This paper investigates the performance of the emerging non-variational Quantum Walk-based Optimisation Algorithm (NV-QWOA) for solving small instances of the Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP). NV-QWOA is benchmarked against classical heuristics, the MaxMin Ant System (MMAS) and Greedy Local Search (GLS), as well as the Grover quantum search algorithm, which serves as a quantum baseline. Performance is evaluated using two metrics: the number of objective function evaluations and the number of algorithm iterations required to consistently reach optimal or near optimal solutions across QAP instances with 5 to 10 facilities. The motivation for this study stems from limitations of both classical exact methods and current quantum algorithms. Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs), such as QAOA and VQE, while widely studied, suffer from costly parameter tuning and barren plateaus that hinder convergence. By adopting a non-variational approach, this work explores a potentially more efficient and scalable quantum strategy for combinatorial optimisation. The results provide a direct comparative analysis between classical and quantum frameworks, characterising the average case performance of NV-QWOA. Our findings highlight the practical utility of quantum walks for complex combinatorial problems and establish a foundation for future quantum optimisation algorithms.
This paper investigates the performance of the emerging non-variational Quantum Walk-based Optimisation Algorithm (NV-QWOA) for solving small instances of the Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP). NV-QWOA is benchmarked against classical heuristics, the MaxMin Ant System (MMAS) and Greedy Local Search (GLS), as well as the Grover quantum search algorithm, which serves as a quantum baseline. Performance is evaluated using two metrics: the number of objective function evaluations and the number of algorithm iterations required to consistently reach optimal or near optimal solutions across QAP instances with 5 to 10 facilities. The motivation for this study stems from limitations of both classical exact methods and current quantum algorithms. Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs), such as QAOA and VQE, while widely studied, suffer from costly parameter tuning and barren plateaus that hinder convergence. By adopting a non-variational approach, this work explores a potentially more efficient and scalable quantum strategy for combinatorial optimisation. The results provide a direct comparative analysis between classical and quantum frameworks, characterising the average case performance of NV-QWOA. Our findings highlight the practical utility of quantum walks for complex combinatorial problems and establish a foundation for future quantum optimisation algorithms.
The performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) in solving the Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP) is evaluated, with the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) as a benchmark. The QAP is directly revelant to numerous industry scenarios. The QAP, a Combinatorial Optimisation Problem (COP), is classified asNP-Hard. This classification means CPU time increases exponentially as the problem size scales when solving the QAP using deterministic optimisation techniques. Therefore, this work investigates the QAOA in search of a non-deterministic optimisation technique to efficiently obtain solutions to the QAP. This research compares two warm start techniques to solve QAP instances of sizes 3 to 7. The metrics of comparison - that measure efficiency and solution quality - were introduced in previous work on this topic. For the QAOA, the impact of the p-value, a determination of circuit depth, is investigated. Of the two quantum hybrid heuristics, the VQE retrieves solutions in a shorter computational time with a smaller circuit size, which allows for solving instances with a larger problem size. Compared to the VQE, the QAOA performs better in terms of feasibility as the problem size scales. The quantum warm start method results implies that the QAOA may not maintain higher solution quality for instances larger than size 4. Still, further investigation should be conducted once quantum devices with more qubits and higher quantum volumes are available.
We present benchmarking results for the non-variational Quantum Walk Optimisation Algorithm (non-variational QWOA) applied to the weighted maxcut problem, using classical simulations for problem sizes up to n=31. The amplified quantum state, prepared using a quadratic number of alternating unitaries, achieves a constant average-case measurement probability for globally optimal solutions across these problem sizes. This behaviour contrasts with that of classical heuristics, which, for NP-hard optimisation problems, typically exhibit solve probabilities that decay as problem size increases. Performance comparisons with two local-search heuristics on the same benchmark instances suggest that the non-variational QWOA may offer a meaningful advantage by scaling more favourably with problem size. These results provide supporting evidence for the potential of this quantum heuristic to achieve quantum advantage, though further work is needed to assess whether the observed performance scaling persists at larger problem sizes, and to confirm whether similar performance trends are observed for the other problem classes to which the non-variational QWOA is designed to generalise.
