Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2606.19848

QMCtwin: Master-Equation Simulation of Syndrome Statistics Beyond Pauli Noise

Tong Shen, Huo Chen, Benchen Huang, Tyler Takeshita, Arian Vezvaee, Izhar Medalsy, Daniel A. Lidar

quant-phSubmitted Jun 18, 2026• Announced Jun 19, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

As quantum error correction moves toward large-scale experimental implementations, decoder performance increasingly depends on how faithfully hardware noise is translated into syndrome statistics. Standard stabilizer workflows achieve scalability by replacing device dynamics with stochastic Pauli or detector-error models, but this compression can discard coherent phase information, nonunital drift, continuous-time effects of always-on couplings, and correlations generated by simultaneous Hamiltonian and dissipative evolution. Here we present QMCtwin, a sign-problem-suppressed quantum Monte Carlo framework for master-equation simulation of QEC circuits, and apply it to a full syndrome-extraction round of a distance-$7$ rotated surface code with $97$ physical qubits. The open-system model includes realistic superconducting-device noise mechanisms such as relaxation, pure dephasing, coherent gate miscalibration, residual $ZZ$ crosstalk, and drive-qubit detuning. By directly estimating syndrome observables from the QMC-generated stochastic density matrix estimator, we compare the master-equation dynamics with their Pauli-twirled Clifford simulation counterparts. QMCtwin predicts syndrome-extraction biases and correlations between syndromes and proxies of logical-string-parity that are absent or strongly suppressed in the stochastic Pauli description. We introduce information-theoretic diagnostics that further quantify how information concerning syndromes versus string-parity proxies differs between the realistic master-equation simulation and the corresponding Pauli-twirled model. These results show that QMC-based master-equation digital twins can expose noise features hidden by conventional Pauli/Clifford noise models and provide a practical path toward more accurate decoder-facing syndrome models.

Comments
20 pages, 8 figures

Related papers

Simulating Quantum Error Correction beyond Pauli Stochastic Errors

Jordan Hines, Corey Ostrove, Kenneth Rudinger +4 more

Quantum error correction (QEC), the lynchpin of fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC), is designed and validated against well-behaved Pauli stochastic error models. But in real-world deployment, QEC protocols encounter a vast array of other errors -- coherent and non-Pauli errors -- whose impacts on quantum circuits are vastly different than those of stochastic Pauli errors. The impacts of these errors on QEC and FTQC protocols have been largely unpredictable to date due to exponential classical simulation cost. Here, we show how to accurately and efficiently model the effects of coherent and non-Pauli errors on FTQC, and we study the effects of such errors on syndrome extraction for surface and bivariate bicycle codes, and on magic state cultivation. Our analysis suggests that coherent error can shift fault-tolerance thresholds, increase the space-time cost of magic state cultivation, and can increase logical error rates by an order of magnitude compared to equivalent stochastic errors. These analyses are enabled by a new technique for mapping any Markovian circuit-level error model with sufficiently small error rates onto a detector error model (DEM) for an FTQC circuit. The resulting DEM enables Monte Carlo estimation of logical error rates and noise-adapted decoding, and its parameters can be analytically related to the underlying physical noise parameters to enable approximate strong simulation.

quant-pharXiv:2603.18457•Mar 20, 2026•0 citations

Scalable Exact Non-Pauli Noise Simulation for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits

