3ε^{-2/3}ε−2/3.
We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using O~(1) quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exponential quantum speed-up over the Ω(n) membership queries that are needed classically. We show that a quantum computer can very efficiently compute an approximate subgradient of a convex Lipschitz function. Combining this with a simplification of recent classical work of Lee, Sidford, and Vempala gives our efficient separation oracle. This in turn implies, via a known algorithm, that O~(n) quantum queries to a membership oracle suffice to implement an optimization oracle (the best known classical upper bound on the number of membership queries is quadratic). We also prove several lower bounds: Ω(n) quantum separation (or membership) queries are needed for optimization if the algorithm knows an interior point of the convex set, and Ω(n) quantum separation queries are needed if it does not.
We establish a linear quantum query lower bound for high-accuracy convex optimization over an explicit family of nnn-dimensional ellipsoids. We focus on linear optimization with an explicitly given objective, where the feasible set is accessed through a membership oracle. We show that any algorithm that, for every unit linear objective, returns an exactly feasible point with additive objective error Θ(n−1/2)Θ(n^{-1/2})Θ(n−1/2) requires Ω(n)Ω(n)Ω(n) membership queries, where the ellipsoids are contained in the unit ball. The same lower bound can be shown to hold if the returned point is only required to be approximately feasible, within Θ(n−3/2)Θ(n^{-3/2})Θ(n−3/2) distance from the feasible set. This resolves an open question posed by Chakrabarti, Childs, Li, and Wu~(\textit{Quantum}, 2020) and by van Apeldoorn, Gilyén, Gribling, and de Wolf~(\textit{Quantum}, 2020). Coupled with the upper bounds in these papers, the query complexity of high-accuracy convex optimization is characterized tightly up to logarithmic factors. The proof is built around a lower bound for determinant computation that is derived via a novel polynomial method based on Fourier-rank. In the continuous matrix phase-query model, computing the determinant of a real n×nn\times nn×n matrix requires at least n/2n/2n/2 matrix-vector product queries. The construction also yields an Ω(n)Ω(n)Ω(n) phase-query lower bound for estimating the minimum eigenvalue of a real symmetric n×nn\times nn×n matrix to additive accuracy Θ(n−2)Θ(n^{-2})Θ(n−2). These results extend the determinant and minimum-eigenvalue lower bounds of Childs, Hung, and Li~(ICALP 2021) from finite fields to the real-valued setting. Based on the same constructions, we also prove an Ω(min⁡{κ,n})Ω(\min\{\sqrtκ,n\})Ω(min{κ​,n}) gradient-query lower bound for constant-accuracy optimization of 111-strongly convex and κκκ-smooth functions, which is optimal up to a logarithmic factor.