Deep Equilibrium Models (DEQs) replace a stack of explicit layers with a single operator whose fixed point defines the output, giving the expressive power of an arbitrarily deep network at the memory cost of a single layer. Quantum Deep Equilibrium Models (QDEQs) bring this idea to quantum machine learning, offering an alternative to Parameterized Quantum Circuits (PQCs), whose depth is limited by hardware coherence and trainability. Here, we introduce, formulate, and compare three ways of coupling a quantum signal to graph DEQs, differing in where the signal enters the fixed-point operator. \textit{Independent} injection computes the quantum signal once per graph and forward fixed-point solve, and holds it fixed throughout the solve. \textit{State-dependent} injection instead recomputes the signal at every solver step and applies it to the current iterate. \textit{Backbone-dependent} injection likewise recomputes at every iteration but applies the signal to the classical backbone's output evaluated at the current iterate. We establish contraction guarantees for each variant under explicit assumptions on the Lipschitz constants of the classical backbone and the quantum signal. On the TU Dortmund graph-classification benchmarks NCI1, PROTEINS, and MUTAG, independent injection achieves the best test accuracy while using fewer forward-solver iterations than both the classical equilibrium baseline and the two dependent variants.
Deep Equilibrium Models (DEQs) replace a stack of explicit layers with a single operator whose fixed point defines the output, giving the expressive power of an arbitrarily deep network at the memory cost of a single layer. Quantum Deep Equilibrium Models (QDEQs) bring this idea to quantum machine learning, offering an alternative to Parameterized Quantum Circuits (PQCs), whose depth is limited by hardware coherence and trainability. Here, we introduce, formulate, and compare three ways of coupling a quantum signal to graph DEQs, differing in where the signal enters the fixed-point operator. \textit{Independent} injection computes the quantum signal once per graph and forward fixed-point solve, and holds it fixed throughout the solve. \textit{State-dependent} injection instead recomputes the signal at every solver step and applies it to the current iterate. \textit{Backbone-dependent} injection likewise recomputes at every iteration but applies the signal to the classical backbone's output evaluated at the current iterate. We establish contraction guarantees for each variant under explicit assumptions on the Lipschitz constants of the classical backbone and the quantum signal. On the TU Dortmund graph-classification benchmarks NCI1, PROTEINS, and MUTAG, independent injection achieves the best test accuracy while using fewer forward-solver iterations than both the classical equilibrium baseline and the two dependent variants.
The feasibility of variational quantum algorithms, the most popular correspondent of neural networks on noisy, near-term quantum hardware, is highly impacted by the circuit depth of the involved parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs). Higher depth increases expressivity, but also results in a detrimental accumulation of errors. Furthermore, the number of parameters involved in the PQC significantly influences the performance through the necessary number of measurements to evaluate gradients, which scales linearly with the number of parameters. Motivated by this, we look at deep equilibrium models (DEQs), which mimic an infinite-depth, weight-tied network using a fraction of the memory by employing a root solver to find the fixed points of the network. In this work, we present Quantum Deep Equilibrium Models (QDEQs): a training paradigm that learns parameters of a quantum machine learning model given by a PQC using DEQs. To our knowledge, no work has yet explored the application of DEQs to QML models. We apply QDEQs to find the parameters of a quantum circuit in two settings: the first involves classifying MNIST-4 digits with 4 qubits; the second extends it to 10 classes of MNIST, FashionMNIST and CIFAR. We find that QDEQ is not only competitive with comparable existing baseline models, but also achieves higher performance than a network with 5 times more layers. This demonstrates that the QDEQ paradigm can be used to develop significantly more shallow quantum circuits for a given task, something which is essential for the utility of near-term quantum computers. Our code is available at https://github.com/martaskrt/qdeq.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is promising for potential speedups and improvements in conventional machine learning (ML) tasks (e.g., classification/regression). The search for ideal QML models is an active research field. This includes identification of efficient classical-to-quantum data encoding scheme, construction of parametric quantum circuits (PQC) with optimal expressivity and entanglement capability, and efficient output decoding scheme to minimize the required number of measurements, to name a few. However, most of the empirical/numerical studies lack a clear path towards scalability. Any potential benefit observed in a simulated environment may diminish in practical applications due to the limitations of noisy quantum hardware (e.g., under decoherence, gate-errors, and crosstalk). We present a scalable quantum-classical hybrid deep neural network (DeepQMLP) architecture inspired by classical deep neural network architectures. In DeepQMLP, stacked shallow Quantum Neural Network (QNN) models mimic the hidden layers of a classical feed-forward multi-layer perceptron network. Each QNN layer produces a new and potentially rich representation of the input data for the next layer. This new representation can be tuned by the parameters of the circuit. Shallow QNN models experience less decoherence, gate errors, etc. which make them (and the network) more resilient to quantum noise. We present numerical studies on a variety of classification problems to show the trainability of DeepQMLP. We also show that DeepQMLP performs reasonably well on unseen data and exhibits greater resilience to noise over QNN models that use a deep quantum circuit. DeepQMLP provided up to 25.3% lower loss and 7.92% higher accuracy during inference under noise than QMLP.
