Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2511.02951

List Decoding and New Bicycle Code Constructions for Quantum LDPC Codes

Rabeti, Sheida, Mahdavifar, Hessam

Published Nov 4, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new decoder, called the Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation List Decoder (MBBP-LD), for Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check (QLDPC) codes. It extends the Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation (MBBP) framework, originally developed for classical cyclic LDPC codes. The proposed method preserves the linear-time complexity of standard BP decoder while improving the logical error rate. To further reduce the logical error rate, a new decision rule is introduced for the post-processing list decoder, outperforming the conventional least-metric selector (LMS) criterion. For the recently developed and implemented bivariate bicycle (BB) code with parameters \([[144,12,12]]\), our proposed MBBP-LD decoder achieves up to 40\% lower logical error rate compared to the state-of-the-art decoder for short QLDPC codes, i.e., BP with ordered-statistics decoding (BP-OSD), while retaining the linear-time complexity of the plain BP decoder. In addition, we explore a new subclass of BB codes, that we refer to as the univariate bicycle (UB) codes, specifically with lower-weight parity checks (\(w=6,8\)). This reduces the polynomial search space for the code compared to general BB codes, i.e., by reducing the search space over two polynomial components in BB codes to just a single polynomial component in UB codes. Simulations demonstrate the promising performance of these codes under various types of BP decoders.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2511.02951

Related papers

Multiple-Bases Belief Propagation List Decoding for Quantum LDPC Codes

Sheida Rabeti, Hessam Mahdavifar

In this paper, we propose a belief-propagation (BP)-based decoder, termed the Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation List Decoder (MBBP-LD), for quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes. The key idea is to generate \emph{structured decoding diversity} by constructing multiple redundant parity-check representations via cycle-free subtree decompositions of the Tanner graph, and running BP decoding in parallel across these representations. This extends the classical Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation (MBBP) framework to the quantum setting while preserving the linear-time complexity and efficiency of standard BP decoding, and avoids the need for super-linear post-processing. Simulation results demonstrate that MBBP-LD improves upon existing BP-based decoders, including BP with ordered statistics decoding (BP-OSD) and belief propagation with guided decimation (BPGD) across several QLDPC codes, while requiring substantially fewer total BP iterations. For bivariate bicycle codes $[[144,12,12]]$ and $[[288,12,18]]$, MBBP-LD achieves up to $20\%$ reduction in error rate compared to BPGD and up to $30\%$ compared to BP-OSD in the low- and moderate-error regimes. For the larger B1 code $[[882, 24, 18 \leq d \leq 24]]$, MBBP-LD attains comparable or improved performance relative to BPGD while maintaining BP-like decoding latency under parallel implementation.

arXiv:2605.14170•May 13, 2026•0 citations

Beam search decoder for quantum LDPC codes

Min Ye, Dave Wecker, Nicolas Delfosse

We propose a decoder for quantum low density parity check (LDPC) codes based on a beam search heuristic guided by belief propagation (BP). Our beam search decoder applies to all quantum LDPC codes and achieves different speed-accuracy tradeoffs by tuning its parameters such as the beam width. We perform numerical simulations under circuit level noise for the $[[144, 12, 12]]$ bivariate bicycle (BB) code at noise rate $p=10^{-3}$ to estimate the logical error rate and the 99.9 percentile runtime and we compare with the BP-OSD decoder which has been the default quantum LDPC decoder for the past six years. A variant of our beam search decoder with a beam width of 64 achieves a $17\times$ reduction in logical error rate. With a beam width of 8, we reach the same logical error rate as BP-OSD with a $26.2\times$ reduction in the 99.9 percentile runtime. We identify the beam search decoder with beam width of 32 as a promising candidate for trapped ion architectures because it achieves a $5.6\times$ reduction in logical error rate with a 99.9 percentile runtime per syndrome extraction round below 1ms at $p=5 \times10^{-4}$. Remarkably, this is achieved in software on a single core, without any parallelization or specialized hardware (FPGA, ASIC), suggesting one might only need three 32-core CPUs to decode a trapped ion quantum computer with 1000 logical qubits.

quant-pharXiv:2512.07057•Dec 9, 2025•0 citations

Beam Search Decoder for Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Min Ye, Dave Wecker, Nicolas Delfosse

