Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2512.21844

A Cohomological Framework for Topological Phases from Momentum-Space Crystallographic Groups

T. R. Liu, Zheng Zhang, Y. X. Zhao

cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elmath-phquant-phSubmitted Dec 26, 2025• Announced Dec 29, 2025
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Crystallographic groups are conventionally studied in real space to characterize crystal symmetries. Recent work has recognized that when these symmetries are realized projectively, momentum space inherently accommodates nonsymmorphic symmetries, thereby evoking the concept of \textit{momentum-space crystallographic groups} (MCGs). Here, we reveal that the cohomology of MCGs encodes fundamental data of crystalline topological band structures. Specifically, the collection of second cohomology groups, $H^2(Γ_F,\mathbb{Z})$, for all MCGs $Γ_F$, provides an exhaustive classification of Abelian crystalline topological insulators, serving as an effective approximation to the full crystalline topological classification. Meanwhile, the third cohomology groups $H^3(Γ_F,\mathbb{Z})$ across all MCGs exhaustively classify all possible twistings of point-group actions on the Brillouin torus, essential data for twisted equivariant K-theory. Furthermore, we establish the isomorphism $H^{n+1}(Γ_F,\mathbb{Z})\cong H^n\big(Γ_F,\operatorname{\mathcal{F}}(\mathbb{R}^d_F,U(1))\big)$ for $ n\ge 1$, where $\operatorname{\mathcal{F}}(\mathbb{R}^d_F,U(1))$ denotes the space of continuous $U(1)$-valued functions on the $d$D momentum space $\mathbb{R}^d_F$. The case $n=1$ yields a complete set of topological invariants formulated in purely algebraic terms, which differs fundamentally from the conventional formulation in terms of differential forms. The case $n=2$, analogously, provides a fully algebraic description for all such twistings. Thus, the cohomological theory of MCGs serves as a key technical framework for analyzing crystalline topological phases within the general setting of projective symmetry.

Comments
16 pages, 2 figures and supplementary materials

Related papers

Bosonic crystalline symmetry protected topological phases beyond the group cohomology proposal

Hao Song, Charles Zhaoxi Xiong, Sheng-Jie Huang

It is demonstrated by explicit construction that three-dimensional bosonic crystalline symmetry protected topological (cSPT) phases are classified by ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{5}(G;\mathbb{Z})\ensuremath{\bigoplus}{H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ for all 230 space groups $G$, where ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{n}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ denotes the $n\mathrm{th}$ twisted group cohomology of $G$ with $\mathbb{Z}$ coefficients, and $\ensuremath{\phi}$ indicates that $g\ensuremath{\in}G$ acts nontrivially on coefficients by sending them to their inverses if $g$ reverses space-time orientation and acts trivially otherwise. The previously known summand ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{5}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ corresponds only to crystalline phases built without the ${E}_{8}$ state or its multiples on 2-cells of space. It is the crystalline analog of the ``group cohomology proposal'' for classifying bosonic symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases, which takes the form ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{d+2}(G;\mathbb{Z})\ensuremath{\cong}{H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{d+1}(G;\text{U}(1))$ for finite internal symmetry groups in $d$ spatial dimensions. The new summand ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ classifies possible configurations of ${E}_{8}$ states on 2-cells that can be used to build crystalline phases beyond the group cohomology proposal. The completeness of our classification and the physical meaning of ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ are established through a combination of dimensional reduction, surface topological order, and explicit cellular construction. The value of ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ can be easily read off from the international symbol for $G$. Our classification agrees with the prediction of the ``generalized cohomology hypothesis,'' which concerns the general structure of the classification of SPT phases, and therefore provides strong evidence for the validity of the said hypothesis in the realm of crystalline symmetries.

arXiv:1811.06558•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Apr 22, 2020•19 citations

