Near-term variational classifiers incur substantial error and latency from two-qubit gates, yet practitioners often assume that additional entangling depth is the default route to higher accuracy. This work studies Optimal Quantum Measurement Decoding (OQMD): optimizing how quantum outcomes are mapped to classical labels by training a readout layer before measurement, jointly with the variational circuit, without adding CNOTs. Experiments use trainable triple single-qubit rotations as one concrete, hardware-native realization of OQMD; other single-qubit parametrizations fit the same classical outer loop. On the Iris benchmark with a 30-point stratified test split, the best observed 0-CNOT configuration with OQMD reaches 83.33\% accuracy, with a 96\% at 9 CNOTs, exceeding the best 18-CNOT controls (56.67\%) and the best 18-CNOT configuration with OQMD (66.67\%) under a common protocol. A six-point CNOT-depth series from 0 to 18 (fixed optimizer, iteration budget, random-seed count, and ZXZ readout) shows that the highest raw scores need not occur at the largest template, so aggregate complexity is not summarized by CNOT count alone. Because run-level accuracies are discrete and non-Gaussian, we emphasize best-observed scores and, where a global comparison of pooled runs is required, Mann--Whitney $U$ tests rather than parametric tests on means. Across architectures, OQMD shows statistically consistent but magnitude-dependent gains: large peak lifts on minimal circuits coexist with a small pooled mean shift on complex 18-CNOT runs ($p\approx 0.03$) that is not ``universal'' in the sense of uniformly large practical effects.%
Near-term variational classifiers incur substantial error and latency from two-qubit gates, yet practitioners often assume that additional entangling depth is the default route to higher accuracy. This work studies Optimal Quantum Measurement Decoding (OQMD): optimizing how quantum outcomes are mapped to classical labels by training a readout layer before measurement, jointly with the variational circuit, without adding CNOTs. Experiments use trainable triple single-qubit rotations as one concrete, hardware-native realization of OQMD; other single-qubit parametrizations fit the same classical outer loop. On the Iris benchmark with a 30-point stratified test split, the best observed 0-CNOT configuration with OQMD reaches 83.33% accuracy, with a 96% at 9 CNOTs, exceeding the best 18-CNOT controls (56.67%) and the best 18-CNOT configuration with OQMD (66.67%) under a common protocol. A six-point CNOT-depth series from 0 to 18 (fixed optimizer, iteration budget, random-seed count, and ZXZ readout) shows that the highest raw scores need not occur at the largest template, so aggregate complexity is not summarized by CNOT count alone. Because run-level accuracies are discrete and non-Gaussian, we emphasize best-observed scores and, where a global comparison of pooled runs is required, Mann--Whitney U tests rather than parametric tests on means. Across architectures, OQMD shows statistically consistent but magnitude-dependent gains: large peak lifts on minimal circuits coexist with a small pooled mean shift on complex 18-CNOT runs (p≈0.03) that is not ``universal'' in the sense of uniformly large practical effects.%
Abstract The quantum asymptotically universal multi-feature (QAUM) encoding architecture was recently introduced and showed improved expressivity and performance in classifying pulsar stars. The circuit uses generalized trainable layers of parameterized single-qubit rotation gates and single-qubit feature encoding gates. Although the improvement in classification accuracy is promising, the single-qubit nature of this architecture, combined with the circuit depth required for accuracy, limits its applications on NISQ devices due to their low coherence times. This work reports on the design, implementation, and evaluation of ensembles of single-qubit QAUM classifiers using classical bagging and boosting techniques. We demonstrate an improvement in validation accuracy for pulsar star classification. We find that this improvement is not dataset specific as we observe consistent improvements for the MNIST Digits and Wisconsin Cancer datasets. We also observe that the boosting ensemble achieves an acceptable level of accuracy with only a small amount of training, while the bagging ensemble achieves higher overall accuracy with ample training time. This shows that classical ensembles of single-qubit circuits present a new approach for certain classification problems.
This study investigates classification performance and trainability of variational quantum classifiers on near-term noisy quantum hardware across circuit depth and qubit count regimes within the context of quantum computing and machine learning, an area of growing scientific importance given its implications for hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment. Using gradient-based parameter optimization of parameterized quantum circuits with hardware noise modeling via density matrix simulation and physical execution on IBM Eagle processors, we examine expressibility of parameterized circuits enabling nonlinear decision boundaries in feature Hilbert space, with trainability constrained by barren plateau gradients at large qubit counts in 96 circuit architectures (4 qubit counts x 4 depths x 6 ansatz families) evaluated across 5 classification datasets with 20 random initialization seeds each drawn from IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit) and Falcon (27-qubit) processors with noise mitigation via zero-noise extrapolation. Results indicate that 10-qubit, 4-layer VQC achieves 84.2% classification accuracy on the best benchmark, within 3.8 percentage points of classical SVM, but gradient variance decays exponentially with qubit count (variance halving per 2 added qubits), confirming barren plateau scaling (p < 0.001), with 84.2% accuracy, 3.8 pp gap to classical SVM baseline as the primary quantitative benchmark. Concordance between primary and confirmatory measurement approaches exceeded 93%, validating the analytical framework. These findings contribute empirically to quantum computing and machine learning and carry actionable implications for the design of programs and policies targeting hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment.
