Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2605.26544

Adaptive Shot Allocation for Recursive QAOA via Reinforcement Learning

Euimin Lee, Shiho Kim

quant-phSubmitted May 26, 2026• Announced May 27, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recursive QAOA (RQAOA) solves combinatorial optimization problems by using shallow quantum circuits to estimate pairwise correlations and recursively eliminate variables until a classical solver can handle the residual instance. Each elimination step requires measurement shots, and the total shot cost grows with the number of recursive stages. On near-term quantum devices, increasing shot counts can translate directly into greater exposure to hardware-level noise sources such as readout errors and decoherence, making shot-efficient execution not merely a cost-reduction measure but a factor with direct implications for solution reliability. While shot reduction has been studied broadly across NISQ algorithms, step-wise measurement control inside the recursive loop of RQAOA has received little attention. We formulate this step-wise allocation as a sequential decision problem and propose two strategies for depth-1 RQAOA on weighted Max-Cut instances. A hand-crafted heuristic assigns shots based on local indicators of step difficulty, and a tabular Double Q-learning agent learns a residual policy that adjusts this baseline under a Lagrangian-constrained objective. Both methods are evaluated under a fixed-cap fairness protocol that equalizes the per-step budget across all strategies, and the elimination rule itself is kept unchanged so that the contribution of adaptive measurement control can be isolated. On a diverse set of weighted graph instances spanning a range of sizes and structures, the heuristic reduces total shots by approximately 23% relative to uniform allocation, and the RL policy achieves a 36% reduction with a lower effective shots per success ratio than both baselines. The improvement persists on problem sizes not seen during training, suggesting that reinforcement learning can discover efficient, instance-adaptive measurement strategies in recursive quantum optimization.

Related papers

Reinforcement learning assisted recursive QAOA

Yash J. Patel, Sofiène Jerbi, Thomas Bäck +1 more

In recent years, variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) have gained popularity as they provide the hope of using NISQ devices to tackle hard combinatorial optimization problems. It is, however, known that at low depth, certain locality constraints of QAOA limit its performance. To go beyond these limitations, a non-local variant of QAOA, namely recursive QAOA (RQAOA), was proposed to improve the quality of approximate solutions. The RQAOA has been studied comparatively less than QAOA, and it is less understood, for instance, for what family of instances it may fail to provide high-quality solutions. However, as we are tackling NP-hard problems (specifically, the Ising spin model), it is expected that RQAOA does fail, raising the question of designing even better quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization. In this spirit, we identify and analyze cases where (depth-1) RQAOA fails and, based on this, propose a reinforcement learning enhanced RQAOA variant (RL-RQAOA) that improves upon RQAOA. We show that the performance of RL-RQAOA improves over RQAOA: RL-RQAOA is strictly better on these identified instances where RQAOA underperforms and is similarly performing on instances where RQAOA is near-optimal. Our work exemplifies the potentially beneficial synergy between reinforcement learning and quantum (inspired) optimization in the design of new, even better heuristics for complex problems.

arXiv:2207.06294•EPJ Quantum Technology•Jan 17, 2024•29 citations

Artificial-intelligence-driven shot reduction in quantum measurement

Senwei Liang, Linghua Zhu, Xiaolin Liu +2 more

Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) provides a powerful solution for approximating molecular ground state energies by combining quantum circuits and classical computers. However, estimating probabilistic outcomes on quantum hardware requires repeated measurements (shots), incurring significant costs as accuracy increases. Optimizing shot allocation is thus critical for improving the efficiency of VQE. Current strategies rely heavily on hand-crafted heuristics requiring extensive expert knowledge. This paper proposes a reinforcement learning (RL)-based approach that automatically learns shot assignment policies to minimize total measurement shots while achieving convergence to the minimum of the energy expectation in VQE. The RL agent assigns measurement shots across VQE optimization iterations based on the progress of the optimization. This approach reduces VQE's dependence on static heuristics and human expertise. When the RL-enabled VQE is applied to a small molecule, a shot reduction policy is learned. The policy demonstrates transferability across systems and compatibility with other wavefunction Ansätze. In addition to these specific findings, this work highlights the potential of RL for automatically discovering efficient and scalable quantum optimization strategies.

