Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2605.09957

On Scalable Pseudorandom Unitaries and the Unitary Synthesis Problem

Zvika Brakerski, Henry Yuen

quant-phcs.CRSubmitted May 11, 2026• Announced May 12, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider the task of constructing pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) with scalable security, i.e. families in which the security parameter may vary independently of the dimension (or input bit-length). It is not known whether scalable PRUs can be constructed. In this work we show that if scalable PRUs can be constructed via the prevailing paradigm for analyzing PRUs, then there would be a positive solution to the Aaronson-Kuperberg unitary synthesis problem, a longstanding question in quantum complexity theory about whether implementing arbitrary unitaries can be efficiently reduced to computing a Boolean function. Specifically, we formalize the notion of ROM-PRUs, which are statistically secure PRUs in the random oracle model (ROM). All prior known constructions of cryptographically secure PRUs are based on a ROM-PRU construction. We prove novel connections between ROM-PRUs, approximate unitary designs, epsilon-nets over the unitary group, and the unitary synthesis problem. In particular, we prove that any unitary synthesis algorithm (and thus any ROM-PRU) must use a classical oracle with input length (2 - o(1)) log d bits, where d is the dimension of the unitary to be implemented. This bound rules out all existing candidates for scalable PRUs in the literature. Together, these connections indicate that ROM-PRUs provide a fruitful idealized model for studying pseudorandom unitaries.

Related papers

Random-Oracle Unitary Synthesis is Impossible

Andrew Huang, Akshar Ramkumar, John Wright

A major open problem in quantum complexity is the question of unitary synthesis---namely, is it possible to efficiently implement any unitary, given the ability to evaluate any classical function in superposition? Inspired by a recent work by Brakerski and Yuen (CRYPTO 2026), we propose an ``average-case'' unitary synthesis problem, which asks whether it is possible to efficiently implement a Haar random unitary given access to a random Boolean function. We then demonstrate a superpolynomial query lower bound, establishing that unitary synthesis in this model is impossible. Along with our main result, we settle in the negative a question Brakerski and Yuen pose, of whether scalable pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can be implemented in the ROM-PRU model. In particular, we show that in the ROM-PRU model, no $Ω(N^{1+γ})$ unitary design on $n$ qubits, where $N=2^n$, can be efficiently achieved for any $γ> 0$. On the other hand, we construct an $O(N)$-design in $\text{poly}(n)$ queries in the same model, surpassing the previously best known results which constructed $O(\sqrt{N})$-designs.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06700•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

How to Build Pseudorandom Unitaries in Microcrypt

Aditya Gulati, Dakshita Khurana, Kabir Tomer

We provide the first evidence relative to a classical oracle that pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can exist without quantum-computable one-way functions. To obtain this result, we first prove that five independent random diagonal phase layers interleaved with Hadamard transforms \[ U=F_5HF_4HF_3HF_2HF_1 \] form a strong PRU with security under adaptive, controlled access to the unitary, its inverse, transpose, and complex conjugate. Our main result is that, when the phase layers are implemented using a classical random oracle O, the construction remains secure against uniform BQP adversaries with coherent access to suitable Boolean completions of classical-input $QMA^{PH}^{O}}$ decision problems. Such an adversary can invert (even quantum-computable) one-way functions and solve efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles defined relative to O. Our result therefore provides classical-oracle evidence that PRUs do not imply quantum-computable one-way functions, in the form of a black-box separation. We substantially strengthen the classical-oracle result of Kretschmer, Qian, and Tal (STOC 2025) by obtaining PRUs secure against these QMA-aided adversaries. Our construction also consists of a simple, efficient circuit that queries a random function, suggesting a route to concrete implementation via the random-oracle heuristic.

quant-pharXiv:2610.03711•Oct 5, 2026•0 citations

Derivatives of Quantum Randomness: Separating Pseudorandom Unitaries from Pseudorandom (Function-like) States

Minki Hhan

Quantum computation gives rise to new pseudorandom primitives for states and unitaries, including pseudorandom state generators (PRSGs), pseudorandom function-like state generators (PRFSGs), and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs). In this paper, we show a full unitary oracle separation between PRFSGs and PRUs. The separation holds between the strongest state notion and the weakest unitary notion: even adaptively secure, quantum-accessible PRFSGs do not imply non-adaptively secure, forward-only PRUs, even when their implementations are allowed to be non-unitary and use an arbitrary number of ancillary qubits. This reveals a fundamental distinction between pseudorandomness for quantum states and for quantum unitaries. Our main technical idea is to view a candidate PRU construction with access to state generation oracles as a map from the underlying oracle states to implemented unitaries, and to study the derivatives of this map. These derivatives are inherently low rank, and we exploit this low-rank structure to distinguish the resulting unitaries from truly random ones. We believe this differential perspective may be useful for studying other structural questions about quantum states and unitaries.

