Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.26297

A Distributed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Simulator for Engineering Design Optimization

Ali Rajabi, Milad Hasanzadeh, Amin Kargarian

Published Jun 24, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper presents a Qiskit-compatible distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DQAOA) simulator for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems arising in engineering design and decision applications. The open-source simulator is available through the RAISE LAB website and GitHub repository, with README documentation for installation, input formatting, configurable parameters, and example workflows. The package addresses the need for a reusable simulator that can solve and compare QUBO instances across different QAOA execution modes. It supports monolithic QAOA on a single quantum processing unit (QPU) and distributed QAOA across a user-specified number of QPUs with configurable capacities. The workflow canonicalizes the QUBO model, maps it to a cost Hamiltonian, allocates variables across QPUs, identifies local and cross-QPU couplings, and constructs the corresponding circuits. Runtime optimizations, including parameterized circuit reuse, objective reuse at fixed depth, batched evaluations, and parallel multi-start execution, reduce repeated overhead. A Streamlit graphical user interface is also provided for entering or uploading QUBO instances, configuring solver settings, running selected modes, and visualizing solution-quality metrics without editing Python scripts. The package is demonstrated on standalone QUBO benchmarks and a power generation unit commitment application. In the unit commitment case, brute force, monolithic QAOA, and distributed QAOA recover the same commitment bitstring and operating cost. Across multiple case studies, the simulator produces results consistent with classical monolithic QAOA references in terms of optimal bitstrings and costs. Staged runtime analysis shows substantial runtime reduction across implementation stages, while distributed QAOA remains more demanding because cross-QPU couplings require remote operations.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2606.26297

Related papers

A Distributed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm for Unit Commitment

Ali Rajabi, Milad Hasanzadeh, Amin Kargarian

This paper presents a distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DQAOA)-enabled three-block alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework for unit commitment (UC). The relaxed commitment and dispatch variables are solved in a continuous quadratic programming block, while the binary commitment block is formulated as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. The DQAOA interface allows this QUBO to be solved using brute-force enumeration, monolithic QAOA, or distributed QAOA, while the remaining ADMM updates are kept unchanged. In the distributed mode, the logical commitment qubits are allocated across multiple capacity-constrained quantum processing units (QPU), avoiding the requirement that the complete binary problem fits on a single device. The framework is evaluated on a five-unit UC instance containing 15 binary variables. All three solver modes reduce the ADMM primal residual below a certain tolerance and recover the same commitment schedule, dispatch, and operating cost. The results demonstrate solution consistency across the three solver modes and the multi-QPU capacity accommodation provided by the distributed QAOA method.

arXiv:2608.04159•Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET)•Aug 1, 2026•0 citations

Quafu-Qcover: Explore Combinatorial Optimization Problems on Cloud-based Quantum Computers

BAQIS Quafu Group

We present Quafu-Qcover, an open-source cloud-based software package designed for combinatorial optimization problems that support both quantum simulators and hardware backends. Quafu-Qcover provides a standardized and complete workflow for solving combinatorial optimization problems using the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). It enables the automatic modeling of the original problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model and corresponding Ising model, which can be further transformed into a weight graph. The core of Qcover relies on a graph decomposition-based classical algorithm, which enables obtaining the optimal parameters for the shallow QAOA circuit more efficiently. Quafu-Qcover includes a specialized compiler that translates QAOA circuits into physical quantum circuits capable of execution on Quafu cloud quantum computers. Compared to a general-purpose compiler, ours generates shorter circuit depths while also possessing better speed performance. The Qcover compiler can establish a library of qubits coupling substructures in real time based on the updated calibration data of the superconducting quantum devices, ensuring that the task is executed on physical qubits with higher fidelity. The Quafu-Qcover allows us to retrieve quantum computer sampling result information at any time using task ID, enabling asynchronous processing. Besides, it includes modules for result preprocessing and visualization, allowing for an intuitive display of the solution to combinatorial optimization problems. We hope that Quafu-Qcover can serve as a guiding example for how to explore application problems on the Quafu cloud quantum computers

arXiv:2305.17979•May 29, 2023•2 citations

Optimize the Optimization: QPU-Efficient Quantum Graph Optimization through HPC-First Experimentation

