arXiv:2605.03958

Fisher-Informational Time: A Causal-Geometric Framework for Emergent Clock Time Physical Distinguishability

J. Sumaya-Martinez

quant-phphysics.opticsSubmitted May 5, 2026• Announced May 6, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

We develop a Fisher-informational reformulation of physical time in which clock time is not regarded as a fundamental ontological substance, but as an emergent calibration of causally ordered distinguishability among physical states. The operational starting point is that clocks do not measure time itself; rather, they instantiate reproducible physical processes whose distinguishable states are correlated with other events. We introduce a causal-informational parameter, denoted by Lambda_F, defined as an accumulated Fisher-geometric distance along a causally admissible trajectory in state space. In classical statistical systems, this parameter is generated by the Fisher information metric; in quantum systems, the corresponding construction is associated with quantum Fisher information, the Bures metric, and the Fubini-Study geometry of projective Hilbert space. The manuscript distinguishes model-dependent Fisher information from quantum Fisher information, clarifies the reparameterization of Schrodinger dynamics, and gives explicit examples involving a qubit clock, an exponential decay process, and a Fisher characterization of clock quality. The proposal is positioned relative to relational time, the Page-Wootters mechanism, thermal time, quantum speed-limit relations, information geometry, and the problem of time in quantum gravity. We do not claim that relational or emergent time is new. The specific contribution is the use of Fisher distinguishability as an operational precursor from which ordinary clock time can be reconstructed. In this sense, the central statement of the paper is: time is not measured by clocks; clock time is reconstructed from the Fisher distinguishability accumulated along causally ordered physical changes.

Related papers

From Distinguishability to Identifiability: An Operational Framework for Quantum States, Geometry, and Processes.

Paz Marcelo Esteban

When does operational distinguishability contain sufficient information to identify physical structure? We address this question through a resource-relative framework of Operational Informational Distinguishability (OID), designed to investigate the mathematical consistency of identifiability across quantum states, information geometry, and physical processes. An operational observer is characterized by (\mathcal{D}=(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{M},\mathcal{R},\delta)), whose labelled outcome distributions define an operational signature and induce equivalence classes of physically indistinguishable realizations. We establish an exact reconstruction criterion: a proposed geometric assignment factors uniquely through the operational signature if and only if it is constant on these equivalence classes. This provides a necessary-and-sufficient condition for operational reconstruction, while separating identifiability from the additional requirements of local non-degeneracy and stability. For faithful finite-dimensional quantum-state manifolds, we establish the measurement–information-geometric hierarchy[g^{(\mathcal{M})}\preceq g^{\mathrm{SLD}}\preceq g^{\mathrm{BKM}}relating measurement-restricted Fisher information, the symmetric logarithmic derivative metric, and the Bogoliubov–Kubo–Mori metric. We clarify the directional attainability of the SLD bound and its distinction from simultaneous multiparameter attainability. As an explicit algebraic result, we characterize the operator span generated by diagonal phase modulation of cyclic-shift eigenstate projectors in the one-excitation sector: it is precisely the constant-diagonal Hermitian subspace, of dimension (N^{2}-N+1), leaving (N-1) independent population directions unresolved. Adjoining site-basis projectors restores informational completeness. This idealized construction is connected to experimentally realized entangled measurements of (W) states. We further extend operational distinguishability to quantum processes through tester-restricted signatures and divergences, explicitly separating signalling from intervention-defined causal influence. Finally, we introduce accumulated information-geometric path length as a candidate operational clock parameter, without identifying it with physical time. By relating these constructions to holographic information-distance bounds, bulk entanglement, conditional mutual information and recovery, and recent approaches to emergent geometry and informational time, we formulate a central testable question: can a common resource-relative distinguishability structure remain identifiable, stable, and compositionally consistent across states, processes, geometry, temporal ordering, and causality? The framework makes both constructive reconstruction and mathematically explicit obstructions possible, providing a falsifiable methodological program rather than presupposing the emergence or unification of physical structure.

Oct 30, 20260 citations

Geometry of State-Update Processes and Wave Function Collapse

Angelo Plastino

We develop an information-geometric framework for describing quantum state-update processes associated with measurement and statistical distinguishability. The approach is based on the quantum relative entropy and the quantum Fisher information metric, which together induce a natural Riemannian geometry on the manifold of quantum states. Using the second-order expansion of relative entropy, we show how the Fisher metric governs the local structure of distinguishability between nearby states and defines a corresponding thermodynamic length. This geometric structure provides an effective description of finite quantum state transitions in terms of fluctuation geometry and information-space distance. The formalism is applied to thermal two-level systems and harmonic oscillator states, illustrating how the Fisher metric encodes susceptibilities, fluctuations, and geometric transition costs. We also discuss the relation between thermodynamic length, dissipation bounds, and optimal paths in state space. Within this framework, wave function collapse is interpreted not as a microscopic dynamical mechanism, but as an effective state-update process that admits a geometric characterization in the manifold of density operators. The resulting perspective unifies concepts from quantum information theory, thermodynamics, and differential geometry within a common operational framework based on statistical distinguishability. Possible connections with quantum speed limits, entanglement geometry, and holographic relations between relative entropy and gravitational dynamics are briefly discussed.

