Data dimensionality reduction techniques are often utilized in the implementation of Quantum Machine Learning models to address two significant issues: the constraints of NISQ quantum devices, which are characterized by noise and a limited number of qubits, and the challenge of simulating a large number of qubits on classical devices. It also raises concerns over the scalability of these approaches, as dimensionality reduction methods are slow to adapt to large datasets. In this article, we analyze how data reduction methods affect different QML models. We conduct this experiment over several generated datasets, quantum machine algorithms, quantum data encoding methods, and data reduction methods. All these models were evaluated on the performance metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Our findings have led us to conclude that the usage of data dimensionality reduction methods results in skewed performance metric values, which results in wrongly estimating the actual performance of quantum machine learning models. There are several factors, along with data dimensionality reduction methods, that worsen this problem, such as characteristics of the datasets, classical to quantum information embedding methods, percentage of feature reduction, classical components associated with quantum models, and structure of quantum machine learning models. We consistently observed the difference in the accuracy range of 14% to 48% amongst these models, using data reduction and not using it. Apart from this, our observations have shown that some data reduction methods tend to perform better for some specific data embedding methodologies and ansatz constructions.
Comments
12 pages, IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing & Engineering (QCE25)
Data dimensionality reduction techniques are often utilized in the implementation of Quantum Machine Learning models to address two significant issues: the constraints of NISQ quantum devices, which are characterized by noise and a limited number of qubits, and the challenge of simulating a large number of qubits on classical devices. It also raises concerns over the scalability of these approaches, as dimensionality reduction methods are slow to adapt to large datasets. In this article, we analyze how data reduction methods affect different QML models. We conduct this experiment over several generated datasets, quantum machine algorithms, quantum data encoding methods, and data reduction methods. All these models were evaluated on the performance metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Our findings have led us to conclude that the usage of data dimensionality reduction methods results in skewed performance metric values, which results in wrongly estimating the actual performance of quantum machine learning models. There are several factors, along with data dimensionality reduction methods, that worsen this problem, such as characteristics of the datasets, classical to quantum information embedding methods, percentage of feature reduction, classical components associated with quantum models, and structure of quantum machine learning models. We consistently observed the difference in the accuracy range of 14% to 48% amongst these models, using data reduction and not using it. Apart from this, our observations have shown that some data reduction methods tend to perform better for some specific data embedding methodologies and ansatz constructions.
When it comes to realizing immediate quantum advantages in practical applications like machine learning and optimization techniques, numerous methods have emerged as a frontrunner technique. Such algorithms often involve quantum circuits for data encoding and the training of Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) to minimize target functions when applied to tasks involving classical data. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is a promising area of quantum computing because it may effectively handle difficult learning tasks by taking advantage of the high dimensional Hilbert space to train better representations from limited data. Despite QML's rising popularity, few academic works have addressed the language's security features. There has been a lot of buzz about the promising new discipline of quantum machine learning. Training a parameterized quantum circuit is a common practice in contemporary QML for performing data analysis on classical or quantum datasets. To make accurate predictions on an independent test dataset, state-of-the-art QML techniques first variationally optimize a parameterized quantum circuit using the training dataset. Quantum modeling in QML has also been shown to offer an exponential benefit in sample complexity. In the realms of pattern recognition, machine learning, and data mining, feature dimensionality reduction as a crucial link in the process has become one hot and tough spot. Most academics have gravitated towards this topic because of the difficulty of its studies. The goal of this research is to learn how to implement low loss in the procedure of feature dimension reduction, preserve the integrity of the original data, locate the most effective mapping, and obtain the best possible low-dimensional data. Preliminary findings suggest that QML models may offer advantages over classical models for classical data analysis. In this paper, a thorough investigation into generalization performance in QML is performed. This paper presents a brief survey on Qubits Encoding using Quantum Machine Learning models that help researchers to identify the limitations of the existing models and to design new efficient models for better performance levels.
Abstract This research explores the potential of quantum computing in data analysis, focusing on the efficient analysis of high-dimensional quantum datasets using dimensionality reduction techniques. The study aims to fill the knowledge gap by developing robust quantum dimensionality reduction techniques that can mitigate noise and errors. The research methodology involved a comprehensive review and analysis of existing quantum dimensionality reduction techniques, such as quantum principal component analysis, quantum linear discriminant analysis and quantum generative models. The study also explored the limitations imposed by NISQ devices and proposed strategies to adapt these techniques to work efficiently within these constraints. The key results demonstrate the potential of quantum dimensionality reduction techniques to effectively reduce the dimensionality of high-dimensional quantum datasets while preserving critical quantum information. The evaluation of quantum principal component analysis, quantum linear discriminant analysis and quantum generative models showed their effectiveness in improving quantum data analysis, particularly in improving simulation speed and predicting properties. Despite the challenges posed by noise and errors, robust quantum dimensionality reduction methods showed promise in mitigating these effects and preserving quantum information. Finally, this research contributes to the advancement of quantum data analysis by presenting a comprehensive analysis of quantum dimensionality reduction techniques and their applications. It highlights the importance of developing robust quantum feature learning methods that can operate efficiently in noisy quantum environments, especially in the NISQ era.
