Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2604.01248 · Symmetry

Origin of the Covariant Wigner Operator as a Quantum Amplitude in QCD

Chueng‐Ryong Ji, Daniel Piasecki

Published Jun 12, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Wigner function plays a central role in QCD as a phase-space object encoding correlations among quarks, antiquarks, and gluons, yet its interpretation remains subtle due to its quasiprobabilistic nature and possible negativity. Recent work based on the Koopman–von Neumann–Sudarshan (KvNS) Hilbert space formulation of classical mechanics suggests the Wigner function arises as a quantum probability amplitude projected onto classical phase space, rather than a quasiprobability density. In the classical limit, this amplitude reduces to the classical Koopman wavefunction. In this work, we extend this perspective to relativistic QCD by constructing a Koopman description of the quark Wigner operator. We show that the Wigner operator is naturally isomorphic to a phase-space spinor, providing a unified framework in which both classical and quantum dynamics are expressed. Within this formulation, the Wigner function retains its interpretation as an amplitude even in the relativistic regime. This viewpoint clarifies the origin of negativity and other nonclassical features, and provides a more transparent foundation for parton distribution functions in QCD. Remarkably, the relativistic Koopman framework reproduces the classical limit of QCD.

DOI
10.3390/sym18061018

Related papers

Wigner phase-space distribution as a wave function

Denys I. Bondar, Renán Cabrera, Dmitry V. Zhdanov +1 more

We demonstrate that the Wigner function of a pure quantum state is a wave function in a specially tuned Dirac bra-ket formalism and argue that the Wigner function is in fact a probability amplitude for the quantum particle to be at a certain point of the classical phase space. Additionally, we establish that in the classical limit, the Wigner function transforms into a classical Koopman--von Neumann wave function rather than into a classical probability distribution. Since probability amplitude need not be positive, our findings provide an alternative outlook on the Wigner function's negativity.

arXiv:1202.3628•Physical Review A•Nov 11, 2013•50 citations

Uncertainty and Wigner negativity in Hilbert-space classical mechanics

Mustafa Amin

Classical mechanics, in the Koopman-von Neumann formulation, is described in Hilbert space. It is shown here that classical canonical transformations are generated by Hermitian operators that are in general noncommutative. This naturally brings about uncertainty relations inherent in classical mechanics, for example between position and the generator of space translations, between momentum and the generator of momentum translations, and between dynamical time and the Liouvillian, to name a few. Further, it is shown that the Wigner representation produces a quasi-probability distribution that can take on negative values. Thus, two of the hallmark features of quantum mechanics are reproduced, and become apparent, in a Hilbert-space formulation of classical mechanics.

quant-pharXiv:2602.10341•Feb 12, 2026•0 citations

Wigner Function's Negativity Demystified

Denys I. Bondar, Renán Cabrera, Dmitry V. Zhdanov +1 more

We demonstrate that the Wigner function of a pure quantum state is a wave function in a specially tuned Dirac bra-ket formalism and argue that the Wigner function is in fact a probability amplitude for the quantum particle to be at a certain point of the classical phase space. Additionally, we establish that in the classical limit, the Wigner function transforms into a classical Koopman-von Neumann wave function rather than into a classical probability distribution. Since probability amplitude need not be positive, our findings provide an alternative outlook on the Wigner function's negativity.