Yuewen Hou, Gokul Subramanian Ravi

Fault-tolerant quantum design relies on simulating noisy quantum error correction (QEC) circuits with hundreds to thousands of physical qubits and large circuit depths. High-throughput stabilizer simulators, such as Stim, are the de facto tools for this regime. However, these simulators typically support only Clifford gates and stochastic Pauli noise. As a result, more realistic device noise models-such as coherent control errors and thermal relaxation-are often approximated using Pauli Twirling. This replacement offers speed but can introduce inaccuracies. To address this, we propose QuasiStim for scalable exact QEC simulation of realistic noise, with QuasiFold as a compiler frontend and DeltaFrame as a sampling backend. QuasiFold lowers sampling overhead by merging equivalent non-Pauli sites in the quantum circuit. DeltaFrame samples the resulting stabilizer trajectories by reusing precomputed predicted references instead of resimulating the full tableau for each shot. QuasiFold can reduce the number of shots by over $100\times$ on bivariate-bicycle (BB) codes. Compared to a per-shot tableau simulator, DeltaFrame is $166\times$--$1331\times$ faster on rotated surface-code memory under coherent $R_Z$ noise as $d$ grows from 5 to 35. QuasiStim also makes the PTA bias measurable: the gap is non-negligible and varies with noise strength, decoder, and circuit schedule. QuasiStim will be open-sourced upon publication at https://github.com/isaachyw/QuasiStim

quant-pharXiv:2610.15975•Oct 13, 2026•0 citations

Spacetime Spins: Statistical mechanics for error correction with stabilizer circuits

Cory T. Aitchison, Benjamin Béri

A powerful method for analyzing quantum error-correcting codes is to map them onto classical statistical mechanics models. Such mappings have thus far mostly focused on static codes, possibly subject to repeated syndrome measurements. Recent progress in quantum error correction, however, has prompted new paradigms where codes emerge from stabilizer circuits in spacetime -- a unifying perspective encompassing syndrome extraction circuits of static codes, dynamically generated codes, and logical operations. We show how to construct statistical mechanical models for stabilizer circuits subject to independent Pauli errors, by mapping logical equivalence class probabilities of errors to partition functions using the spacetime subsystem code formalism. We also introduce a modular language of spin diagrams for constructing the spin Hamiltonians, which we describe in detail focusing on independent circuit-level X-Z error channels. With the repetition and toric codes as examples, we use our approach to analytically rank logical error rates and thresholds between code implementations with standard and dynamic syndrome extraction circuits, describe the effect of transversal logical Clifford gates on logical error rates, and perform Monte Carlo simulations to estimate maximum likelihood thresholds. Our framework offers a universal prescription to analyze, simulate, and compare the decoding properties of any stabilizer circuit, while revealing the innate connections between dynamical quantum systems and noise-resilient phases of matter.

quant-pharXiv:2512.21991•Dec 29, 2025•0 citations

Correcting coherent quantum errors by going with the flow

Wayne M. Witzel, Anand Ganti, Tzvetan S. Metodi

The performance of a given quantum error correction (QEC) code depends upon the noise model that is assumed. Independent Pauli noise, applied after each quantum operation, is a simplistic noise model that is easy to simulate and understand in the context of stabilizer codes. Although such a noise model is artificial, it is equivalent to independent, random, unbiased qubit rotations. What about spatially or temporally correlated qubit rotations? Such a noise model is applicable to global operations (e.g., NMR or ESR), common control sources (e.g., lasers), or slow drift (e.g., charge or magnetic noise) in various qubit technologies. In the worst case, such errors can combine constructively and result in a post-correction failure rate that increases with the number of error correction cycles. However, we show that this worst case does not generally arise unless taking active corrective actions while performing QEC. That is, by employing virtual Pauli frame updates ("passive" error correction) rather than physical corrections ("active" error correction), coherent errors do not compound appreciably. Starting in a random Pauli frame is also advantageous. In fact, through perturbation theory arguments and supporting numerical simulations, we show that the logical qubit performance beyond distance 3 for correlated single-qubit Hamiltonian noise models (i.e., global errant qubit rotations), when employing these "lazy" strategies, essentially matches the performance of Pauli noise model with the same process fidelity (fidelity after one application). In a more general circuit model of noise, correlations may add constructively within syndrome extraction rounds but Pauli frame randomization from passive error correction mitigates this effect across multiple rounds.

