Quantum machine learning is often motivated by the idea that quantum systems can expose useful high-dimensional structure that is difficult to access with classical models. We isolate one central component of this claim: the fixed data-encoding map. Amplitude, angle, and basis encoding are evaluated as deterministic feature maps for classical supervised learning under matched output dimensionality and strong classical controls. The benchmark compares these encodings against raw linear models, random Fourier features, polynomial features, PCA, RBF SVMs, and shallow neural networks across diverse classical datasets. Rather than treating performance as a single endpoint, we analyze the geometry of each representation through effective rank, condition number, centered kernel alignment, predictive performance, and practical overhead. The resulting picture is mechanistic: amplitude encoding can remove magnitude information through unit-sphere normalization, angle encoding can become geometrically redundant with raw linear features, and basis encoding can impose a binary Hamming geometry that is poorly aligned with smooth decision structure. These findings do not argue against quantum computation, however, they show that fixed quantum-inspired encoding geometry alone is not a reliable source of machine-learning advantage on classical data.
Quantum machine learning is often motivated by the idea that quantum systems can expose useful high-dimensional structure that is difficult to access with classical models. We isolate one central component of this claim: the fixed data-encoding map. Amplitude, angle, and basis encoding are evaluated as deterministic feature maps for classical supervised learning under matched output dimensionality and strong classical controls. The benchmark compares these encodings against raw linear models, random Fourier features, polynomial features, PCA, RBF SVMs, and shallow neural networks across diverse classical datasets. Rather than treating performance as a single endpoint, we analyze the geometry of each representation through effective rank, condition number, centered kernel alignment, predictive performance, and practical overhead. The resulting picture is mechanistic: amplitude encoding can remove magnitude information through unit-sphere normalization, angle encoding can become geometrically redundant with raw linear features, and basis encoding can impose a binary Hamming geometry that is poorly aligned with smooth decision structure. These findings do not argue against quantum computation, however, they show that fixed quantum-inspired encoding geometry alone is not a reliable source of machine-learning advantage on classical data.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has a theoretical advantage over classical algorithms for specific synthetic data that is computationally hard. However, it remains unclear whether such theoretical advantages play a meaningful role for realistic classical data, such as natural images. Quantum structural properties induced by unitary operations or entanglement introduce inductive biases that differ from those of classical models, potentially leading to distinct learning behavior on real-world data. In a fully quantum learning pipeline, classical real-world data are first encoded into quantum states via a quantum feature mapping, analogous to a classical feature extractor, and a quantum classifier then classifies the resulting states. Quantum feature mappings generate representations that are difficult to realize classically, while also inducing representation-level biases that do not necessarily match the structure of realistic data. To enable a fair comparison at the classifier level, we focus on the classifier and use classical feature extractors that already provide powerful representations for natural images. By controlling the data scale and supervision strength, we analyze how the unitary structure of quantum classifiers affects generalization, and show that their effectiveness depends strongly on the geometry of the input representations. These results indicate that quantum classifiers benefit from classical features that are aligned with quantum feature spaces. Our analysis shows that kernel alignment identifies representations compatible with quantum feature spaces, providing insights into translating classical models into quantum algorithms.
Quantum computing has inspired new ways to represent and process data, offering perspectives that can also benefit classical machine learning. In this work, we investigate how quantum-inspired data representations can be integrated into classical machine learning classifiers such as Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, and Naive Bayes for binary classification tasks. The proposed approach utilizes a simple amplitude-based encoding that normalizes feature vectors and incorporates phase-like transformations, assisting classical models to capture complex interactions and patterns in the data similar to quantum information processing. We evaluate this approach on both synthetic and three other benchmark datasets, comparing standard and quantum-inspired data representations. The results highlights that the quantum-inspired data encoding often matches or improves classifier performance in terms of accuracy, F1-Score, and precision. Additionally, the normalized encoding provides a more structured representation of the data, which can help with interpretability and visualization. These results highlight the potential of quantum-inspired transformations as a practical and effective tool for improving classical machine learning pipelines without requirement of quantum hardware.