•Feb 16, 2012•2 citations

On the operator origins of classical and quantum wave functions

Xerxes D. Arsiwalla, David Chester, Louis Hirsch Kauffman

Abstract We investigate operator algebraic origins of the classical Koopman–von Neumann wave function $$\psi _{KvN}$$ ψ KvN as well as the quantum-mechanical one $$\psi _{QM}$$ ψ QM . We introduce a formalism of Operator Mechanics (OM) based on a noncommutative Poisson, symplectic, and noncommutative differential structures. OM serves as a pre-quantum algebra from which algebraic structures relevant to real-world classical and quantum mechanics follow. In particular, $$\psi _{KvN}$$ ψ KvN and $$\psi _{QM}$$ ψ QM are both consequences of this pre-quantum formalism. No a priori Hilbert space is needed. OM admits an algebraic notion of operator expectation values without invoking states. A phase space bundle $${{\mathcal {E}}}$$ E follows from this. $$\psi _{KvN}$$ ψ KvN and $$\psi _{QM}$$ ψ QM are shown to be sections in $${{\mathcal {E}}}$$ E . The difference between $$\psi _{KvN}$$ ψ KvN and $$\psi _{QM}$$ ψ QM originates from a quantization map interpreted as “twisting” of sections over $${{\mathcal {E}}}$$ E . We also show that the Schrödinger equation is obtained from the Koopman–von Neumann equation. What this suggests is that neither the Schrödinger equation nor the quantum wave function are fundamental structures. Rather, they both originate from a pre-quantum operator algebra. Finally, we comment on how entanglement between these operators suggests emergence of space; and possible extensions of this formalism to field theories.

arXiv:2211.01838•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•Dec 19, 2023•6 citations

On the Quantum-Classical Character of the Quantum Wavefunction of Material Particles

Daniela Dragoman

We show that the quantum wavefunction, interpreted as the probability density of finding a single non-localized quantum particle, which evolves according to classical laws of motion, is an intermediate description of a material quantum particle between the quantum and classical realms. Accordingly, classical and quantum mechanics should not be treated separately, a unified description in terms of the Wigner distribution function being possible. Although defined on classical phase space coordinates, the Wigner distribution function accommodates the nonlocalization property of quantum systems, and leads to both the Schrodinger equation for the quantum wavefunction and to the definition of position and momentum operators.

arXiv:quant-ph/0604087•Annales de la fondation Louis de Broglie/Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie•Apr 12, 2006•0 citations

Classical and quantum mechanics across representations: an operational reading of the Wigner Weyl correspondence

Samuel Schlegel, Borivoje Dakić, Flavio Del Santo

The physical content of a theory is not intrinsically tied to any single mathematical formalism. Both classical and quantum mechanics admit equivalent representations, notably in phase space and in Hilbert space, related by the Wigner-Weyl correspondence. While this correspondence has long been studied in mathematical physics, its foundational and operational implications are often left implicit. Here we give a systematic account of what changes, and what does not, when classical and quantum theories are expressed in each other's native language. This representational viewpoint separates artifacts (such as the appearance of non-positivity or negativity under certain maps) from robust structural distinctions that persist across representations, in particular noncommutativity and its $\hbar$-dependent $\star$-deformation of the classical algebra. We develop the comparison at the level of states, kinematics, and dynamics, and extend it to measurement by formulating both outcome statistics and state-update rules within the same framework.