This paper introduces in detail a non-variational quantum algorithm designed to solve a wide range of combinatorial optimisation problems, including constrained problems and problems with non-binary variables. The algorithm returns optimal and near-optimal solutions from repeated preparation and measurement of an amplified state. The amplified state is prepared via repeated application of two unitaries; one which phase-shifts solution states dependent on objective function values, and the other which mixes phase-shifted probability amplitudes via a continuous-time quantum walk (CTQW) on a problem-specific mixing graph. The general interference process responsible for amplifying optimal solutions is derived in part from statistical analysis of objective function values as distributed over the mixing graph. The algorithm's versatility is demonstrated through its application to various problems: weighted maxcut, k-means clustering, quadratic assignment, maximum independent set and capacitated facility location. In all cases, efficient circuit implementations of the CTQWs are discussed. A penalty function approach for constrained problems is also introduced, including a method for optimising the penalty function. For each of the considered problems, the algorithm's performance is simulated for a randomly generated problem instance, and in each case, the amplified state produces a globally optimal solution within a small number of iterations.
Quantum computing offers promising approaches to combinatorial optimization problems whose search spaces grow exponentially with problem size. The Closest String problem belongs to this category, which seeks a string that minimizes the maximum Hamming distance to any string in a given collection of reference strings. In this work, we present an end-to-end quantum implementation of the Closest String problem using the Non-Variational Quantum Walk Optimization Algorithm (NV-QWOA), evaluating its resource requirements and solution amplification capabilities. Our automated workflow converts arbitrary problem instances into quantum circuits expressed in one- or two-qubit gates that encode candidate solutions, evaluate the objective function, and apply NV-QWOA optimisation to increase the measurement probabilities of high-quality solutions. Analytical resource estimates yield a qubit complexity of O(nmlogk) and a circuit depth of O(pmlog2n+pnlogn), where n is the string length, m is the number of reference strings, k is the alphabet size, and p is the number of NV-QWOA iterations. We introduce a revised prescription for the phase-separation parameter, γ, that depends on problem size but requires no instance-specific optimization. This prescription mitigates excessive phase wrapping modulo 2π, which can weaken the relationship between objective values and the phases guiding the optimization dynamics. Across all simulated problem sizes, the algorithm consistently amplifies optimal and near-optimal candidates. This work provides an explicit gate-level implementation, an improved phase-scaling method, and a foundation for hardware experiments and benchmarking against classical algorithms.
This paper introduces a non-variational quantum algorithm designed to solve a wide range of combinatorial optimisation problems, including constrained and non-binary problems. The algorithm leverages an engineered interference process achieved through repeated application of two unitaries; one inducing phase-shifts dependent on objective function values, and the other mixing phase-shifted probability amplitudes via a continuous-time quantum walk (CTQW) on a problem-specific graph. The algorithm's versatility is demonstrated through its application to various problems, namely those for which solutions are characterised by either a vector of binary variables, a vector of non-binary integer variables, or permutations (a vector of integer variables without repetition). An efficient quantum circuit implementation of the CTQW for each of these problem types is also discussed. A penalty function approach for constrained problems is also introduced, including a method for optimising the penalty function. The algorithm's performance is demonstrated through numerical simulation for randomly generated instances of the following problems (and problem sizes): weighted maxcut (18 vertices), maximum independent set (18 vertices), k-means clustering (12 datapoints, 3 clusters), capacitated facility location (12 customers, 3 facility locations), and the quadratic assignment problem (9 locations). For each problem instance, the algorithm finds a globally optimal solution with a small number of iterations.
The prevalence of NP-Hard Combinatorial Optimisation Problems (COP) requires a continuous search for powerful heuristic techniques to efficiently solve problems of this nature, due to the exponentially growing CPU times faced by deterministic methods. This paper focuses on two COP, namely the Travelling Salesmen Problem (TSP) and the Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP). In particular, the computational performance of classical optimisation techniques, Branch and Bound (BNB) and Simulated Annealing (SA), are compared to the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) algorithm. These algorithms are executed respectively on classical and Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers, in this case, a host of IBM quantum devices. The experimental results resemble and extend on previously reported results found in the literature. Furthermore, this research critically analyses, compares and comments on the performance of quantum computing techniques to that of classical techniques. The results highlight the current shortcomings of NISQ devices, as classical optimisation techniques significantly outperform the VQE algorithm when run on state of the art IBM Quantum devices.