We propose a decoder for quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes based on a beam search heuristic guided by belief propagation (BP). Our beam search decoder applies to all quantum LDPC codes and achieves different speed-accuracy tradeoffs by tuning its parameters such as the beam width. We perform numerical simulations under circuit level noise for the [ [ 144 , 12 , 12 ] ] bivariate bicycle (BB) code at noise rate p = 10 − 3 to estimate the logical error rate and the 99.9 percentile runtime and we compare with the BP-OSD decoder which has been the default quantum LDPC decoder for the past six years. A variant of our beam search decoder with a beam width of 64 achieves a 17 × reduction in logical error rate. With a beam width of 8, we reach the same logical error rate as BP-OSD with a 26.2 × reduction in the 99.9 percentile runtime. We identify the beam search decoder with beam width of 32 as a promising candidate for trapped ion architectures because it achieves a 5.6 × reduction in logical error rate with a 99.9 percentile runtime per syndrome extraction round below 1 ms at p = 5 × 10 − 4 . Remarkably, this is achieved in software on a single core, without any parallelization or specialized hardware (FPGA, ASIC), suggesting one might only need three 32-core CPUs to decode a trapped ion quantum computer with 1000 logical qubits.

PRX Quantum•May 26, 2026•0 citations

Best-First Ordered Statistics Decoding of Quantum LDPC Codes

Michele Banfi, Marco Ferrari, Antonino Favano +2 more

Belief Propagation (BP) followed by Ordered Statistics Decoding (OSD) has emerged as the gold standard for decoding quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes. Recent advancements in this field have proposed new methods and algorithms to lower the complexity of this standard pipeline. Because of code degeneracy, and more in general because multiple distinct error patterns can produce the same syndrome, OSD is inherently a list-decoding technique; that is, it enumerates a set of syndrome-consistent candidates and returns the most probable one. In this work, we propose a variant of OSD, which we call Best-First OSD (BF-OSD), that explores the error-candidate space more efficiently by traversing it in order of decreasing likelihood, rather than by brute-force enumeration of a pre-selected subset. In addition, we depart from the conventional BP+OSD cascade: instead of conditioning the OSD invocation on BP convergence, we invoke OSD after a fixed, small number of BP iterations. This design choice is motivated by the full circuit-level noise regime, in which BP is particularly unreliable. Monte Carlo simulations of a family of Bivariate Bicycle (BB) codes under full circuit-level noise show that BF-OSD matches the performance of the BP+OSD baseline while exploring the solution space with 1/100th of the query budget.

arXiv:2605.25777•May 25, 2026•0 citations

Accelerating A*-Based Algorithms for Decoding Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Lamia Yous, Francisco Garcia Herrero, Mark F. Flanagan

Quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes represent a promising approach for error correction in quantum computing. The recently proposed Tesseract decoder uses the A* search algorithm that guarantees finding the most likely error pattern. However, practical implementations of Tesseract often involve an extremely large graph, and the inherently sequential nature of the search results in high computational overhead and long runtime. To improve decoding efficiency, we propose a two-stage decoding framework. First, a belief propagation (BP) decoder efficiently processes the syndrome. This step generates hard decisions (a binary error vector) and soft information (per-qubit confidence levels). In non-convergent BP cases, a gating mechanism examines the BP decoder's output to identify and filter out qubits with oscillating confidence values. In these cases, the refined output serves as input to Tesseract, which then attempts to identify and correct any residual errors. This hybrid approach leverages the high speed of BP decoding and delegates the more challenging decoding instances to Tesseract. Numerical results demonstrate a substantial reduction in overall decoding complexity while maintaining the logical error rate (LER) of the stand-alone Tesseract. Across all tested physical error rates, the proposed method achieves at least 5x reduction in the number of expanded nodes in the Tesseract, with a peak reduction of nearly 15x at a physical error rate of p = 0.05 for the [[126, 12, d < 11]] T1 code, and approximately 8.8x at p = 0.05 for the [[72, 12, 6]] bicycle bivariate (BB) code.

quant-pharXiv:2609.10056•IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)•Sep 10, 2026•0 citations

Univariate Bicycle Quantum LDPC Codes: Explicit Logical Structure and Distance Bounds

