We study algorithms inspired by quantum annealing that are suited for the NISQ era. First, we analyze approximate quantum annealing (AQA), which employs a discretized annealing ansatz in which the time step and the number of layers are allowed to deviate from a faithful implementation of quantum annealing. Parameter scans identify regimes that reproduce annealing-like behavior with reduced resources, making them more suitable for NISQ devices. The resulting parameters can then be used as an effective warm start for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), improving its performance compared to random initializations. We also introduce evolving Hamiltonian quantum optimization (EHQO), a multistep variational scheme that guides the optimization process through intermediate Hamiltonians derived from the standard annealing Hamiltonian. Numerical simulations on sets of hard 2-SAT instances suggest that quantum annealing-inspired algorithms provide practical strategies for enhancing variational quantum optimization.
We study algorithms inspired by quantum annealing that are suited for the NISQ era. First, we analyze approximate quantum annealing (AQA), which employs a discretized annealing ansatz in which the time step and the number of layers are allowed to deviate from a faithful implementation of quantum annealing. Parameter scans identify regimes that reproduce annealing-like behavior with reduced resources, making them more suitable for NISQ devices. The resulting parameters can then be used as an effective warm start for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), improving its performance compared to random initializations. We also introduce evolving Hamiltonian quantum optimization (EHQO), a multistep variational scheme that guides the optimization process through intermediate Hamiltonians derived from the standard annealing Hamiltonian. Numerical simulations on sets of hard 2-SAT instances suggest that quantum annealing-inspired algorithms provide practical strategies for enhancing variational quantum optimization.
This chapter investigates the application of quantum computing to optimization, a field traditionally dominated by classical methods but increasingly limited by computational demands in tackling complex, large-scale problems. The discussion focuses on quantum optimization techniques, particularly variational quantum algorithms like the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), along with quantum annealing (QA), a process inspired by physical annealing that leverages quantum tunnelling and superposition. The chapter also explores the integration of quantum approaches within machine learning frameworks, where quantum algorithms can potentially accelerate model training and enhance capabilities. Additionally, it presents practical applications and challenges associated with these quantum algorithms, covering their effectiveness on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices and the evolving landscape of quantum hardware. This chapter concludes with insights into quantum optimization's future potential to address optimization and machine learning challenges that are currently intractable for classical methods, marking a significant shift in computational science.
Quantum optimization allows for up to exponential quantum speedups for specific, possibly industrially relevant problems. As the key algorithm in this field, we motivate and discuss the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), which can be understood as a slightly generalized version of Quantum Annealing for gate-based quantum computers. We delve into the quantum circuit implementation of the QAOA, including Hamiltonian simulation techniques for higher-order Ising models, and discuss parameter training using the parameter shift rule. An example implementation with Pennylane source code demonstrates practical application for the Maximum Cut problem. Further, we show how constraints can be incorporated into the QAOA using Grover mixers, allowing to restrict the search space to strictly valid solutions for specific problems. Finally, we outline the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) as a generalization of the QAOA, highlighting its potential in the NISQ era and addressing challenges such as barren plateaus and ansatz design.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a promising method for solving certain classical combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices. When employing the QAOA to 3-SAT and Max-3-SAT problems, the quantum cost exhibits an easy-hard-easy or easy-hard pattern, respectively, as the clause density is changed. The quantum resources needed in the hard-region problems are out of reach for current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. We show by numerical simulations with up to 14 variables and analytical arguments that the adaptive-bias QAOA (ab-QAOA) greatly improves performance in the hard region of the 3-SAT problems and hard region of the Max-3-SAT problems. For similar accuracy, on average, ab-QAOA needs 3 levels for 10-variable 3-SAT problems as compared to 22 for QAOA. For 10-variable Max-3-SAT problems, the numbers are 7 levels and 62 levels. The improvement comes from a more targeted and more limited generation of entanglement during the evolution. We demonstrate that classical optimization is not strictly necessary in the ab-QAOA since local fields are used to guide the evolution. This leads us to propose an optimization-free ab-QAOA that can solve the hard-region 3-SAT and Max-3-SAT problems effectively with significantly fewer quantum gates as compared to the original ab-QAOA. Our work paves the way for realizing quantum advantages for optimization problems on NISQ devices.