quant-pharXiv:2609.14626•Sep 15, 2026•0 citations

Distinctness threshold for pseudorandom unitaries

Asad Raza, Jens Eisert, Bill Fefferman

Pseudorandomness is increasingly recognized as a key property of ensembles in quantum information theory, statistical mechanics, and quantum many-body physics. Yet it appears in two conceptually different forms: statistical pseudorandomness, embodied by unitary designs, and computational pseudorandomness captured by pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs). The relationship between these two forms of pseudorandomness remains surprisingly poorly understood. Existing PRU constructions reveal this interplay where a statistically randomizing ingredient, a unitary design, is combined with classical cryptographic primitives to produce computational pseudorandomness. We show that statistical pseudorandomness is not necessary for computationally pseudorandom unitaries. We do this by replacing the unitary $2$-design layer in the existing constructions with ensembles that are not even state $1$-designs, yet are sufficiently {\em distinct}, a property we identify to be necessary for any PRU. This yields new non-adaptively secure PRU ensembles whose computational pseudorandomness is obtained without an underlying statistically pseudorandom quantum ensemble, such as a $2$-design. We characterize distinctness via an entangled analogue of anticoncentration and use it to show that distinctness already captures constraints on coherence and imaginarity of PRUs, while identifying broad classes of inputs for which the latter obstruction disappears, enabling real-valued PRUs even for certain (maximally) entangled states. As an application, we use lack of distinctness to constrain the conjectured pseudorandomness of the random phase-Hadamard ensemble to form a PRU.

quant-pharXiv:2609.03065•Sep 4, 2026•0 citations

How to Construct Random Unitaries

Fermi Ma, Hsin-Yuan Huang

The existence of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) -- efficient quantum circuits that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random unitaries -- has been a central open question, with significant implications for cryptography, complexity theory, and fundamental physics. In this work, we close this question by proving that PRUs exist, assuming that any quantum-secure one-way function exists. We establish this result for both (1) the standard notion of PRUs, which are secure against any efficient adversary that makes queries to the unitary $U$, and (2) a stronger notion of PRUs, which are secure even against adversaries that can query both the unitary $U$ and its inverse $U^\dagger$. In the process, we prove that any algorithm that makes queries to a Haar-random unitary can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer, up to inverse-exponential trace distance.

arXiv:2410.10116•ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 15, 2025•19 citations

Explicit Separations for One-Query Unitary Synthesis

Fangqi Dong, Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma

The unitary synthesis problem (Aaronson-Kuperberg, CCC 2007) asks whether every $n$-qubit unitary $U$ is computable by efficient quantum circuits relative to some classical oracle $f = f_U$ depending on $U$. Recently, Lombardi-Ma-Wright (STOC 2024) proved that Haar-random unitaries cannot be efficiently synthesized by algorithms that make 1 query (or poly$(n)$ parallel queries) to an arbitrary classical oracle. In this work, we prove several results about the hardness (and easiness!) of variants of unitary synthesis. Our results include: (1) 1-query vs. 2-query unitary synthesis: we prove 1-query lower bounds for synthesizing random permutation unitaries $P\lvert x\rangle = \lvert π(x)\rangle$, as well as random alternating-basis phase unitaries $F_2 \cdot H^{\otimes n} \cdot F_1$. This gives 1-query lower bounds for "explicit" families of unitaries that have efficient (even 2-query) synthesis algorithms. (2) Upper bound for complex phase unitaries: we also consider complex phase unitaries $\lvert x\rangle\mapsto α_x \lvert x\rangle$, which have a clean 2-query synthesis algorithm with no obvious 1-query algorithm. In this case, we prove an upper bound: there are 1-query algorithms (relative to binary phase oracles) that constant-approximate these unitaries in diamond distance. In order to prove our lower bounds, we introduce and analyze two new cryptographic games: the oracle state search game and the oracle Choi state game. Compared to prior work, our framework is mathematically simple, more flexible in what it can prove, and more accurately captures the hardness of synthesizing unitaries that are not "fully random". Finally, we also use the search game to prove a new hardness-of-approximation result for quantum programs (synthesizing unitaries relative to quantum advice) for phase unitaries, giving a sharper separation between 1-query unitary synthesis and quantum programs.

