Major technological advances of the past century are rooted in our understanding of quantum physics in the non-interacting limit. A central challenge today is to understand the behavior of complex quantum many-body systems, where interactions play an essential role. About four decades ago, Richard Feynman proposed using controllable quantum systems to efficiently simulate complex physics and chemistry problems, envisioning quantum orreries, highly tunable quantum devices built to emulate less understood quantum systems. Here we ask whether quantum simulators have already uncovered new physical phenomena-and, if so, in which areas and with what impact. We find that, in several notable instances, they have advanced our understanding of many-body quantum dynamics. Although many of these insights could in principle have been obtained theoretically or numerically, they were nevertheless first achieved using quantum processors. While a broad landscape of problems beyond non-equilibrium dynamics still awaits exploration, it is encouraging that quantum simulators are already beginning to challenge and refine our conventional wisdom.
Comments
This commentary is an expanded version of a perspective originally published in Science as part of the December 2025 special issue celebrating 100 years of quantum mechanics
Major technological advances of the past century are rooted in our understanding of quantum physics in the non-interacting limit. A central challenge today is to understand the behavior of complex quantum many-body systems, where interactions play an essential role. About four decades ago, Richard Feynman proposed using controllable quantum systems to efficiently simulate complex physics and chemistry problems, envisioning quantum orreries, highly tunable quantum devices built to emulate less understood quantum systems. Here we ask whether quantum simulators have already uncovered new physical phenomena-and, if so, in which areas and with what impact. We find that, in several notable instances, they have advanced our understanding of many-body quantum dynamics. Although many of these insights could in principle have been obtained theoretically or numerically, they were nevertheless first achieved using quantum processors. While a broad landscape of problems beyond non-equilibrium dynamics still awaits exploration, it is encouraging that quantum simulators are already beginning to challenge and refine our conventional wisdom.
Envisioned by Richard Feynman in the early 1980s, quantum simulation has received dramatic impetus thanks to the development of a variety of plateforms able to emulate a wide class of quantum Hamiltonians.During the past decade, most of the quantum simulators have implemented rather well-known models, hence permitting a direct comparison with theoretical calculations and a precise benchmarking of their reliability.The field has now reached a maturity such that one can address difficult problems, which cannot be solved efficiently using classical algorithms.These advances provide unprecedented opportunities to explore previously unreachable fields, test theoretical predictions, and inspire novel approaches.This contribution is an elementary introduction to quantum simulation.We discuss the challenges, define both digital and analog quantum simulators, and list the demanding conditions they require.We also provide a brief account of the contributions gathered in the dossier on Quantum simulation in the Compte rendus Physique of the French Academy of Sciences [1][2][3][4][5][6].The latter completes excellent reviews that appeared previously, see for instance . Universal models and the role of simulations in many-body physicsUnderstanding the behavior of macroscopic quantum systems is a major challenge of modern physics.The basic laws of low-energy physics are by now quite well known at the microscopic, say atomic, scale.Conversely, many fundamental questions remain open, and even debated, about the collective dynamics at the macroscopic scale.By "macroscopic scale", here we mean systems made up of a huge number of constituents, or degrees of freedom, say 10 6 , 10 23 , or even more, as relevant in condensed matter physics or in astrophysics, for instance.Such huge systems cannot be treated exactly, be it a the classical level and, even worse, at the quantum level.Yet, it is the main outcome of the thermodynamic approach that the collective behavior of a macroscopic system can drastically differ from that of its elementary constituents.For instance, the elementary interactions between the H 2 O molecules are fundamentally unchanged when a water bucket turns from the liquid phase to the solid phase at zero degree Celsius.Similarly, the interactions between the microscopic magnetic moments do not show any brutal change when a magnetic material gets magnetized underneath the Curie temperature.Hence, the dramatic effects observed in macroscopic systems are governed by large-scale instabilities, without obvious counterparts at the microscopic level.This observation takes a universal character, summarized in the celebrated motto "More is Different" [15].Such so-called emerging phenomena also appear in quantum systems, where new effects that are impossible in the classical world show up below some critical temperature or at zero temperature when some interaction parameter passes through a critical value.Celebrated examples include the superfluid transition in helium or super-conducting transitions and other metal-insulator transitions in electronic systems.Strikingly enough at first sight, while emerging phenomena only appear in very large scale macroscopic systems, their germs are contained in the mutual interactions of their elementary constituents.Hence, local two-body interactions are sufficient to explain a huge class of phase transitions, such as the liquid-solid and magnetic transitions mentioned above.The Boltzmann statistical approach proved particularly successful in describing this connection between the microscopic and macroscopic scales.To understand emerging phenomena on grounds as fundamental as possible, the programme is now well established: One tries to identify the basic microscopic terms that seem to be relevant and disregards all the other microscopic details.One then elaborates a model, as generic as possible, likely to reproduce the main experimental observations.The most usual examples are the Ising and Heisenberg models for magnetic transitions, or the Hubbard model for metal-insulator transitions [16][17][18].Then all is left to do is to check that the phenomenon of interest indeed emerges from the dynamics of the simplified model.The realization of this programme is nothing but a simulation.It consists in building up a simplified system that mimics the main properties of a real system.
