Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2512.21992

Measure of entanglement and the monogamy relation: a topical review

Yu Guo, Zhixiang Jin

quant-phSubmitted Dec 26, 2025• Announced Dec 29, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Characterizing entanglement, including quantifying and distribution of entanglement, which lies at heart of the quantum resource theory, have been investigated extensively ever since Bennett \etal proposed three seminal measures of entanglement in 1996. Up to now, there are numerous measures of entanglement that have been proposed from different point of view and plenty of monogamy relations have been explored which make the distribution of entanglement became more and more clear. While this is relatively easy in the case of pure states, it is much more intricate for the case of mixed quantum states especially with higher dimension and more particles in the system. We present here an overview of the theory along this line. We outline most of the results in this field historically and focus on the finite-dimensional systems. In particular we emphasize the point of view that (i) which yardsticks haven been applied in quantifying entanglement and its distribution, (ii) what are the substantive characteristics and interrelations of these measures and their monogamy relations mathematically by comparing, and (iii) which concepts should be improved or revised and how they were developed accordingly.

Comments
149 pages, 25 Tables, 15 figures. Comments are welcome

Related papers

Quantifying entanglement resources

Christopher Eltschka, Jens Siewert

We present an overview of the quantitative theory of single-copy entanglement in finite-dimensional quantum systems. In particular we emphasize the point of view that different entanglement measures quantify different types of resources which leads to a natural interdependence of entanglement classification and quantification. Apart from the theoretical basis, we outline various methods for obtaining quantitative results on arbitrary mixed states.

arXiv:1402.6710•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 9, 2014•201 citations

Quantifying entanglement resources

Christopher Eltschka, Jens Siewert

We present an overview of the quantitative theory of single-copy entanglement in finite-dimensional quantum systems. In particular we emphasize the point of view that different entanglement measures quantify different types of resources, which leads to a natural interdependence of entanglement classification and quantification. Apart from the theoretical basis, we outline various methods for obtaining quantitative results on arbitrary mixed states.

•Oct 24, 2014•111 citations

Unified view of monogamy relations for different entanglement measures

Yu Chen Guo

A particularly interesting feature of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is the monogamy laws of entanglement. Although the monogamy relation has been explored extensively in the last decade, it is still not clear to what extent a given entanglement measure is monogamous. We give here a conjecture on the amount of entanglement contained in the reduced states by observing all the known related results at first. Consequently, we propose the monogamy power of an entanglement measure and the polygamy power for its dual quantity, the assisted entanglement, and show that both the monogamy power and the polygamy power exist in any multipartite systems with any dimension, from which we formalize exactly for the first time when an entanglement measure and an assisted entanglement obey the monogamy relation and the polygamy relation respectively in a unified way. In addition, we show that any entanglement measure violates the polygamy relation, which is misstated in some recent papers. Only the existence of monogamy power is conditioned on the conjecture, all other results are strictly proved.

arXiv:1703.01935•Mar 6, 2017•1 citation

Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful?

Cécilia Lancien, Sara Di Martino, Marcus Huber +3 more

"Is entanglement monogamous?" asks the title of a popular article [B. Terhal, IBM J. Res. Dev. 48, 71 (2004)], celebrating C. H. Bennett's legacy on quantum information theory. While the answer is affirmative in the qualitative sense, the situation is less clear if monogamy is intended as a quantitative limitation on the distribution of bipartite entanglement in a multipartite system, given some particular measure of entanglement. Here, we formalize what it takes for a bipartite measure of entanglement to obey a general quantitative monogamy relation on all quantum states. We then prove that an important class of entanglement measures fail to be monogamous in this general sense of the term, with monogamy violations becoming generic with increasing dimension. In particular, we show that every additive and suitably normalized entanglement measure cannot satisfy any nontrivial general monogamy relation while at the same time faithfully capturing the geometric entanglement structure of the fully antisymmetric state in arbitrary dimension. Nevertheless, monogamy of such entanglement measures can be recovered if one allows for dimension-dependent relations, as we show explicitly with relevant examples.

arXiv:1604.02189•Physical Review Letters•Aug 1, 2016•88 citations

Qudit Concurrence and Monogamy

Edyharto Yanuwar, Jusak Sali Kosasih

Abstract It is well known that entanglement is one of the distinctive aspects of the quantum world. The measurement and quantification of entanglement is one of the major problems in understanding and applying this resource. This research aims to investigate entanglement measures and their properties in high-dimensional systems. One such property is entanglement monogamy, viz. quantum correlations are not shareable, different from the classical ones. On the other hand, the study of entanglement depends on the definitions of its measures. Here we examine the applicability of concurrence, an entanglement measure known for its effectiveness in the analysis of qubit entanglement. While the entanglement of two-level systems or qubits is widely understood, its extension to higher dimensions remains challenging. Our research establishes equivalence between different concurrence definitions for bipartite qubit pure states and extends them to qudits. Subsequently, we investigate the monogamous relations of these measurements to explore their characteristics. This approach might enhance our comprehension of quantum traits in qudit systems and advance our understanding of entanglement in broader quantum contexts.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Mar 1, 2024•0 citations