Unified Theory of Quantum Crystalline Symmetries

Y. X. Zhao, Shao, L. B.

Symmetry groups are projectively represented in quantum mechanics, and crystalline symmetries are fundamental in condensed matter physics. Here, we systematically present a unified theory of quantum mechanical space groups from two complementary aspects. First, we provide a decomposition form for the space-group factor systems to characterize all quantum space groups. It consists of three factors, the factor system for the translation subgroup $L$, an in-homogeneous factor system for the point group $P$, and a factor connecting $L$ and $P$. The three factors satisfy three consistency equations, which are exactly solvable and can completely exhaust all factor systems for space groups. Second, since factors systems are classified by the second cohomology group, we show the (co)homology groups for space groups can be derived from Borel's equivariant (co)homology theory, which leads to an algorithm that can compute all (co)homology groups for space groups. To demonstrate the general theory, we explicitly present quantum wallpaper groups with the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge group. Furthermore, as a primitive application, we find the time-reversal invariant quantum space groups with inversion symmetry can lead to a novel clifford band theory, where each band is fourfold degenerate to represent certain real Clifford algebras with topologically nontrivial pinor structures over the Brillouin zone. Our work serves as a foundation for exploring quantum mechanical space groups, and can find applications in spin liquids, unconventional superconductors, and artificial lattice systems, including cold atoms, photonic and phononic crystals, and even LC electric circuit networks.

arXiv:2009.07483•Sep 16, 2020•0 citations

Fragile Topological Phases and Topological Order of 2D Crystalline Chern Insulators

Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber

We apply methods of equivariant homotopy theory, which may not previously have found due attention in condensed matter physics, to classify first the fragile/unstable topological phases of 2D crystalline Chern insulator materials, and second the possible topological order of their fractional cousins. We highlight that the phases are given by the equivariant 2-Cohomotopy of the Brillouin torus of crystal momenta (with respect to wallpaper point group actions) -- which, despite the attention devoted to crystalline Chern insulators, seems not to have been considered before. Arguing then that any topological order must be reflected in the adiabatic monodromy of gapped quantum ground states over the covariantized space of these band topologies, we compute the latter in examples where this group is non-abelian, showing that any potential FQAH anyons must be localized in momentum space. We close with an outlook on the relevance for the search for topological quantum computing hardware. Mathematical details are spelled out in a supplement.

cond-mat.str-elCross-listedarXiv:2512.24709•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Crystallographic interacting topological phases and equivariant cohomology: to assume or not to assume

Daniel Sheinbaum, Omar Antolín Camarena

Abstract For symmorphic crystalline interacting gapped systems we derive a classification under adiabatic evolution. This classification is complete for non-degenerate ground states. For the degenerate case we discuss some invariants given by equivariant characteristic classes. We do not assume an emergent relativistic field theory nor that phases form a topological spectrum. We also do not restrict to systems with short-range entanglement, stability against stacking with trivial systems nor assume the existence of quasi-particles as is done in SPT and SET classifications respectively. Using a slightly generalized Bloch decomposition and Grassmanians made out of ground state spaces, we show that the P-equivariant cohomology of a d-dimensional torus gives rise to different interacting phases, where P denotes the point group of the crystalline structure. We compare our results to bosonic symmorphic crystallographic SPT phases and to non-interacting fermionic crystallographic phases in class A. Finally we discuss the relation of our assumptions to those made for crystallographic SPT and SET phases.

arXiv:2007.06595•Journal of High Energy Physics•Jul 1, 2021•1 citation

Tenfold topology of crystals: Unified classification of crystalline topological insulators and superconductors

Eyal Cornfeld, Shachar Carmeli

The celebrated tenfold way of Altland-Zirnbauer symmetry classes discern any quantum system by its pattern of nonspatial symmetries.It lays at the core of the periodic table of topological insulators and superconductors which provided a complete classification of weakly interacting electrons' noncrystalline topological phases for all symmetry classes.Over recent years, a plethora of topological phenomena with diverse surface states has been discovered in crystalline materials.In this paper, we obtain an exhaustive classification of topologically distinct ground states as well as topological phases with anomalous surface states of crystalline topological insulators and superconductors for key space-groups, layer-groups, and rod-groups.This is done in a unified manner for the full tenfold way of Altland-Zirnbauer nonspatial symmetry classes.We establish a comprehensive paradigm that harnesses the modern mathematical framework of equivariant spectra; it allows us to obtain results applicable to generic topological classification problems.In particular, this paradigm provides efficient computational tools that enable an inherently unified treatment of the full tenfold way.

arXiv:2009.04486•Physical Review Research•Jan 15, 2021•36 citations

Topological invariants for gauge theories and symmetry-protected topological phases