quant-pharXiv:2607.13135•Physical Review A•Jul 16, 2026•0 citations
The Wigner function plays a central role in QCD as a phase-space object encoding correlations among quarks, antiquarks, and gluons, yet its interpretation remains subtle due to its quasiprobabilistic nature and possible negativity. Recent work based on the Koopman–von Neumann–Sudarshan (KvNS) Hilbert space formulation of classical mechanics suggests the Wigner function arises as a quantum probability amplitude projected onto classical phase space, rather than a quasiprobability density. In the classical limit, this amplitude reduces to the classical Koopman wavefunction. In this work, we extend this perspective to relativistic QCD by constructing a Koopman description of the quark Wigner operator. We show that the Wigner operator is naturally isomorphic to a phase-space spinor, providing a unified framework in which both classical and quantum dynamics are expressed. Within this formulation, the Wigner function retains its interpretation as an amplitude even in the relativistic regime. This viewpoint clarifies the origin of negativity and other nonclassical features, and provides a more transparent foundation for parton distribution functions in QCD. Remarkably, the relativistic Koopman framework reproduces the classical limit of QCD.
We demonstrate that the Wigner function of a pure quantum state is a wave function in a specially tuned Dirac bra-ket formalism and argue that the Wigner function is in fact a probability amplitude for the quantum particle to be at a certain point of the classical phase space. Additionally, we establish that in the classical limit, the Wigner function transforms into a classical Koopman--von Neumann wave function rather than into a classical probability distribution. Since probability amplitude need not be positive, our findings provide an alternative outlook on the Wigner function's negativity.
Classical mechanics, in the Koopman-von Neumann formulation, is described in Hilbert space. It is shown here that classical canonical transformations are generated by Hermitian operators that are in general noncommutative. This naturally brings about uncertainty relations inherent in classical mechanics, for example between position and the generator of space translations, between momentum and the generator of momentum translations, and between dynamical time and the Liouvillian, to name a few. Further, it is shown that the Wigner representation produces a quasi-probability distribution that can take on negative values. Thus, two of the hallmark features of quantum mechanics are reproduced, and become apparent, in a Hilbert-space formulation of classical mechanics.
We demonstrate that the Wigner function of a pure quantum state is a wave function in a specially tuned Dirac bra-ket formalism and argue that the Wigner function is in fact a probability amplitude for the quantum particle to be at a certain point of the classical phase space. Additionally, we establish that in the classical limit, the Wigner function transforms into a classical Koopman-von Neumann wave function rather than into a classical probability distribution. Since probability amplitude need not be positive, our findings provide an alternative outlook on the Wigner function's negativity.
Abstract We investigate operator algebraic origins of the classical Koopman–von Neumann wave function ψKvN\psi _{KvN}ψKvN​ ψ KvN as well as the quantum-mechanical one ψQM\psi _{QM}ψQM​ ψ QM . We introduce a formalism of Operator Mechanics (OM) based on a noncommutative Poisson, symplectic, and noncommutative differential structures. OM serves as a pre-quantum algebra from which algebraic structures relevant to real-world classical and quantum mechanics follow. In particular, ψKvN\psi _{KvN}ψKvN​ ψ KvN and ψQM\psi _{QM}ψQM​ ψ QM are both consequences of this pre-quantum formalism. No a priori Hilbert space is needed. OM admits an algebraic notion of operator expectation values without invoking states. A phase space bundle E{{\mathcal {E}}}E E follows from this. ψKvN\psi _{KvN}ψKvN​ ψ KvN and ψQM\psi _{QM}ψQM​ ψ QM are shown to be sections in E{{\mathcal {E}}}E E . The difference between ψKvN\psi _{KvN}ψKvN​ ψ KvN and ψQM\psi _{QM}ψQM​ ψ QM originates from a quantization map interpreted as “twisting” of sections over E{{\mathcal {E}}}E E . We also show that the Schrödinger equation is obtained from the Koopman–von Neumann equation. What this suggests is that neither the Schrödinger equation nor the quantum wave function are fundamental structures. Rather, they both originate from a pre-quantum operator algebra. Finally, we comment on how entanglement between these operators suggests emergence of space; and possible extensions of this formalism to field theories.
We show that the quantum wavefunction, interpreted as the probability density of finding a single non-localized quantum particle, which evolves according to classical laws of motion, is an intermediate description of a material quantum particle between the quantum and classical realms. Accordingly, classical and quantum mechanics should not be treated separately, a unified description in terms of the Wigner distribution function being possible. Although defined on classical phase space coordinates, the Wigner distribution function accommodates the nonlocalization property of quantum systems, and leads to both the Schrodinger equation for the quantum wavefunction and to the definition of position and momentum operators.
The physical content of a theory is not intrinsically tied to any single mathematical formalism. Both classical and quantum mechanics admit equivalent representations, notably in phase space and in Hilbert space, related by the Wigner-Weyl correspondence. While this correspondence has long been studied in mathematical physics, its foundational and operational implications are often left implicit. Here we give a systematic account of what changes, and what does not, when classical and quantum theories are expressed in each other's native language. This representational viewpoint separates artifacts (such as the appearance of non-positivity or negativity under certain maps) from robust structural distinctions that persist across representations, in particular noncommutativity and its ℏ\hbarℏ-dependent ⋆\star⋆-deformation of the classical algebra. We develop the comparison at the level of states, kinematics, and dynamics, and extend it to measurement by formulating both outcome statistics and state-update rules within the same framework.