Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.23392

On the cryptographic potential of single-qubit rotations

Alex B. Grilo, Lucas Hanouz, Anne Marin

quant-phSubmitted Jun 22, 2026• Announced Jun 23, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In the domain of quantum communication, cryptographic protocols often require users to have access to trusted qubit sources or detectors. Recently, it was shown that on an architecture called the Qline, several protocols can equivalently be performed by parties capable only of single-qubit rotations. In this work, we introduce two composably secure constructions that together show how in most quantum cryptographic protocols, parties traditionally required to perform trusted qubit preparation or measurement can delegate these tasks to an untrusted provider and instead rely on a trusted single-qubit rotation device. Our first construction implements single-qubit measurement and is universally applicable across any context. In contrast, our second construction, which addresses qubit preparation, relies on specific assumptions regarding the underlying protocol. We show, however, that these assumptions are inherently satisfied by the vast majority of common quantum cryptographic protocols. A notable consequence of our results is the formal validation of the Qline as a versatile architecture capable of supporting a wide range of single-qubit protocols.

Comments
18 pages, 5 figures

Related papers

Verification of Quantum Computations Without Trusted Preparations or Measurements

Elham Kashefi, Dominik Leichtle, Luka Music +1 more

ABSTRACT With the advent of delegated quantum computing as a service, verifying the integrity of quantum computations is becoming a question of great importance. Existing information‐theoretically Secure Delegated Quantum Computing (SDQC) protocols require the client to possess the ability to perform either trusted state preparations or measurements. Whether it is possible to verify universal quantum computations with information‐theoretic security without trusted preparations or measurements was an open question so far. In this paper, we settle this question in the affirmative by presenting a modular, composable, and efficient way to turn known verification schemes into protocols that rely only on trusted gates. Our first contribution is an extremely lightweight reduction of the problem of quantum verification for to the trusted application of single‐qubit rotations around the axis and bit flips. The second construction presented in this work shows that it is possible to information‐theoretically verify arbitrary quantum computations without trusted preparations or measurements if the verifier can perform two‐qubit gates on a register whose size is logarithmic in the security parameter. Our third contribution extends these two results to the multi‐party setting in which multiple mutually distrustful clients delegate a joint computation to a potentially malicious server.

arXiv:2403.10464•Advanced Quantum Technologies•May 1, 2026•1 citation

Verification of Quantum Computations: Hardware-Efficient Security Proofs

Harold Ollivier

How can a user with limited quantum resources verify the output of an untrusted, fully quantum server? This manuscript provides a conceptual synthesis of some recent developments toward answering this question under statistical (information-theoretic) security. Rather than duplicating the dense technical proofs of the underlying publications, our focus here is on the physical motivations, the structural connections between different protocols, and the path toward hardware-efficient implementation. We begin by introducing a modular, composable framework that partitions verification into three distinct, independent primitives: remote state preparation, trap-based deviation detection, and error-correcting embedding. Using this framework, we show how the demanding hardware requirements of early protocols can be systematically relaxed. We review schemes that eliminate the spatial overhead, remove the need to prepare computational-basis dummy states, and replace single-photon sources with trusted local rotations or weak coherent pulses. Finally, we examine how these techniques scale, both to asymmetric multi-party settings and to the delegation of fully fault-tolerant computations in the presence of gate-level noise. This document is intended as a guide to the architectural principles of practical quantum verification.

quant-pharXiv:2607.03983•Jul 7, 2026•0 citations

Computationally-Secure and Composable Remote State Preparation

Alexandru Gheorghiu, Thomas Vidick

We introduce a protocol between a classical polynomial-time verifier and a quantum polynomial-time prover that allows the verifier to securely delegate to the prover the preparation of certain single-qubit quantum states The prover is unaware of which state he received and moreover, the verifier can check with high confidence whether the preparation was successful. The delegated preparation of single-qubit states is an elementary building block in many quantum cryptographic protocols. We expect our implementation of "random remote state preparation with verification", a functionality first defined in (Dunjko and Kashefi 2014), to be useful for removing the need for quantum communication in such protocols while keeping functionality. The main application that we detail is to a protocol for blind and verifiable delegated quantum computation (DQC) that builds on the work of (Fitzsimons and Kashefi 2018), who provided such a protocol with quantum communication. Recently, both blind an verifiable DQC were shown to be possible, under computational assumptions, with a classical polynomial-time client (Mahadev 2017, Mahadev 2018). Compared to the work of Mahadev, our protocol is more modular, applies to the measurement-based model of computation (instead of the Hamiltonian model) and is composable. Our proof of security builds on ideas introduced in (Brakerski et al. 2018).