quant-pharXiv:2602.21076•Feb 25, 2026•0 citations

Continuous Noise Model for Quantum Circuits

Yunos El Kaderi, Andreas Honecker, Iryna Andriyanova

Quantum noise is a central challenge in quantum computing across many applications. Extensive work has examined how qubits couple to their environment, leading to decoherence and irreversible relaxation. This work studies a continuous coherent noise model for quantum circuits and compares it with a discrete Pauli model. The focus is on small, coherent gate errors that accumulate across circuit depth. These errors are modeled as random rotations on the Bloch sphere using a von Mises-Fisher distribution. In the small-angle limit, the model reduces to an isotropic Gaussian distribution. We test the model on quantum error-correction circuits based on the [[5,1,3]] and [[7,1,3]] codes. A variant of Grover's search circuit with different qubit counts is also examined. To enable fair comparison, we introduce a model-independent matching scheme. Pauli and continuous noise channels are aligned using the binary entropy at readout. This isolates the effect of noise structure at fixed uncertainty. An approximate analytical method for the propagation of coherent errors is also developed. The method tracks error distributions both on Clifford and non-Clifford circuits without full Monte Carlo sampling. It reduces simulation cost while preserving accuracy for circuit-level error estimates. The approximation is validated against brute-force simulations, identifying its regime of validity with Clifford and non-Clifford circuits under error correction. Our results show that continuous coherent noise and Pauli noise lead to comparable logical-error trends in the stabilizer-code circuits studied here. This behavior is consistent with syndrome extraction projecting a general single-qubit error onto Pauli-error subspaces before recovery. They also show where simplified propagation models work well and where their accuracy is reduced.

quant-pharXiv:2604.26008•Apr 30, 2026•0 citations

Characterization of syndrome-dependent logical noise in detector regions

Girling, Matthew, Ben Criger, Cristina Cîrstoiu

Characterizing how quantum error correction circuits behave under realistic hardware noise is essential for testing the premises that enable scalable fault tolerance. Logical error rates conditioned on syndrome outcomes are needed to enable noise-aware decoding and validate threshold-relevant assumptions. We introduce a protocol to directly estimate the logical Pauli channels (and pure errors) associated with detector regions formed of two or more syndrome extraction gadgets, conditioned on observing a particular parity in the syndrome outcomes. The method is SPAM-robust and most suitable for flag-based syndrome measurement schemes. For classical processing of the experimental data we implement a Bayesian modelling approach. We validate this new protocol on a small error-detecting code using Quantinuum H1-1, a trapped-ion device, and demonstrate that several noise diagnostic tests for fault tolerance improve significantly when using noise tailoring and mitigation strategies, such as swapped measurements for leakage protection, and Pauli frame randomization.