Sheida Rabeti, Hessam Mahdavifar

We introduce univariate bicycle (UB) codes, a structured subclass of generalized bicycle (GB) quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes obtained via a Frobenius relation. This construction reduces the code design space from a two-polynomial search in GB codes to a single-polynomial search, while preserving sparsity. We provide an explicit algebraic characterization of the logical coset spaces by constructing a basis for the logical quotient space, yielding a complete parametrization of logical operators. Leveraging this structure, we derive upper bounds on the minimum distance by relating structured logical representatives to cycle-density properties of associated circulant matrices. Finally, simulation results for short- to medium-length UB codes (block lengths ranging from a few hundred to approximately $10^3$) demonstrate competitive performance relative to existing GB and bivariate bicycle (BB) codes despite the additional algebraic restriction.

arXiv:2605.14173•May 13, 2026•0 citations
In this paper, we propose a new decoder, called the Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation List Decoder (MBBP-LD), for Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check (QLDPC) codes. It extends the Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation (MBBP) framework, originally developed for classical cyclic LDPC codes. The proposed method preserves the linear-time complexity of standard BP decoder while improving the logical error rate. To further reduce the logical error rate, a new decision rule is introduced for the post-processing list decoder, outperforming the conventional least-metric selector (LMS) criterion. For the recently developed and implemented bivariate bicycle (BB) code with parameters ([[144,12,12]]), our proposed MBBP-LD decoder achieves up to 40% lower logical error rate compared to the state-of-the-art decoder for short QLDPC codes, i.e., BP with ordered-statistics decoding (BP-OSD), while retaining the linear-time complexity of the plain BP decoder. In addition, we explore a new subclass of BB codes, that we refer to as the univariate bicycle (UB) codes, specifically with lower-weight parity checks ((w=6,8)). This reduces the polynomial search space for the code compared to general BB codes, i.e., by reducing the search space over two polynomial components in BB codes to just a single polynomial component in UB codes. Simulations demonstrate the promising performance of these codes under various types of BP decoders.
In this paper, we propose a belief-propagation (BP)-based decoder, termed the Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation List Decoder (MBBP-LD), for quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes. The key idea is to generate \emph{structured decoding diversity} by constructing multiple redundant parity-check representations via cycle-free subtree decompositions of the Tanner graph, and running BP decoding in parallel across these representations. This extends the classical Multiple-Bases Belief-Propagation (MBBP) framework to the quantum setting while preserving the linear-time complexity and efficiency of standard BP decoding, and avoids the need for super-linear post-processing. Simulation results demonstrate that MBBP-LD improves upon existing BP-based decoders, including BP with ordered statistics decoding (BP-OSD) and belief propagation with guided decimation (BPGD) across several QLDPC codes, while requiring substantially fewer total BP iterations. For bivariate bicycle codes [[144,12,12]][[144,12,12]][[144,12,12]] and [[288,12,18]][[288,12,18]][[288,12,18]], MBBP-LD achieves up to 20%20\%20% reduction in error rate compared to BPGD and up to 30%30\%30% compared to BP-OSD in the low- and moderate-error regimes. For the larger B1 code [[882,24,18≤d≤24]][[882, 24, 18 \leq d \leq 24]][[882,24,18≤d≤24]], MBBP-LD attains comparable or improved performance relative to BPGD while maintaining BP-like decoding latency under parallel implementation.
We propose a decoder for quantum low density parity check (LDPC) codes based on a beam search heuristic guided by belief propagation (BP). Our beam search decoder applies to all quantum LDPC codes and achieves different speed-accuracy tradeoffs by tuning its parameters such as the beam width. We perform numerical simulations under circuit level noise for the [[144,12,12]][[144, 12, 12]][[144,12,12]] bivariate bicycle (BB) code at noise rate p=10−3p=10^{-3}p=10−3 to estimate the logical error rate and the 99.9 percentile runtime and we compare with the BP-OSD decoder which has been the default quantum LDPC decoder for the past six years. A variant of our beam search decoder with a beam width of 64 achieves a 17×17\times17× reduction in logical error rate. With a beam width of 8, we reach the same logical error rate as BP-OSD with a 26.2×26.2\times26.2× reduction in the 99.9 percentile runtime. We identify the beam search decoder with beam width of 32 as a promising candidate for trapped ion architectures because it achieves a 5.6×5.6\times5.6× reduction in logical error rate with a 99.9 percentile runtime per syndrome extraction round below 1ms at p=5×10−4p=5 \times10^{-4}p=5×10−4. Remarkably, this is achieved in software on a single core, without any parallelization or specialized hardware (FPGA, ASIC), suggesting one might only need three 32-core CPUs to decode a trapped ion quantum computer with 1000 logical qubits.