Chenjie Wang, Michael Levin

According to a recent theoretical conjecture for a classification of symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases which can arise in a collection of lattice boson models called group cohomology models, each model belongs to a distinct SPT phase, and each SPT phase can be realized by a model. Here the authors show that for SPT phases with symmetry groups that are finite, Abelian, and unitary, each group cohomology model can be characterized by a unique set of topological invariants and therefore belongs to a distinct SPT phase. In two dimensions it is further shown that the complete set of group cohomology models accounts for all SPT phases, while in three dimensions evidence pointing toward such a proof is found.

arXiv:1412.1781•Physical Review B•Apr 15, 2015•94 citations
Crystallographic groups are conventionally studied in real space to characterize crystal symmetries. Recent work has recognized that when these symmetries are realized projectively, momentum space inherently accommodates nonsymmorphic symmetries, thereby evoking the concept of \textit{momentum-space crystallographic groups} (MCGs). Here, we reveal that the cohomology of MCGs encodes fundamental data of crystalline topological band structures. Specifically, the collection of second cohomology groups, H2(ΓF,Z)H^2(Γ_F,\mathbb{Z})H2(ΓF​,Z), for all MCGs ΓFΓ_FΓF​, provides an exhaustive classification of Abelian crystalline topological insulators, serving as an effective approximation to the full crystalline topological classification. Meanwhile, the third cohomology groups H3(ΓF,Z)H^3(Γ_F,\mathbb{Z})H3(ΓF​,Z) across all MCGs exhaustively classify all possible twistings of point-group actions on the Brillouin torus, essential data for twisted equivariant K-theory. Furthermore, we establish the isomorphism Hn+1(ΓF,Z)≅Hn(ΓF,F⁡(RFd,U(1)))H^{n+1}(Γ_F,\mathbb{Z})\cong H^n\big(Γ_F,\operatorname{\mathcal{F}}(\mathbb{R}^d_F,U(1))\big)Hn+1(ΓF​,Z)≅Hn(ΓF​,F(RFd​,U(1))) for n≥1 n\ge 1n≥1, where F⁡(RFd,U(1))\operatorname{\mathcal{F}}(\mathbb{R}^d_F,U(1))F(RFd​,U(1)) denotes the space of continuous U(1)U(1)U(1)-valued functions on the dddD momentum space RFd\mathbb{R}^d_FRFd​. The case n=1n=1n=1 yields a complete set of topological invariants formulated in purely algebraic terms, which differs fundamentally from the conventional formulation in terms of differential forms. The case n=2n=2n=2, analogously, provides a fully algebraic description for all such twistings. Thus, the cohomological theory of MCGs serves as a key technical framework for analyzing crystalline topological phases within the general setting of projective symmetry.
It is demonstrated by explicit construction that three-dimensional bosonic crystalline symmetry protected topological (cSPT) phases are classified by ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{5}(G;\mathbb{Z})\ensuremath{\bigoplus}{H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ for all 230 space groups GGG, where ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{n}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ denotes the nthn\mathrm{th}nth twisted group cohomology of GGG with Z\mathbb{Z}Z coefficients, and $\ensuremath{\phi}$ indicates that $g\ensuremath{\in}G$ acts nontrivially on coefficients by sending them to their inverses if ggg reverses space-time orientation and acts trivially otherwise. The previously known summand ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{5}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ corresponds only to crystalline phases built without the E8{E}_{8}E8​ state or its multiples on 2-cells of space. It is the crystalline analog of the ``group cohomology proposal'' for classifying bosonic symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases, which takes the form ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{d+2}(G;\mathbb{Z})\ensuremath{\cong}{H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{d+1}(G;\text{U}(1))$ for finite internal symmetry groups in ddd spatial dimensions. The new summand ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ classifies possible configurations of E8{E}_{8}E8​ states on 2-cells that can be used to build crystalline phases beyond the group cohomology proposal. The completeness of our classification and the physical meaning of ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ are established through a combination of dimensional reduction, surface topological order, and explicit cellular construction. The value of ${H}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{1}(G;\mathbb{Z})$ can be easily read off from the international symbol for GGG. Our classification agrees with the prediction of the ``generalized cohomology hypothesis,'' which concerns the general structure of the classification of SPT phases, and therefore provides strong evidence for the validity of the said hypothesis in the realm of crystalline symmetries.
