Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.24899

From Meta Idea to Advanced Mathematical Discovery -- Human-AI Co-Discovery of Sign-Embedding Quantum Algorithms

Yanqiao Wang, Jin-Peng Liu, Peng Li, Yang Liu

cs.LGcs.AIquant-phSubmitted Jun 12, 2026• Announced Jun 15, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

AI-assisted mathematics is often evaluated on solving predefined problems. In practice, however, many important advances begin earlier, when a vague research intuition is transformed into a concrete problem, a promising route, and a theorem family worth proving. This report studies that stage through a case study that led to sign-embedding quantum algorithms for matrix equations and matrix functions, foundational primitives in quantum linear algebra and operator-output quantum algorithms. The project began with a human-originated intuition that rational approximation is especially effective for jump-type functions such as the sign function, and might therefore serve as a design principle for quantum algorithms. Rather than merely assisting after the problem was fixed, AI-assisted exploration, including workflows later integrated into the agentic AI-mathematician system AIM, played a key role in expanding this intuition into a route map, comparing candidate formulations, and converging toward sign embedding as the central framework. AIM then helped connect a known matrix-sign identity to wider classes of matrix equations and matrix functions, and drafted proof and complexity calculations. The decisive scientific judgments remained human: selecting which human-AI-expanded routes were worth pursuing, rejecting a Cayley-trapezoidal approximation when its validity required a hidden condition, and refining the Sylvester implementation from a coarse quadratic-gap query route to the final factorized and scaled analysis. The report argues that human-AI co-discovery workflows, with systems such as AIM as important components, are most valuable not as standalone theorem provers, but as research partners for problem formation, connection discovery, derivation, and skeptical review inside a human-gated research loop.

Comments
35 pasges, 3 figures

Related papers

Sign Embedding Quantum Algorithms for Matrix Equations and Matrix Functions

Yanqiao Wang, Jin-Peng Liu

We develop operator-output quantum algorithms for matrix equations and matrix functions using matrix-sign embeddings. For each problem, an augmented matrix $M$ is chosen so that the target operator is a block of $\text{sign}(M)$ or is recovered from blocks of $(I-\text{sign}(M))/2$. We approximate the half-plane sign by a logarithmic-sinc formula and implement the shifted inverse families by scaled multiplexing with node-dependent rebalancing. For ordinary Sylvester equations, this yields a block-encoding of the solution with query complexity linear in the relevant conditioning parameters and logarithmic in the inverse error tolerance, under either a field-of-values (FoV) gap or a strip-resolvent bound. The same method extends to generalized Sylvester and Lyapunov equations, principal square and inverse square roots, matrix geometric means, and continuous-time algebraic Riccati equations (CARE), with explicit query-complexity and block-encoding-normalization bounds that cover non-normal and non-diagonalizable cases.

quant-pharXiv:2604.25333•Apr 29, 2026•0 citations

AI and Quantum Computing: A Co-Evolutionary Co-Design Framework and Systematic Review of Synergistic Benefits

Swati Shukla

Artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing (QC) have emerged as two rapidly advancing computational paradigms, each facing distinct theoretical and practical challenges. In recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward their interaction, particularly in the context of hybrid quantum-classical systems suitable for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. This paper presents a structured analysis of the bidirectional relationship between AI and QC, examining how classical machine learning methods currently support quantum hardware operation, algorithm optimization, and error mitigation, while critically assessing the potential of quantum computing to enhance artificial intelligence in the longer term. Building on this analysis, we introduce a co-evolutionary co-design framework that characterizes feedback mechanisms across hardware, algorithmic, and application layers. The framework is intended as an analytical tool for understanding system-level dependencies rather than as a performance-optimizing prescription. To ground the discussion, we include a simulation-based case study in which a variational quantum circuit is optimized using a classical learning loop implemented with a hybrid quantum-classical workflow. The results demonstrate stable convergence behavior under idealized conditions, illustrating the feasibility of AI-assisted quantum optimization without claiming quantum advantage. By combining a critical literature review, a modest computational study, and a system-level design perspective, this work aims to provide a balanced reference for researchers investigating the near-term and long-term interactions between artificial intelligence and quantum computing.