Quantum computing introduces a revolutionary approach to solving problems that are computationally beyond the reach of classical systems. Among its most promising applications is the simulation of many-body systems, where strong particle interactions lead to complex quantum behaviors. Traditional computational techniques often fail due to exponential resource requirements, but quantum simulators can efficiently model these interactions through entanglement and superposition. Recent advances in superconducting qubits, trapped ions, and photonic quantum devices have enabled small- scale experimental demonstrations of spin models, Hubbard systems, and correlated electron dynamics. These developments offer new insights into condensed matter physics and quantum phase transitions. As quantum technologies continue to evolve, they hold the potential to transform the study of materials, superconductivity, and other many-body phenomena with remarkable precision and scalability.
Various fundamental phenomena of strongly correlated quantum systems such as high-T(c) superconductivity, the fractional quantum-Hall effect and quark confinement are still awaiting a universally accepted explanation. The main obstacle is the computational complexity of solving even the most simplified theoretical models which are designed to capture the relevant quantum correlations of the many-body system of interest. In his seminal 1982 paper (Feynman 1982 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467), Richard Feynman suggested that such models might be solved by 'simulation' with a new type of computer whose constituent parts are effectively governed by a desired quantum many-body dynamics. Measurements on this engineered machine, now known as a 'quantum simulator,' would reveal some unknown or difficult to compute properties of a model of interest. We argue that a useful quantum simulator must satisfy four conditions: relevance, controllability, reliability and efficiency. We review the current state of the art of digital and analog quantum simulators. Whereas so far the majority of the focus, both theoretically and experimentally, has been on controllability of relevant models, we emphasize here the need for a careful analysis of reliability and efficiency in the presence of imperfections. We discuss how disorder and noise can impact these conditions, and illustrate our concerns with novel numerical simulations of a paradigmatic example: a disordered quantum spin chain governed by the Ising model in a transverse magnetic field. We find that disorder can decrease the reliability of an analog quantum simulator of this model, although large errors in local observables are introduced only for strong levels of disorder. We conclude that the answer to the question 'Can we trust quantum simulators?' is … to some extent.
Simulating quantum many-body systems is essential for understanding complex phenomena in condensed matter, chemistry, and materials science. Quantum computing offers a way to overcome the limitations of classical methods by operating directly in exponentially large Hilbert spaces. In particular, classical methods often fail to capture the dynamics of strongly correlated systems, which makes quantum algorithms a promising alternative for exploring these challenging regimes. This thesis uses quantum dynamics simulations to probe the behaviour of many-body systems. We first introduce a spectroscopy-based protocol to extract excitation spectra from the time evolution of observables and analyse its performance on near-term quantum devices. We show that the protocol requires only short evolution times and is resilient to errors, facilitating its implementation on real hardware. Building on this, we simulate fermionic excitation spectra using current quantum devices, introducing resource optimisations - including an approximate free-fermion initial state, a unitary quench without ancillae, and reduced Trotter steps - that significantly lower circuit depth. These improvements enable simulations at system sizes competitive with the state of the art, yielding results that match classical benchmarks. While most studies focus on unitary dynamics of isolated systems, open quantum dynamics is increasingly relevant for describing non-equilibrium processes across biology, materials science, and quantum control. We extend our scope to systems coupled to an environment and governed by Lindbladian evolution. By studying simulation complexity through physically meaningful quantities - such as correlation length and mixing time - we explore whether open-system dynamics can be as tractable as their unitary counterparts. These findings provide insights into the computational complexity landscape of open-system simulation and highlight regimes where quantum methods offer a clear advantage.
Recent advances in coherent manipulation and control have led to new opportunities to study non-equilibrium dynamics in quantum many-body systems. Using a variety of experimental platforms ranging from cold atoms and ions to solid-state spin defects, small building blocks of fully controllable quantum systems can be assembled into a strongly interacting many-body system. With this approach, one can gain new insights into fundamental questions in basic science such as the mechanism of quantum thermalization or the existence of exotic phases of matter out of equilibrium. At the same time, a fully controllable large-scale quantum device has promising applications for high precision sensing, secure communication, and quantum information processing.\nThis thesis describes recent progress in engineering quantum dynamics that is robust against various imperfections such as environmental noise, disorder, or imprecise controls. We find that non-equilibrium quantum states of strongly interacting systems can be protected from imperfections upon appropriate external manipulations such as time-dependent periodic controls, engineered coherent or dissipative interactions, or an introduction of strong quenched disorder. Furthermore, under certain conditions, these imperfections can be utilized to stabilize non-trivial quantum states. Our results challenge conventional wisdom of statistical mechanics, shedding light on the microscopic mechanisms of thermalization.\nWe also discuss how engineered dynamics can be harnessed for applications such as quantum metrology, simulations, or information processing.