The practical value of quantum machine learning must be derived from efficiency rather than scale, as current NISQ processors support only small, shallow circuits. This paper evaluated whether variational quantum circuits (VQCs) can reduce the trainable parameter count in an image classification scenario while preserving accuracy. Experimentation compared quantum classifier heads to parameter-matched classical heads on an identical set of frozen features drawn from the Fashion-MNIST dataset by a CNN. 9 configurations of a quantum circuit crossed 4, 6, and 8 qubits with 1, 2, and 4 entangling layers, each matched to a multilayer perceptron with an approximately equal parameter count. The linear probes served as a floor baseline for all 105 runs across 5 random seed values. 7 out of 9 quantum-based configurations met the mean test accuracy of no more than 1 percentage point below its matched classical head, enforced by the pre-specified criterion. The 2 failures were single-layer circuits, with each falling roughly 8 points below its matched classical head and 12 points below the circuit-free linear probe; in total, 6 configs with 2+ layers passed, with the smallest at 74 trainable parameters. The general trend noticed was that accuracy increased progressively with depth. The 4-layer circuits exceeded the linear probe at every qubit count and produced the highest accuracy at 6 and 8 qubits. The simulation ran noiselessly; VQCs preserved accuracy at the matched parameter budget when depth was given, showcasing depth rather than qubit count gating performance.
In quantum computation every unitary operation can be decomposed into quantum circuits---a series of single-qubit rotations and a single type entangling two-qubit gates, such as controlled-not(cnot) gates. Two measures are important when judging the complexity of the circuit: the total number of cnot gates needed to implement it and the depth of the circuit, measured by the minimal number of computation steps needed to perform it. Here we give an explicit and simple quantum circuit scheme for preparation of arbitrary quantum states, which can directly utilize any decomposition scheme for arbitrary full quantum gates, thus connecting the two problems. Our circuit reduces the depth of the best currently known circuit by a factor of 2. It also reduces the total number of cnot gates from 2n to 24232n in the leading order for even number of qubits. Specifically, the scheme allows us to decrease the upper bound from 11 cnot gates to 9 and the depth from 11 to 5 steps for four qubits. Our results are expected to help in designing and building small-scale quantum circuits using present technologies.
Abstract Hybrid quantum machine learning combines classical minimization with parameterized quantum circuits, enabling powerful learning models even on near-term quantum hardware. This work presents an evaluation of hybrid quantum machine learning classifiers using the data re-uploading framework across nine binary and multi-class classification tasks with varying geometric complexity. We compare three quantum circuit architectures, single-qubit, two-qubit, and two-qubit entangled, trained with three classical minimizers: COBYLA, Nelder-Mead, and SLSQP. Our experiments span training sizes from 1 to 200 samples and reveal that two-qubit classifiers, when paired with the SLSQP minimizer, achieve the highest overall test accuracy of 99.775% on structured tasks and strong performance (up to 89.78%) on complex multi-class pattern. Among minimizers, SLSQP consistently provides the best generalization, while entanglement improves accuracy in non-linear and fragmented tasks. By analyzing accuracy trends, generalization gaps, and confusion matrices, this study offers practical guidance for designing quantum classifiers that scale effectively and generalize well, providing a foundation for real-world Hybrid quantum machine learning applications.
This thesis presents a systematic empirical evaluation of quantum machine learning performance under noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era constraints. Through 670 controlled experiments, it evaluated quantum kernel support vector machines and variational quantum classifiers against classical baselines on MNIST binary and multiclass classification tasks with systematic variation of problem difficulty, feature dimensionality (4, 8 qubits), and training set size (n ∈{100, 250, 400, 500, 2000, 4000}). Statistical rigor was ensured through five random seeds per condition and comprehensive significance testing. During the testing with binary datasets, classical methods (SVM, logistic regression, k-NN, neural networks) achieved 85.9% to 99.6% accuracy with training times under one second across all sample sizes. Quantum kernel methods utilizing ZZ feature maps yielded 70.5% to 96.0% accuracy, requiring 129 to 2,140 seconds training with quadratic sample size scaling. Larger scale quantum experiments (n = 4000 for both architectures, 8-qubit encoding with n = 2000 for quantum kernels) proved computationally impossible on available hardware leading to out of memory errors, highlighting practical NISQ-era scalability constraints. Variational quantum classifiers exhibited persistent performance stagnation, failing to exceed 66.5% accuracy despite increases in training data and feature dimensionality. Performance gaps ranged from 3.3 to 35.2 percentage points. All quantum classical differences achieved statistical significance (p< 0.05, with 13 of 14 comparisons meeting p< 0.01) and exhibited large to very large efect sizes (d> 1.0, with 13 of 14 comparisons exceeding d> 2.0). To further evaluate performance and scalability, a 4 class classification experiment was conducted following an identical experimental protocol, with training set sizes of n ∈{100, 250, 400}. Across 180 runs, classical baselines achieved mean accuracies between 87.2% and 95% across both 4 and 8 dimensional data. Quantum Kernel SVM struggled during runs with 4 dimensions, accuracy varying between 64.6% and 74%. Quantum Kernel SVM accuracy declined 16%-25% when the dimension and qubit count were increased to 8, showing findings of exponential kernel concentration. The Variational Quantum Classifier also performed poorly, with accuracy ranging from 43.4% to 44.6% across all runs, providing further evidence that it failed to leverage additional features or training data. Experiments employed noiseless statevector simulation, establishing that quantum underperformance stems from fundamental algorithmic limitations independent of hardware noise. A further extension to 8 class classification (digits 0–7) confirmed and amplified these findings: classical methods maintained 65–83% accuracy while Quantum Kernel SVM degraded to 34–47% and VQC collapsed to 21–23%, approaching the 12.5% random baseline. Supplementary appendix experiments further examined amplitude encoding on raw 784 dimensional pixel features and an alternative angle encoding scheme on the 8-class task; the latter demonstrated that replacing the ZZ Feature Map with simple per qubit rotations substantially recovered quantum kernel performance, suggesting feature map design as a more consequential variable than circuit depth or qubit count in near-term quantum classification.