Node embeddings act as the information interface for graph neural networks, yet their empirical impact is often reported under mismatched backbones, splits, and training budgets. This paper provides a controlled benchmark of embedding choices for graph classification, comparing classical baselines with quantum-oriented node representations under a unified pipeline. We evaluate two classical baselines alongside quantum-oriented alternatives, including a circuit-defined variational embedding and quantum-inspired embeddings computed via graph operators and linear-algebraic constructions. All variants are trained and tested with the same backbone, stratified splits, identical optimization and early stopping, and consistent metrics. Experiments on five different TU datasets and on QM9 converted to classification via target binning show clear dataset dependence: quantum-oriented embeddings yield the most consistent gains on structure-driven benchmarks, while social graphs with limited node attributes remain well served by classical baselines. The study highlights practical trade-offs between inductive bias, trainability, and stability under a fixed training budget, and offers a reproducible reference point for selecting quantum-oriented embeddings in graph learning.
We study parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) integrated as residual sidecar modules within a ResNet-50 backbone for 31-class neural population decoding---imagined handwriting classification from multi-neuron spike rasters. Under strictly controlled conditions (fixed data splits, seeds, and optimizer), we compare four model variants: baseline, quantum sidecar with frozen input projection, quantum sidecar with backbone-gradient-trained projection, and a measurement-guided variant that aligns angle encodings with circuit measurement outcomes. The backbone-gradient variant improves accuracy in 3/4 seeds (+0.19% mean, 95% CI [-1.10%, +1.48%]) and consistently reduces Linear CKA similarity to baseline features (Δ=−0.025, 4/4 seeds), indicating genuine structural reorganization of representations. A nine-variant ablation identifies simple shallow architectures as the most effective and reproducible configuration. Measurement-guided training consistently improves representation geometry without reducing accuracy. All results use noiseless statevector simulation on 4 qubits, a regime chosen to reflect the practical constraints of current near-term superconducting hardware; no quantum computational advantage over classical methods is claimed.
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) achieve state-of-the-art performance on graph-structured data, but training and inference on large graphs are often bottlenecked by memory constraints and sparse linear-algebra workloads. Quantum computing offers an alternative set of primitives that may improve scalability for graph learning. Building on the quantum graph neural network (QGNN) framework of Liao \textit{et al.}, this work implements two representative architectures --- the Simplified Graph Convolution (SGC) and Linear Graph Convolution (LGC) models --- and evaluates them on open benchmark graph datasets and semi-supervised learning tasks using quantum simulation. We compare predictive performance and optimization behavior against classical baselines, showing that the quantum models achieve competitive performance with fewer parameters. Finally, we present a cost gradient analysis that identifies the tasks for which the models showcased are trainable. This is followed by a classical simulability study to find regimes in which the proposed circuits remain robust during training.
Abstract In this paper, we describe a parameterized quantum circuit that can be considered as convolutional and pooling layers for graph neural networks. The circuit incorporates the parameterized quantum Fourier circuit where the qubit connections for the controlled gates derived from the Laplacian operator. Specifically, we show that the eigenspace of the Laplacian operator of a graph can be approximated by using QFT based circuit whose connections are determined from the adjacency matrix. For an N × N Laplacian, this approach yields an approximate polynomial-depth circuit requiring only n = log(N) qubits. These types of circuits can eliminate the expensive classical computations for approximating the learnable functions of the Laplacian through Chebyshev polynomial or Taylor expansions. Using this circuit as a convolutional layer provides an n− dimensional probability vector that can be considered as the filtered and compressed graph signal. Therefore, the circuit along with the measurement can be considered a very efficient convolution plus pooling layer that transforms an N-dimensional signal input into n−dimensional signal with an exponential compression. We then apply a classical neural network prediction head to the output of the circuit to construct a complete graph neural network. Since the circuit incorporates geometric structure through its graph connection-based approach, we present graph classification results for the benchmark datasets listed in TUDataset library (AIDS, Letter-high, Letter-med, Letter-low, MUTAG, ENZYMES, PROTEINS, COX2, BZR, DHFR, MSRC-9). Using only [1-100] learnable parameters for the quantum circuit and minimal classical layers (1000-5000 parameters) in a generic setting, the obtained results are comparable to and in some cases better than many of the baseline results, particularly for the cases when geometric structure plays a significant role.