Quantum ReportsMay 15, 20261 citation

Distinguishability Geometry as a Universal Foundation for Physical Dynamics

Alexander M. Tishin

Abstract We propose physical distinguishability as the fundamental primitive underlying quantum mechanics, general relativity, and thermodynamics. A state is defined operationally: two states are physically distinct if a physical interaction or measurement can reveal a difference between them. From this single principle, the distinguishability divergence D generates a smooth state space endowed with a Riemannian metric , a geometric velocity, an accessibility scale Λ, an accessibility ratio , and a geometric time . The framework provides a unified geometric description of the three major domains of physics. Quantum mechanics emerges through the Fubini–Study geometry of projective Hilbert space, thermodynamics through Fisher–Rao and Ruppeiner information geometry, and general relativity through the geometry of geodesic deviation. The threshold condition A=1acquires a universal physical meaning and appears in all three realizations as the boundary between physically accessible and inaccessible evolution. Variational formulations of both the Einstein and Schrödinger equations are constructed within the same geometric framework. The Lorentzian signature of spacetime emerges from a single sign reversal associated with the geometric-time direction, while the coupling constant of the distinguishability action is connected to the observed vacuum energy density. The framework further predicts a characteristic vacuum distinguishability scale ≈8.8×10^(-5) m, corresponding to an energy scale≈2.25" " meV. The theory is tested experimentally on IBM Quantum superconducting processors. Across one-qubit, two-qubit, 127-qubit, and 156-qubit experiments performed on three independent Heron-generation backends, excitation probabilities collapse onto universal curves when parameterized by endpoint Fubini–Study distinguishability. Protocols with identical laboratory control parameters but different endpoint distinguishabilities produce excitation probabilities differing by up to a factor of 3.8, while protocols with identical distinguishability produce identical outcomes across independent processors. Cross-backend transfer errors remain below 1%, providing direct experimental support for endpoint distinguishability as a universal physical variable. Taken together, the theoretical construction, variational formulations, vacuum-sector predictions, and large-scale quantum-processor experiments support distinguishability geometry as a unified and experimentally testable foundation for physical dynamics.

Jun 12, 20260 citations

Information-Geometric Analysis of Quantum Collapse Dynamics: From State-Update Geometry to Dynamical Collapse Trajectories

Angelo Plastino

We develop an information-geometric framework for analyzing quantum state-update processes generated by explicit collapse dynamics. Whereas a purely geometric description characterizes collapse as a finite displacement between an initial and a final statistical state, the present approach incorporates the dynamical law governing the intermediate evolution. A quantum state is represented by a density operator ρ(t) satisfying a specified dynamical equation, dρdt=C[ρ,t], or, more generally, by a unitary-plus-collapse evolution in which the collapse contribution is explicitly identified. The resulting trajectory is embedded in the statistical manifold of quantum states and analyzed using the quantum Fisher information metric. This allows one to define the instantaneous Fisher speed, the information-geometric length of the collapse trajectory, and an integrated geometric cost associated with the dynamical state change. The framework also permits comparison between the actual trajectory generated by a collapse model and the corresponding Fisher-geodesic trajectory connecting the same initial and final states. Relative entropy provides a complementary global measure of the distinguishability generated by the evolution, while the quantum Fisher metric characterizes its local statistical structure. The formalism is constructed so that different dynamical collapse proposals can be analyzed within a common geometric language without assuming that the geometric quantities themselves constitute a collapse mechanism: this is a diagnostic framework rather than a mechanism. In particular, once a specific collapse generator is supplied, the framework can determine how its parameters, localization properties, stochasticity, and time scale are reflected in the geometry of the associated state trajectory. The resulting formulation therefore provides a bridge between dynamical models of wave-function collapse and the information geometry of a quantum state space, while preserving the distinction between a physical collapse law and its geometric characterization.