•Dec 29, 2025•0 citations

Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation of Quantum AI Algorithms

Talabattula Divya Sai Sri Akanksha, Chodapuneedi Sowjanya, Manjula Devarakonda Venkata

Quantum AI is a new way to think about the future of Artificial Intelligence through the merging of two technologies: quantum computing and advanced machine learning. Quantum AI has the potential to provide solutions to computationally difficult problems that traditional systems cannot solve. Quantum AI's continued success will rely on advancements in hybrid quantum-classical solutions, as well as the expansion of quantum hardware; hence, research remains necessary to conduct systematic benchmarks as well as performance analysis in order to determine both how well quantum AI algorithms perform practically, and where their limitations lie. In this chapter, detailed examinations of benchmarks that have been developed specifically for quantum AI are presented alongside evaluative metrics across various key areas of performance including algorithmic efficiency, scalability, noise immunity, and resource use for various types of quantum architectures. The chapter integrates dialogue between theory and practice to demonstrate ways in which performance metrics (i.e., quantum circuit depth, fidelity, convergence behaviour and computational complexity) can effectively compare Quantum AI algorithms to classical algorithms. Particular attention is given to hybrid variational algorithms, quantum-enhanced optimization algorithms, and quantum machine learning. Using benchmark datasets, simulation frameworks and new evaluation methods, there are several challenges in terms of reproducibility, hardware variability and algorithm/hardware co-design that emerge through analysis of the above metrics as well. Aside from focusing on a more broad view of how Performance Evaluation relates to developing more effective Quantum AI Solutions. In addition to viewing Benchmarking as a technical exercise solely, this chapter provides a more holistic view in relation to a human perspective of the situation. This paper outlines how performance evaluation practices can be used as a considerable and well-designed means of bridging the gap between the promise of Quantum Technology at an abstract level, and the ability of Quantum Technology to produce tangible outcomes in the real world by adopting a more comprehensive Governance-oriented approach to Benchmarking Quantum AI Systems. The purpose of this chapter is to assist the growing community of researchers, practitioners, and Strategic Technology Professionals by providing them with a clear and structured framework for Evaluation of Quantum AI Algorithms. There is a significant focus of the chapter on establishing important reference points that organizations can use to determine when an intelligent system has successfully achieved a true and validated quantum advantage. The ultimate goal is to assist in guiding the responsible development and implementation of Quantum AI to enable the Potential Benefits of Quantum AI to be realized, in ways that are meaningful and impactful.

Indian Journal of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Towards autonomous quantum physics research using LLM agents with access to intelligent tools

Sören Arlt, Xuemei Gu, Mario Krenn

Artificial intelligence (AI) is used in numerous fields of science, yet the initial research questions and targets are still almost always provided by human researchers. AI-generated creative ideas in science are rare and often vague, so that it remains a human task to execute them. Automating idea generation and implementation in one coherent system would significantly shift the role of humans in the scientific process. Here we present AI-Mandel, an LLM agent that can generate and implement ideas in quantum physics. AI-Mandel formulates ideas from the literature and uses a domain-specific AI tool to turn them into concrete experiment designs that can readily be implemented in laboratories. The generated ideas by AI-Mandel are often scientifically interesting - for two of them we have already written independent scientific follow-up papers. The ideas include new variations of quantum teleportation, primitives of quantum networks in indefinite causal orders, and new concepts of geometric phases based on closed loops of quantum information transfer. AI-Mandel is a prototypical demonstration of an AI physicist that can generate and implement concrete, actionable ideas. Building such a system is not only useful to accelerate science, but it also reveals concrete open challenges on the path to human-level artificial scientists.

cs.AICross-listedarXiv:2511.11752•Nov 14, 2025•1 citation

Quantum Computing for Explainable AI: Developing Quantum-inspired Interpretable Models for Complex Decision-making Systems

Chidera Onyeka Agu

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has heightened concerns about the opacity of decision-making processes in complex models, particularly deep neural networks. This research explores a novel paradigm that integrates quantum computing principles into Explainable AI (XAI) to enhance interpretability without compromising predictive accuracy. The study introduces a Quantum-inspired Interpretable Model (QIIM) framework that leverages Hilbert space embeddings, unitary transformations, and operator-based learning to represent knowledge in a mathematically transparent form. The proposed model computes interpretability through the expectation values of observable operators, enabling the decomposition of decisions into quantifiable, human-understandable components. To capture hierarchical relationships, a Tensor Network Interpretable Model (TNIM) is further developed, offering scalable insights into complex dependencies among features. Experimental evaluations—performed on benchmark datasets for decision-making tasks—demonstrate that the quantum-inspired models achieve competitive accuracy while significantly improving local and global interpretability metrics compared to classical XAI techniques. The findings underscore the potential of quantum formalism as a new foundation for transparent AI systems, bridging the gap between computational efficiency and explainability. This study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical advancement in interpretable machine learning, paving the way for ethically aligned, transparent, and human-trustworthy AI-driven decision support systems.

