Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2603.18100 · International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Comment on “Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light Speed Invariance with Quantum and Classical Entanglement”

Justo Pastor Lambare

Published Mar 16, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10773-026-06285-6

Related papers

Reply to Lambare’s “Comment on “Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light Speed Invariance with quantum and classical entanglement””

Gianfranco Spavieri

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 10, 2026•2 citations

Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light Speed Invariance with Quantum and Classical Entanglement

Gianfranco Spavieri, Ramón Carrasquero, Antonio Contreras +3 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 13, 2025•5 citations

Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light-Speed Invariance with Quantum and Classical Entanglement

Gianfranco Spavieri, Juan Carlos Mendoza Sánchez, Ramón Carrasquero +3 more

In a rod of length AB \(= L\), rotating uniformly, any two spatially separated points along the rod are connected in a way that shows analogies with the quantum entanglement of the spin of particles. This ”classical entanglement” reflects the simultaneity preset in the system, which can be used for syncing two distant clocks, one at A and the other at B. Since it differs from Einstein synchronization, this procedure can be adopted for testing the one-way light speed and Lorentz invariance. Applications to optical Sagnac effects confirm that a consistent interpretation requires the adoption of absolute versus relative simultaneity.

Qeios•Dec 2, 2024•1 citation

Quantum Entanglement Under Lorentz Transformation

Ji-Rong Ren, Shi-Xiong Song

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 23, 2010•6 citations

Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light-Speed Invariance with Quantum and Classical Entanglement

Gianfranco Spavieri, Juan Carlos Mendoza Sánchez, Ramón Carrasquero +3 more

In a rod of length AB \(= L\), rotating uniformly, any two spatially separated points along the rod are connected in a way that shows analogies with the quantum entanglement of the spin of particles. This ”classical entanglement” reflects the simultaneity preset in the system, which can be used for syncing two distant clocks, one at A and the other at B. Since it differs from Einstein synchronization, this procedure can be adopted for testing the one-way light speed and Lorentz invariance. Applications to optical Sagnac effects confirm that a consistent interpretation requires the adoption of absolute versus relative simultaneity.

Qeios•Oct 29, 2024•1 citation

Verifying quantum entanglement

Physics Today•Apr 23, 2009•0 citations
In a rod of length AB =L= L=L, rotating uniformly, any two spatially separated points along the rod are connected in a way that shows analogies with the quantum entanglement of the spin of particles. This ”classical entanglement” reflects the simultaneity preset in the system, which can be used for syncing two distant clocks, one at A and the other at B. Since it differs from Einstein synchronization, this procedure can be adopted for testing the one-way light speed and Lorentz invariance. Applications to optical Sagnac effects confirm that a consistent interpretation requires the adoption of absolute versus relative simultaneity.
In a rod of length AB =L= L=L, rotating uniformly, any two spatially separated points along the rod are connected in a way that shows analogies with the quantum entanglement of the spin of particles. This ”classical entanglement” reflects the simultaneity preset in the system, which can be used for syncing two distant clocks, one at A and the other at B. Since it differs from Einstein synchronization, this procedure can be adopted for testing the one-way light speed and Lorentz invariance. Applications to optical Sagnac effects confirm that a consistent interpretation requires the adoption of absolute versus relative simultaneity.