Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2601.19820

Enhanced quantum state discrimination under general measurements with entanglement and nonorthogonality restrictions

Swati Choudhary, Aparajita Bhattacharyya, Ujjwal Sen

quant-phSubmitted Jan 27, 2026• Announced Jan 28, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The minimum error probability for distinguishing between two quantum states is bounded by the Helstrom limit, derived under the assumption that measurement strategies are restricted to positive operator-valued measurements. We explore scenarios in which the error probability for discriminating two quantum states can be reduced below the Helstrom bound under some constrained access of resources, indicating the use of measurement operations that go beyond the standard positive operator-valued measurements framework. We refer to such measurements as non-positive operator-valued measurements. While existing literature often associates these measurements with initial entanglement between the system and an auxiliary, followed by joint projective measurement and discarding the auxiliary, we demonstrate that initial entanglement between system and auxiliary is not necessary for the emergence of such measurements in the context of state discrimination. Interestingly, even initial product states can give rise to effective non-positive measurements on the subsystem, and achieve sub-Helstrom discrimination error when discriminating quantum states of the subsystem.

Comments
12 pages, 6 figures

Related papers

Strategies for discriminating between non-orthogonal quantum states

Anthony Chefles, Stephen Mark Barnett

Any measurement strategy designed to discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states will have a finite probability of yielding erroneous or inconclusive results. The lower bounds on these probabilities for conclusive and error-free strategies are given by the Helstrom and Ivanovic–Feres limits respectively. We consider intermediate measurements which interpolate between these extremes and derive a general lower bound on the combination of errors and inconclusive results. We also describe a family of measurement strategies which attains this limit.

Journal of Modern Optics•Jun 1, 1998•112 citations

Optimal Quantum State Discrimination with Fixed Measurements

Maison Clouâtré, Stefano Maranò, Andrea Conti +2 more

Given an unknown quantum state described by one of two possible density operators, the Helstrom bound provides the minimum discrimination error probability (DEP) by optimizing over all possible quantum measurements. However, it is unrealistic to implement arbitrary measurements in practice due to physical limitations of measurement apparatuses. This paper considers a quantum state discrimination scenario where a fixed measurement apparatus is available. In this setting, we advocate the use of quantum pre-processing (QPP) to realize effectively different measurements from that of the fixed apparatus. Applying optimal QPP prior to measurement with the fixed apparatus allows one to minimize the DEP. This paper derives the minimum DEP, determines the QPP required to achieve it, and provides necessary and sufficient conditions for this minimum DEP with optimal QPP to coincide with the Helstrom bound.

International Conference on Quantum Communications, Networking, and Computing (QCNC)•Mar 31, 2025•1 citation

Minimum-error discrimination between mixed quantum states

Daowen Qiu

We derive a general lower bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination between arbitrary $m$ mixed quantum states with given prior probabilities. When $m=2$, this bound is precisely the well-known Helstrom limit. Also, we give a general lower bound on the minimum-error probability for discriminating quantum operations. Then we further analyze how this lower bound is attainable for ambiguous discrimination of mixed quantum states by presenting necessary and sufficient conditions related to it. Furthermore, with a restricted condition, we work out an upper bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination of mixed quantum states. Therefore, some sufficient conditions are obtained for the minimum-error probability attaining this bound. Finally, under the condition of the minimum-error probability attaining this bound, we compare the minimum-error probability for ambiguously discriminating arbitrary $m$ mixed quantum states with the optimal failure probability for unambiguously discriminating the same states.