We propose a decoder for quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes based on a beam search heuristic guided by belief propagation (BP). Our beam search decoder applies to all quantum LDPC codes and achieves different speed-accuracy tradeoffs by tuning its parameters such as the beam width. We perform numerical simulations under circuit level noise for the [ [ 144 , 12 , 12 ] ] bivariate bicycle (BB) code at noise rate p = 10 − 3 to estimate the logical error rate and the 99.9 percentile runtime and we compare with the BP-OSD decoder which has been the default quantum LDPC decoder for the past six years. A variant of our beam search decoder with a beam width of 64 achieves a 17 × reduction in logical error rate. With a beam width of 8, we reach the same logical error rate as BP-OSD with a 26.2 × reduction in the 99.9 percentile runtime. We identify the beam search decoder with beam width of 32 as a promising candidate for trapped ion architectures because it achieves a 5.6 × reduction in logical error rate with a 99.9 percentile runtime per syndrome extraction round below 1 ms at p = 5 × 10 − 4 . Remarkably, this is achieved in software on a single core, without any parallelization or specialized hardware (FPGA, ASIC), suggesting one might only need three 32-core CPUs to decode a trapped ion quantum computer with 1000 logical qubits.
Belief Propagation (BP) followed by Ordered Statistics Decoding (OSD) has emerged as the gold standard for decoding quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes. Recent advancements in this field have proposed new methods and algorithms to lower the complexity of this standard pipeline. Because of code degeneracy, and more in general because multiple distinct error patterns can produce the same syndrome, OSD is inherently a list-decoding technique; that is, it enumerates a set of syndrome-consistent candidates and returns the most probable one. In this work, we propose a variant of OSD, which we call Best-First OSD (BF-OSD), that explores the error-candidate space more efficiently by traversing it in order of decreasing likelihood, rather than by brute-force enumeration of a pre-selected subset. In addition, we depart from the conventional BP+OSD cascade: instead of conditioning the OSD invocation on BP convergence, we invoke OSD after a fixed, small number of BP iterations. This design choice is motivated by the full circuit-level noise regime, in which BP is particularly unreliable. Monte Carlo simulations of a family of Bivariate Bicycle (BB) codes under full circuit-level noise show that BF-OSD matches the performance of the BP+OSD baseline while exploring the solution space with 1/100th of the query budget.
Quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes represent a promising approach for error correction in quantum computing. The recently proposed Tesseract decoder uses the A* search algorithm that guarantees finding the most likely error pattern. However, practical implementations of Tesseract often involve an extremely large graph, and the inherently sequential nature of the search results in high computational overhead and long runtime. To improve decoding efficiency, we propose a two-stage decoding framework. First, a belief propagation (BP) decoder efficiently processes the syndrome. This step generates hard decisions (a binary error vector) and soft information (per-qubit confidence levels). In non-convergent BP cases, a gating mechanism examines the BP decoder's output to identify and filter out qubits with oscillating confidence values. In these cases, the refined output serves as input to Tesseract, which then attempts to identify and correct any residual errors. This hybrid approach leverages the high speed of BP decoding and delegates the more challenging decoding instances to Tesseract. Numerical results demonstrate a substantial reduction in overall decoding complexity while maintaining the logical error rate (LER) of the stand-alone Tesseract. Across all tested physical error rates, the proposed method achieves at least 5x reduction in the number of expanded nodes in the Tesseract, with a peak reduction of nearly 15x at a physical error rate of p = 0.05 for the [[126, 12, d < 11]] T1 code, and approximately 8.8x at p = 0.05 for the [[72, 12, 6]] bicycle bivariate (BB) code.
We introduce univariate bicycle (UB) codes, a structured subclass of generalized bicycle (GB) quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes obtained via a Frobenius relation. This construction reduces the code design space from a two-polynomial search in GB codes to a single-polynomial search, while preserving sparsity. We provide an explicit algebraic characterization of the logical coset spaces by constructing a basis for the logical quotient space, yielding a complete parametrization of logical operators. Leveraging this structure, we derive upper bounds on the minimum distance by relating structured logical representatives to cycle-density properties of associated circulant matrices. Finally, simulation results for short- to medium-length UB codes (block lengths ranging from a few hundred to approximately 10310^3103) demonstrate competitive performance relative to existing GB and bivariate bicycle (BB) codes despite the additional algebraic restriction.