arXiv:2508.08188•Aug 11, 2025•0 citations
As quantum error correction moves toward large-scale experimental implementations, decoder performance increasingly depends on how faithfully hardware noise is translated into syndrome statistics. Standard stabilizer workflows achieve scalability by replacing device dynamics with stochastic Pauli or detector-error models, but this compression can discard coherent phase information, nonunital drift, continuous-time effects of always-on couplings, and correlations generated by simultaneous Hamiltonian and dissipative evolution. Here we present QMCtwin, a sign-problem-suppressed quantum Monte Carlo framework for master-equation simulation of QEC circuits, and apply it to a full syndrome-extraction round of a distance-777 rotated surface code with 979797 physical qubits. The open-system model includes realistic superconducting-device noise mechanisms such as relaxation, pure dephasing, coherent gate miscalibration, residual ZZZZZZ crosstalk, and drive-qubit detuning. By directly estimating syndrome observables from the QMC-generated stochastic density matrix estimator, we compare the master-equation dynamics with their Pauli-twirled Clifford simulation counterparts. QMCtwin predicts syndrome-extraction biases and correlations between syndromes and proxies of logical-string-parity that are absent or strongly suppressed in the stochastic Pauli description. We introduce information-theoretic diagnostics that further quantify how information concerning syndromes versus string-parity proxies differs between the realistic master-equation simulation and the corresponding Pauli-twirled model. These results show that QMC-based master-equation digital twins can expose noise features hidden by conventional Pauli/Clifford noise models and provide a practical path toward more accurate decoder-facing syndrome models.
Quantum error correction (QEC), the lynchpin of fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC), is designed and validated against well-behaved Pauli stochastic error models. But in real-world deployment, QEC protocols encounter a vast array of other errors -- coherent and non-Pauli errors -- whose impacts on quantum circuits are vastly different than those of stochastic Pauli errors. The impacts of these errors on QEC and FTQC protocols have been largely unpredictable to date due to exponential classical simulation cost. Here, we show how to accurately and efficiently model the effects of coherent and non-Pauli errors on FTQC, and we study the effects of such errors on syndrome extraction for surface and bivariate bicycle codes, and on magic state cultivation. Our analysis suggests that coherent error can shift fault-tolerance thresholds, increase the space-time cost of magic state cultivation, and can increase logical error rates by an order of magnitude compared to equivalent stochastic errors. These analyses are enabled by a new technique for mapping any Markovian circuit-level error model with sufficiently small error rates onto a detector error model (DEM) for an FTQC circuit. The resulting DEM enables Monte Carlo estimation of logical error rates and noise-adapted decoding, and its parameters can be analytically related to the underlying physical noise parameters to enable approximate strong simulation.
Fault-tolerant quantum design relies on simulating noisy quantum error correction (QEC) circuits with hundreds to thousands of physical qubits and large circuit depths. High-throughput stabilizer simulators, such as Stim, are the de facto tools for this regime. However, these simulators typically support only Clifford gates and stochastic Pauli noise. As a result, more realistic device noise models-such as coherent control errors and thermal relaxation-are often approximated using Pauli Twirling. This replacement offers speed but can introduce inaccuracies. To address this, we propose QuasiStim for scalable exact QEC simulation of realistic noise, with QuasiFold as a compiler frontend and DeltaFrame as a sampling backend. QuasiFold lowers sampling overhead by merging equivalent non-Pauli sites in the quantum circuit. DeltaFrame samples the resulting stabilizer trajectories by reusing precomputed predicted references instead of resimulating the full tableau for each shot. QuasiFold can reduce the number of shots by over 100×100\times100× on bivariate-bicycle (BB) codes. Compared to a per-shot tableau simulator, DeltaFrame is 166×166\times166×--1331×1331\times1331× faster on rotated surface-code memory under coherent RZR_ZRZ​ noise as ddd grows from 5 to 35. QuasiStim also makes the PTA bias measurable: the gap is non-negligible and varies with noise strength, decoder, and circuit schedule. QuasiStim will be open-sourced upon publication at https://github.com/isaachyw/QuasiStim