quant-pharXiv:2607.26478•Jul 30, 2026•0 citations
We consider the task of constructing pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) with scalable security, i.e. families in which the security parameter may vary independently of the dimension (or input bit-length). It is not known whether scalable PRUs can be constructed. In this work we show that if scalable PRUs can be constructed via the prevailing paradigm for analyzing PRUs, then there would be a positive solution to the Aaronson-Kuperberg unitary synthesis problem, a longstanding question in quantum complexity theory about whether implementing arbitrary unitaries can be efficiently reduced to computing a Boolean function.
Specifically, we formalize the notion of ROM-PRUs, which are statistically secure PRUs in the random oracle model (ROM). All prior known constructions of cryptographically secure PRUs are based on a ROM-PRU construction. We prove novel connections between ROM-PRUs, approximate unitary designs, epsilon-nets over the unitary group, and the unitary synthesis problem. In particular, we prove that any unitary synthesis algorithm (and thus any ROM-PRU) must use a classical oracle with input length (2 - o(1)) log d bits, where d is the dimension of the unitary to be implemented. This bound rules out all existing candidates for scalable PRUs in the literature.
Together, these connections indicate that ROM-PRUs provide a fruitful idealized model for studying pseudorandom unitaries.
A major open problem in quantum complexity is the question of unitary synthesis---namely, is it possible to efficiently implement any unitary, given the ability to evaluate any classical function in superposition? Inspired by a recent work by Brakerski and Yuen (CRYPTO 2026), we propose an ``average-case'' unitary synthesis problem, which asks whether it is possible to efficiently implement a Haar random unitary given access to a random Boolean function. We then demonstrate a superpolynomial query lower bound, establishing that unitary synthesis in this model is impossible. Along with our main result, we settle in the negative a question Brakerski and Yuen pose, of whether scalable pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can be implemented in the ROM-PRU model. In particular, we show that in the ROM-PRU model, no Ω(N1+γ)Ω(N^{1+γ})Ω(N1+γ) unitary design on nnn qubits, where N=2nN=2^nN=2n, can be efficiently achieved for any γ>0γ> 0γ>0. On the other hand, we construct an O(N)O(N)O(N)-design in poly(n)\text{poly}(n)poly(n) queries in the same model, surpassing the previously best known results which constructed O(N)O(\sqrt{N})O(N​)-designs.
We provide the first evidence relative to a classical oracle that pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can exist without quantum-computable one-way functions. To obtain this result, we first prove that five independent random diagonal phase layers interleaved with Hadamard transforms U=F5HF4HF3HF2HF1 U=F_5HF_4HF_3HF_2HF_1 U=F5​HF4​HF3​HF2​HF1​ form a strong PRU with security under adaptive, controlled access to the unitary, its inverse, transpose, and complex conjugate. Our main result is that, when the phase layers are implemented using a classical random oracle O, the construction remains secure against uniform BQP adversaries with coherent access to suitable Boolean completions of classical-input $QMA^{PH}^{O}}$ decision problems. Such an adversary can invert (even quantum-computable) one-way functions and solve efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles defined relative to O. Our result therefore provides classical-oracle evidence that PRUs do not imply quantum-computable one-way functions, in the form of a black-box separation. We substantially strengthen the classical-oracle result of Kretschmer, Qian, and Tal (STOC 2025) by obtaining PRUs secure against these QMA-aided adversaries. Our construction also consists of a simple, efficient circuit that queries a random function, suggesting a route to concrete implementation via the random-oracle heuristic.
Quantum computation gives rise to new pseudorandom primitives for states and unitaries, including pseudorandom state generators (PRSGs), pseudorandom function-like state generators (PRFSGs), and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs). In this paper, we show a full unitary oracle separation between PRFSGs and PRUs. The separation holds between the strongest state notion and the weakest unitary notion: even adaptively secure, quantum-accessible PRFSGs do not imply non-adaptively secure, forward-only PRUs, even when their implementations are allowed to be non-unitary and use an arbitrary number of ancillary qubits. This reveals a fundamental distinction between pseudorandomness for quantum states and for quantum unitaries. Our main technical idea is to view a candidate PRU construction with access to state generation oracles as a map from the underlying oracle states to implemented unitaries, and to study the derivatives of this map. These derivatives are inherently low rank, and we exploit this low-rank structure to distinguish the resulting unitaries from truly random ones. We believe this differential perspective may be useful for studying other structural questions about quantum states and unitaries.