arXiv:1904.06320•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Nov 1, 2019•71 citations

Establishing shared secret keys on quantum line networks: protocol and security

Mina Doosti, Lucas Hanouz, Anne Marin +2 more

We show the security of multi-user key establishment on a single line of quantum communication. More precisely, we consider a quantum communication architecture where the qubit generation and measurement happen at the two ends of the line, whilst intermediate parties are limited to single-qubit unitary transforms. This network topology has been previously introduced to implement quantum-assisted secret-sharing protocols for classical data, as well as the key establishment, and secure computing. This architecture has numerous advantages. The intermediate nodes are only using simplified hardware, which makes them easier to implement. Moreover, key establishment between arbitrary pairs of parties in the network does not require key routing through intermediate nodes. This is in contrast with quantum key distribution (QKD) networks for which non-adjacent nodes need intermediate ones to route keys, thereby revealing these keys to intermediate parties and consuming previously established ones to secure the routing process. Our main result is to show the security of key establishment on quantum line networks. We show the security using the framework of abstract cryptography. This immediately makes the security composable, showing that the keys can be used for encryption or other tasks.

arXiv:2304.01881•Apr 4, 2023•1 citation

Establishing Shared Secret Keys on Quantum Line Networks: Protocol and Security

Mina Doosti, Lucas Hanouz, Anne Marin +2 more

We show the security of multi-user key establishment on a single line of quantum communication. More precisely, we consider a quantum communication architecture where the qubit generation and measurement happen at the two ends of the line, whilst intermediate parties are limited to single-qubit unitary transforms. This network topology has been previously introduced to implement quantum-assisted secret-sharing protocols for classical data, as well as the key establishment, and secure computing. This architecture has numerous advantages. The intermediate nodes are only using simplified hardware, which makes them easier to implement. Moreover, key establishment between arbitrary pairs of parties in the network does not require key routing through intermediate nodes. This is in contrast with quantum key distribution (QKD) networks for which non-adjacent nodes need intermediate ones to route keys, thereby revealing these keys to intermediate parties and consuming previously established ones to secure the routing process. Our main result is to show the security of key establishment on quantum line networks. We show the security using the framework of abstract cryptography. This immediately makes the security composable, showing that the keys can be used for encryption or other tasks.

International Conference on Quantum Communications, Networking, and Computing (QCNC)•Jul 1, 2024•8 citations

Semi-Quantum Cryptography: Designing Protocols with Classical Verification

Yusuf Alnawakhtha

Properties of quantum mechanics such as entanglement and the no-cloning theorem enable new forms of cryptography that are unattainable in classical models of computation. Quantum information, however, is harder to process, store, and transmit than classical information. As such, it is desirable to construct semi-quantum cryptographic protocols where only a subset of the parties have quantum capabilities while the rest operate classically. In this dissertation, we analyze the security of semi-quantum protocols based on two approaches: (i) nonlocality-based techniques and (ii) the hardness of the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem. In the first part of the dissertation, we leverage a form of Bell test to construct a quantum position verification (QPV) protocol. Initial QPV protocols required verifiers to prepare and send quantum states to an honest prover to achieve security against adversaries with bounded memory or entanglement. Later work constructed QPV protocols with classical verifiers but required additional assumptions such as the hardness of LWE or of random circuit sampling. We construct a variant of QPV where classical verifiers verify the spatial locations of two provers. We use the nonlocal correlations produced by the two provers to show security against adversaries with bounded quantum memory without making any computational intractability assumptions. In the second part of the dissertation, we use trapdoor claw-free functions (TCFs) to construct semi-quantum cryptographic protocols. TCFs, which are constructible from the hardness of LWE, have been shown to be immensely valuable in the construction of classically verifiable quantum cryptographic protocols. As opposed to previous work where the server is asked to prepare a claw state and perform Pauli-X and Z measurements, we use a technique that leverages the entire range of qubit measurements on the XY-plane. We use this technique to construct three protocols: (i) a one-round blind remote state preparation protocol that delegates the preparation of an arbitrary state on the XY-plane up to a Pauli-X correction; (ii) a two-round proof of quantumness whose security is directly in terms of the hardness of LWE and only requires the prover to prepare and measure a single claw state; and (iii) a 1-of-2 Puzzle with a single qubit auxiliary state.