A powerful method for analyzing quantum error-correcting codes is to map them onto classical statistical mechanics models. Such mappings have thus far mostly focused on static codes, possibly subject to repeated syndrome measurements. Recent progress in quantum error correction, however, has prompted new paradigms where codes emerge from stabilizer circuits in spacetime -- a unifying perspective encompassing syndrome extraction circuits of static codes, dynamically generated codes, and logical operations. We show how to construct statistical mechanical models for stabilizer circuits subject to independent Pauli errors, by mapping logical equivalence class probabilities of errors to partition functions using the spacetime subsystem code formalism. We also introduce a modular language of spin diagrams for constructing the spin Hamiltonians, which we describe in detail focusing on independent circuit-level X-Z error channels. With the repetition and toric codes as examples, we use our approach to analytically rank logical error rates and thresholds between code implementations with standard and dynamic syndrome extraction circuits, describe the effect of transversal logical Clifford gates on logical error rates, and perform Monte Carlo simulations to estimate maximum likelihood thresholds. Our framework offers a universal prescription to analyze, simulate, and compare the decoding properties of any stabilizer circuit, while revealing the innate connections between dynamical quantum systems and noise-resilient phases of matter.
The performance of a given quantum error correction (QEC) code depends upon the noise model that is assumed. Independent Pauli noise, applied after each quantum operation, is a simplistic noise model that is easy to simulate and understand in the context of stabilizer codes. Although such a noise model is artificial, it is equivalent to independent, random, unbiased qubit rotations. What about spatially or temporally correlated qubit rotations? Such a noise model is applicable to global operations (e.g., NMR or ESR), common control sources (e.g., lasers), or slow drift (e.g., charge or magnetic noise) in various qubit technologies. In the worst case, such errors can combine constructively and result in a post-correction failure rate that increases with the number of error correction cycles. However, we show that this worst case does not generally arise unless taking active corrective actions while performing QEC. That is, by employing virtual Pauli frame updates ("passive" error correction) rather than physical corrections ("active" error correction), coherent errors do not compound appreciably. Starting in a random Pauli frame is also advantageous. In fact, through perturbation theory arguments and supporting numerical simulations, we show that the logical qubit performance beyond distance 3 for correlated single-qubit Hamiltonian noise models (i.e., global errant qubit rotations), when employing these "lazy" strategies, essentially matches the performance of Pauli noise model with the same process fidelity (fidelity after one application). In a more general circuit model of noise, correlations may add constructively within syndrome extraction rounds but Pauli frame randomization from passive error correction mitigates this effect across multiple rounds.
Quantum noise is a central challenge in quantum computing across many applications. Extensive work has examined how qubits couple to their environment, leading to decoherence and irreversible relaxation. This work studies a continuous coherent noise model for quantum circuits and compares it with a discrete Pauli model. The focus is on small, coherent gate errors that accumulate across circuit depth. These errors are modeled as random rotations on the Bloch sphere using a von Mises-Fisher distribution. In the small-angle limit, the model reduces to an isotropic Gaussian distribution. We test the model on quantum error-correction circuits based on the [[5,1,3]] and [[7,1,3]] codes. A variant of Grover's search circuit with different qubit counts is also examined. To enable fair comparison, we introduce a model-independent matching scheme. Pauli and continuous noise channels are aligned using the binary entropy at readout. This isolates the effect of noise structure at fixed uncertainty. An approximate analytical method for the propagation of coherent errors is also developed. The method tracks error distributions both on Clifford and non-Clifford circuits without full Monte Carlo sampling. It reduces simulation cost while preserving accuracy for circuit-level error estimates. The approximation is validated against brute-force simulations, identifying its regime of validity with Clifford and non-Clifford circuits under error correction. Our results show that continuous coherent noise and Pauli noise lead to comparable logical-error trends in the stabilizer-code circuits studied here. This behavior is consistent with syndrome extraction projecting a general single-qubit error onto Pauli-error subspaces before recovery. They also show where simplified propagation models work well and where their accuracy is reduced.
Characterizing how quantum error correction circuits behave under realistic hardware noise is essential for testing the premises that enable scalable fault tolerance. Logical error rates conditioned on syndrome outcomes are needed to enable noise-aware decoding and validate threshold-relevant assumptions. We introduce a protocol to directly estimate the logical Pauli channels (and pure errors) associated with detector regions formed of two or more syndrome extraction gadgets, conditioned on observing a particular parity in the syndrome outcomes. The method is SPAM-robust and most suitable for flag-based syndrome measurement schemes. For classical processing of the experimental data we implement a Bayesian modelling approach. We validate this new protocol on a small error-detecting code using Quantinuum H1-1, a trapped-ion device, and demonstrate that several noise diagnostic tests for fault tolerance improve significantly when using noise tailoring and mitigation strategies, such as swapped measurements for leakage protection, and Pauli frame randomization.