Developing quantum algorithms adaptive to specific constraints of near-term devices is an essential step towards practical quantum advantage. In a recent work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 103601 (2023)], we show cold atoms in an optical cavity can be built as a universal quantum optimizer with programmable all-to-all interactions, and the effective Hamiltonian for atoms directly encodes number partitioning problems (NPPs). Here, we numerically investigate the performance of quantum annealing (QA) and quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) to find the solution of NPP that is encoded in the ground state of atomic qubits. We find the success probability of the standard QA decays rapidly with the problem size. The optimized annealing path or inhomogeneous driving fields only lead to mild improvement on the success probability. Similarly, the QAOA always gets trapped in a false local minimum, and there is no significant performance improvement as we increase the depth of the quantum circuit. To overcome the difficulty of solving NPPs, we propose an adaptive variational quantum algorithm (VQA) whose ansatz differs from that of the QAOA by releasing the parameter freedom of the NPP Hamiltonian. Through numerical simulations, we find that our adaptive VQA can achieve rather high success probability within very small circuit depth. It is thus worth paying the extra optimization cost of additional parameters for improving performance compared to the QAOA. Therefore, our adaptive VQA provides a promising choice for programmable atom-cavity systems to demonstrate competitive computational power within its quantum coherence time.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm designed to tackle combinatorial optimization problems.Despite its promise for near-term quantum applications, not much is currently understood about the QAOA's performance beyond its lowestdepth variant.An essential but missing ingredient for understanding and deploying the QAOA is a constructive approach to carry out the outer-loop classical optimization.We provide an in-depth study of the performance of the QAOA on MaxCut problems by developing an efficient parameter-optimization procedure and revealing its ability to exploit nonadiabatic operations.Building on observed patterns in optimal parameters, we propose heuristic strategies for initializing optimizations to find quasioptimal p-level QAOA parameters in O½polyðpÞ time, whereas the standard strategy of random initialization requires 2 OðpÞ optimization runs to achieve similar performance.We then benchmark the QAOA and compare it with quantum annealing, especially on difficult instances where adiabatic quantum annealing fails due to small spectral gaps.The comparison reveals that the QAOA can learn via optimization to utilize nonadiabatic mechanisms to circumvent the challenges associated with vanishing spectral gaps.Finally, we provide a realistic resource analysis on the experimental implementation of the QAOA.When quantum fluctuations in measurements are accounted for, we illustrate that optimization is important only for problem sizes beyond numerical simulations but accessible on near-term devices.We propose a feasible implementation of large MaxCut problems with a few hundred vertices in a system of 2D neutral atoms, reaching the regime to challenge the best classical algorithms.
This paper presents an Adaptive Quantum Annealing Algorithm (AQA), designed to enhance the solution efficiency of complex optimization problems. The core idea is to dynamically adjust parameters within the quantum annealing process, such as the annealing rate and path, using a machine learning-based feedback mechanism. Specifically, a reinforcement learning algorithm is employed to monitor the quantum annealing process in real-time, analyzing its state and adjusting the annealing parameters accordingly. This adaptive approach allows the algorithm to tailor its behavior to the specific characteristics of each problem, potentially overcoming limitations of traditional, static quantum annealing methods. The algorithm's performance is evaluated through simulation, demonstrating its ability to achieve improved results compared to standard quantum annealing strategies. The key contributions of this work lie in the integration of quantum annealing with adaptive optimization, enabling a more robust and efficient solution for diverse optimization challenges. The algorithm's design provides a framework for future research in hybrid quantum-classical optimization techniques.