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations
In the domain of quantum communication, cryptographic protocols often require users to have access to trusted qubit sources or detectors. Recently, it was shown that on an architecture called the Qline, several protocols can equivalently be performed by parties capable only of single-qubit rotations. In this work, we introduce two composably secure constructions that together show how in most quantum cryptographic protocols, parties traditionally required to perform trusted qubit preparation or measurement can delegate these tasks to an untrusted provider and instead rely on a trusted single-qubit rotation device. Our first construction implements single-qubit measurement and is universally applicable across any context. In contrast, our second construction, which addresses qubit preparation, relies on specific assumptions regarding the underlying protocol. We show, however, that these assumptions are inherently satisfied by the vast majority of common quantum cryptographic protocols. A notable consequence of our results is the formal validation of the Qline as a versatile architecture capable of supporting a wide range of single-qubit protocols.
ABSTRACT With the advent of delegated quantum computing as a service, verifying the integrity of quantum computations is becoming a question of great importance. Existing information‐theoretically Secure Delegated Quantum Computing (SDQC) protocols require the client to possess the ability to perform either trusted state preparations or measurements. Whether it is possible to verify universal quantum computations with information‐theoretic security without trusted preparations or measurements was an open question so far. In this paper, we settle this question in the affirmative by presenting a modular, composable, and efficient way to turn known verification schemes into protocols that rely only on trusted gates. Our first contribution is an extremely lightweight reduction of the problem of quantum verification for to the trusted application of single‐qubit rotations around the axis and bit flips. The second construction presented in this work shows that it is possible to information‐theoretically verify arbitrary quantum computations without trusted preparations or measurements if the verifier can perform two‐qubit gates on a register whose size is logarithmic in the security parameter. Our third contribution extends these two results to the multi‐party setting in which multiple mutually distrustful clients delegate a joint computation to a potentially malicious server.
How can a user with limited quantum resources verify the output of an untrusted, fully quantum server? This manuscript provides a conceptual synthesis of some recent developments toward answering this question under statistical (information-theoretic) security. Rather than duplicating the dense technical proofs of the underlying publications, our focus here is on the physical motivations, the structural connections between different protocols, and the path toward hardware-efficient implementation. We begin by introducing a modular, composable framework that partitions verification into three distinct, independent primitives: remote state preparation, trap-based deviation detection, and error-correcting embedding. Using this framework, we show how the demanding hardware requirements of early protocols can be systematically relaxed. We review schemes that eliminate the spatial overhead, remove the need to prepare computational-basis dummy states, and replace single-photon sources with trusted local rotations or weak coherent pulses. Finally, we examine how these techniques scale, both to asymmetric multi-party settings and to the delegation of fully fault-tolerant computations in the presence of gate-level noise. This document is intended as a guide to the architectural principles of practical quantum verification.
We introduce a protocol between a classical polynomial-time verifier and a quantum polynomial-time prover that allows the verifier to securely delegate to the prover the preparation of certain single-qubit quantum states The prover is unaware of which state he received and moreover, the verifier can check with high confidence whether the preparation was successful. The delegated preparation of single-qubit states is an elementary building block in many quantum cryptographic protocols. We expect our implementation of "random remote state preparation with verification", a functionality first defined in (Dunjko and Kashefi 2014), to be useful for removing the need for quantum communication in such protocols while keeping functionality. The main application that we detail is to a protocol for blind and verifiable delegated quantum computation (DQC) that builds on the work of (Fitzsimons and Kashefi 2018), who provided such a protocol with quantum communication. Recently, both blind an verifiable DQC were shown to be possible, under computational assumptions, with a classical polynomial-time client (Mahadev 2017, Mahadev 2018). Compared to the work of Mahadev, our protocol is more modular, applies to the measurement-based model of computation (instead of the Hamiltonian model) and is composable. Our proof of security builds on ideas introduced in (Brakerski et al. 2018).