Symmetry groups are projectively represented in quantum mechanics, and crystalline symmetries are fundamental in condensed matter physics. Here, we systematically present a unified theory of quantum mechanical space groups from two complementary aspects. First, we provide a decomposition form for the space-group factor systems to characterize all quantum space groups. It consists of three factors, the factor system for the translation subgroup LLL, an in-homogeneous factor system for the point group PPP, and a factor connecting LLL and PPP. The three factors satisfy three consistency equations, which are exactly solvable and can completely exhaust all factor systems for space groups. Second, since factors systems are classified by the second cohomology group, we show the (co)homology groups for space groups can be derived from Borel's equivariant (co)homology theory, which leads to an algorithm that can compute all (co)homology groups for space groups. To demonstrate the general theory, we explicitly present quantum wallpaper groups with the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2Z2​ gauge group. Furthermore, as a primitive application, we find the time-reversal invariant quantum space groups with inversion symmetry can lead to a novel clifford band theory, where each band is fourfold degenerate to represent certain real Clifford algebras with topologically nontrivial pinor structures over the Brillouin zone. Our work serves as a foundation for exploring quantum mechanical space groups, and can find applications in spin liquids, unconventional superconductors, and artificial lattice systems, including cold atoms, photonic and phononic crystals, and even LC electric circuit networks.
We apply methods of equivariant homotopy theory, which may not previously have found due attention in condensed matter physics, to classify first the fragile/unstable topological phases of 2D crystalline Chern insulator materials, and second the possible topological order of their fractional cousins. We highlight that the phases are given by the equivariant 2-Cohomotopy of the Brillouin torus of crystal momenta (with respect to wallpaper point group actions) -- which, despite the attention devoted to crystalline Chern insulators, seems not to have been considered before. Arguing then that any topological order must be reflected in the adiabatic monodromy of gapped quantum ground states over the covariantized space of these band topologies, we compute the latter in examples where this group is non-abelian, showing that any potential FQAH anyons must be localized in momentum space. We close with an outlook on the relevance for the search for topological quantum computing hardware. Mathematical details are spelled out in a supplement.
Abstract For symmorphic crystalline interacting gapped systems we derive a classification under adiabatic evolution. This classification is complete for non-degenerate ground states. For the degenerate case we discuss some invariants given by equivariant characteristic classes. We do not assume an emergent relativistic field theory nor that phases form a topological spectrum. We also do not restrict to systems with short-range entanglement, stability against stacking with trivial systems nor assume the existence of quasi-particles as is done in SPT and SET classifications respectively. Using a slightly generalized Bloch decomposition and Grassmanians made out of ground state spaces, we show that the P-equivariant cohomology of a d-dimensional torus gives rise to different interacting phases, where P denotes the point group of the crystalline structure. We compare our results to bosonic symmorphic crystallographic SPT phases and to non-interacting fermionic crystallographic phases in class A. Finally we discuss the relation of our assumptions to those made for crystallographic SPT and SET phases.
The celebrated tenfold way of Altland-Zirnbauer symmetry classes discern any quantum system by its pattern of nonspatial symmetries.It lays at the core of the periodic table of topological insulators and superconductors which provided a complete classification of weakly interacting electrons' noncrystalline topological phases for all symmetry classes.Over recent years, a plethora of topological phenomena with diverse surface states has been discovered in crystalline materials.In this paper, we obtain an exhaustive classification of topologically distinct ground states as well as topological phases with anomalous surface states of crystalline topological insulators and superconductors for key space-groups, layer-groups, and rod-groups.This is done in a unified manner for the full tenfold way of Altland-Zirnbauer nonspatial symmetry classes.We establish a comprehensive paradigm that harnesses the modern mathematical framework of equivariant spectra; it allows us to obtain results applicable to generic topological classification problems.In particular, this paradigm provides efficient computational tools that enable an inherently unified treatment of the full tenfold way.
According to a recent theoretical conjecture for a classification of symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases which can arise in a collection of lattice boson models called group cohomology models, each model belongs to a distinct SPT phase, and each SPT phase can be realized by a model. Here the authors show that for SPT phases with symmetry groups that are finite, Abelian, and unitary, each group cohomology model can be characterized by a unique set of topological invariants and therefore belongs to a distinct SPT phase. In two dimensions it is further shown that the complete set of group cohomology models accounts for all SPT phases, while in three dimensions evidence pointing toward such a proof is found.