arXiv:2405.02493•Chemical Physics Reviews•Oct 29, 2024•10 citations

Recursive QAOA for Interference-Aware Resource Allocation in Wireless Networks

Kuan-Cheng Chen, Hiromichi Matsuyama, Wei-hao Huang +1 more

Discrete radio resource management problems in dense wireless networks are naturally cast as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) programs but are difficult to solve at scale. We investigate a quantum-classical approach based on the Recursive Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (RQAOA), which interleaves shallow QAOA layers with variable elimination guided by measured single- and two-qubit correlators. For interference-aware channel assignment, we give a compact QUBO/Ising formulation in which pairwise interference induces same-channel couplings and one-hot constraints are enforced via quadratic penalties (or, optionally, constraint-preserving mixers). Within RQAOA, fixing high-confidence variables or relations reduces the problem dimension, stabilizes training, and concentrates measurement effort on a shrinking instance that is solved exactly once below a cutoff. On simulated instances of modest size, including a four-user, four-channel example, the method consistently returns feasible assignments and, for the demonstrated case, attains the global optimum. These results indicate that recursion can mitigate parameter growth and feasibility issues that affect plain QAOA, and suggest a viable pathway for near-term quantum heuristics in wireless resource allocation.

quant-pharXiv:2602.07483•Feb 10, 2026•0 citations

Beyond QAOA: A Review of AI and Quantum Computing for Adaptive Combinatorial Optimization

Hoong Chuin Lau

Near-term quantum approaches to combinatorial optimization are limited by qubit counts, circuit fidelity, sampling cost, and the difficulty of encoding constraints, while machine learning is increasingly used to configure and control quantum optimization workflows. We call such workflows adaptive: decisions conventionally fixed in advance, from formulation and penalties to shot budgets, backends, and whether to invoke a quantum processor at all, are made by learned policies that respond to the instance, the progress of the solve, or the hardware. This review examines three paradigms, AI for quantum optimization, quantum for AI-driven optimization, and AI-quantum co-optimization, and organizes the literature by the decision being learned rather than by application. A structured search identified a 119-paper corpus, of which 67 papers form an evidence core coded in detail. The evidence is considerably stronger for AI-assisted quantum optimization than for the reverse direction: learning already reduces quantum evaluations, improves initialization, supports decomposition and penalty control, and mitigates noise, whereas evidence that quantum computation improves learned optimizers remains largely confined to small-scale simulation. Experimental controls are thin: of 52 studies in the three paradigms, 22 include no classical baseline, the quantum contribution is fully isolated in 10 of 24 where an ablation applies, and the median largest experiment uses 16 qubits. We introduce an M0-M5 evidence hierarchy, from simulation to practical quantum advantage, and find no broadly convincing result at the highest level. We argue that scaling is increasingly a systems problem: the question is not only whether a problem fits on a quantum processor, but how classical and quantum resources should be allocated across the optimization process.

quant-pharXiv:2610.11759•Oct 9, 2026•0 citations

Modified recursive QAOA for exact MAX-CUT solutions on bipartite graphs: closing the gap beyond QAOA limit

Eunok Bae, Hyukjoon Kwon, V Vijendran +1 more

Abstract Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum–classical hybrid algorithm proposed with the goal of approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems such as the MAX-CUT problem. It has been considered a potential candidate for achieving quantum advantage in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era and has been extensively studied. However, the performance limitations of low-level QAOA have also been demonstrated across various instances. In this work, we first analytically prove the performance limitations of the standard level-1 QAOA in solving the MAX-CUT problem on bipartite graphs. To this end, we derive an upper bound for the approximation ratio based on the average degree of bipartite graphs. Second, we demonstrate that recursive QAOA (RQAOA), which recursively reduces graph size using QAOA as a subroutine, outperforms the standard level-1 QAOA. However, the performance of RQAOA exhibits limitations as the graph size increases. Finally, we show that RQAOA with a restricted parameter regime can fully address these limitations. Surprisingly, this modified RQAOA always finds the exact maximum cut for any bipartite graphs and even for a more general graph with parity-signed weights.

arXiv:2408.13207•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Nov 18, 2025•0 citations

Adaptive V16: Cost-Aware Reinforcement Learning Control for Robust NISQ Variational Optimization