Quantum ReportsOct 28, 20260 citations

The 0 → 1 Hypothesis: Physical Events, Information, and the Emergence of Time

Reino Rehn

Abstract, This paper introduces the 0 → 1 hypothesis, a conceptual framework in which physical events and their relational ordering are treated as potentially more fundamental than macroscopic time. Rather than assuming time to be a universally flowing background parameter, the framework begins with distinguishable physical states, transitions between states, and causal or relational ordering among events. The notation 0 → 1 is used as a conceptual shorthand for physical becoming; it does not imply binary computation, creation from nothing, wave-function collapse, or a universal Planck-time clock. The central question is whether familiar temporal quantities can emerge from a more fundamental relational structure while remaining compatible with relativistic causal structure, quantum theory, and the thermodynamic arrow of time. A minimal mathematical scaffold is proposed in terms of an event set, a causal partial order, state transitions, and a coarse-grained duration functional. The framework is compared with relational time, the Page–Wootters mechanism, and causal-set approaches. At its present stage, the 0 → 1 hypothesis is a conceptual research framework rather than a complete physical theory. The paper therefore identifies the mathematical and empirical requirements that would be necessary for the hypothesis to become falsifiable and experimentally distinguishable from existing approaches.

Sep 11, 20260 citations

Commitment Time, Metric Time, and Physical Temporal Interfaces

David Betzer

SCQG Paper 4 of 28 This paper explains how different physical ways of measuring and ordering time relate to one another. Proper time is defined by the spacetime metric along a path. A material clock produces a reading through its own dynamics and calibration. A detector writes a timestamp, and exchanged signals allow separate clocks to be synchronized. A temporal bridge is a map connecting such coordinates under stated physical conditions. Semantic time counts or orders the interactions through which a physical distinction becomes usable, compared, or maintained. Forward actionability is the resolution of uncertainty into a distinction that a later operation can use. Local grounding depends on forward action making that resolution available to a local interaction; measurement realizes the grounding by writing a registration. Access to a readable record, inference meeting a specified accuracy test, and completed durable maintenance have separate first-success times. The paper derives causal access conditions, timing bounds for finite detector windows, synchronization errors, and relations between physical clock time and interaction counts. It defines agreement between event orders and entrainment: agreement maintained through physical coupling over a stated interval. It also distinguishes the accumulated interaction count from the records that remain readable. Applications include quantum clocks, accelerated observers, black-hole observations, cosmological modes, delayed-choice experiments, and reciprocal cosmological coordinates. Each connection states the physical systems, operations, units, calibration, and conditions under which it holds. Commitment Time, Metric Time, and Physical Temporal Interfaces Proper Time, Clocks, Synchronization, Addressability, and Durable Commitment This work develops a unified physical architecture for the many different quantities that physics calls “time.” Modern theories routinely move between coordinate time, proper time, clock readings, detector timestamps, synchronization conventions, thermodynamic arrows, quantum relational clocks, record formation, inference, and historical reconstruction. These quantities are often written with the same symbol t even though they arise from different physical systems and perform different roles. The central claim of this paper is that temporal quantities are strongly typed. A proper-time interval is generated by a metric and a worldline. A clock reading is generated by a material clock, a readout instrument, and a calibration. A detector timestamp is generated by switching, response, record formation, and estimation. A shared operational time is generated by signal exchange and a maintained clock ledger. Semantic time is generated by physically realized interactions that create addressable distinctions. Thermodynamic time is generated by routed physical exchange. Modular time is generated by an algebra–state pair. Lifecycle time is generated by a branch-history coordinate. These temporal objects can be compared, synchronized, or mapped into one another only through explicit physical bridges. Numerical agreement does not make them the same object. The paper collects the principal temporal coordinates into the owner-complete family 𝔗ₑₓₜ(Ξ)= (t, τγ, qC, τ̂C, Tₒₚ, Iᴰ, t̂ₑ, τˢᵉᵐₚᵣₒₚ, Tᵣₑc, Tₐddr, Tcmp, Tinf, Tlock, τedge, smod, u). Here: t is a coordinate parameter; τγ is metric proper time along a worldline γ; qC is the raw output of a physical clock C; τ̂C is a calibrated estimate derived from that output; Tₒₚ is synchronized operational time constructed through signal exchange and a maintained timing ledger; Iᴰ is the detector’s physical operating support; t̂ₑ is an estimated timestamp assigned to an event e; τˢᵉᵐₚᵣₒₚ counts physically realized semantic interaction steps; Tᵣₑc is the first time an extant carrier becomes readable as a record; Tₐddr is the first time the record becomes physically addressable; Tcmp is the first realized comparison time; Tinf is an inference stopping time; Tlock is the time at which a commitment enters a durable shared ledger; τedge is a coordinate generated by routed