arXiv:0707.3970•Physical Review A•Jan 23, 2008•66 citations

Post-measurement states are (very) useful for measurement discrimination

Charbel Eid, Marco Túlio Quintino

The standard approach to quantum measurement discrimination is to perform the given unknown measurement on a probe state, possibly entangled with an auxiliary system, and make a decision based on the measurement outcome obtained. In this work, we go beyond the standard aforementioned scenarios by consider not only the classical measurement outcome of a measurement, but also its the post-measurement quantum state. More specifically, instead of considering only the positive-operator valued measure (POVM) operators, we consider their associated Lüders' instrument associated with them. We prove that, when the post-measurement quantum states are available, the task of discriminating two qubit projective measurements is equivalent to discriminating two copies of quantum states associated to each projector pair, extending previous results known for the case where probe states are separable. Then, we proceed by showing that the advantage of considering post-measurement states in measurement discrimination can be large. We formalise this claim by presenting a family of pairs of measurements where the ratio between the discrimination bias of the measurement discrimination task with and without post-measurement states can be arbitrarily large. This shows that, while the post-measurement state was neglected in most of the previous literature, its use can significantly improve the performance of quantum measurement discrimination.

quant-pharXiv:2602.12258•Feb 13, 2026•0 citations

Optimal bounded-error strategies for projective measurements in nonorthogonal-state discrimination

Maximilian Puelma Touzel, Robert B. A. Adamson, Aephraim M. Steinberg

Research in nonorthogonal-state discrimination has given rise to two conventional optimal strategies: unambiguous discrimination (UD) and minimum error discrimination. We explore the experimentally relevant range of measurement strategies between the two, where the rate of inconclusive results is minimized for a bounded-error rate. We first provide some constraints on the problem that apply to generalized measurements [positive-operator-valued measurements (POVMs)]. We then provide the theory for the optimal projective measurement in this range. Through analytical and numerical results we investigate this family of projective, bounded-error strategies and compare it to the POVM family as well as to experimental implementation of UD using POVMs. We also discuss a possible application of these bounded-error strategies to quantum key distribution.

arXiv:0708.1540•Physical Review A•Dec 19, 2007•39 citations

Optimal discrimination of quantum states

Graeme Weir

Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental task in the field of quantum communication and quantum information theory. Unless the states to be discriminated are mutually orthogonal, there will be some error in any attempt to determine which state was sent. Several strategies to optimally discriminate between quantum states exist, each maximising some figure of merit. In this thesis we mainly investigate the minimum-error strategy, in which the probability of correctly guessing the signal state is maximised. We introduce a method for constructing the optimal Positive-Operator Valued Measure (POVM) for this figure of merit, which is applicable for arbitrary states and arbitrary prior probabilities. We then use this method to solve minimum-error state discrimination for the so-called trine states with arbitrary prior probabilities - the first such general solution for a set of quantum states since the two-state case was solved when the problem of state discrimination was first introduced. We also investigate the difference between local and global measurements for a bipartite ensemble of states, and find that in certain circumstances the local measurement is superior. We conclude by finding a bipartite analogue to the Helstrom conditions, which indicate when a POVM satisfies the minimum-error criteria.

