Project-based learning is recognized as an effective approach for improving engagement and applied understanding in STEM education. In quantum engineering courses, however, the question is no longer only whether students benefit from projects but how those projects should culminate if the goal is authentic disciplinary preparation. This paper examines the educational role of a conference-style paper requirement embedded within a project-based learning implementation for an introductory quantum mechanics course for engineers. We use post-course survey responses from students in a pilot run of the course. We evaluate perceived effects on conceptual understanding, scientific communication, research readiness, and attitudes toward the writing requirement itself. The results suggest that students viewed the project as beneficial for engagement, confidence, and technical skill development, while the conference-style paper emerged as a demanding but meaningful component of the experience. We argue that once PBL has been established in quantum mechanics education, conference-style writing can serve as an extension of that model, especially for graduate students. The findings support retaining the conference-paper requirement with improved scaffolding.
Project-based learning is recognized as an effective approach for improving engagement and applied understanding in STEM education. In quantum engineering courses, however, the question is no longer only whether students benefit from projects but how those projects should culminate if the goal is authentic disciplinary preparation. This paper examines the educational role of a conference-style paper requirement embedded within a project-based learning implementation for an introductory quantum mechanics course for engineers. We use post-course survey responses from students in a pilot run of the course. We evaluate perceived effects on conceptual understanding, scientific communication, research readiness, and attitudes toward the writing requirement itself. The results suggest that students viewed the project as beneficial for engagement, confidence, and technical skill development, while the conference-style paper emerged as a demanding but meaningful component of the experience. We argue that once PBL has been established in quantum mechanics education, conference-style writing can serve as an extension of that model, especially for graduate students. The findings support retaining the conference-paper requirement with improved scaffolding.
Quantum computing introduces abstract concepts and non-intuitive behaviors that can be challenging for students to grasp through traditional lecture-based instruction alone. This paper demonstrates how Project-Based Learning (PBL) can be leveraged to bridge that gap. This can be done by engaging students in a real-world, interdisciplinary task that combines quantum computing with their field of interest. As part of a similar assignment, we investigated the application of the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm for computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction and benchmarked its performance against the classical Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (ART). Through implementing and analyzing both methods on a small-scale problem, we gained practical experience with quantum algorithms, critically evaluated their limitations, and developed technical writing and research skills. The experience demonstrated that Project-Based Learning not only enhances conceptual understanding but also encourages students to engage deeply with emerging technologies through research, implementation, and reflection. We recommend the integration of similar PBL modules in introductory quantum computing courses. The assignment also works better if students are required to write and submit a conference-style paper, supported by mentorship from faculty across the different fields. In such course interdisciplinary, real-world problems can transform abstract theory into meaningful learning experiences and better prepare students for future advancements in quantum technologies.
Abstract As the field of quantum information science and engineering (QISE) continues its rapid growth, there are increasing concerns about the workforce demands and the necessity of preparing students for quantum-related careers. Given the interdisciplinary nature of the field, it is necessary to offer diverse educational opportunities to ensure that students are well-prepared for careers emerging from the second quantum revolution. In this paper, we present our findings from a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with university QISE educators, who have taken on the challenges and opportunities in developing QISE courses and curricula for undergraduate and graduate students from different academic backgrounds. Our findings focus on common themes across undergraduate and graduate QISE education, as well as advising and mentoring students to prepare them for research in the field. The interviewees discussed the various strategies they had implemented, such as incorporating hands-on lab activities, integration of Python coding with Qiskit, and including project-based learning experiences. Furthermore, their reflections on mentorship and advising students emphasized the importance of recognizing students’ prior preparation, providing targeted resources, and supportive learning environments. Our findings are meant to provide guidance for educators looking to implement effective QISE educational strategies that address the changing landscape of quantum information revolution.
This poster explores strategies for supporting quantum computing education in academic libraries and invites collaborative discussion on building sustainable support models. As quantum computing emerges as a transformative technology with potential to solve complex research questions across disciplines, institutions of higher education must develop effective and scalable support frameworks. Successful integration of quantum computing education and support may position institutions at the forefront of breakthrough computational research and confer benefits such as strengthening the institutional ability to attract top faculty and students, boost workforce development, and deliver a competitive advantage for funding opportunities. We present our initial framework for quantum computing support developed at the University Libraries, University of Alabama. Our instructional model employs backward design principles, emphasizing hands-on engagement with open-source quantum development tools and focusing on transferable computational thinking skills that extend beyond specific tools. Our approach centers on workshops that prioritize achievable learning outcomes tailored to diverse student backgrounds, incorporate active learning strategies, and emphasize real-world applications to build quantum literacy across disciplines. Both our successes and ongoing challenges are shared to inform broader discussions. More broadly, we invite engagement with our framework and discussion across four critical dimensions of emerging technology support including pedagogical approach, assessment strategies, technology platforms and infrastructure, and collaborative support models. Pedagogically, we seek to explore which instructional methods most effectively build quantum computing literacy for students with diverse academic backgrounds as well as strategies to strike the balance between theoretical foundations and hands-on practice. With assessment, we seek meaningful assessment approaches that can address varied student backgrounds and account for steep learning curves accompanying emerging technologies. For technology, we endeavor to discover which platforms will work best within higher education and ensure access and reliability for students and educators on a broad scale. And finally, we seek to examine how academic libraries and other units collaborate to build sustainable, coordinated support infrastructure. As quantum computing and other emerging technologies reshape higher education, academic libraries may be uniquely positioned to lead support for quantum computing by democratizing access to computational resources and bridging gaps between research, instruction, and student success. To that end, we invite discussion on how academic libraries can help to build sustainable, adaptable, and collaborative models to support quantum computing. We seek experiences, challenges, and strategies to inform best practices while aligning with library and other campus computing efforts and meeting the evolving needs of students.