British Journal of Computer Networking and Information Technology•Dec 3, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Computing and AI: Perspectives on Advanced Automation in Science and Engineering

Tadashi Kadowaki

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing are accelerating automation in scientific and engineering processes, fundamentally reshaping research methodologies. This perspective highlights parallels between scientific automation and established Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) practices, introducing Quantum CAE as a framework that leverages quantum algorithms for simulation, optimization, and machine learning within engineering design. Practical implementations of Quantum CAE are illustrated through case studies for combinatorial optimization problems. Further discussions include advancements toward higher automation levels, highlighting the critical role of specialized AI agents proficient in quantum algorithm design. The integration of quantum computing with AI raises significant questions about the collaborative dynamics among human scientists and engineers, AI systems, and quantum computational resources, underscoring a transformative future for automated discovery and innovation.

arXiv:2505.10012•May 15, 2025•0 citations
AI-assisted mathematics is often evaluated on solving predefined problems. In practice, however, many important advances begin earlier, when a vague research intuition is transformed into a concrete problem, a promising route, and a theorem family worth proving. This report studies that stage through a case study that led to sign-embedding quantum algorithms for matrix equations and matrix functions, foundational primitives in quantum linear algebra and operator-output quantum algorithms. The project began with a human-originated intuition that rational approximation is especially effective for jump-type functions such as the sign function, and might therefore serve as a design principle for quantum algorithms. Rather than merely assisting after the problem was fixed, AI-assisted exploration, including workflows later integrated into the agentic AI-mathematician system AIM, played a key role in expanding this intuition into a route map, comparing candidate formulations, and converging toward sign embedding as the central framework. AIM then helped connect a known matrix-sign identity to wider classes of matrix equations and matrix functions, and drafted proof and complexity calculations. The decisive scientific judgments remained human: selecting which human-AI-expanded routes were worth pursuing, rejecting a Cayley-trapezoidal approximation when its validity required a hidden condition, and refining the Sylvester implementation from a coarse quadratic-gap query route to the final factorized and scaled analysis. The report argues that human-AI co-discovery workflows, with systems such as AIM as important components, are most valuable not as standalone theorem provers, but as research partners for problem formation, connection discovery, derivation, and skeptical review inside a human-gated research loop.
We develop operator-output quantum algorithms for matrix equations and matrix functions using matrix-sign embeddings. For each problem, an augmented matrix MMM is chosen so that the target operator is a block of sign(M)\text{sign}(M)sign(M) or is recovered from blocks of (I−sign(M))/2(I-\text{sign}(M))/2(I−sign(M))/2. We approximate the half-plane sign by a logarithmic-sinc formula and implement the shifted inverse families by scaled multiplexing with node-dependent rebalancing. For ordinary Sylvester equations, this yields a block-encoding of the solution with query complexity linear in the relevant conditioning parameters and logarithmic in the inverse error tolerance, under either a field-of-values (FoV) gap or a strip-resolvent bound. The same method extends to generalized Sylvester and Lyapunov equations, principal square and inverse square roots, matrix geometric means, and continuous-time algebraic Riccati equations (CARE), with explicit query-complexity and block-encoding-normalization bounds that cover non-normal and non-diagonalizable cases.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing (QC) have emerged as two rapidly advancing computational paradigms, each facing distinct theoretical and practical challenges. In recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward their interaction, particularly in the context of hybrid quantum-classical systems suitable for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. This paper presents a structured analysis of the bidirectional relationship between AI and QC, examining how classical machine learning methods currently support quantum hardware operation, algorithm optimization, and error mitigation, while critically assessing the potential of quantum computing to enhance artificial intelligence in the longer term. Building on this analysis, we introduce a co-evolutionary co-design framework that characterizes feedback mechanisms across hardware, algorithmic, and application layers. The framework is intended as an analytical tool for understanding system-level dependencies rather than as a performance-optimizing prescription. To ground the discussion, we include a simulation-based case study in which a variational quantum circuit is optimized using a classical learning loop implemented with a hybrid quantum-classical workflow. The results demonstrate stable convergence behavior under idealized conditions, illustrating the feasibility of AI-assisted quantum optimization without claiming quantum advantage. By combining a critical literature review, a modest computational study, and a system-level design perspective, this work aims to provide a balanced reference for researchers investigating the near-term and long-term interactions between artificial intelligence and quantum computing.