Multipartite monogamy of entanglement for three qubit states

Priyabrata Char, Dipayan Chakraborty, Prabir Kumar Dey +4 more

Abstract The distribution of entanglement in a multiparty system can be described by the principle of monogamy. Monogamy is a fundamental characteristic of entanglement that restricts its distribution among more than two parties. In this work, our aim is to explore how quantum entanglement is distributed in accordance with monogamy relations, which utilize both genuine multipartite entanglement measures and bipartite entanglement measures. Specifically, we treat the source entanglement or the accessible entanglement as genuine multipartite entanglement measures and use the entanglement of formation for bipartite cases. For GHZ class states, we analytically demonstrate that the square of the source entanglement serves as an upper bound for the sum of the squares of the entanglement of formation of the reduced subsystems, with some exceptions in specific non-generic GHZ states. We will also present numerical evidence supporting this result for W-class states. In addition, we also explore the monogamy relationship by using accessible entanglement as an upper bound. Our analysis reveals an opposite but consistent pattern in the behavior of monogamy depending on whether source entanglement or accessible entanglement is used as the upper bound. This pattern emphasizes the dual nature of these two measures.

arXiv:2409.00865•Physica Scripta•Sep 2, 2025•2 citations
Characterizing entanglement, including quantifying and distribution of entanglement, which lies at heart of the quantum resource theory, have been investigated extensively ever since Bennett \etal proposed three seminal measures of entanglement in 1996. Up to now, there are numerous measures of entanglement that have been proposed from different point of view and plenty of monogamy relations have been explored which make the distribution of entanglement became more and more clear. While this is relatively easy in the case of pure states, it is much more intricate for the case of mixed quantum states especially with higher dimension and more particles in the system. We present here an overview of the theory along this line. We outline most of the results in this field historically and focus on the finite-dimensional systems. In particular we emphasize the point of view that (i) which yardsticks haven been applied in quantifying entanglement and its distribution, (ii) what are the substantive characteristics and interrelations of these measures and their monogamy relations mathematically by comparing, and (iii) which concepts should be improved or revised and how they were developed accordingly.
A particularly interesting feature of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is the monogamy laws of entanglement. Although the monogamy relation has been explored extensively in the last decade, it is still not clear to what extent a given entanglement measure is monogamous. We give here a conjecture on the amount of entanglement contained in the reduced states by observing all the known related results at first. Consequently, we propose the monogamy power of an entanglement measure and the polygamy power for its dual quantity, the assisted entanglement, and show that both the monogamy power and the polygamy power exist in any multipartite systems with any dimension, from which we formalize exactly for the first time when an entanglement measure and an assisted entanglement obey the monogamy relation and the polygamy relation respectively in a unified way. In addition, we show that any entanglement measure violates the polygamy relation, which is misstated in some recent papers. Only the existence of monogamy power is conditioned on the conjecture, all other results are strictly proved.
"Is entanglement monogamous?" asks the title of a popular article [B. Terhal, IBM J. Res. Dev. 48, 71 (2004)], celebrating C. H. Bennett's legacy on quantum information theory. While the answer is affirmative in the qualitative sense, the situation is less clear if monogamy is intended as a quantitative limitation on the distribution of bipartite entanglement in a multipartite system, given some particular measure of entanglement. Here, we formalize what it takes for a bipartite measure of entanglement to obey a general quantitative monogamy relation on all quantum states. We then prove that an important class of entanglement measures fail to be monogamous in this general sense of the term, with monogamy violations becoming generic with increasing dimension. In particular, we show that every additive and suitably normalized entanglement measure cannot satisfy any nontrivial general monogamy relation while at the same time faithfully capturing the geometric entanglement structure of the fully antisymmetric state in arbitrary dimension. Nevertheless, monogamy of such entanglement measures can be recovered if one allows for dimension-dependent relations, as we show explicitly with relevant examples.
Abstract It is well known that entanglement is one of the distinctive aspects of the quantum world. The measurement and quantification of entanglement is one of the major problems in understanding and applying this resource. This research aims to investigate entanglement measures and their properties in high-dimensional systems. One such property is entanglement monogamy, viz. quantum correlations are not shareable, different from the classical ones. On the other hand, the study of entanglement depends on the definitions of its measures. Here we examine the applicability of concurrence, an entanglement measure known for its effectiveness in the analysis of qubit entanglement. While the entanglement of two-level systems or qubits is widely understood, its extension to higher dimensions remains challenging. Our research establishes equivalence between different concurrence definitions for bipartite qubit pure states and extends them to qudits. Subsequently, we investigate the monogamous relations of these measurements to explore their characteristics. This approach might enhance our comprehension of quantum traits in qudit systems and advance our understanding of entanglement in broader quantum contexts.
Abstract The distribution of entanglement in a multiparty system can be described by the principle of monogamy. Monogamy is a fundamental characteristic of entanglement that restricts its distribution among more than two parties. In this work, our aim is to explore how quantum entanglement is distributed in accordance with monogamy relations, which utilize both genuine multipartite entanglement measures and bipartite entanglement measures. Specifically, we treat the source entanglement or the accessible entanglement as genuine multipartite entanglement measures and use the entanglement of formation for bipartite cases. For GHZ class states, we analytically demonstrate that the square of the source entanglement serves as an upper bound for the sum of the squares of the entanglement of formation of the reduced subsystems, with some exceptions in specific non-generic GHZ states. We will also present numerical evidence supporting this result for W-class states. In addition, we also explore the monogamy relationship by using accessible entanglement as an upper bound. Our analysis reveals an opposite but consistent pattern in the behavior of monogamy depending on whether source entanglement or accessible entanglement is used as the upper bound. This pattern emphasizes the dual nature of these two measures.