Abstract The emerging field of Quantum Computing (QC) is novel for most K12 educators. Fundamental understandings of QC rely on advanced mathematics and physics. Therefore, why is a middle or high school introduction to QC relevant or needed? In our local area, the Pennsylvania (PA) Department of Education specifies that PA science teachers implement learning experiences that allow students to understand the nexus of how societal needs create a demand for new technologies that in turn advance scientific knowledge and impact society [1], that science teachers create opportunities for students to engage in computational thinking and mathematics within authentic science and engineering contexts [2], and that mathematics pedagogy supports students to model with mathematics and make sense of complex problems [3]. To fulfill these existing learning aims, we present a collaborative curriculum development project based on our interdisciplinary research in which we develop quantum computing methods and tools for therapeutic drug discovery. The team includes faculty from medicine, quantum computing, machine learning, and science education. The curriculum development work aims to develop resources for middle and high school (U.S. grades 6 – 12) teachers to facilitate an introduction to Quantum Information Science (QIS) and QC, embedded in existing learning aims including mathematical, scientific, and engineering practices and concepts in statistics and probability, the natural sciences, and computing. We therefore demonstrate a proof-of-concept paper for how an introduction to QC designed for teachers and students in middle and high school can be responsive to disciplinary science and math learning goals (e.g., interpreting a distribution of quantum states and decoding it into viable molecular structures) and situated in contexts of emerging quantum technologies. The educational resources provide a developmentally-appropriate approximation [4] of the drug discovery goals of the project and utilize existing cloud-based quantum infrastructure from IBM (IBM Quantum Experience), making the QIS concepts accessible and useful in the middle and high school contexts in relation to these existing discipline-based learning goals. The associated professional development (PD) will foster a pathway for teachers to engage with scientists and engineers around unfinished problems, supporting an epistemological stance toward science that aligns with interdisciplinary negotiations and model-based reasoning characteristic of ongoing scientific research. This, at its most basic level, supports teachers and students to engage with technological innovation as a form of scientific literacy. The teacher toolkit will support practitioners to visualize qubit states and facilitate learning activities that address how QC is an ongoing engineering endeavor, driven by societal needs for new technologies, and enabling QIS applications that young learners can authentically engage in. [1] Pennsylvania Technology and Engineering Standards (2020). https://www.education.pa.gov/Documents/Teachers-Administrators/Curriculum/Science%20Education/PA-Technology%20and%20Engineering%20Standards%20Grade%206-12.pdf [2] National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. National Academies Press. [3] National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC. [4] Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100.
Abstract The revolutionary new field of quantum computing (QC) continues to gain attention in industry, academia, and government in both research and education. At educational institutions, there is a proliferation of introductory courses at various academic levels signaling a growing interest and recognition of the significance of this field. A crucial and often overlooked aspect is the development of research-based materials and pedagogical approaches to effectively teach the complexities of QC to diverse cohorts of learners across multiple disciplines. There is a great need for empirical investigations of the effectiveness of learning materials and pedagogical approaches in this new interdisciplinary field. We present an empirical investigation done at an R1 institution using the multiple case study method. We compare a case study on students in an introductory QC course without research-based mini-tutorials to a study of students taking the QC course with research-based mini-tutorials. We compare the strengths and difficulties of students in the two courses, discuss the general strengths and difficulties of students across both courses, postulate the effectiveness of the mini-tutorials and discuss how they can be revised. Strengths across both classes include the ability to apply single-qubit and two-qubit gates, favoring application of Dirac notation, and a reasonable understanding of normalization, probability and teleportation described qualitatively. Difficulties across both classes included use of matrix representation, use of rotation gates, and an ability to recall and analyze quantitatively a circuit representing teleportation. We postulate that the mini-tutorials on gates, normalization, probability and a qualitative description of teleportation may have been effective in increasing students’ understanding of the concepts. We also identify mini-tutorials that may need revision.
Quantum Science and Technology (QST) has rapidly emerged as a transformative domain, driving advances in computing, sensing, and communication. The global expansion of quantum research and education programs reflects the recognition of quantum technologies as central to twenty-first-century scientific and technological progress. Sustaining this trajectory requires cultivating a workforce with strong conceptual and technical foundations in quantum science. Yet, significant pedagogical challenges persist, particularly in designing curricula that balance theoretical rigor with accessibility for students with basic understanding of ordinary differential equations. This study seeks to address a critical gap in undergraduate quantum mechanics instruction by introducing a tractable framework for solving the Schrödinger equation with noncentral potentials. Such potentials—including ring-shaped interactions—are indispensable for modelling molecular structures, anisotropic systems, and ultracold collision phenomena. Despite their importance, their mathematical complexity has historically hindered integration into standard coursework, leaving students underprepared for contemporary quantum applications. We develop a differential-equation-based approach that explicitly solves the orbital component of the Schrödinger equation under a noncentral potential. The resulting normalized wavefunctions are expressed in terms of Jacobi polynomials. The framework is designed to be mathematically rigorous yet pedagogically accessible, enabling undergraduate students to engage with noncentral potentials without requiring advanced mathematical tools beyond the standard curriculum. The solutions obtained demonstrate clear dependence on both potential parameters and quantum numbers, while maintaining consistency with established results in the literature. This validates the framework’s accuracy and suitability for instructional use. By simplifying the mathematical treatment without sacrificing rigor, the approach provides students with meaningful exposure to complex quantum systems. This work offers a pathway for incorporating noncentral potentials into undergraduate quantum mechanics instruction. By broadening the conceptual toolkit available to students, it supports the development of a versatile quantum-ready workforce and advances the integration of contemporary quantum applications into mainstream education.