•Jan 1, 2018•4 citations
The minimum error probability for distinguishing between two quantum states is bounded by the Helstrom limit, derived under the assumption that measurement strategies are restricted to positive operator-valued measurements. We explore scenarios in which the error probability for discriminating two quantum states can be reduced below the Helstrom bound under some constrained access of resources, indicating the use of measurement operations that go beyond the standard positive operator-valued measurements framework. We refer to such measurements as non-positive operator-valued measurements. While existing literature often associates these measurements with initial entanglement between the system and an auxiliary, followed by joint projective measurement and discarding the auxiliary, we demonstrate that initial entanglement between system and auxiliary is not necessary for the emergence of such measurements in the context of state discrimination. Interestingly, even initial product states can give rise to effective non-positive measurements on the subsystem, and achieve sub-Helstrom discrimination error when discriminating quantum states of the subsystem.
Any measurement strategy designed to discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states will have a finite probability of yielding erroneous or inconclusive results. The lower bounds on these probabilities for conclusive and error-free strategies are given by the Helstrom and Ivanovic–Feres limits respectively. We consider intermediate measurements which interpolate between these extremes and derive a general lower bound on the combination of errors and inconclusive results. We also describe a family of measurement strategies which attains this limit.
Given an unknown quantum state described by one of two possible density operators, the Helstrom bound provides the minimum discrimination error probability (DEP) by optimizing over all possible quantum measurements. However, it is unrealistic to implement arbitrary measurements in practice due to physical limitations of measurement apparatuses. This paper considers a quantum state discrimination scenario where a fixed measurement apparatus is available. In this setting, we advocate the use of quantum pre-processing (QPP) to realize effectively different measurements from that of the fixed apparatus. Applying optimal QPP prior to measurement with the fixed apparatus allows one to minimize the DEP. This paper derives the minimum DEP, determines the QPP required to achieve it, and provides necessary and sufficient conditions for this minimum DEP with optimal QPP to coincide with the Helstrom bound.
We derive a general lower bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination between arbitrary mmm mixed quantum states with given prior probabilities. When m=2m=2m=2, this bound is precisely the well-known Helstrom limit. Also, we give a general lower bound on the minimum-error probability for discriminating quantum operations. Then we further analyze how this lower bound is attainable for ambiguous discrimination of mixed quantum states by presenting necessary and sufficient conditions related to it. Furthermore, with a restricted condition, we work out an upper bound on the minimum-error probability for ambiguous discrimination of mixed quantum states. Therefore, some sufficient conditions are obtained for the minimum-error probability attaining this bound. Finally, under the condition of the minimum-error probability attaining this bound, we compare the minimum-error probability for ambiguously discriminating arbitrary mmm mixed quantum states with the optimal failure probability for unambiguously discriminating the same states.
The standard approach to quantum measurement discrimination is to perform the given unknown measurement on a probe state, possibly entangled with an auxiliary system, and make a decision based on the measurement outcome obtained. In this work, we go beyond the standard aforementioned scenarios by consider not only the classical measurement outcome of a measurement, but also its the post-measurement quantum state. More specifically, instead of considering only the positive-operator valued measure (POVM) operators, we consider their associated Lüders' instrument associated with them. We prove that, when the post-measurement quantum states are available, the task of discriminating two qubit projective measurements is equivalent to discriminating two copies of quantum states associated to each projector pair, extending previous results known for the case where probe states are separable. Then, we proceed by showing that the advantage of considering post-measurement states in measurement discrimination can be large. We formalise this claim by presenting a family of pairs of measurements where the ratio between the discrimination bias of the measurement discrimination task with and without post-measurement states can be arbitrarily large. This shows that, while the post-measurement state was neglected in most of the previous literature, its use can significantly improve the performance of quantum measurement discrimination.
Research in nonorthogonal-state discrimination has given rise to two conventional optimal strategies: unambiguous discrimination (UD) and minimum error discrimination. We explore the experimentally relevant range of measurement strategies between the two, where the rate of inconclusive results is minimized for a bounded-error rate. We first provide some constraints on the problem that apply to generalized measurements [positive-operator-valued measurements (POVMs)]. We then provide the theory for the optimal projective measurement in this range. Through analytical and numerical results we investigate this family of projective, bounded-error strategies and compare it to the POVM family as well as to experimental implementation of UD using POVMs. We also discuss a possible application of these bounded-error strategies to quantum key distribution.
Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental task in the field of quantum communication and quantum information theory. Unless the states to be discriminated are mutually orthogonal, there will be some error in any attempt to determine which state was sent. Several strategies to optimally discriminate between quantum states exist, each maximising some figure of merit. In this thesis we mainly investigate the minimum-error strategy, in which the probability of correctly guessing the signal state is maximised. We introduce a method for constructing the optimal Positive-Operator Valued Measure (POVM) for this figure of merit, which is applicable for arbitrary states and arbitrary prior probabilities. We then use this method to solve minimum-error state discrimination for the so-called trine states with arbitrary prior probabilities - the first such general solution for a set of quantum states since the two-state case was solved when the problem of state discrimination was first introduced. We also investigate the difference between local and global measurements for a bipartite ensemble of states, and find that in certain circumstances the local measurement is superior. We conclude by finding a bipartite analogue to the Helstrom conditions, which indicate when a POVM satisfies the minimum-error criteria.