David Vesterlund

Abstract This paper studies how much Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) work can be avoided while preserving optimization quality in the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). Using exact statevector simulation of QAOA on six graph optimization problems across seven graph families, three baselines are compared: a naive QPU-centric workflow with 30 quantum evaluations, a best-practice workflow that separates classical parameter optimization from a single QPU evaluation, and a classical-only solver. Six QPUminimization strategies are evaluated: preprocessing, pretraining, surrogate modeling, adaptive stopping, adaptive shots, and measurement reuse. Quality is measured using normalized expected value rather than the saturated best-of-b metric. The key findings are: the best-practice baseline achieves 510- to 2070-fold shot reduction across 8 to 16 qubits with at most 0.4 percent quality loss relative to naive QAOA; quality improves with QAOA depth from 0.82 to 0.91 while the gap between naive and best-practice remains negligible; four of six strategies achieve 100 percent quality retention at depth 3; quality is stable across graph families ranging from 0.77 to 0.87; and a structural predictor achieves perfect prediction on held-out graph families. These results support the thesis that the required QPU budget is a structured, predictable function of the problem instance and workflow policy, rather than a fixed algorithmic constant.

•Oct 13, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Algorithms for Discrete and Combinatorial Optimization

Gloria Oppong

This study explores quantum computing for combinatorial optimization, focusing on the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). Using Qiskit, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is implemented on simulators and quantum hardware, and compared with classical optimization using Gurobi. TSP instances are encoded as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems derived from the Miller–Tucker–Zemlin formulation, with quadratic penalties enforcing degree and subtour constraints. Results indicate that QAOA consistently generates feasible tours, but classical branch-and-bound methods achieve better solution quality and runtime. On Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, performance degrades with problem size due to sensitivity to parameter tuning, penalty scaling, and hardware noise. Among the tested classical optimizers, COBYLA provides the best balance of efficiency and noise tolerance. Overall, this work establishes a reproducible quantum-classical workflow, provides performance baselines, and identifies critical factors such as encoding design, optimizer choice, and error mitigation for improving near-term quantum heuristic performance.

•May 5, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Simulators and Applications on Quantum Framework

Srikar Chundury, Zhihao Xu, Amir Shehata +3 more

Simulating quantum circuits is essential for validating quantum algorithms. However, no single simulator consistently performs best - efficiency depends on circuit structure, entanglement, and depth. In this work, we integrate Qiskit-Aer (state-vector and matrix product state) and QTensor, a tree-tensor-network based simulator, into the Quantum Framework (QFw), a modular platform that supports multiple quantum backends via a unified interface. We also enable distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DQAOA) application compatibility with QFw, allowing sub-problems to be solved in parallel at scale. We then benchmark DQAOA and TFIM (transverse field Ising model) circuits across supported simulators, showing how performance varies significantly with problem type. All simulations are deployed on the Frontier supercomputer using QFw's MPI-based orchestration for distributed, multinode execution. These results underscore the need for simulatoragnostic infrastructure to enable systematic evaluation and highperformance scaling of quantum workloads. QFw provides a practical and extensible path toward reproducible quantum algorithm development across diverse application domains.

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Aug 30, 2025•0 citations

SPLIT-Q: A Scalable Sequential Quantum Computing Framework for Coherent Controlled Islanding

Yuqi Jiang, Zhiding Liang, Qiang Guan +2 more

Growing integration of distributed energy resources increases power-system variability and uncertainty. During disturbances, these effects can intensify generation-load imbalances and cascading failures. Controlled islanding limits their propagation by partitioning a compromised grid into connected, electrically sustainable islands. However, classical methods face rapidly growing computational costs as network size and island count increase. Quantum optimization offers an alternative for exploring this combinatorial partition space. Yet monolithic quantum formulations encode all assignment decisions in one circuit, causing qubit demand and circuit complexity to scale with network size. In this study, a qubit-bounded sequential distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) framework is proposed to tackle coherent controlled islanding under limited quantum resources. It formulates the optimization as boundary-conditioned regional quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) subproblems that are solved sequentially within a fixed qubit budget. Thus, circuit width remains independent of network size, with aggregate quantum workload scaling linearly on bounded-degree networks. Evaluation covers eleven IEEE systems from 9 to 300 buses using IBM quantum computing resources, with Gurobi and monolithic QAOA as references. Across all systems, the framework recovers feasible Gurobi-optimal partitions under noise, confirming the resilience of its solution quality. The results further show that the proposed method substantially reduces quantum-resource demand and circuit complexity relative to monolithic QAOA, allowing large islanding problems to be addressed within current hardware limits. The proposed framework provides a feasible and scalable pathway for quantum optimization in large-scale power systems.