Classical machine learning has practical significant advancements and extensive acceptance across various domains, enabling the growth of precise predictive models. The purpose of this work is to examine the accuracy gained by various machine learning algorithms, both classical and quantum. In addition, the study delves into the fundamental ideas and principles that form the backbone of quantum machine learning algorithms, such as quantum data representation, quantum feature mapping, and quantum optimization strategies. Experiments use classical machine learning models trained and tested on traditional hardware to measure evaluation metrics like classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score for quantum machine learning models executed on quantum computing platforms or simulators. In quantum SVM, the seed dataset obtained 100% accuracy, and the supermarket dataset obtained 69% accuracy when compared to classical SVM. The findings imply that, under some conditions, quantum machine learning algorithms show the capacity to beat their conventional counterparts in terms of accuracy.
Quantum machine learning has emerged as a promising approach to enhance computational efficiency by leveraging the principles of quantum computing. However, the limitations of current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, such as noise, limited qubit availability, and circuit depth constraints, restrict the implementation of fully quantum models. To address these challenges, this study focuses on the design, implementation, and performance evaluation of hybrid quantum-classical machine learning (HQML) models. The proposed approach integrates parameterized quantum circuits with classical optimization techniques to enable efficient learning within NISQ environments. The study employs standard benchmark datasets, including Iris, Breast Cancer, and MNIST, to evaluate the performance of the hybrid model. The results indicate that the HQML model achieves competitive accuracy on small and medium-sized datasets while maintaining balanced precision, recall, and F1-score. However, performance declines for complex datasets due to hardware limitations and noise effects. Additionally, the hybrid model demonstrates a lower number of parameters compared to classical deep learning models but requires higher training time due to iterative quantum-classical optimization. The findings highlight that hybrid quantum-classical models provide a practical and scalable approach for utilizing quantum computing in the current technological landscape. Although challenges related to noise, scalability, and computational overhead persist, advancements in quantum hardware and algorithm design are expected to improve performance. This study contributes to the growing field of quantum machine learning by providing a systematic framework for evaluating hybrid models on NISQ devices and identifying key areas for future research.
In this work, we studied the use of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) algorithms for binary classification and compared their performance with classical Machine Learning (ML) methods. QML merges principles of Quantum Computing (QC) and ML, offering improved efficiency and potential quantum advantage in data-driven tasks and when solving complex problems. In binary classification, where the goal is to assign data to one of two categories, QML uses quantum algorithms to process large datasets efficiently. Quantum algorithms like Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) exploit quantum parallelism and entanglement to enhance performance over classical methods. This study focuses on two common QML algorithms, Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC) and QNN. We used the Qiskit software and conducted the experiments with three different datasets. Data preprocessing included dimensionality reduction using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and standardization using scalers. The results showed that quantum algorithms demonstrated competitive performance against their classical counterparts in terms of accuracy, while QSVC performed better than QNN. These findings suggest that QML holds potential for improving computational efficiency in binary classification tasks. This opens the way for more efficient and scalable solutions in complex classification challenges and shows the complementary role of quantum computing.
Abstract - The exponential growth of large-scale data has created significant challenges in storage, processing, and optimization that classical computing systems struggle to address efficiently. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising paradigm that integrates quantum computing concepts with machine learning techniques to tackle complex big data optimization problems. By utilizing quantum features such as superposition, entanglement, and parallelism, QML algorithms can accelerate tasks like clustering, classification, and dimensionality reduction, which are traditionally computationally demanding. Recent advancements indicate strong potential for quantum-inspired optimization in fields including cybersecurity, financial portfolio management, Industry 4.0, and healthcare analytics. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of QML algorithms designed for big data optimization, examining their advantages, limitations, and application domains. Additionally, it discusses the performance trade-offs associated with hybrid quantum–classical frameworks and highlights future research directions aimed at creating secure, scalable, and resource-efficient quantum solutions for large-scale, data-driven decision-making. As data volumes continue to expand at extremely rapid rates, processing big data with traditional machine learning (ML) techniques has become increasingly challenging. ML models often struggle with issues related to computational power, efficient parameter tuning, accurate model selection, and maintaining high performance when dealing with massive datasets. Deep learning approaches—such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs)—demand substantial computational resources to train on large-scale supervised learning tasks. Moreover, the difficulty of training these networks grows significantly as the size and complexity of the datasets increase. In response to these limitations, Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising research domain at the intersection of quantum computing and machine learning. Quantum computers operate fundamentally differently from classical systems, using the principles of quantum mechanics to encode and process information. As a result, quantum computational methods have the potential to address certain problems that are computationally intensive or infeasible for classical machines. Index Terms— Quantum Machine Learning (QML); Big Data Optimization; Quantum Algorithms; Hybrid Quantum-Classical Models; Quantum Computing; Data Analytics