Kondamudi Sivaparvathi, Cheppali Prabhavathi

Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are promising for near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, but their performance is often limited by device noise, finite-shot uncertainty, and nonstationary behavior that destabilize optimization. This paper proposes a cost-aware closed-loop hybrid framework (Adaptive V16) that augments a standard VQA loop with an online decision policy to adapt measurement effort and mitigation actions during execution. At each iteration, the controller uses runtime signals such as objective progress and uncertainty to select an action comprising the shot budget, mitigation mode, and step-scaling factor, explicitly trading solution improvement against resource overhead under a fixed budget. Experimental evaluation on a representative molecular Hamiltonian optimization task shows that Adaptive V16 achieves a lower final energy than a static VQE baseline and reduces the absolute error from 0.1391 to 0.0657. The controller’s decision module also demonstrates strong predictive performance with 0.9700 accuracy, 0.9595 F1-score, and 0.9951 ROC–AUC, indicating reliable adaptive behavior across thresholds. These results suggest that policy-driven adaptation can improve robustness and budget efficiency for hybrid quantum–classical optimization in realistic NISQ settings.

International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS)•Apr 24, 2026•0 citations
Recursive QAOA (RQAOA) solves combinatorial optimization problems by using shallow quantum circuits to estimate pairwise correlations and recursively eliminate variables until a classical solver can handle the residual instance. Each elimination step requires measurement shots, and the total shot cost grows with the number of recursive stages. On near-term quantum devices, increasing shot counts can translate directly into greater exposure to hardware-level noise sources such as readout errors and decoherence, making shot-efficient execution not merely a cost-reduction measure but a factor with direct implications for solution reliability. While shot reduction has been studied broadly across NISQ algorithms, step-wise measurement control inside the recursive loop of RQAOA has received little attention. We formulate this step-wise allocation as a sequential decision problem and propose two strategies for depth-1 RQAOA on weighted Max-Cut instances. A hand-crafted heuristic assigns shots based on local indicators of step difficulty, and a tabular Double Q-learning agent learns a residual policy that adjusts this baseline under a Lagrangian-constrained objective. Both methods are evaluated under a fixed-cap fairness protocol that equalizes the per-step budget across all strategies, and the elimination rule itself is kept unchanged so that the contribution of adaptive measurement control can be isolated. On a diverse set of weighted graph instances spanning a range of sizes and structures, the heuristic reduces total shots by approximately 23% relative to uniform allocation, and the RL policy achieves a 36% reduction with a lower effective shots per success ratio than both baselines. The improvement persists on problem sizes not seen during training, suggesting that reinforcement learning can discover efficient, instance-adaptive measurement strategies in recursive quantum optimization.
In recent years, variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) have gained popularity as they provide the hope of using NISQ devices to tackle hard combinatorial optimization problems. It is, however, known that at low depth, certain locality constraints of QAOA limit its performance. To go beyond these limitations, a non-local variant of QAOA, namely recursive QAOA (RQAOA), was proposed to improve the quality of approximate solutions. The RQAOA has been studied comparatively less than QAOA, and it is less understood, for instance, for what family of instances it may fail to provide high-quality solutions. However, as we are tackling NP-hard problems (specifically, the Ising spin model), it is expected that RQAOA does fail, raising the question of designing even better quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimization. In this spirit, we identify and analyze cases where (depth-1) RQAOA fails and, based on this, propose a reinforcement learning enhanced RQAOA variant (RL-RQAOA) that improves upon RQAOA. We show that the performance of RL-RQAOA improves over RQAOA: RL-RQAOA is strictly better on these identified instances where RQAOA underperforms and is similarly performing on instances where RQAOA is near-optimal. Our work exemplifies the potentially beneficial synergy between reinforcement learning and quantum (inspired) optimization in the design of new, even better heuristics for complex problems.
Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) provides a powerful solution for approximating molecular ground state energies by combining quantum circuits and classical computers. However, estimating probabilistic outcomes on quantum hardware requires repeated measurements (shots), incurring significant costs as accuracy increases. Optimizing shot allocation is thus critical for improving the efficiency of VQE. Current strategies rely heavily on hand-crafted heuristics requiring extensive expert knowledge. This paper proposes a reinforcement learning (RL)-based approach that automatically learns shot assignment policies to minimize total measurement shots while achieving convergence to the minimum of the energy expectation in VQE. The RL agent assigns measurement shots across VQE optimization iterations based on the progress of the optimization. This approach reduces VQE's dependence on static heuristics and human expertise. When the RL-enabled VQE is applied to a small molecule, a shot reduction policy is learned. The policy demonstrates transferability across systems and compatibility with other wavefunction Ansätze. In addition to these specific findings, this work highlights the potential of RL for automatically discovering efficient and scalable quantum optimization strategies.