Pseudorandomness is increasingly recognized as a key property of ensembles in quantum information theory, statistical mechanics, and quantum many-body physics. Yet it appears in two conceptually different forms: statistical pseudorandomness, embodied by unitary designs, and computational pseudorandomness captured by pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs). The relationship between these two forms of pseudorandomness remains surprisingly poorly understood. Existing PRU constructions reveal this interplay where a statistically randomizing ingredient, a unitary design, is combined with classical cryptographic primitives to produce computational pseudorandomness. We show that statistical pseudorandomness is not necessary for computationally pseudorandom unitaries. We do this by replacing the unitary 222-design layer in the existing constructions with ensembles that are not even state 111-designs, yet are sufficiently {\em distinct}, a property we identify to be necessary for any PRU. This yields new non-adaptively secure PRU ensembles whose computational pseudorandomness is obtained without an underlying statistically pseudorandom quantum ensemble, such as a 222-design. We characterize distinctness via an entangled analogue of anticoncentration and use it to show that distinctness already captures constraints on coherence and imaginarity of PRUs, while identifying broad classes of inputs for which the latter obstruction disappears, enabling real-valued PRUs even for certain (maximally) entangled states. As an application, we use lack of distinctness to constrain the conjectured pseudorandomness of the random phase-Hadamard ensemble to form a PRU.
The existence of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) -- efficient quantum circuits that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random unitaries -- has been a central open question, with significant implications for cryptography, complexity theory, and fundamental physics. In this work, we close this question by proving that PRUs exist, assuming that any quantum-secure one-way function exists. We establish this result for both (1) the standard notion of PRUs, which are secure against any efficient adversary that makes queries to the unitary UUU, and (2) a stronger notion of PRUs, which are secure even against adversaries that can query both the unitary UUU and its inverse U†U^\daggerU†. In the process, we prove that any algorithm that makes queries to a Haar-random unitary can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer, up to inverse-exponential trace distance.
The unitary synthesis problem (Aaronson-Kuperberg, CCC 2007) asks whether every nnn-qubit unitary UUU is computable by efficient quantum circuits relative to some classical oracle f=fUf = f_Uf=fU​ depending on UUU. Recently, Lombardi-Ma-Wright (STOC 2024) proved that Haar-random unitaries cannot be efficiently synthesized by algorithms that make 1 query (or poly(n)(n)(n) parallel queries) to an arbitrary classical oracle. In this work, we prove several results about the hardness (and easiness!) of variants of unitary synthesis. Our results include: (1) 1-query vs. 2-query unitary synthesis: we prove 1-query lower bounds for synthesizing random permutation unitaries P∣x⟩=∣π(x)⟩P\lvert x\rangle = \lvert π(x)\rangleP∣x⟩=∣π(x)⟩, as well as random alternating-basis phase unitaries F2⋅H⊗n⋅F1F_2 \cdot H^{\otimes n} \cdot F_1F2​⋅H⊗n⋅F1​. This gives 1-query lower bounds for "explicit" families of unitaries that have efficient (even 2-query) synthesis algorithms. (2) Upper bound for complex phase unitaries: we also consider complex phase unitaries ∣x⟩↦αx∣x⟩\lvert x\rangle\mapsto α_x \lvert x\rangle∣x⟩↦αx​∣x⟩, which have a clean 2-query synthesis algorithm with no obvious 1-query algorithm. In this case, we prove an upper bound: there are 1-query algorithms (relative to binary phase oracles) that constant-approximate these unitaries in diamond distance. In order to prove our lower bounds, we introduce and analyze two new cryptographic games: the oracle state search game and the oracle Choi state game. Compared to prior work, our framework is mathematically simple, more flexible in what it can prove, and more accurately captures the hardness of synthesizing unitaries that are not "fully random". Finally, we also use the search game to prove a new hardness-of-approximation result for quantum programs (synthesizing unitaries relative to quantum advice) for phase unitaries, giving a sharper separation between 1-query unitary synthesis and quantum programs.