quant-pharXiv:2608.12711•Aug 14, 2026•0 citations
This paper presents a Qiskit-compatible distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DQAOA) simulator for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems arising in engineering design and decision applications. The open-source simulator is available through the RAISE LAB website and GitHub repository, with README documentation for installation, input formatting, configurable parameters, and example workflows. The package addresses the need for a reusable simulator that can solve and compare QUBO instances across different QAOA execution modes. It supports monolithic QAOA on a single quantum processing unit (QPU) and distributed QAOA across a user-specified number of QPUs with configurable capacities. The workflow canonicalizes the QUBO model, maps it to a cost Hamiltonian, allocates variables across QPUs, identifies local and cross-QPU couplings, and constructs the corresponding circuits. Runtime optimizations, including parameterized circuit reuse, objective reuse at fixed depth, batched evaluations, and parallel multi-start execution, reduce repeated overhead. A Streamlit graphical user interface is also provided for entering or uploading QUBO instances, configuring solver settings, running selected modes, and visualizing solution-quality metrics without editing Python scripts. The package is demonstrated on standalone QUBO benchmarks and a power generation unit commitment application. In the unit commitment case, brute force, monolithic QAOA, and distributed QAOA recover the same commitment bitstring and operating cost. Across multiple case studies, the simulator produces results consistent with classical monolithic QAOA references in terms of optimal bitstrings and costs. Staged runtime analysis shows substantial runtime reduction across implementation stages, while distributed QAOA remains more demanding because cross-QPU couplings require remote operations.
This paper presents a distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DQAOA)-enabled three-block alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework for unit commitment (UC). The relaxed commitment and dispatch variables are solved in a continuous quadratic programming block, while the binary commitment block is formulated as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. The DQAOA interface allows this QUBO to be solved using brute-force enumeration, monolithic QAOA, or distributed QAOA, while the remaining ADMM updates are kept unchanged. In the distributed mode, the logical commitment qubits are allocated across multiple capacity-constrained quantum processing units (QPU), avoiding the requirement that the complete binary problem fits on a single device. The framework is evaluated on a five-unit UC instance containing 15 binary variables. All three solver modes reduce the ADMM primal residual below a certain tolerance and recover the same commitment schedule, dispatch, and operating cost. The results demonstrate solution consistency across the three solver modes and the multi-QPU capacity accommodation provided by the distributed QAOA method.
We present Quafu-Qcover, an open-source cloud-based software package designed for combinatorial optimization problems that support both quantum simulators and hardware backends. Quafu-Qcover provides a standardized and complete workflow for solving combinatorial optimization problems using the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). It enables the automatic modeling of the original problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model and corresponding Ising model, which can be further transformed into a weight graph. The core of Qcover relies on a graph decomposition-based classical algorithm, which enables obtaining the optimal parameters for the shallow QAOA circuit more efficiently. Quafu-Qcover includes a specialized compiler that translates QAOA circuits into physical quantum circuits capable of execution on Quafu cloud quantum computers. Compared to a general-purpose compiler, ours generates shorter circuit depths while also possessing better speed performance. The Qcover compiler can establish a library of qubits coupling substructures in real time based on the updated calibration data of the superconducting quantum devices, ensuring that the task is executed on physical qubits with higher fidelity. The Quafu-Qcover allows us to retrieve quantum computer sampling result information at any time using task ID, enabling asynchronous processing. Besides, it includes modules for result preprocessing and visualization, allowing for an intuitive display of the solution to combinatorial optimization problems. We hope that Quafu-Qcover can serve as a guiding example for how to explore application problems on the Quafu cloud quantum computers