Quantum AI is a new way to think about the future of Artificial Intelligence through the merging of two technologies: quantum computing and advanced machine learning. Quantum AI has the potential to provide solutions to computationally difficult problems that traditional systems cannot solve. Quantum AI's continued success will rely on advancements in hybrid quantum-classical solutions, as well as the expansion of quantum hardware; hence, research remains necessary to conduct systematic benchmarks as well as performance analysis in order to determine both how well quantum AI algorithms perform practically, and where their limitations lie. In this chapter, detailed examinations of benchmarks that have been developed specifically for quantum AI are presented alongside evaluative metrics across various key areas of performance including algorithmic efficiency, scalability, noise immunity, and resource use for various types of quantum architectures. The chapter integrates dialogue between theory and practice to demonstrate ways in which performance metrics (i.e., quantum circuit depth, fidelity, convergence behaviour and computational complexity) can effectively compare Quantum AI algorithms to classical algorithms. Particular attention is given to hybrid variational algorithms, quantum-enhanced optimization algorithms, and quantum machine learning. Using benchmark datasets, simulation frameworks and new evaluation methods, there are several challenges in terms of reproducibility, hardware variability and algorithm/hardware co-design that emerge through analysis of the above metrics as well. Aside from focusing on a more broad view of how Performance Evaluation relates to developing more effective Quantum AI Solutions. In addition to viewing Benchmarking as a technical exercise solely, this chapter provides a more holistic view in relation to a human perspective of the situation. This paper outlines how performance evaluation practices can be used as a considerable and well-designed means of bridging the gap between the promise of Quantum Technology at an abstract level, and the ability of Quantum Technology to produce tangible outcomes in the real world by adopting a more comprehensive Governance-oriented approach to Benchmarking Quantum AI Systems. The purpose of this chapter is to assist the growing community of researchers, practitioners, and Strategic Technology Professionals by providing them with a clear and structured framework for Evaluation of Quantum AI Algorithms. There is a significant focus of the chapter on establishing important reference points that organizations can use to determine when an intelligent system has successfully achieved a true and validated quantum advantage. The ultimate goal is to assist in guiding the responsible development and implementation of Quantum AI to enable the Potential Benefits of Quantum AI to be realized, in ways that are meaningful and impactful.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is used in numerous fields of science, yet the initial research questions and targets are still almost always provided by human researchers. AI-generated creative ideas in science are rare and often vague, so that it remains a human task to execute them. Automating idea generation and implementation in one coherent system would significantly shift the role of humans in the scientific process. Here we present AI-Mandel, an LLM agent that can generate and implement ideas in quantum physics. AI-Mandel formulates ideas from the literature and uses a domain-specific AI tool to turn them into concrete experiment designs that can readily be implemented in laboratories. The generated ideas by AI-Mandel are often scientifically interesting - for two of them we have already written independent scientific follow-up papers. The ideas include new variations of quantum teleportation, primitives of quantum networks in indefinite causal orders, and new concepts of geometric phases based on closed loops of quantum information transfer. AI-Mandel is a prototypical demonstration of an AI physicist that can generate and implement concrete, actionable ideas. Building such a system is not only useful to accelerate science, but it also reveals concrete open challenges on the path to human-level artificial scientists.
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has heightened concerns about the opacity of decision-making processes in complex models, particularly deep neural networks. This research explores a novel paradigm that integrates quantum computing principles into Explainable AI (XAI) to enhance interpretability without compromising predictive accuracy. The study introduces a Quantum-inspired Interpretable Model (QIIM) framework that leverages Hilbert space embeddings, unitary transformations, and operator-based learning to represent knowledge in a mathematically transparent form. The proposed model computes interpretability through the expectation values of observable operators, enabling the decomposition of decisions into quantifiable, human-understandable components. To capture hierarchical relationships, a Tensor Network Interpretable Model (TNIM) is further developed, offering scalable insights into complex dependencies among features. Experimental evaluations—performed on benchmark datasets for decision-making tasks—demonstrate that the quantum-inspired models achieve competitive accuracy while significantly improving local and global interpretability metrics compared to classical XAI techniques. The findings underscore the potential of quantum formalism as a new foundation for transparent AI systems, bridging the gap between computational efficiency and explainability. This study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical advancement in interpretable machine learning, paving the way for ethically aligned, transparent, and human-trustworthy AI-driven decision support systems.
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing are accelerating automation in scientific and engineering processes, fundamentally reshaping research methodologies. This perspective highlights parallels between scientific automation and established Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) practices, introducing Quantum CAE as a framework that leverages quantum algorithms for simulation, optimization, and machine learning within engineering design. Practical implementations of Quantum CAE are illustrated through case studies for combinatorial optimization problems. Further discussions include advancements toward higher automation levels, highlighting the critical role of specialized AI agents proficient in quantum algorithm design. The integration of quantum computing with AI raises significant questions about the collaborative dynamics among human scientists and engineers, AI systems, and quantum computational resources, underscoring a transformative future for automated discovery and innovation.