Discrete radio resource management problems in dense wireless networks are naturally cast as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) programs but are difficult to solve at scale. We investigate a quantum-classical approach based on the Recursive Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (RQAOA), which interleaves shallow QAOA layers with variable elimination guided by measured single- and two-qubit correlators. For interference-aware channel assignment, we give a compact QUBO/Ising formulation in which pairwise interference induces same-channel couplings and one-hot constraints are enforced via quadratic penalties (or, optionally, constraint-preserving mixers). Within RQAOA, fixing high-confidence variables or relations reduces the problem dimension, stabilizes training, and concentrates measurement effort on a shrinking instance that is solved exactly once below a cutoff. On simulated instances of modest size, including a four-user, four-channel example, the method consistently returns feasible assignments and, for the demonstrated case, attains the global optimum. These results indicate that recursion can mitigate parameter growth and feasibility issues that affect plain QAOA, and suggest a viable pathway for near-term quantum heuristics in wireless resource allocation.
Near-term quantum approaches to combinatorial optimization are limited by qubit counts, circuit fidelity, sampling cost, and the difficulty of encoding constraints, while machine learning is increasingly used to configure and control quantum optimization workflows. We call such workflows adaptive: decisions conventionally fixed in advance, from formulation and penalties to shot budgets, backends, and whether to invoke a quantum processor at all, are made by learned policies that respond to the instance, the progress of the solve, or the hardware. This review examines three paradigms, AI for quantum optimization, quantum for AI-driven optimization, and AI-quantum co-optimization, and organizes the literature by the decision being learned rather than by application. A structured search identified a 119-paper corpus, of which 67 papers form an evidence core coded in detail. The evidence is considerably stronger for AI-assisted quantum optimization than for the reverse direction: learning already reduces quantum evaluations, improves initialization, supports decomposition and penalty control, and mitigates noise, whereas evidence that quantum computation improves learned optimizers remains largely confined to small-scale simulation. Experimental controls are thin: of 52 studies in the three paradigms, 22 include no classical baseline, the quantum contribution is fully isolated in 10 of 24 where an ablation applies, and the median largest experiment uses 16 qubits. We introduce an M0-M5 evidence hierarchy, from simulation to practical quantum advantage, and find no broadly convincing result at the highest level. We argue that scaling is increasingly a systems problem: the question is not only whether a problem fits on a quantum processor, but how classical and quantum resources should be allocated across the optimization process.
Abstract Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum–classical hybrid algorithm proposed with the goal of approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems such as the MAX-CUT problem. It has been considered a potential candidate for achieving quantum advantage in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era and has been extensively studied. However, the performance limitations of low-level QAOA have also been demonstrated across various instances. In this work, we first analytically prove the performance limitations of the standard level-1 QAOA in solving the MAX-CUT problem on bipartite graphs. To this end, we derive an upper bound for the approximation ratio based on the average degree of bipartite graphs. Second, we demonstrate that recursive QAOA (RQAOA), which recursively reduces graph size using QAOA as a subroutine, outperforms the standard level-1 QAOA. However, the performance of RQAOA exhibits limitations as the graph size increases. Finally, we show that RQAOA with a restricted parameter regime can fully address these limitations. Surprisingly, this modified RQAOA always finds the exact maximum cut for any bipartite graphs and even for a more general graph with parity-signed weights.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are promising for near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, but their performance is often limited by device noise, finite-shot uncertainty, and nonstationary behavior that destabilize optimization. This paper proposes a cost-aware closed-loop hybrid framework (Adaptive V16) that augments a standard VQA loop with an online decision policy to adapt measurement effort and mitigation actions during execution. At each iteration, the controller uses runtime signals such as objective progress and uncertainty to select an action comprising the shot budget, mitigation mode, and step-scaling factor, explicitly trading solution improvement against resource overhead under a fixed budget. Experimental evaluation on a representative molecular Hamiltonian optimization task shows that Adaptive V16 achieves a lower final energy than a static VQE baseline and reduces the absolute error from 0.1391 to 0.0657. The controller’s decision module also demonstrates strong predictive performance with 0.9700 accuracy, 0.9595 F1-score, and 0.9951 ROC–AUC, indicating reliable adaptive behavior across thresholds. These results suggest that policy-driven adaptation can improve robustness and budget efficiency for hybrid quantum–classical optimization in realistic NISQ settings.