Abstract This paper studies how much Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) work can be avoided while preserving optimization quality in the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). Using exact statevector simulation of QAOA on six graph optimization problems across seven graph families, three baselines are compared: a naive QPU-centric workflow with 30 quantum evaluations, a best-practice workflow that separates classical parameter optimization from a single QPU evaluation, and a classical-only solver. Six QPUminimization strategies are evaluated: preprocessing, pretraining, surrogate modeling, adaptive stopping, adaptive shots, and measurement reuse. Quality is measured using normalized expected value rather than the saturated best-of-b metric. The key findings are: the best-practice baseline achieves 510- to 2070-fold shot reduction across 8 to 16 qubits with at most 0.4 percent quality loss relative to naive QAOA; quality improves with QAOA depth from 0.82 to 0.91 while the gap between naive and best-practice remains negligible; four of six strategies achieve 100 percent quality retention at depth 3; quality is stable across graph families ranging from 0.77 to 0.87; and a structural predictor achieves perfect prediction on held-out graph families. These results support the thesis that the required QPU budget is a structured, predictable function of the problem instance and workflow policy, rather than a fixed algorithmic constant.
This study explores quantum computing for combinatorial optimization, focusing on the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). Using Qiskit, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is implemented on simulators and quantum hardware, and compared with classical optimization using Gurobi. TSP instances are encoded as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems derived from the Miller–Tucker–Zemlin formulation, with quadratic penalties enforcing degree and subtour constraints. Results indicate that QAOA consistently generates feasible tours, but classical branch-and-bound methods achieve better solution quality and runtime. On Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, performance degrades with problem size due to sensitivity to parameter tuning, penalty scaling, and hardware noise. Among the tested classical optimizers, COBYLA provides the best balance of efficiency and noise tolerance. Overall, this work establishes a reproducible quantum-classical workflow, provides performance baselines, and identifies critical factors such as encoding design, optimizer choice, and error mitigation for improving near-term quantum heuristic performance.
Simulating quantum circuits is essential for validating quantum algorithms. However, no single simulator consistently performs best - efficiency depends on circuit structure, entanglement, and depth. In this work, we integrate Qiskit-Aer (state-vector and matrix product state) and QTensor, a tree-tensor-network based simulator, into the Quantum Framework (QFw), a modular platform that supports multiple quantum backends via a unified interface. We also enable distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DQAOA) application compatibility with QFw, allowing sub-problems to be solved in parallel at scale. We then benchmark DQAOA and TFIM (transverse field Ising model) circuits across supported simulators, showing how performance varies significantly with problem type. All simulations are deployed on the Frontier supercomputer using QFw's MPI-based orchestration for distributed, multinode execution. These results underscore the need for simulatoragnostic infrastructure to enable systematic evaluation and highperformance scaling of quantum workloads. QFw provides a practical and extensible path toward reproducible quantum algorithm development across diverse application domains.
Growing integration of distributed energy resources increases power-system variability and uncertainty. During disturbances, these effects can intensify generation-load imbalances and cascading failures. Controlled islanding limits their propagation by partitioning a compromised grid into connected, electrically sustainable islands. However, classical methods face rapidly growing computational costs as network size and island count increase. Quantum optimization offers an alternative for exploring this combinatorial partition space. Yet monolithic quantum formulations encode all assignment decisions in one circuit, causing qubit demand and circuit complexity to scale with network size. In this study, a qubit-bounded sequential distributed quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) framework is proposed to tackle coherent controlled islanding under limited quantum resources. It formulates the optimization as boundary-conditioned regional quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) subproblems that are solved sequentially within a fixed qubit budget. Thus, circuit width remains independent of network size, with aggregate quantum workload scaling linearly on bounded-degree networks. Evaluation covers eleven IEEE systems from 9 to 300 buses using IBM quantum computing resources, with Gurobi and monolithic QAOA as references. Across all systems, the framework recovers feasible Gurobi-optimal partitions under noise, confirming the resilience of its solution quality. The results further show that the proposed method substantially reduces quantum-resource demand and circuit complexity relative to monolithic QAOA, allowing large islanding problems to be addressed within current hardware limits. The proposed framework provides a feasible and scalable pathway for quantum optimization in large-scale power systems.