Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2602.15199 · Physical Review A

Intractability of Witnessing Entangled Measurements Device Independently

Peter Bierhorst

quant-phSubmitted Feb 16, 2026• Announced Feb 18, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Protocols have been previously proposed to certify the presence of an entangled measurement in a fully device-independent manner. Here, I provide models for these protocols in which the claimed measurement is not entangled, and demonstrate it is always possible to displace entanglement from measurements to measured states for a general class of device-independent scenarios. This indicates that no black-box measurement scenario requires entangled measurements to replicate its behavior, which is relevant to our fundamental understanding of this phenomenon and how to witness it.

Comments
5 pages, 6 figures

Related papers

Device-Independent Entanglement Certification of All Entangled States

Joseph Bowles, Ivan Šupić, Daniel Cavalcanti +1 more

We present a method to certify the entanglement of all entangled quantum states in a device-independent way. This is achieved by placing the state in a quantum network and constructing a correlation inequality based on an entanglement witness for the state. Our method is device independent, in the sense that entanglement can be certified from the observed statistics alone, under minimal assumptions on the underlying physics. Conceptually, our results borrow ideas from the field of self-testing to bring the recently introduced measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses into the fully device-independent regime.

arXiv:1801.10444•Physical Review Letters•Oct 29, 2018•86 citations

Experimental Semi-Device-Independent Certification of Entangled Measurements

Adam Bennet, Tamás Vértesi, D. J. Saunders +2 more

Certifying the entanglement of quantum states with Bell inequalities allows one to guarantee the security of quantum information protocols independently of imperfections in the measuring devices. Here, we present a similar procedure for witnessing entangled measurements, which play a central role in many quantum information tasks. Our procedure is termed semi-device-independent, as it uses uncharacterized quantum preparations of fixed Hilbert space dimension. Using a photonic setup, we experimentally certify an entangled measurement using only measurement statistics. We also apply our techniques to certify unentangled but nevertheless inherently quantum measurements.

arXiv:1404.1422•Physical Review Letters•Aug 22, 2014•16 citations

Efficient measurement-device-independent detection of multipartite entanglement structure

Qi Zhao, Xiao Yuan, Xiongfeng Ma

Witnessing entanglement is crucial in quantum information processing. With properly preparing ancillary states, it has been shown previously that genuine entanglement can be witnessed without trusting measurement devices. In this work we generalize the scenario and show that generic multipartite entanglement structures, including entanglement of subsystems and entanglement depth, can be witnessed via measurement-device-independent means. As the original measurement-device-independent entanglement witness scheme exploits only one out of four Bell measurement outcomes for each party, a direct generalization to multipartite quantum states will inevitably cause inefficiency in entanglement detection after taking account of statistical fluctuations. To resolve this problem, we also present a way to utilize all the measurement outcomes. The scheme is efficient for multipartite entanglement detection and can be realized with state-of-the-art technologies.

arXiv:1607.08002•Physical Review A•Jul 26, 2016•16 citations

Practical measurement-device-independent entanglement quantification

Denis Rosset, Anthony Martin, E. Verbanis +2 more

The robust estimation of entanglement is key to the validation of implementations of quantum systems. On the one hand, the evaluation of standard entanglement measures, either using quantum tomography or using quantitative entanglement witnesses, requires perfect implementation of measurements. On the other hand, measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses (MDIEWs) can certify entanglement of all entangled states using untrusted measurement devices. We show that MDIEWs can be used as well to quantify entanglement according to standard entanglement measures, and we present a practical method to derive such witnesses using experimental data only.

arXiv:1709.03090•Physical Review A•Nov 26, 2018•21 citations

Measurement-device-independent entanglement and randomness estimation in quantum networks

Ivan Šupić, Paul Skrzypczyk, Daniel Cavalcanti

Detection of entanglement in quantum networks consisting of many parties is one of the important steps toward building quantum communication and computation networks. We consider a scenario where the measurement devices used for this certification are uncharacterized. In this case, it is well known that by using quantum states as inputs for the measurement devices it is possible to detect any entangled state (a situation known as measurement-device-independent entanglement witnessing). Here we go beyond entanglement detection and provide methods to estimate the amount of entanglement in a quantum network. We also consider the task of randomness certification and show that randomness can be certified in a variety of cases, including single-partite experiments or setups using only separable states.

arXiv:1702.04752•Physical Review A•Apr 26, 2017•42 citations

Detection loophole in measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses

Kornikar Sen, Chirag Srivastava, Shiladitya Mal +2 more

There always exists an entanglement witness for every entangled quantum state. Negativity of the expectation value of an entanglement witness operator guarantees entanglement of the corresponding state, given that the measurement devices involved are perfect, i.e., the performed measurements actually constitute the witness operator for the state under consideration. In a realistic situation, there are two possible ways of measurements to drive the process away from the ideal one. First, wrong measurements may be performed, and, second, while the measurement operators are implemented correctly, the detection process may be noisy. Entanglement witnesses are prone to both of these imperfections. The concept of measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses was introduced to remove the first problem. We analyze the ``detection loophole'' in the context of measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses, which deal with the second problem of imprecise measurements. We obtain an upper bound, a threshold value, on the entanglement witness function in the measurement-device-independent entanglement witness scenario, below which entanglement is guaranteed for given nonideal detector efficiencies, that can involve both lost events and dark counts. We also present a threshold value on the function in the ``worst-case scenario'' where the threshold of the witness operator for guaranteeing entanglement assumes its maximal negative value.

arXiv:2004.09101•Physical Review A•Mar 15, 2021•8 citations
Protocols have been previously proposed to certify the presence of an entangled measurement in a fully device-independent manner. Here, I provide models for these protocols in which the claimed measurement is not entangled, and demonstrate it is always possible to displace entanglement from measurements to measured states for a general class of device-independent scenarios. This indicates that no black-box measurement scenario requires entangled measurements to replicate its behavior, which is relevant to our fundamental understanding of this phenomenon and how to witness it.
We present a method to certify the entanglement of all entangled quantum states in a device-independent way. This is achieved by placing the state in a quantum network and constructing a correlation inequality based on an entanglement witness for the state. Our method is device independent, in the sense that entanglement can be certified from the observed statistics alone, under minimal assumptions on the underlying physics. Conceptually, our results borrow ideas from the field of self-testing to bring the recently introduced measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses into the fully device-independent regime.
Certifying the entanglement of quantum states with Bell inequalities allows one to guarantee the security of quantum information protocols independently of imperfections in the measuring devices. Here, we present a similar procedure for witnessing entangled measurements, which play a central role in many quantum information tasks. Our procedure is termed semi-device-independent, as it uses uncharacterized quantum preparations of fixed Hilbert space dimension. Using a photonic setup, we experimentally certify an entangled measurement using only measurement statistics. We also apply our techniques to certify unentangled but nevertheless inherently quantum measurements.
Witnessing entanglement is crucial in quantum information processing. With properly preparing ancillary states, it has been shown previously that genuine entanglement can be witnessed without trusting measurement devices. In this work we generalize the scenario and show that generic multipartite entanglement structures, including entanglement of subsystems and entanglement depth, can be witnessed via measurement-device-independent means. As the original measurement-device-independent entanglement witness scheme exploits only one out of four Bell measurement outcomes for each party, a direct generalization to multipartite quantum states will inevitably cause inefficiency in entanglement detection after taking account of statistical fluctuations. To resolve this problem, we also present a way to utilize all the measurement outcomes. The scheme is efficient for multipartite entanglement detection and can be realized with state-of-the-art technologies.
The robust estimation of entanglement is key to the validation of implementations of quantum systems. On the one hand, the evaluation of standard entanglement measures, either using quantum tomography or using quantitative entanglement witnesses, requires perfect implementation of measurements. On the other hand, measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses (MDIEWs) can certify entanglement of all entangled states using untrusted measurement devices. We show that MDIEWs can be used as well to quantify entanglement according to standard entanglement measures, and we present a practical method to derive such witnesses using experimental data only.
Detection of entanglement in quantum networks consisting of many parties is one of the important steps toward building quantum communication and computation networks. We consider a scenario where the measurement devices used for this certification are uncharacterized. In this case, it is well known that by using quantum states as inputs for the measurement devices it is possible to detect any entangled state (a situation known as measurement-device-independent entanglement witnessing). Here we go beyond entanglement detection and provide methods to estimate the amount of entanglement in a quantum network. We also consider the task of randomness certification and show that randomness can be certified in a variety of cases, including single-partite experiments or setups using only separable states.
There always exists an entanglement witness for every entangled quantum state. Negativity of the expectation value of an entanglement witness operator guarantees entanglement of the corresponding state, given that the measurement devices involved are perfect, i.e., the performed measurements actually constitute the witness operator for the state under consideration. In a realistic situation, there are two possible ways of measurements to drive the process away from the ideal one. First, wrong measurements may be performed, and, second, while the measurement operators are implemented correctly, the detection process may be noisy. Entanglement witnesses are prone to both of these imperfections. The concept of measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses was introduced to remove the first problem. We analyze the ``detection loophole'' in the context of measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses, which deal with the second problem of imprecise measurements. We obtain an upper bound, a threshold value, on the entanglement witness function in the measurement-device-independent entanglement witness scenario, below which entanglement is guaranteed for given nonideal detector efficiencies, that can involve both lost events and dark counts. We also present a threshold value on the function in the ``worst-case scenario'' where the threshold of the witness operator for guaranteeing entanglement assumes its maximal negative value.