thermodynamic export; smod is a modular-flow parameter; u is a lifecycle gauge. The complete package Ξ includes the event, worldline or interaction process, clock subsystem, detector, ledger, route data, calibration data, and any thermodynamic, modular, horizon, or lifecycle structure used by the selected branch. A temporal bridge is represented as a partial typed map: ℬA→B : Dom(ℬA→B) ⊆ 𝕋A × ℝA→B → 𝕋B. Every bridge must identify its source type, target type, carrier, causal support, units, domain, calibration, hypotheses, thresholds, uncertainty, exchange law, and failure surface. When the bridge fails, the source temporal quantity remains meaningful; the target comparison simply remains undefined. This framework replaces the assumption of one universal temporal variable with a network of physically realized temporal interfaces. Relativistic addressability Relativistic causal support is necessary for an event to become available at a later anchor: x ∉ J⁺(e) ⇒ qᵛᵃˡₑ,ₓ = 0. An event outside the causal future J⁺(e) cannot be physically delivered to x. Causal accessibility alone is not sufficient. A record becomes addressable only when a surviving carrier reaches the anchor, enters the detector’s operating support, passes the decoder and validation gates, and is written into an actionable register. The paper therefore distinguishes: causal reach,physical delivery,readability,addressability,comparison,inference,and durable commitment. These stages may occur at different times, and some may never occur. Proper time and physical clocks Proper time is generated by metric geometry along a worldline. A material clock is a dynamical system that evolves along that worldline. Its displayed value is a physical measurement outcome, not proper time itself. A clock reading becomes an estimate of proper time only through a calibration map. Periodic clocks also require cycle provenance: the phase shown on a dial does not by itself identify how many complete cycles have elapsed. The paper proves that proper time and clock readout remain type-distinct even when the clock is highly accurate. Their numerical agreement is produced by a calibrated physical bridge. This distinction becomes decisive in accelerated motion, gravitational redshift, horizon-limited observation, finite detector windows, and quantum clocks. Synchronization and clock ledgers Synchronization is not a property that two distant clocks possess automatically. It is produced through signal exchange, a propagation model, calibration, and a maintained ledger of timing relations. Two-way timing protocols contain route-dependent biases whenever the outward and return propagation conditions differ. A synchronization convention can remove some ambiguity only after the propagation model and admissible equivalence class have been declared. Operational time is therefore a constructed relational product. It belongs to the clock network and its synchronization procedure, not to either clock in isolation. The paper separates static order agreement from dynamical entrainment. Two clocks can preserve the same event ordering without matching rates, phases, or physical mechanisms. Semantic time and interaction anchors Semantic time records the order in which physical distinctions become available for downstream action. Its basic increment occurs at a realized interaction anchor: emission, scattering, absorption, detection, amplification, decoding, comparison, or record formation. Free propagation between anchors carries causal support but does not create an intermediate semantic tick. For a free null carrier, ds² = 0, and the carrier accumulates no proper time. The same free segment also produces no intermediate semantic-interaction increment: Δτˢᵉᵐₚᵣₒₚ = 0. The timelike source and receiver can accumulate proper time, operate clocks, and create records. The freely propagating null carrier connects those interactions without generating a chain of local commitment events between them. This gives a precise temporal account of photons, communication channels, interferometers, and delayed-choice experiments. Finite measurement duration Measurement is not instantaneous. Every physical detector has an operating window, switching dynamics, response latency, finite bandwidth, resolution limits, and a nonzero probability of failure. A timestamp is generated only after the detector response has been transformed into a record and processed by an estimator. The achievable precision depends on the measurement duration, signal energy, distinguishability, detector dynamics, and calibration. The paper keeps three limits separate: the quantum speed limit governing how quickly states can become distinguishable; the detector’s finite response and operating support; the statistical precision of the timestamp estimator. Records, inference, and durable commitment A registration can exist before it becomes readable. A readable record can exist before it becomes semantically addressable. An addressable record can exist before comparison. An inference can be reached before the result is locked into a durable shared ledger. The corresponding stopping times satisfy no universal equality: Tᵣₑc ≠ Tₐddr ≠ Tcmp ≠ Tinf ≠ Tlock. Their order depends on the realized physical architecture. A durable commitment requires more than a transient signal. It requires a surviving carrier, decoding, validation, admission, maintenance, and sufficient resistance to noise and decay. The paper distinguishes live semantic activity from durable recorded stock. A system may be processing and transmitting information without having written a stable commitment. Conversely, a durable record may survive after the process that created it has ended. Quantum clocks and relational dynamics

Aug 1, 20260 citations