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) offer a framework for learning functions from classical data, but their expressive power depends critically on how inputs are encoded into quantum states. Angle encoding can require resources that scale with the number of features, whereas amplitude encoding represents d features using only O(log2d) qubits. This compactness comes at a representational cost: normalization makes conventional amplitude encoding invariant to nonzero real rescaling of the input, up to an unobservable global phase. We show that this invariance induces an exact, architecture-independent restriction on the resulting hypothesis class. No downstream quantum circuit can distinguish inputs differing by nonzero real scaling. We develop a general condition under which deterministic preprocessing can remove this ambiguity and show that nonlinearity alone is insufficient. Based on this analysis, we introduce a fixed nonlinear feature map that provably distinguishes all real inputs under subsequent amplitude encoding, without adding trainable parameters and while retaining logarithmic qubit scaling. We evaluate the resulting QNN on three canonical classification benchmarks and a nonlinear synthetic dataset against conventional amplitude and angle encoding, as well as a classical neural network. Across these tasks, the proposed encoding consistently improves classification accuracy over both quantum encoding baselines by 21$-$44 %. Our results establish normalization-induced scale invariance as a concrete representational bottleneck of amplitude encoding and demonstrate that it can be removed while preserving a compact quantum representation, marking a step toward quantum models capable of capturing arbitrary relationships in classical data.
Quantum kernel methods are promising for near-term quantum ma- chine learning, yet their behavior under data corruption remains insuf- ficiently understood. We analyze how quantum feature constructions degrade under controlled additive noise. We introduce Spectral Phase Encoding (SPE), a hybrid construc- tion combining a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) front-end with a diagonal phase-only embedding aligned with the geometry of diagonal quantum maps. Within a unified framework, we compare QK-DFT against alternative quantum variants (QK-PCA, QK-RP) and classi- cal SVM baselines under identical clean-data hyperparameter selection, quantifying robustness via dataset fixed-effects regression with wild cluster bootstrap inference across heterogeneous real-world datasets. Across the quantum family, DFT-based preprocessing yields the smallest degradation rate as noise increases, with statistically sup- ported slope differences relative to PCA and RP. Compared to classical baselines, QK-DFT shows degradation comparable to linear SVM and more stable than RBF SVM under matched tuning. Hardware exper- iments confirm that SPE remains executable and numerically stable for overlap estimation. These results indicate that robustness in quan- tum kernels depends critically on structure-aligned preprocessing and its interaction with diagonal embeddings, supporting a robustness-first perspective for NISQ-era quantum machine learning.
This study explores the integration of quantum data embedding techniques into classical machine learning (ML) algorithms; to assess performance enhancements and computational implications across a spectrum of models. We explored various classical-to-quantum mapping methods; ranging from basis encoding and angle encoding to amplitude encoding; for encoding classical data. We conducted an extensive empirical study encompassing popular ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, and ensemble methods like Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, and CatBoost. Our findings reveal that quantum data embedding contributes to improved classification accuracy and F1 scores, particularly notable in models that inherently benefit from enhanced feature representation. We observed nuanced effects on running time, with low-complexity models exhibiting moderate increases and more computationally intensive models experiencing discernible changes. Notably, ensemble methods demonstrated a favorable balance between performance gains and computational overhead. This study underscores the potential of quantum data embedding to enhance classical ML models and emphasizes the importance of weighing performance improvements against computational costs. Future research may involve refining quantum encoding processes to optimize computational efficiency and explore scalability for real-world applications. Our work contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the intersection of quantum computing and classical machine learning, offering insights for researchers and practitioners seeking to harness the advantages of quantum-inspired techniques in practical scenarios.
The encoding of classical data into quantum states constitutes the primary performance bottleneck in Quantum Machine Learning (qml) on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (nisq) devices. No existing framework jointly characterises resource cost, expressivity, and noise robustness, nor provides actionable selection guidelines for practitioners. This survey addresses that gap through a systematic review of 66 primary works (2017-2026) assembled via a PRISMA-adapted protocol across five academic databases. Four principal contributions are made. First, a three-axis cost-expressivity-robustness taxonomy classifies all major encoding families - basis, angle, dense-angle, amplitude, data re-uploading, and IQP - along independently measurable axes. Second, closed-form depth-fidelity bounds under nisq decoherence channels identify the critical gate-error rate p* ~ 10^-3 below which amplitude encoding is viable. Third, a unified treatment of Fourier expressivity, barren-plateau onset, and quantum kernel concentration as functions of the encoding circuit provides the first joint trainability analysis. Fourth, a five-regime decision framework maps (D, n, p, tau) - feature dimension, qubit budget, error rate, and task type - to a hardware-grounded encoding recommendation. The central finding is that for p >= 10^-3, shallow angle-based encodings consistently outperform amplitude encoding in practice, despite the latter's exponential qubit advantage.