We show the security of multi-user key establishment on a single line of quantum communication. More precisely, we consider a quantum communication architecture where the qubit generation and measurement happen at the two ends of the line, whilst intermediate parties are limited to single-qubit unitary transforms. This network topology has been previously introduced to implement quantum-assisted secret-sharing protocols for classical data, as well as the key establishment, and secure computing. This architecture has numerous advantages. The intermediate nodes are only using simplified hardware, which makes them easier to implement. Moreover, key establishment between arbitrary pairs of parties in the network does not require key routing through intermediate nodes. This is in contrast with quantum key distribution (QKD) networks for which non-adjacent nodes need intermediate ones to route keys, thereby revealing these keys to intermediate parties and consuming previously established ones to secure the routing process. Our main result is to show the security of key establishment on quantum line networks. We show the security using the framework of abstract cryptography. This immediately makes the security composable, showing that the keys can be used for encryption or other tasks.
We show the security of multi-user key establishment on a single line of quantum communication. More precisely, we consider a quantum communication architecture where the qubit generation and measurement happen at the two ends of the line, whilst intermediate parties are limited to single-qubit unitary transforms. This network topology has been previously introduced to implement quantum-assisted secret-sharing protocols for classical data, as well as the key establishment, and secure computing. This architecture has numerous advantages. The intermediate nodes are only using simplified hardware, which makes them easier to implement. Moreover, key establishment between arbitrary pairs of parties in the network does not require key routing through intermediate nodes. This is in contrast with quantum key distribution (QKD) networks for which non-adjacent nodes need intermediate ones to route keys, thereby revealing these keys to intermediate parties and consuming previously established ones to secure the routing process. Our main result is to show the security of key establishment on quantum line networks. We show the security using the framework of abstract cryptography. This immediately makes the security composable, showing that the keys can be used for encryption or other tasks.
Properties of quantum mechanics such as entanglement and the no-cloning theorem enable new forms of cryptography that are unattainable in classical models of computation. Quantum information, however, is harder to process, store, and transmit than classical information. As such, it is desirable to construct semi-quantum cryptographic protocols where only a subset of the parties have quantum capabilities while the rest operate classically. In this dissertation, we analyze the security of semi-quantum protocols based on two approaches: (i) nonlocality-based techniques and (ii) the hardness of the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem. In the first part of the dissertation, we leverage a form of Bell test to construct a quantum position verification (QPV) protocol. Initial QPV protocols required verifiers to prepare and send quantum states to an honest prover to achieve security against adversaries with bounded memory or entanglement. Later work constructed QPV protocols with classical verifiers but required additional assumptions such as the hardness of LWE or of random circuit sampling. We construct a variant of QPV where classical verifiers verify the spatial locations of two provers. We use the nonlocal correlations produced by the two provers to show security against adversaries with bounded quantum memory without making any computational intractability assumptions. In the second part of the dissertation, we use trapdoor claw-free functions (TCFs) to construct semi-quantum cryptographic protocols. TCFs, which are constructible from the hardness of LWE, have been shown to be immensely valuable in the construction of classically verifiable quantum cryptographic protocols. As opposed to previous work where the server is asked to prepare a claw state and perform Pauli-X and Z measurements, we use a technique that leverages the entire range of qubit measurements on the XY-plane. We use this technique to construct three protocols: (i) a one-round blind remote state preparation protocol that delegates the preparation of an arbitrary state on the XY-plane up to a Pauli-X correction; (ii) a two-round proof of quantumness whose security is directly in terms of the hardness of LWE and only requires the prover to prepare and measure a single claw state; and (iii) a 1-of-2 Puzzle with a single qubit auxiliary state.